1634:
attracted considerable interest due to its uncompromisingly anti-Zionist pole of Jewish resistance to Israel. In terms of activism, IJAN is primarily involved in the boycott campaign, but has ambitions to set itself up as a transnational anti-Zionist pole of Jewish resistance to Israel. While it has small groups in Canada, India, Argentina and several
European countries, its main organisational base is in the USA. Nevertheless it can legitimately be called a transnational network since it consciously tries to coordinate activities across continents --- one example of this is its campaign against the Jewish National Fund (JNF) for its involvement in ethnic cleansing in Israel/Palestine, and more broadly for its rĂ´le in furthering what is seen as a racist vision of an ethnically pure Israeli state." There are also less substantial references to IJAN on pages 92, 100, 108, 152, 164, 195, 213 and 215. Please note that Landy, who discusses in the introduction to the book his possible conflict of interest as a Jew and a former chair of Irish PSC, is a lecturer on race, ethnicity and conflict in the department of sociology at Trinity College Dublin, and thus an acknowledged expert on the subject.
1021:
British MPs which was included in a list of possible debate topics. It was never discussed, and it's not unlike a late-night speech in an empty House of
Representatives (for benefit of the C-SPAN cameras) or adding something into the Congressional Record (which is not an indicator of reliability or notability). The others are passing mentions, except for the mini-article about the six arrested activists in the
2560:
2326:: No one here, including Biosketch, genuinely disputes that "the scope of their activities is national or international in scale". If he doesn't like their web site claims, or the press clippings there, well, we've already cited five separate WP:RS articles documenting one of its recent tour events in New Jersey, one WP:RS article for its event in Wisconson,
362:, that has judged this organization and its message as being significant, timely, and relevant enough to merit the attention of its readership, and on the prime real-estate of its A7 editorial page, too. Of course, if the text had been self-published (e.g. if it only appeared in the newspaper only via a paid advert) then that would be a different matter;
965:
963:
968:
510:
411:. I include it here just to keep like with like: The RT interview is pretty general I/P slugfest stuff, but a similar argument applies as with the guest editorial, as I see it. RT News considers IJAN important enough ( or however you want to say that ) to use their representative as a principal in a debate/interview.  –
2393:, anyway; than for their structure & history. Besides, it would seem absurd to admit, as we can't avoid doing based on the press coverage, that their international presentations comparing the Holocaust with Israel's treatment of the Palestinians are notable, but the organization making them isn't.  –
2384:
sure can, easily: We have an abundance of reliable source articles about its activities. I'd also like to see e.g. a "history of" article about the org that user
Biosketch keeps insisting is necessary to meet this part of the standard, of course, but I'm not willing to say it isn't notable because we
1668:
Signing a petition hosted on the IJAN website is not the same as "openly endorsing" the group, which Landy has not done. IJAN is merely one of the 30 groups and individuals sponsoring the petition. Landy's book, based on his PhD dissertation, is a peer-reviewed academic study of the subject; and one
815:
I appologize, I prejudged the name of the article without analyzing at its content, This article has proper citations, and gives a short but detailed description of the movment, just because I dont like it doesnt mean it should be censored, so keep. If anyone would like to tag this for rescue, place
1020:
Only a single source in the article (or presented in this discussion) is both more than a passing mention and is independent of its subject is the link which Stuart Yeates brought up--and its notability is somewhat questionable, as it is simply a declaration of support for the group from a group of
991:
As a service to people who do not read German, on the page of the German-language source that is accessible via Google, the organization is the subject of the two sentences at the top of the page, apparently in the context of a general discussion of the concepts of antizionism and antisemitism. The
1851:
tour, and the controversy at
Rutgers. It should be noted that this opinion piece was written by one a young man affiliated with the group that was most prominent in organizing opposition to the Rutgers event, a young man named Sam Weiner, "a junior at Rutgers studying Jewish Studies and Political
1614:
Could you please quote the three relevant pages of the book (pg 118 and pp 213-214) to demonstrate that they are more than a cursory discussion of the book? Again, I am not contesting the reliability of the sources; I am stating that they are not the substantial independent coverage. But now that
640:
A small radical group can still be notable. That's not the problem. The problem is that the sources that establish this organization's notability aren't independent third-party reliable sources – and the independent third-party reliable sources that do mention the organization don't establish its
1571:
Can you provide any independent sources which discuss the organization's aims or goals? It's rather obvious that the only sources in the article (or which have been referenced in this discussion) that cite the goals of the group (beyond mentioning that they organized a specific seminar or were
2041:
criteria. Is the scope of IJAN's activities national or international? It hasn't been established that IJAN's activities are either national or international in scale. Can information about the organization and its activities be verified by independent reliable third-party sources? Presumably
1633:
The most substantial reference is on page 118: "This is far from the case and it may well be that
Americans are more aware of this problem; it is suggestive that the transnational organisation IJAN is by origin a US enterprise. While still a very small network, IJAN, established in 2007, has
1382:
Yes it does, the full sentance says "The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to
1756:
on 29 January 2011 gained considerable coverage. It was met with very emphatic and well-organized opposition from
Zionist groups. There were accusations and counter-accusations between opposing groups and this organization that generated significant coverage from multiple media
1162:
I have found a few articles that seem to indicate the group, whilst small, is receiving attention. That along with the acceptance (even by the deletists) that there are a couple of good sources is moving me in the direction of keep, but its still a moderately weak case. This
2625:
that I don't much care that no WP:RS journalist appears to have done a "history" article on the organization yet. Further, I don't think this really needs the nudge, but I'll also go ahead and mention that a bit lower in the text for WP:NONPROFIT, the policy suggests that
687:. I bet many more of the early "delete" !votes here would also change if the editors who registered them revisited this re the sources that have now been added. Don't you want !voters to give their best judgments based on the fullest and most current information available?
