450:. It argues that though IZArc supports plenty of archive formats in fact it is quite slow in compressing and decompressing ZIP archives. And since it has been frequently used by netizens I think that keeping this article will be quite useful for readers, since they may not know the fact that its compressing and decommpressing speed is slower than WinZip or WinRAR before downloading and installing it.--
31:
300:. He had introduced three sources as evidence, two of which were mere download listings. (Surprisingly, the number of Google results at that time was 414,000.) Also, the closure itself seems questionable since many of the participants had used very weak arguments, mostly appeals to usefulness. Looks like the last AfD closure was more of a vote count.
249:- listings, blogs posts , a how-to, that kind of thing. The software itself is generic in nature and there is no evidence of widespread use (I am unsurprised by this, I have personally seen software lists from tens of thousands of computers all over the globe in the last ten years and have never once encountered it).
423:
only lists it as a download, but there is no editorial review. PC World and PC Magazine don't even list it! PC/Computing never even had the opportunity to list it because it was folded in 2002. I didn't find a publication called "PC home advanced" at all, let alone search it! Best regards,
605:- no obvious significant coverage or any indication this is used by the wider world. For the majority of people, a zipfile is just a means to an end, something you double click on to get what you want - that's kind of it really.
214:
563:; and it is definitely unreliable. 2008 Knowledge (XXG) consensus holds that reviews by Seth Rosenblatt are immature and unreliable; since then, Download.com no longer writes the reviewers' name.
569:
Now, either you are writing all this to convince the closing admin or to convince me. If it is the former, no comments; but if it is the latter, I am afraid I have to say when you find yourself
113:
167:
323:
40:
294:
coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject itself. Just two. I also studied the first AfD and carefully study the irritated response by
208:
174:
559:
is a prestigious download site"! That's a weird way of saying it is pretty. But it is not "independent from the subject itself" which is required by
108:
573:, like some Chinese website and shouldiremoveit.com, I am more convinced that the subject is definitely not fit for inclusion on Knowledge (XXG).
245:
Kept in 2008, but many of the rationales would certainly not pass muster now. Of the sources cited, none actually establishes notability per
17:
679:
613:
636:
445:
87:
493:
and everything in it is author's own commentary. Seriously, your statements' factual accuracy is too poor. Best regards,
661:
69:
46:
642:
615:
589:
546:
502:
480:
459:
433:
408:
359:
335:
316:
282:
262:
92:
229:
196:
140:
135:
144:
570:
585:
498:
429:
312:
279:
127:
527:
657:
65:
190:
530:
395:
611:
355:
542:
476:
455:
404:
222:
186:
630:
581:
494:
425:
308:
131:
534:
331:
273:
85:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
656:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
236:
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
560:
515:
469:
347:
246:
123:
98:
606:
351:
271:
One of many non-notable, free archivers. A few short reviews do not establish notability.
524:
518:
566:
TOPAttack is one of the two valid coverages that I found. You are yet to find my other!
538:
472:
451:
400:
673:
624:
257:
251:
556:
514:
is a prestigious download site, and its editor's reviews can be used as RSes, thus
511:
383:
327:
202:
82:
161:
367:
Computer magazines often compare IZArc with other file archiving utilities, e.g.
521:
377:
290:. I tried a search myself and, among the 390,000 Google results, couldn't find
372:
389:
296:
368:
650:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25:
157:
153:
149:
221:
235:
72:). No further edits should be made to this page.
664:). No further edits should be made to this page.
324:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
322:Note: This debate has been included in the
114:Articles for deletion/IZArc (2nd nomination)
537:are all informative commercial websites.--
321:
571:raiding the garbage dumps of the Internet
106:
45:For an explanation of the process, see
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
41:deletion review on 2021 September 13
105:
623:insufficient sourcing to meet GNG
24:
29:
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1:
109:Articles for deletion/IZArc
696:
643:09:11, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
616:07:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
590:18:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
547:08:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
529:are also good RSes, since
503:17:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
481:16:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
460:08:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
434:17:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
409:16:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
360:18:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
336:18:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
317:17:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
283:15:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
263:12:56, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
93:11:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
680:Pages at deletion review
653:Please do not modify it.
61:Please do not modify it.
399:to verify my comment.--
346:No good sources, fails
517:can be used as an RS.
