2059:. Just because a multitude of websites turned up when "India" and "terrorism" were included in a google search, it does not not mean that India supports terrorism. Not one reliable source in the huge string of links you provided, establishes Indian government support to terrorism factually. What is it with you guys and allegations? Anybody can allege anybody. The fact that a Pakistani leader is the alleger does not automatically prove that the alleged did the alleged crime. Independent investigations have to be performed and the results have to be published in an international arena. Which in this case, has not been done. And no Pakistani sources please. Pakistani media has reported false information and apologised many times has no credibility internationally IMO and for this case where international media has not established india's link to terrorism, use of Pakistani sources cannot be warranted.
2570:) Infact India was the first to designate it a terrorist organisation. As such half of the Sri Lanka section on LTTE has to be removed. Hence, the entire Sri Lanka section, apart from the one sentence where the Sri Lankan Prime minister "alleges" of terrorist camps in India, is full of Pakistani allegations which can be moved as a subsection under Pakistani allegations. The same goes for the section on Burma which has to be removed because it mentions support to rebels in Burma as terrorist activities. A good example for
2164:
reliable independent sources, accusations by
Pakistan will have a place in the article. But this is not the case here. Though reliable sources are provided, they "do not document terrorism of India as fact". All of them "document trivial mentions of allegations by Pakistan". The whole article is a list of allegations made by Pakistan over the years with no scope for further improvement and hence has no place in Knowledge.
82:
899:, the article still has reliable sources and is a notable topic and should not be deleted just because Indian editors want it to be censored. This is against wikipedia policy and I'll like to remind everyone that consensus does not override policy. The burden for establishing notability is cleared, and and POV related issues should be dealt with on the talkpage; AFD is not for clean up. --
2495:
2686:
2674:
2658:
1965:) describes accusations by Pakistan (not good enough again) and Indian sponsored blasts in Sialkot. It looks alright on a cursory glance, however it should be subject to same kind of scrutiny as other sources have been subject to, on the talk page. And this source alone still does not validate the existence of a separate article with
1659:
2148:
Took you ages? You have registered your account 20 days ago and have made 14 edits in total (not that date of registration and edit count are taken into consideration for a comment to be valid). You have made one edit on July 25 and resumed editing the next day this afd was opened. I don't know about
481:
has been proven to be SPS, synthesis or OR in the article. This topic is highly notable and includes statements by heads of state (Presidents, Prime
Ministers), politicians, academics on the issue. There are a variety of sources available that make this topic important, the ones currently used on the
919:
TG, a clarification. "Consensus does not override policy" makes no sense because consensus is the main decision making policy on
Knowledge. It is through consensus that editors will decide here whether this article satisfies Knowledge's notability requirements or whether it is mere synthesis and OR.
2586:
is what the article would look like if you tried to reorder the content to its appropriate sections and removed stuff that didn't mention anything about terrorism and kept everything else. As can be seen, it is one big list of
Pakistani allegations. And as far as allegations go, its veracity can be
2163:
As for the presence of reliable sources in the article, just the presence of sources from BBC or NYT does not warrant its inclusion. What has to be analyzed is whether the stuff included is within the scope of the article. If the article documented the sponsorship of terrorism by India supported by
1457:
Because of the content dispute surrounding this AfD, I have fully protected the page until the 14th August, when this AfD is set to close. I will remind editors that continuing a content dispute in this way while a deletion discussion is in progress is inappropriate. I have reverted the article to
2590:
As an example, North Korea alleges US of terrorism on a daily basis. You can't have an article on "US and state sponsored terrorism" and just list all the allegations North Korea has ever made. If you can't find other sources establishing US involvement in terrorism, no matter how hard you try to
986:
Instead of refactoring, I'll clarify my comment further as I still intend to stand by it.. just that you didn't get the intended meaning. Yes, policy is dictated by consensus (but unlike this one... a consensus among the general community which this consensus can not override). Hope it is clearer
781:
Reliable sources must be strong enough to support the claim. Questionable sources are generally unsuitable for citing contentious claims about third parties, which includes claims against institutions, persons living or dead, as well as more ill-defined entities. The proper uses of a questionable
723:
Wow indeed. I am tired of your counter arguments citing lame sources for your claims, like for example, a thesis by a random student or a self published book to name a couple. The talk page of the article clearly shows that editors have been repeatedly asking you to bring up credible sources for
2398:
That's a good point. However, the article contains a number of academic sources that discuss either India's involvement or the possibility of India's involvement in the LTTE struggle. There are also some good sources on Burma. I don't really like these sorts of articles (are the Chin and Kachin
2699:
I suggest that this article be deleted and the editors here shift to the section on India in State-sponsored terrorism. Once that section is expanded, the POV issues are dealt with and the editors still feel that a broader coverage of the topic is required, they are free create a new article.