1669:
of the first to study this issue. As I note above, in the introduction Landy explicitly addresses the implications of his own activism. The section is too long to copy, but I recommend reading what he has to say in this before dismissing the book as necessarily biased.
1572:
amongst a score of groups invited to speak at a handful of symposia) are sources from the group's own website. Even the sources which are critical (from the ADL) don't mention the group, only specific incidents without any context at all. If the group is notable, then
2655:. My opinion of this organization is irrelevant to whether the article should be kept. For me, the references are sufficient, with much of the detail coming from opponents of this organization. Controversial organizations should be covered by Knowledge (XXG). --
1924:. I'm not spending as much time here as I have in the past, and find that I'm enjoying research more than composition lately, anyway. I hope other editors will feel free to use the sources I've documented here to contribute content to the article itself.  –
2277:'s argument for international scope (I don't know where the sources are for all those cities, but supposing there are sources), we're still left without independent third-party reliable sources that give details about the organization and its activities.—
1419:
of coverage is the crucial consideration, only to undermine its own claim by next saying that unsubstantial coverage is fine as long as it spans multiple sources. It then concludes by reinforcing its first claim and contradicting the second
156:
1436:
It says "The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered", not that it is crucial. Indeed I see no contradiction, it says that either one very in-depth source or multiple non-in-depth sources are needed to establish
764:
I.E. news coverage shows the group's importance and the article written by a member and possibly its own site gives details. This is what is normal for most political activist groups here. No reason to treat this one differently.
1389:
says “International Jewish Anti-Zionist … have important roles in creating policy and setting anti-Israel agendas but do not organize a significant number of events.” So the ADL think they are important, this also from the ADL
616:
Much improved article, with quality sources. Plus sources have been identified on this page that aren't in the article yet. Still, it's troubling when a source describes the article's subject as a "small radical fringe group".
863:
as the only source mentioned here that from an independent third party source (there are some sources behind paywalls I can't get to). I agree that the issues being promoted by the group are notable (and covered in
2062:
etc. Outside of the organization's own publications and the writings of individuals variously affiliated with it, there's little or no information about the organization and its activities in reliable sources.—
1383:
establish notability." This is excatly what has been done. This clearly meets the notabilty criteria, but thank you for drawing my attention to the fact. Two paragraphs discussing the organisations activities
1883:
events were also held. But it'd probably be worth looking into that more closely... Oh, wait; there was evidently also some controversy around the tour's event at the
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee:
1908:
events held in Canada and
California, but only in obscure, possibly non-RS sources. Also, the org's own description of the Rutger's controversy can currently be found on the its subsidiary website,
90:
85:
150:
2239:
Not only in the US and Canada. In 2010, the tour visited Paris, Lyon, Strasbourg, Vienna, Geneva, Berlin, Glasgow, Dundee, Edinburgh, Sheffield, Liverpool, Manchester, London, Belfast and Dublin.
94:
646:
77:
2438:
Nomination already implies that the nominator recommends deletion (unless indicated otherwise), and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted line.
1408:
2385:
haven't found one. That just seems pretty far fetched when its activities get so much coverage and generate so much controversy. Organizations always get much more coverage for what they
836:
What is "antisemitic"? If you think the article is antisemitic, then change it. But if you think the group is itself antisemitic, then that is certainly not a valid reason for deletion.
2092:
Well apart from organsing speaking tours and demos in the USA, attending gatherings in
Ireland, and suppriting tours in Scotland no. An organisation is RS for information about itself.
1455:
communicates obligation, i.e. we're obligated to consider depth of coverage, which is also the spirit that issues from "Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient."—
484:
117:
225:
subsection of WP:CORP is the applicable governing policy in this AfD; just mentioning WP:CORP in its entirety is too broad. Saying the same thing another way, WP:CORP comprises
1260:
So instead of deleting it, you'll replace the article with a redirect? Virtually the same thing. Is there more than a sentence or two at most that would actually be "merged"?
226:
2490:
still says "I'm formally logging my vote as a strong delete" with "strong delete" in boldface, no less. Thanks for your response, but you missed the point: As nominator, you
568:
919:
Relister's comment: I have undone an inappropriate non-admin closure of this discussion, following a request on my talk page to review the closure, and after considering a
645:, which currently seems to be the number-one source being invoked for arguing that IJAN meets Knowledge (XXG)'s notability criteria. After all the energy you invested in
441:
2523:
per OhioStandard and RolandR. The sources brought by OhioStandard are sufficient to establish notability for a nonprofit organization (though not the first one listed).
2340:. Even tha Anti-Defamation League's own press-releases mention, in the past tense, about all the different places around the world this org has made these presentations.
