344:
285:
479:
deserves its own article. It was once a popular topic for a few leftist blogs. I strongly recommend naming that back to "Denbeaux study" (the original name), and putting "Denbeaux" in the names of the companion articles. Please DO NOT call any of them "Seton Hall Report." They're best known under
233:
228:
237:
220:
87:
82:
91:
74:
292:
411:
130:
497:, and click through to the end. Exclude all Knowledge (XXG) sites, all other Wikis, and all blogs, as they are unacceptable sources, click through to the last page for a true-ish count, which leaves us
591:
Okay, so if from Mark
Denbeaux, Seton Hall study, and Denbeaux study, Mark Denbeaux gets the most ghits and everything under discussion originates from him, so why not make him the main page??--
516:
finds more. That said, I will still shamelessly prefer calling it the "Denbeaux study." As for blogs, they're not good for sources but I think they should count in determining notablility. --
649:, so reluctant to delete, but the article contains insufficient context. Perhaps with improvement, especially the addition of sourced commentary, the article might be split off again. --
125:
both the words
Knowledge (XXG) and blog, to exclude ourselves and unacceptable sources, we end up with just the NY Times referencing the report (once) and a lone university reference. See
126:
133:
with the same parameters reveals nothing. We have nothing, in essence, besides it's own self as a primary source, and the lone NY Times trivial reference. Delete as non-notable. •
114:
653:
633:
621:
595:
586:
577:
568:
559:
546:
529:
520:
507:
484:
463:
421:
399:
377:
361:
352:
263:
224:
205:
165:
152:
139:
56:
216:
335:
525:
No, they really shouldn't. Anyone can go out and start any number of blogs and fill them with any kind of content. They don't do anything to establish notability.--
513:
539:
78:
475:
and you'll see that it was notable enough that West Point did their own version to debunk it. I could see a partial merge of the lesser ones, but the main
299:
70:
62:
49:
48:. I just don't see the reliable sources here for an article. If they do exist, I will consider undeletion. Note that this just applies for now to
198:
552:
494:
573:
Now I'm confused. I thought the question was to which one of the three aforementioned articles should the other two be merged into?--
17:
345:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Defense
Department list of terrorist organizations other than the Taliban or al Qaeda
286:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Defense
Department list of terrorist organizations other than the Taliban or al Qaeda
671:
36:
385:
into Seton Hall reports. Not notable on it's own, and could probably be shortened to fit into the main article per
373:
The findings reported in the report should be cited in another article. However the report itself is not notable.
670:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
480:
the name
Denbeaux, and some at Seton Hall probably don't deserve to be associated with the Denbeauxs. --
53:
357:
That sounds like a good idea to me. Mr. Denbeaux might be notable enough for his own article however.
334:, currently a disambiguation page to articles above, which is the the name under which their subject
502:
306:
260:
192:
160:
134:
386:
642:
432:
374:
358:
330:
186:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
436:
349:
592:
574:
564:
Well, yeah, but we could also just file everything under "Guantanamo" if we wanted to. --
556:
460:
451:
180:
650:
618:
583:
565:
543:
517:
481:
476:
472:
121:
Not a notable report. Having looked this up, if you do a simple
Knowledge (XXG) search
646:
176:
630:
456:
418:
313:
217:
Defense
Department list of terrorist organizations other than the Taliban or al Qaeda
149:
526:
440:
389:
254:
108:
471:
or only a partial-merge: You're mistaken about the Google search. Search for
293:
A Profile of 517 Detainees through
Analysis of Department of Defense Data
300:
June 10th
Suicides at Guantanamo: Government Words and Deeds Compared
279:
Inter- and Intra-Departmental
Disagreements About Who Is Our Enemy
71:
Inter- and Intra-Departmental Disagreements About Who Is Our Enemy
63:
Inter- and Intra-Departmental Disagreements About Who Is Our Enemy
50:
Inter- and Intra-Departmental Disagreements About Who Is Our Enemy
645:. Merge the other spin-offs as well. The article is borderline
664:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
148:
kinda, the source itself could be used on an appropriate page.
493:
Just for clarification, you need to adjust your search to
52:, as the AFD notice was never put on the other articles.
412:
list of Guantanamo Bay detainment camp-related deletions
450:. Only then is it possible to discuss its notability --
250:
246:
242:
104:
100:
96:
179:. No significant discussion by multiple independent
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
271:that the following articles be nominated together:
674:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
512:Then the shame is really on me. I see that
328:, per not forking content of articles, into
582:I was being facetious to make a point. --
214:. I suspect this exists only to support
410:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
459:. Everything branches out of him. --
24:
283:Currently nominated for deletion:
1:
654:13:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
634:15:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
622:01:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
596:07:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
587:18:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
578:05:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
569:21:21, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
560:22:52, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
547:23:07, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
530:04:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
521:22:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
508:21:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
485:21:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
464:18:14, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
454:17:53, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
422:11:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
400:15:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
378:03:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
362:03:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
353:23:20, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
343:this request also posted at
264:22:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
206:22:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
166:21:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
153:21:40, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
140:21:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
57:21:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
629:-- today I opt for merge.
