156:. Valid arguments were made that it was more than a dictionary and could be encyclopedic, but I find no evidence that the concept is of standalone notability. It's too general to be covered in one article due to all the varieties from one country to another and probably from one bank to another within a particular country. I cannot see how this can ever meet WP:V without applying only to one bank/country's regs and or possibly cover every variation on international payments, so I'm bringing it here for another look.
217:: I do not understand the nominator's argument. The international payment system is pretty standardized and the basic mechanisms do not differ between banks or between countries. Moreover, there are more general concepts covered in a single article. No one has raised the issue of "generality" as a reason to delete
193:
and how would you suggest using those so that it's not a dictionary definion or turning into a HowTo guide to international payments? I think if stubbed the article could be valid and verifiable, but then it's simply a dictionary definion. That's what I see as the problem with this article. It's a
174:. The concept itself is certainly notable enough to have an article in Knowledge. Although the article is currently badly written, a plethora of reliable sources may be used to improve its text.
56:. If this article is to evolve into an article that provides any braoder context besides textbook reading, it should be written from scratch. Ping me if you want to salvage some content.
242:
this is heavily US/Europe focused, having dealt with the Asian banking world I can tell you there are differences. International payments is an overarching system that includes
141:
273:. What salvageable info is here already exists at various other banking-related articles and this simply put cannot aspire to be an encyclopedic topic and should be deleted.
48:
with no prejudice against recreation. As the article currenctly stands, it has not evolved since the last AfD. As the general process is already covered in
108:
103:
112:
95:
175:
282:
259:
234:
207:
185:
165:
77:
17:
149:
297:
36:
99:
296:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
230:
181:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
255:
246:
and others. How do you write an encyclopedia article that's more than a dicdef without crossing into a howto?
203:
161:
91:
83:
157:
226:
177:
278:
70:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
274:
270:
49:
59:
129:
222:
53:
243:
290:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
218:
153:
136:
125:
121:
117:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
300:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
52:, this article adds little more then some
271:indiscriminate collection of information
7:
152:minutes after creation when it was
24:
194:term or a process. Just my .02
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
283:23:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
260:12:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
235:05:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
208:12:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
186:05:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
166:16:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
317:
78:15:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
293:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
154:a dictionary definition
150:at AfD in December 2006
92:International payment
84:International payment
251:
199:
308:
295:
247:
195:
148:I know this was
139:
133:
115:
76:
73:
67:
34:
316:
315:
311:
310:
309:
307:
306:
305:
304:
298:deletion review
291:
258:
206:
135:
106:
90:
87:
71:
60:
57:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
314:
312:
303:
302:
286:
285:
264:
263:
262:
254:
249:TRAVELLINGCARI
227:Andrzej Kmicic
212:
211:
210:
202:
197:TRAVELLINGCARI
178:Andrzej Kmicic
158:Travellingcari
146:
145:
86:
81:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
313:
301:
299:
294:
288:
287:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
261:
257:
256:Tell me yours
253:
250:
245:
241:
238:
237:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
209:
205:
204:Tell me yours
201:
198:
192:
189:
188:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
169:
168:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
143:
138:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
110:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
88:
85:
82:
80:
79:
74:
68:
66:
64:
55:
51:
50:Wire transfer
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
292:
289:
266:
252:
248:
239:
214:
200:
196:
190:
171:
147:
62:
61:
45:
43:
31:
28:
275:Eusebeus
240:Disagree
142:View log
223:Physics
215:Comment
191:Comment
109:protect
104:history
267:Delete
137:delete
113:delete
65:dokter
54:jargon
46:Delete
244:SWIFT
140:) – (
130:views
122:watch
118:links
16:<
279:talk
269:per
231:talk
182:talk
172:Keep
162:talk
126:logs
100:talk
96:edit
72:Talk
221:or
219:God
281:)
233:)
225:.
184:)
164:)
128:|
124:|
120:|
116:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
75:•
69:•
58:—
277:(
229:(
180:(
160:(
144:)
134:(
132:)
94:(
63:E
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.