2175:"The IJAZN (sic) was created in 2008 when Professor Moshe Machover and Selma James announced the adoption of the organization’s charter at a press conference in London."
1775:
has already been mentioned above, IIRC, but a quick scan gives me the impression that the following additional media coverage might not have been discovered previously:
748:
but a Google search of recent news gave 10 stories about its recent activities. Clearly considered an important group, even if there is not an in-depth article online.
461:
81:
2215:
Also, re national/international objection
Biosketch raised, perhaps I gave him the wrong impression in a comment I made above about the organization's recent
2380:: Can "information about the organization and its activities can be verified by multiple, third-party, independent, reliable sources"? Information about its
2219:
tour. It didn't just take place at Rutgers; those tour/events were all across the U.S., in 15 major cites, and also included Toronto, Canada, as well.  –
1615:
you've brought it up, a publication from the former chair of the "Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign" might have some issues with weight and balance.
1210:
171:
1384:
1025:, or links to not-independent sources, such as their own website. as a side note to Slatersteven, lots of trivial mentions don't add up to notability.
746:(because I would rather not see a nuclear war killing millions of people which is what will probably happen if Arabs do not learn to live with Israel)
138:
73:
65:
2630:( which would appear to include generating emphatic controversy documented in national and international media ) are also relevant to notability.  –
708:
had previously been disqualified at RSN. But so what? We still have 15 or 20 other WP:RS articles that establish notability just fine, thank you.  –
1297:
1167:
1087:
2563:. One may politically have sympathy for them or not, but WP cannot censor their existence which is well reported by numerous third-party sources
1106:. After all this discussion it is becoming clear that this organization did not receive substantial coverage in independent secondary sources. --
2664:
2645:
2587:
2572:
2551:
2533:
2509:
2481:
2463:
2408:
2286:
2252:
2234:
2192:
2137:
2119:
2101:
2087:
1977:
1963:
1939:
1680:
1663:
1645:
1628:
1609:
1589:
1562:
1528:
1511:
1478:
1464:
1446:
1429:
1402:
1377:
1355:
1339:
1322:
1283:
1253:
1232:
1194:
1177:
1151:
1122:
1098:
1073:
1054:
1038:
1008:
982:
954:
935:
910:
877:
847:
827:
806:
790:
774:
757:
723:
662:
627:
607:
585:
559:
498:
476:
453:
426:
381:
329:
307:
200:
59:
653:
nasty to say about them in this context. Not to mention that you were personally brought here by an editor yesterday to reconsider your vote.—
1524:
1346:
An artciel does not have to claim notability, we just need soourcs that discuse them in a couple of paragraphs. We have sources that do this.
295:
48:. the sources added after the relisting were clearly convincing, for almost all the subsequent comments after they were added were keep.
1797:'s exhortations to her readers to show up to protest what she misrepresented as "a holocaust-denial and Islamic supremacy" event at Rutgers.
132:
1852:
Science. He is a member of Rutgers Hillel and is a member of the board of directors of Hillel International" according to his byline. See
971:
623:
603:
2337:
1806:
1214:
128:
2437:
1793:
gives a much more balanced account of the kerfuffle. It's the only source I've seen, for example, that documents Zionist poster-girl
17:
1387:
403:
Similarly, I just found a ten-minute video interview/debate with IJAN spokesperson/co-founder Mich Levy, published under the title
1502:
per Stuartyeates. While there is some coverage in reliable sources it does not appear to be "significant coverage" in my opinion.
540:
1844:
1831:, hasn't been mentioned yet in the article or in this discussion. Hadn't realized that police were called out to keep order, btw.
1520:
1113:
178:
2021:
2017:
2327:
1206:
1190:
259:
Information about the organization and its activities can be verified by multiple third-party, independent, reliable sources.
1865:
973:"specially with the “International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network” a highly visible co-sponsor". This is all very borderline.
742:
1137:
962:
The mentions do seem trivial, but ther also appear to be a lot of them Also there are these Sources that we can discus.
2679:
2174:
1709:
546:
144:
36:
1294:
2568:
1894:
2621:
This org clearly meets criterion (1), and re criterion number (2), it gets so much press ( 15+ articles ) for its
2162:
self-published sources are fine in this case for basic, non-controversial organizational information. And anyway,
1654:(number 243 on the list). He openly endorses the group and therefore might not qualify as an independent source.—
1913:
641:
notability. What I find most perplexing, though, is that you've not seen fit to make any comment in relation to
534:
2678:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1560:
1202:
1186:
824:
803:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
2616:
Information about the organization and its activities can be verified by multiple 3rd-party, independent, RS."
2016:
Information about the organization and its activities can be verified by multiple,<ref name=Multiple /: -->
1824:
1716:
that appears not to have been mentioned yet. This clearly pushes the org over the bar to establish notability.
1164:
1815:
is a long article written from a perspective of support for those who sought to protest or disrupt the event.
1140:
513:
Google hits can hardly be described as receiving "no significant coverage". IJAN has been the subject of an
2640:
2600:
states ( non-commercial ) "Organizations are usually notable if they meet both of the following standards:
2583:
2547:
2504:
2458:
2403:
2229:
2187:
2133:
2097:
1973:
1959:
1934:
1869:
1576:
must have discussed them in a depth greater than what is presented here. I don't see that for this group.