104:AfDs for this article:
371:. Editors can search
531:Should I Remove It?
444:can be found here:
440:The review made by
489:It is a mirror of
338:
261:
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
687:
655:
449:
442:PC home Advanced
396:PC home Advanced
299:
277:
255:
240:
239:
225:
177:
165:
147:
63:
33:
32:
26:
695:
694:
690:
689:
688:
686:
685:
684:
670:
669:
668:
662:deletion review
651:
447:
418:No, they don't.
297:Jimmy Fleischer
295:
275:
182:
173:
138:
122:
119:
102:
90:
77:The result was
70:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
693:
691:
683:
682:
672:
671:
667:
666:
646:
645:
618:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
579:
575:
574:
567:
564:
550:
549:
506:
505:
484:
483:
465:
464:
463:
462:
437:
436:
412:
411:
362:
340:
339:
319:
306:
302:
301:
285:
243:
242:
179:
118:
117:
116:
111:
103:
101:
96:
88:
75:
74:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
692:
681:
678:
677:
675:
665:
663:
659:
654:
648:
647:
644:
640:
639:
634:
633:
628:
627:
622:
619:
617:
614:
612:
610:
609:
604:
601:
600:
591:
587:
583:
582:Codename Lisa
580:
578:Best regards,
577:
576:
572:
568:
565:
562:
558:
554:
553:
552:
551:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
525:
522:
519:
516:
513:
510:
509:
508:
507:
504:
500:
496:
495:Codename Lisa
492:
488:
487:
486:
485:
482:
478:
474:
470:
467:
466:
461:
457:
453:
446:
443:
439:
438:
435:
431:
427:
426:Codename Lisa
422:
419:
416:
415:
414:
413:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:
392:
391:
386:
385:
380:
379:
374:
370:
366:
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
320:
318:
314:
310:
309:Codename Lisa
307:
305:Best regards,
304:
303:
298:
293:
289:
286:
284:
281:
280:
278:
270:
267:
266:
265:
264:
259:
254:
253:
248:
238:
234:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
188:
185:
184:Find sources:
180:
176:
172:
169:
163:
159:
155:
151:
146:
142:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
120:
115:
112:
110:
107:
100:
97:
95:
94:
91:
86:
84:
80:
73:
71:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
652:
649:
637:
631:
625:
620:
607:
602:
557:Download.com
512:Download.com
491:Download.com
490:
468:Another RS:
448:(in Chinese)
441:
420:
417:
394:
388:
384:PC Computing
382:
376:
364:
343:
291:
287:
272:
268:
250:
244:
232:
226:
218:
211:
205:
199:
193:
183:
170:
78:
76:
60:
57:
36:
378:PC Magazine
292:significant
209:free images
608:Ritchie333
352:Joseph2302
658:talk page
539:RekishiEJ
535:TOPAttack
473:RekishiEJ
452:RekishiEJ
421:Softpedia
401:RekishiEJ
373:Softpedia
328:• Gene93k
66:talk page
674:Category
660:or in a
626:Snuggums
390:PC World
276:itsJamie
168:View log
68:or in a
215:WP refs
203:scholar
141:protect
136:history
83:Yunshui
621:Delete
603:Delete
561:WP:GNG
369:WinZip
348:WP:GNG
344:Delete
288:Delete
269:Delete
247:WP:GNG
187:Google
145:delete
79:delete
638:edits
258:Help!
230:JSTOR
191:books
175:Stats
162:views
154:watch
150:links
124:IZArc
99:IZArc
16:<
632:talk
586:talk
543:talk
533:and
499:talk
477:talk
456:talk
430:talk
405:talk
393:and
365:Keep
356:talk
332:talk
313:talk
274:OhNo
223:FENS
197:news
158:logs
132:talk
128:edit
471:.--
252:Guy
237:TWL
166:– (
81:.
676::
641:)
635:/
588:)
545:)
526:,
523:,
520:,
501:)
479:)
458:)
432:)
407:)
387:,
381:,
375:,
358:)
350:.
334:)
326:.
315:)
217:)
160:|
156:|
152:|
148:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
43:.
629:(
584:(
555:"
541:(
497:(
475:(
454:(
428:(
403:(
354:(
330:(
311:(
260:)
256:(
241:)
233:·
227:·
219:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
189:(
181:(
178:)
171:·
164:)
126:(
89:水
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.