691:
667:Please do not modify it.
542:finds hundreds more. --
159:Redirect to where...? •
32:Please do not modify it.
615:Weak keep, strong merge
538:On the other hand,
307:No-hearing hearings
514:"Seton Hall study"
331:Seton Hall reports
643:Seton Hall report
555:takes the cake!--
540:"Denbeaux report"
433:Seton Hall report
424:
415:
347:
682:
669:
505:
473:"Denbeaux study"
448:
445:
430:everything into
416:
406:
397:
394:
342:
258:
240:
203:
201:
195:
189:
181:reliable sources
163:
137:
112:
94:
34:
690:
689:
685:
684:
683:
681:
680:
679:
678:
672:deletion review
665:
503:
446:
441:
395:
390:
383:Delete or Merge
231:
215:
199:
193:
187:
185:
161:
135:
85:
69:
66:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
688:
686:
677:
676:
659:
657:
656:
636:
624:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
504:Lawrence Cohen
488:
487:
477:Denbeaux study
466:
425:
404:
402:
380:
367:
366:
365:
364:
340:
339:
338:
318:
317:
310:
303:
296:
289:
281:
273:
272:
266:
208:
169:
168:
162:Lawrence Cohen
156:
155:
136:Lawrence Cohen
119:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
687:
675:
673:
668:
662:
661:
660:
655:
652:
648:
644:
640:
637:
635:
632:
628:
625:
623:
620:
616:
613:
612:
597:
594:
590:
589:
588:
585:
581:
580:
579:
576:
572:
571:
570:
567:
563:
562:
561:
558:
554:
553:Mark Denbeaux
550:
549:
548:
545:
541:
537:
531:
528:
524:
523:
522:
519:
515:
511:
510:
509:
506:
500:
496:
492:
491:
490:
489:
486:
483:
478:
474:
470:
467:
465:
462:
458:
457:Mark Denbeaux
455:
453:
449:
444:
438:
434:
429:
426:
423:
420:
413:
409:
405:
403:
401:
398:
393:
388:
384:
381:
379:
376:
372:
369:
368:
363:
360:
356:
355:
354:
351:
346:
341:
337:
333:
332:
327:
324:that they be
323:
320:
319:
316:
315:
314:Mark Denbeaux
311:
309:
308:
304:
302:
301:
297:
295:
294:
290:
288:
287:
282:
280:
277:
276:
275:
274:
270:
267:
265:
262:
256:
252:
248:
244:
239:
235:
230:
226:
222:
218:
213:
209:
207:
204:
202:
196:
190:
182:
178:
174:
171:
170:
167:
164:
158:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
666:
663:
658:
638:
626:
614:
498:
495:this version
468:
442:
431:
427:
407:
391:
382:
375:Steve Dufour
370:
359:Steve Dufour
336:meets WP:N:
329:
325:
321:
312:
305:
298:
291:
284:
278:
268:
211:
184:
175:per nom and
172:
145:
122:
120:
45:
43:
31:
28:
437:victor falk
350:victor falk
322:My opinion:
131:news search
593:Brewcrewer
575:Brewcrewer
557:Brewcrewer
461:Brewcrewer
452:Brewcrewer
651:SmokeyJoe
619:Sherurcij
584:Randy2063
566:Randy2063
544:Randy2063
518:Randy2063
482:Randy2063
261:Cruftbane
194:seriously
123:excluding
631:Geo Swan
617:into ].
501:hits. •
419:Geo Swan
387:WP:CFORK
150:Speciate
146:Redirect
115:View log
647:notable
527:Crossmr
269:Request
234:protect
229:history
88:protect
83:history
54:W.marsh
447:figura
396:figura
371:Delete
326:merged
238:delete
212:Delete
173:Delete
92:delete
46:delete
639:Merge
627:merge
428:Merge
255:views
247:watch
243:links
200:folks
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
551:But
469:Keep
439:and
435:per
408:Note
251:logs
225:talk
221:edit
183:. --
177:WP:N
129:. A
127:here
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
641:to
414:.
188:But
113:– (
499:20
348:--
259:.
253:|
249:|
245:|
241:|
236:|
232:|
227:|
223:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
443:B
417:—
392:B
257:)
219:(
210:'
197:|
191:|
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.