1474:
1442:
1398:
1351:
1249:
1173:
1147:
1094:
1050:
978:
873:
770:
753:
718:
421:
376:
280:
2597:
2441:
2375:
2321:
2270:
1412:
1365:
230:
222:
2564:
1726:
1507:
618:
598:
1299:
79 results to go through, but those two I believe are enough. Its a real thing, and it gets coverage.
2126:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:IRS#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves
1134:
1789:
1766:
1624:
1585:
1335:
1131:
1118:
1069:
1034:
537:
2473:
2278:
2111:
2079:
2071:
2063:
1655:
1456:
1421:
1369:
945:
Only causal mentions in newspaper articles and opinion columns don't make a notable organization. --
654:
366:
wouldn't say anything at all the notability of the org. But as I see it, a guest editorial does.  –
192:
2660:
2477:
2282:
2115:
2083:
2075:
2067:
1659:
1551:
1460:
1425:
1373:
950:
821:
800:
658:
196:
164:
1651:
888:
597:
Off-hand mentions in newspaper articles and opinion columns don't make an organization notable. —
350:
of any assertions made by the guest writer, then it seems to me that it's the independence of the
210:
2526:
1753:
1713:
1330:
Article doesn't make any real claim of notability. Mentioned is not the same thing as notable. --
358:
317:
2269:
as far as Knowledge (XXG) goes. The Admin considering this AfD needs to note carefully that per
356:
that's most relevant. Here we have an independent print newspaper with a circulation of 75,000,
528:
2632:
2579:
2543:
2496:
2450:
2395:
2247:
2221:
2179:
2129:
2093:
1994:
1969:
1955:
1926:
1675:
1640:
1604:
1470:
1438:
1394:
1347:
1245:
1169:
1143:
1090:
1046:
974:
869:
842:
786:
766:
749:
710:
580:
554:
494:
413:
368:
326:
272:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1547:
267:
188:
1749:
1503:
1300:
1261:
1229:
518:
514:
303:
2159:
1890:
1543:
1539:
1391:
1244:
until it rises to the level of notability. (vote changed in an effort to reach consensus).
213:
after most or all of the comments from other !voters shown below had already been posted. )
1840:
1828:
1811:
1731:
1617:
1598:, which refers several times to IJAN. This is clearly an independent and reliable source.
1578:
1331:
1108:
1062:
1027:
468:
445:
408:
266:
Non-commercial orgainizations have a much lower bar to clear to establish notability than
2266:
2025:
1366:" Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to establish notability."
2448:
cricket per policy, but I'd have no objection and I doubt anyone else would, either.  –
2124:
RS do not have to be independant, as long as the information is not unduly self serving
1993:
Given that I never actually voted, I'm formally logging my vote as a strong delete. Per
2656:
1771:
1293:
Click the Google news archive search at the top of the AFD. Ample places cover them.
999:
946:
926:
901:
525:
2177:
Different sources also verify this, along with related organizational information.  –
191:
in that there is no significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. —
2258:
2128:. So for information like who set them up or When it ws founded they would be RS for.
1794:
799:
I am an inclusionist on many things, but this is anti-semetic, should not be kept. –
55:
2274:
2243:
1951:
1735:
this particular organization is discussed in two paragraphs of that longer article.
1671:
1636:
1600:
1241:
865:
838:
576:
550:
543:
490:
404:
1185:- If you look into this group, there is really nothing encyclopedic about them. --
111:
1225:- the independent coverage is not substantial enough to qualify as significant.
1853:
1226:
299:
247:
Organizations are usually notable if they meet both of the following standards:
2432:. User Biosketch needs revert the "strong delete" !vote and bullet point that
2164:
half the questions Biosketch says can't be answered from independent sources
1596:
Jewish Identity and Palestimnian Rights: Disapora Jewish Opposition to Israel
1166:
has a couple of paragraphs about them. Also more then just a trivial mention
992:
two sentences, of which the first is incomplete, translate as: "... 2008 the
891:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
325:
is not independent of the subject, as the author is affiliated with IJAN. Â --
1785:
Controversy at Rutgers as Activists Attempt To Disrupt Pro-Palestinian Event
1594:
I have already cited in the article the book by Irish academic David Landy,
322:
1784:
861:
522:
1086:
I find it interesting that many of the mentions revolve around Dr Meyer.
679:
Geez, Biosketch, you're making this terribly personal. There was nothing
50:
2542:. Enough coverage in reliable sourceshas been presented for notability.
1710:
an attack piece that provides considerable detail about the organization
1954:
but don't actually discuss the organisation in a great deal of detail.
1922:
Please note that I haven't added any of the above to the article myself
531:
2329:
and here's an as-yet-unmentioned source documenting the Toronto events
1825:
Pro-Israeli supporters clash with anti-Zionists at New Brunswick event
1296:
talks about a meeting they had. Their protests get coverage as well.
342:
A misinterpretation, Lambian? It's a subtle distinction, but if it's
2610:
The scope of their activities is national or international in scale.
2013:
The scope of their activities is national or international in scale.
1968:
Policy does not require indepth coverage, just non trivial coverage.
