120:
196:
159:
280:
I agree with Fr33kman and Cazort. I can not find any other mention other than the above article, and the link that is on the
Idealwine article page itself.
139:. If someone thinks it does qualify for speedy, then I apologize, and by all means... If not, then perhaps the author can edit the article further?
17:
290:
I just realized that I probably shouldn't vote since my opinion is already known in the initial delete posting. Sorry. :) --
87:
82:
91:
314:
135:. The only edits from this user have been this article, and adding a link to the IDealwine website on another article,
36:
74:
313:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
299:
271:
243:
222:
185:
148:
78:
56:
232:
259:
210:
173:
131:
advertising), I do believe this is simply an advertisement, and the company is not notable, per
70:
62:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
239:
264:
215:
178:
132:
295:
285:
144:
254:
205:
168:
50:
108:
235:
136:
291:
281:
140:
251:
I found only the same source as User:Cazort, nothing more, non-notable
307:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
127:
While I don't think the article qualified for speedy (no
115:
104:
100:
96:
234:
in passing, but that hardly establishes notability.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
317:). No further edits should be made to this page.
197:list of Advertising-related deletion discussions
231:. I did find one source mentioning this site:
8:
160:list of Wine-related deletion discussions
195:: This debate has been included in the
158:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
288:) 21:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
1:
300:22:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
272:17:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
244:16:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
223:15:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
186:15:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
149:08:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
57:05:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
334:
310:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
225:
200:
188:
163:
325:
312:
267:
262:
257:
218:
213:
208:
201:
191:
181:
176:
171:
164:
154:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
333:
332:
328:
327:
326:
324:
323:
322:
321:
315:deletion review
308:
265:
260:
255:
216:
211:
206:
179:
174:
169:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
331:
329:
320:
319:
303:
302:
274:
246:
226:
189:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
330:
318:
316:
311:
305:
304:
301:
297:
293:
289:
287:
283:
279:
275:
273:
270:
269:
268:
263:
258:
250:
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
220:
219:
214:
209:
198:
194:
190:
187:
184:
183:
182:
177:
172:
161:
157:
153:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
309:
306:
277:
276:
253:
252:
248:
228:
204:
203:
192:
167:
166:
155:
128:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
137:French Wine
71:IDealwine
63:IDealwine
121:View log
129:blatant
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
278:Delete
249:delete
236:Cazort
229:Delete
133:WP:ORG
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
292:Pax85
282:Pax85
256:fr33k
207:fr33k
170:fr33k
141:Pax85
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
296:talk
286:talk
240:talk
193:Note
156:Note
145:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
266:-s-
261:man
217:-s-
212:man
202:--
199:.
180:-s-
175:man
165:--
162:.
298:)
242:)
147:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
294:(
284:(
238:(
143:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.