Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/I Have This Dream - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

127:. Assuming Associated Press is a reliable source, the immanent appearance of the CD single was announced several times. The article simply describes what was actually reported, rather than (implicitly) assuming the accuracy of the "prophecies" reported upon, just like 69:
Ok - this article survived an afd last year when it seemed imminent, but is now faintly embarrasing - personally i don't think it's going to happen at all, if and when it does, we can write an article about it
239:. It failed several times to prove its notability by getting released. It always gets delayed and we can't continue to maintain an article of a non-existing single till eternity. 131:
reports on the embarrassing failure of a prophecy. The article itself does not suggest anything specific is going to happen: my crystal ball detector gives a negative.
107:
as Mangojuice says. I'd say nothing should be included until a decent interval has passed after it has happened, to avoid this kind of nonsense.
17: 153: 302: 36: 175: 301:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
284: 268: 256: 222: 210: 194: 182: 158: 139: 115: 99: 87: 74: 57: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
148: 52: 174:(or the musical equivilent) can be notable if enough press is churned out about it. I equate this to 207: 128: 265: 191: 135: 63: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
231: 277: 167: 203: 96: 71: 179: 123:. I agree this is embarrassing, to express it faintly, not to Knowledge (XXG) but to 108: 84: 219: 132: 281: 124: 49: 248: 240: 171: 230:. An object lesson in why crystal ball articles need to be deleted. -- 95:, this is a good example of why WP should not be a crystal ball. 295:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
190:
Notable and arguably has enough relevance for own article.--
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 305:). No further edits should be made to this page. 264:. Encyclopedias don't predict the future. -- 8: 202:For the same reasons stated above by 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 44:The result of the debate was 322: 285:00:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC) 269:20:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 257:15:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 223:17:40, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 211:17:17, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 195:17:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 183:17:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 159:13:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 140:12:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 116:12:56, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 100:12:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 88:12:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 75:11:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 176:The Phantom (game system) 298:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 147:, easily verifiable. -- 58:05:12, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 218:Per Isotope and Cini. 170:crystalball, but even 129:Great Disappointment 255: 157: 137: 64:I_Have_This_Dream 313: 300: 252: 247: 244: 151: 136: 112: 55: 34: 321: 320: 316: 315: 314: 312: 311: 310: 309: 303:deletion review 296: 251:Who's the boss? 250: 242: 110: 67: 53: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 319: 317: 308: 307: 290: 288: 287: 271: 259: 234: 225: 213: 197: 185: 161: 149:badlydrawnjeff 142: 118: 102: 90: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 318: 306: 304: 299: 293: 292: 291: 286: 283: 279: 275: 272: 270: 267: 266:notyouravgjoe 263: 260: 258: 254: 253: 246: 245: 238: 235: 233: 229: 226: 224: 221: 217: 214: 212: 209: 205: 201: 198: 196: 193: 189: 186: 184: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 162: 160: 155: 150: 146: 143: 141: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 119: 117: 114: 106: 103: 101: 98: 94: 91: 89: 86: 82: 79: 78: 77: 76: 73: 65: 62: 60: 59: 56: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 297: 294: 289: 273: 261: 249: 241: 236: 227: 215: 199: 187: 163: 144: 120: 104: 92: 80: 68: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 125:Wacko Jacko 83:as per nom 204:Mangojuice 97:Mangojuice 72:Petesmiles 180:Isotope23 172:vaporware 154:WP:MEMES? 113:you know? 109:Just zis 220:JoshuaZ 208:Charles 166:, yes, 133:Lambiam 282:In1984 278:WP:NOT 274:Delete 262:Delete 237:Delete 228:Delete 200:Delete 168:WP:NOT 105:Delete 93:Delete 81:Delete 243:Lajbi 16:< 216:Keep 206:. -- 192:Cini 188:Keep 164:Keep 145:Keep 121:Keep 50:Tito 276:. 232:GWO 178:.-- 111:Guy 85:Gu 54:xd 48:. 280:. 156:) 152:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Tito
xd
05:12, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
I_Have_This_Dream
Petesmiles
11:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Gu
12:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Mangojuice
12:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Just zis Guy you know?
12:56, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Wacko Jacko
Great Disappointment
Lambiam

12:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
badlydrawnjeff
WP:MEMES?
13:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
WP:NOT
vaporware
The Phantom (game system)
Isotope23
17:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Cini
17:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Mangojuice

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.