1130:
This is a bit more then just a trivial mention, but still not a lot
253:
The scope of their activities is national or international in scale.
2672:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1909:
1827:
by journalist Steve Strunsky in New Jersey's largest newspaper,
1089:
seesm to regard them as rahter more then a trivial organisation.
2125:
1409:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Notability (organizations and companies)
294:
I found a number of news references and at least one article
923:. I am relisting this discussion for further consideration.
2273:
two criteria need to be met. Assuming good faith vis-a-vis
2240:
784:
since noteworthy and update including newer news articles.
2440:
I'd invite him to re-add the text of his views concerning
2333:
2444:
as a new bulleted "comment". I'm not sure that would be
1807:
Rutgers Students Rise Up to Protest Anti-Zionist Program
209:( Please note immediately-following reply was added per
2494:
no separate vote; it's implicit in your nomination.  –
2487:
2433:
2037:
Note that it is necessary for the organization to meet
920:
684:
107:
103:
99:
996:
founded. It was initiated by a Jew living in Canada."
227:
Alternate Criteria for Specific Types of Organizations
163:
2078:) 12:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC) Debolded per request.—
548:
and many more reliable sources. No case for deletion
2070:) 11:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC) Edited per request.—
898:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
177:
2628:"Factors that have attracted widespread attention"
1914:Rutger's official statement about the controbversy
1767:Pro-Israel students charge racism at Rutgers event
509:Notable organisation. An organisation that merits
485:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
315:. While appearing in a generally reliable source,
1411:. There's a problem, in my opinion, with the way
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2682:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1891:Palestine Lecture Tonight at UWM Draws Criticism
2559:it is very notable with a thorough coverage in
2004:Organizations are usually notable if they meet
1866:Israel Supporters, Critics in Rutgers Showdown
569:list of Palestine-related deletion discussions
346:of the orgaization we're considering, not the
2336:were also documented in WP:RS articles, e.g.
1469:What defines Trivial or incidental coverage"?
970:, but I can't read German. We also have this
442:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
405:| Not all Jews support the Israeli government
298:written specifically about the organization.
8:
1879:I haven't checked other locations where the
1060:Which is why I broke it out as a side note.
567:Note: This debate has been included in the
483:Note: This debate has been included in the
460:Note: This debate has been included in the
440:Note: This debate has been included in the
1997:'s latest additions at the top of the page:
1700:Comment - Multiple additional sources found
462:list of Israel-related deletion discussions
1727:an article about the anti-Zionist movement
1133:This also seesm to be non-tivial coverage
566:
482:
459:
439:
1415:is formulated. It starts out saying that
994:International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network
74:International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network
66:International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network
1650:Note that David Landy's name appears at
868:). I'm not seeing the group as notable.
1548:notability guidelines for organizations
649:, one would think you'd at least have
2060:Who currently leads the organization?
2042:"information" in this context means,
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
2578:Lay of the personal comments people.
2332:and the ensuing controversy there.
2168:actually independently documented
1856:re the Hillel group's involvement.
24:
2170:in the very first source I listed
1904:I also saw some criticism of the
1364:qualify as significant coverage:
2261:was honest enough to point out,
1952:Anti-Zionism#Jewish_anti-Zionism
1950:These are excellent sources for
1242:Anti-Zionism#Jewish_anti-Zionism
866:Anti-Zionism#Jewish_anti-Zionism
524:; it has been mentioned in the
2338:this London RS article does so
2056:How many members does it have?
2052:Where are its offices located?
1045:If you note I haved not voted.
1:
2044:Who founded the organization?
2665:00:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
2646:14:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
2588:12:32, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
2573:17:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2552:17:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2534:12:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2510:14:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2482:12:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2464:12:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2409:13:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
2334:The org's recent U.K. events
2287:11:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
2253:16:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2235:15:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2193:15:14, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2138:13:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2120:12:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2102:12:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2088:11:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
2008:of the following standards:
1978:10:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
1964:09:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
1940:08:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
1847:about the organization, the
1681:12:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
1664:12:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
1646:10:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
1629:22:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1610:22:17, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1590:21:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1563:20:36, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1544:reliable third party sources
1529:19:12, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1512:17:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1479:13:23, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1465:13:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1447:13:11, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1430:13:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1403:12:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1378:11:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1356:11:22, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1340:10:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
1323:21:39, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
1284:21:39, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
1254:19:45, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
1233:19:33, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
1195:21:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1178:20:21, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1152:20:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1123:20:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1099:20:00, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1074:19:53, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1055:19:52, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1039:19:49, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
1009:19:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
983:19:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
955:19:29, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
936:19:26, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
911:19:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
878:23:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
848:18:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
828:17:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
807:17:58, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
791:11:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
775:20:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
758:20:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
724:09:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
704:And no, I wasn't aware that
663:11:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
628:17:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
608:19:45, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
586:18:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
560:18:36, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
499:17:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
477:14:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
454:14:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
427:14:07, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
382:09:22, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
330:14:26, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
308:12:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
201:10:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
60:03:54, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
1407:I've left a comment at the
2699:
1895:Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
820:on the article itself. –
2675:Please do not modify it.
2110:RS as required, though.—
1916:may also be of interest.
1538:Article appears to have
32:Please do not modify it.
2158:Just so, Slatersteven:
1910:NeveragainForAnyone.com
270:do, in other words.  –
229:which itself comprises
2217:Never Again for Anyone
1906:Never Again for Anyone
1881:Never Again for Anyone
1870:New Jersey Jewish News
1849:Never Again for Anyone
1746:Never Again for Anyone
921:related ANI discussion
2561:| Google News Archive
2436:, immediately above:
1215:few or no other edits
860:Right now I'm seeing
2048:When was it founded?
1790:Jewish Daily Forward
1744:This organization's
1540:significant coverage
1360:That's exactly what
1217:outside this topic.
1203:Need to reconfirm me
1187:Need to reconfirm me
2265:isn't considered a
1748:on-campus event at
1139:, refering to this
967:There is also this
2263:FrontPage Magazine
1754:Rutgers University
1714:FrontPage Magazine
1652:this IJAN petition
809:
743:WP:I don't like it
706:FrontPage Magazine
643:FrontPage Magazine
521:, signed by 27 MPs
471:
448:
400:( note timestamp )
359:The Register-Guard
318:The Register-Guard
245:( non-commercial )
44:The result was
2536:
1995:User:Ohiostandard
1845:a guest editorial
1627:
1588:
1218:
1076:
1072:
1037:
1007:
934:
913:
909:
795:
685:this notification
588:
572:
501:
488:
479:
469:
465:
456:
446:
402:
214:
2690:
2677:
2644:
2637:
2565:GrandPhilliesFan
2529:
2524:
2508:
2501:
2488:Your "done" edit
2462:
2455:
2407:
2400:
2251:
2233:
2226:
2191:
2184:
2026:reliable sources
1938:
1931:
1750:Douglass College
1679:
1644:
1623:
1620:
1608:
1584:
1581:
1558:
1519:per Kylfingers.
1319:
1316:
1313:
1310:
1307:
1304:
1280:
1277:
1274:
1271:
1268:
1265:
1200:
1116:
1111:
1068:
1065:
1059:
1033:
1030:
1006:
1004:
997:
933:
931:
924:
908:
906:
899:
897:
893:
846:
722:
715:
584:
573:
558:
519:House of Commons
515:Early Day Motion
489:
474:
466:
451:
425:
418:
398:
380:
373:
284:
277:
208:
182:
181:
167:
115:
97:
34:
2698:
2697:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2680:deletion review
2673:
2633:
2631:
2527:
2497:
2495:
2451:
2449:
2396:
2394:
2389:than what they
2242:
2222:
2220:
2180:
2178:
1927:
1925:
1841:The Jewish Week
1829:The Star-Ledger
1812:Jewish Standard
1732:Tablet Magazine
1670:
1635:
1618:
1599:
1579:
1552:
1317:
1314:
1311:
1308:
1305:
1302:
1278:
1275:
1272:
1269:
1266:
1263:
1114:
1109:
1063:
1028:
1000:
998:
927:
925:
902:
900:
886:
837:
711:
709:
626:
606:
575:
549:
472:
449:
414:
412:
369:
367:
273:
271:
268:wp:corporations
233:, which states:
124:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2696:
2694:
2685:
2684:
2668:
2667:
2649:
2648:
2619:
2618:
2617:
2611:
2602:
2601:
2576:
2575:
2554:
2537:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2513:
2512:
2486:No, not done.
2467:
2466:
2430:Point of order
2426:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2014:
1999:
1998:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1943:
1942:
1918:
1917:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1885:
1884:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1772:Jerusalem Post
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1703:
1702:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1566:
1565:
1555:Alpha_Quadrant
1546:and meets the
1532:
1531:
1514:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1343:
1342:
1325:
1287:
1286:
1257:
1256:
1235:
1198:
1197:
1180:
1154:
1125:
1101:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1042:
1041:
1023:Jewish Journal
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
986:
985:
957:
939:
938:
916:
915:
914:
895:
894:
883:
882:
881:
853:
852:
851:
850:
831:
830:
822:Phoenix B 1of3
816:this template
810:
801:Phoenix B 1of3
793:
778:
777:
761:
760:
735:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
647:this dicussion
633:
632:
631:
630:
622:
602:
590:
589:
563:
562:
538:Glasgow Herald
526:Jerusalem Post
503:
502:
480:
457:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
335:
334:
333:
332:
288:
287:
286:
285:
264:
263:
262:
260:
254:
248:
237:
236:
235:
234:
215:
185:
184:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2695:
2683:
2681:
2676:
2670:
2669:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2651:
2650:
2647:
2642:
2638:
2636:
2629:
2624:
2620:
2615:
2612:
2609:
2606:
2605:
2604:
2603:
2599:
2595:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2574:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2558:
2555:
2553:
2549:
2545:
2541:
2538:
2535:
2531:
2530:
2522:
2519:
2518:
2511:
2506:
2502:
2500:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2465:
2460:
2456:
2454:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2434:he just added
2431:
2428:
2427:
2410:
2405:
2401:
2399:
2392:
2388:
2383:
2379:
2378:criterion two
2377:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2339:
2335:
2331:
2330:
2325:
2324:criterion one
2323:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2259:User:Nableezy
2256:
2255:
2254:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2231:
2227:
2225:
2218:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2194:
2189:
2185:
2183:
2176:
2172:
2171:
2167:
2161:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2040:
2036:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2007:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1989:
1988:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1941:
1936:
1932:
1930:
1923:
1920:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1902:
1896:
1892:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1877:
1871:
1867:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1855:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1830:
1826:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1814:
1813:
1808:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1796:
1795:Pamela Geller
1792:
1791:
1786:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1774:
1773:
1768:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1734:
1733:
1728:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1701:
1698:
1697:
1682:
1677:
1673:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1642:
1638:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1621:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1606:
1602:
1597:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1582:
1575:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1564:
1561:
1559:
1557:
1556:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1534:
1533:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1515:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1498:
1497:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1385:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1344:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1320:
1298:
1295:
1292:
1289:
1288:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1259:
1258:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1236:
1234:
1231:
1228:
1224:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1161:
1159:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1138:
1135:
1132:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1112:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1031:
1024:
1019:
1016:
1015:
1010:
1005:
1003:
995:
990:
989:
988:
987:
984:
980:
976:
972:
969:
966:
964:
961:
958:
956:
952:
948:
944:
941:
940:
937:
932:
930:
922:
918:
917:
912:
907:
905:
896:
892:
890:
885:
884:
880:
879:
875:
871:
867:
862:
859:
855:
854:
849:
844:
840:
835:
834:
833:
832:
829:
826:
823:
819:
814:
811:
808:
805:
802:
798:
794:
792:
789:
788:
783:
780:
779:
776:
772:
768:
763:
762:
759:
755:
751:
747:
744:
741:
738:
737:
736:
725:
720:
716:
714:
707:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
686:
682:
681:even remotely
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
629:
625:
620:
619:Malik Shabazz
615:
612:
611:
610:
609:
605:
600:
599:Malik Shabazz
596:
592:
591:
587:
582:
578:
570:
565:
564:
561:
556:
552:
547:
545:
541:
539:
535:
533:
529:
527:
523:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
504:
500:
496:
492:
486:
481:
478:
475:
463:
458:
455:
452:
443:
438:
437:
428:
423:
419:
417:
410:
406:
401:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
383:
378:
374:
372:
365:
361:
360:
355:
354:
349:
345:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
331:
328:
324:
320:
319:
314:
311:
310:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
290:
289:
282:
278:
276:
269:
265:
261:
258:
255:
252:
249:
246:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
207:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
190:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
2674:
2671:
2652:
2635:OhioStandard
2634:
2627:
2622:
2613:
2607:
2598:WP:NONPROFIT
2593:
2580:Slatersteven
2577:
2556:
2544:Phil Bridger
2539:
2525:
2520:
2499:OhioStandard
2498:
2491:
2453:OhioStandard
2452:
2445:
2442:WP:NONPROFIT
2429:
2398:OhioStandard
2397:
2390:
2386:
2381:
2376:WP:NONPROFIT
2373:
2328:
2322:WP:NONPROFIT
2319:
2275:User:RolandR
2271:WP:NONPROFIT
2262:
2224:OhioStandard
2223:
2216:
2182:OhioStandard
2181:
2169:
2165:
2163:
2130:Slatersteven
2107:
2106:It's not an
2094:Slatersteven
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2038:
2005:
1990:
1970:Slatersteven
1956:Stuartyeates
1929:OhioStandard
1928:
1921:
1905:
1880:
1848:
1810:
1788:
1770:
1745:
1730:
1699:
1616:
1595:
1577:
1573:
1554:
1553:
1535:
1516:
1499:
1471:Slatersteven
1452:
1439:Slatersteven
1416:
1413:WP:CORPDEPTH
1395:Slatersteven
1361:
1348:Slatersteven
1327:
1301:
1290:
1262:
1246:Stuartyeates
1237:
1230:(let's chat)
1222:
1199:
1182:
1170:Slatersteven
1157:
1156:
1144:Slatersteven
1127:
1119:(yada, yada)
1107:
1103:
1091:Slatersteven
1083:
1061:
1047:Slatersteven
1026:
1022:
1017:
1001:
993:
975:Slatersteven
959:
942:
928:
903:
887:
870:Stuartyeates
857:
856:
817:
812:
796:
787:CarolMooreDC
785:
781:
767:Steve Dufour
750:Steve Dufour
745:
739:
734:
713:OhioStandard
712:
705:
683:improper in
680:
650:
642:
613:
594:
593:
544:Miami Herald
506:
416:OhioStandard
415:
399:
371:OhioStandard
370:
363:
357:
352:
351:
347:
343:
316:
312:
291:
275:OhioStandard
274:
256:
250:
244:
231:WP:NONPROFIT
223:WP:NONPROFIT
218:
186:
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
2160:policy says
2108:independent
2022:independent
2018:third-party
1504:Mark Arsten
1437:notability.
1213:) has made
348:reliability
151:free images
2623:activities
2557:Clear Keep
2382:activities
2257:Still, as
1843:published
1619:Horologium
1580:Horologium
1451:The modal
1332:Kylfingers
1064:Horologium
1029:Horologium
1002:Sandstein
929:Sandstein
904:Sandstein
818:{{rescue}}
344:notability
2657:DThomsen8
2474:Biosketch
2279:Biosketch
2112:Biosketch
2080:Biosketch
2072:Biosketch
2064:Biosketch
1769:from the
1656:Biosketch
1457:Biosketch
1422:Biosketch
1370:Biosketch
1136:and this
947:Cox wasan
655:Biosketch
651:something
614:Weak keep
491:• Gene93k
353:publisher
323:editorial
219:Biosketch
211:wp:indent
193:Biosketch
2528:nableezy
2446:strictly
1991:Comment.
1912:, while
1757:sources:
1708:There's
1574:somebody
1521:Broccolo
1211:contribs
889:Relisted
118:View log
2244:RolandR
1893:in the
1868:in the
1809:in the
1787:in the
1672:RolandR
1637:RolandR
1601:RolandR
1386:. This
1362:doesn't
1128:Comment
1084:Comment
960:Comment
839:RolandR
577:RolandR
551:RolandR
532:Haaretz
517:in the
511:647,000
409:RT News
327:Lambiam
321:, this
313:Comment
189:WP:CORP
157:WPÂ refs
145:scholar
91:protect
86:history
2472:Done.—
1625:(talk)
1586:(talk)
1517:Delete
1328:Delete
1227:Yaksar
1223:Delete
1183:Delete
1115:crewer
1104:Delete
1070:(talk)
1035:(talk)
1018:Delete
943:Delete
858:Delete
825:(talk)
804:(talk)
797:DELETE
595:Delete
542:, the
536:, the
470:ŞůṜīΣĻ
447:ŞůṜīΣĻ
300:Mangoe
221:: The
187:Fails
129:Google
95:delete
2267:WP:RS
1500:Merge
1420:one.—
1417:depth
1318:Focus
1279:Focus
1238:Merge
624:Stalk
604:Stalk
172:JSTOR
133:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
56:talk
16:<
2661:talk
2653:Keep
2641:talk
2594:Keep
2584:talk
2569:talk
2548:talk
2540:Keep
2521:Keep
2505:talk
2492:have
2478:talk
2459:talk
2404:talk
2283:talk
2248:talk
2230:talk
2188:talk
2134:talk
2116:talk
2098:talk
2084:talk
2076:talk
2068:talk
2039:both
2006:both
1974:talk
1960:talk
1935:talk
1854:here
1676:talk
1660:talk
1641:talk
1605:talk
1536:Keep
1525:talk
1508:talk
1475:talk
1461:talk
1453:must
1443:talk
1426:talk
1399:talk
1374:talk
1352:talk
1336:talk
1291:Keep
1250:talk
1207:talk
1191:talk
1174:talk
1160:keep
1158:Weak
1148:talk
1110:brew
1095:talk
1051:talk
979:talk
951:talk
874:talk
843:talk
813:Keep
782:Keep
771:talk
754:talk
740:Keep
719:talk
659:talk
581:talk
555:talk
507:Keep
495:talk
473:Âą98Âą
450:Âą98Âą
422:talk
377:talk
364:that
304:talk
296:here
292:Keep
281:talk
197:talk
165:FENS
139:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
46:keep
2614:(2)
2608:(1)
2391:are
2374:Re
2320:Re
2166:are
1752:of
1729:in
1725:In
1712:in
1542:in
1240:to
407:by
257:(2)
251:(1)
179:TWL
116:– (
51:DGG
2663:)
2596:.
2586:)
2571:)
2550:)
2532:-
2480:)
2387:do
2285:)
2173::
2136:)
2118:)
2100:)
2086:)
2058:;
2054:;
2050:;
2046:;
2024:,
2020:,
1976:)
1962:)
1662:)
1550:.
1527:)
1510:)
1477:)
1463:)
1445:)
1428:)
1401:)
1376:)
1354:)
1338:)
1252:)
1209:•
1201:—
1193:)
1176:)
1150:)
1097:)
1053:)
981:)
953:)
876:)
773:)
756:)
661:)
617:—
571:.
530:,
497:)
487:.
464:.
444:.
306:)
199:)
159:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
2659:(
2643:)
2639:(
2582:(
2567:(
2546:(
2507:)
2503:(
2476:(
2461:)
2457:(
2406:)
2402:(
2281:(
2250:)
2246:(
2232:)
2228:(
2190:)
2186:(
2132:(
2114:(
2096:(
2082:(
2074:(
2066:(
2028:.
1972:(
1958:(
1937:)
1933:(
1897:.
1872:.
1678:)
1674:(
1658:(
1643:)
1639:(
1607:)
1603:(
1523:(
1506:(
1473:(
1459:(
1441:(
1424:(
1397:(
1393:.
1372:(
1368:—
1350:(
1334:(
1315:m
1312:a
1309:e
1306:r
1303:D
1276:m
1273:a
1270:e
1267:r
1264:D
1248:(
1205:(
1189:(
1172:(
1146:(
1142:.
1093:(
1049:(
977:(
949:(
872:(
845:)
841:(
769:(
752:(
721:)
717:(
657:(
621:/
601:/
583:)
579:(
574:—
557:)
553:(
493:(
467:—
424:)
420:(
379:)
375:(
302:(
283:)
279:(
217:@
195:(
183:)
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
123:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.