1007:
Better because you no longer say that consensus cannot override policy (consensus is, after all, our key policy!) But, to be honest, your clarification, assuming I'm getting the intended meaning this time, is vague and not very useful. For example, which particular consensus among the general
316:
Basically this is a list of
Pakistani allegations against India accusing India of supporting terrorism. The majority of the article is a synthesis with some OR thrown into the mix. There is nothing here which cannot be added to the State sponsored terrorism article or to the article on RAW.
52:. There seems to be a consensus that the sourcing and POV of this article make it unfit for inclusion in the project. There is less of a consensus that this is a non-notable subject, so if anyone wants to have the article restored, please write a userspace draft and propose via
1638:
the concerns raised at the talk page or even previous comments in this page for that matter. The matter of the article having reliable sources or even notability has been repeatedly refuted both here and the talk page and IMHO, your !vote (and SMS's) adds nothing new to this
1875:).i.e. India's support to militant groups involved in violence and terrorism related activities. Besides continued editing of the article after it was nominated for deletion just endorses that it is a content issue, which obviously cannot be resolved by deletion. --
1046:, more or less, is what the article ought to look like. Just for outsiders who come to this AfD and see the current article (which is a mess), how substantial content has been removed from the original version to the current version, due to sensitivities of the
942:
Yes, but consensus is not a ballot vote, which I suspect may be happening here. In short, the closing admin should weigh up the pros and cons. There are clearly enough sources available that lend notability and credibility of this topic. Knowledge is not truth
2308:
Though the article is a pov mess, as long as the material can be rewritten neutrally, I don't see why not. In fact, some of the references appear to go beyond allegations (particularly in the Sri Lanka part). Perhaps the article should be retitled
1100:" made by Topgun above for example exhibit the nationalist POV pushing mentality that has motivated the addition of content. AFAIK, all content that was removed was explained atleast through informative edit summaries to make such claims moot.
1438:. Agree with Bearian as to SOAP/FORK. Language also NPOV and incidents cherry-picked, allegations assumed as fact. Indian Peacekeeping Force in Sri Lanka does not comprise state-sponsored terrorism. There are other objectionable cases also.
2581:
And the article cannot be rewritten neutrally. If you tried, the entire article would contain nothing but the lead sentence with no scope for further expansion. Also please see the last few edits before the article was fully protected.
362:: violates???, shamelessly covering the terrorism. In the existence of most reliable sources, tagging the article for deletion?, is that legitimate?, perhaps yes because all looks yellow to a jaundiced eye, but the world is not blind.
285:
2095:
and a case of censorship by people of that particular country we must move forward SMS has shown the sources are reliable yet people still continue to argue with baseless arguments for deletion I sense strong conflicts of interests.
2399:
rebels freedom fighters or terrorists, what about the LTTE, these sorts of questions are difficult to answer). But I can't think of other ways to title this article and it does seem that
Knowledge supports articles of this sort. --
1986:
See, the fact of matter always has been that this article is about an extremely sensitive and derogatory claim against a whole Nation which is backed only by some form of unfounded allegation or hypothesis by
Pakistani leaders and
1954:. While these sources look reliable, there is no point in bloating a whole article with SPSs and allegations, violating a dozen wikipedia policies in the process, when the content on LTTE could just as easily be placed
486:
and a poor attempt to whitewash content when users couldn't get to enforce their POV on the article. The only thing that is shameless here is this AFD being initiated by a user who has a clear conflict of interest.
969:
I was just pointing out that consensus is policy (and therefore there is no question of anything else deciding an AfD). TG might want to refactor his !vote because it doesn't make sense the way it is written.
523:
was removed simply on lame summaries) along with other things, making the current article a jumbled mess without a head or tail. Furthermore, the article is part of a series of country terrorism articles eg.
665:. Agree with DS here. I have been trying to improve the article for a few days now and in my opinion, has very little to no scope for improvement other than removal of 90% of the content which is either
805:
based on the unsubstantiated, speculative, tenuous reports or unfounded, propagandist allegations by unreliable, biased sources is not what should be encouraged. Also I don't think the article meets
2541:
But the article is in effect blemishing the whole structure of Indian government when it alleges India sponsors terrorism. But yeah, there is a difference like there is a difference between
279:
874:, which is, like always, eligible to be discounted. Like most other similar articles in this topic, the purpose of the article is evidently to advance a position. The article is full of
820:
of article creation. Minor news stories are all examples of coverage but they do not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as reliable sources. Thank you.
213:
208:
217:
511:
I'll also note that the article was in a far different shape and had other reliably sourced content too which was removed by the users claiming to be enforcing NPOV (for example,
200:
89:
2373:. Besides, unlike this article, United States and state terrorism is based on the works of Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman (both well known scholars) and is not simply a
1700:. Agree with the nominator and others. Almost everything in this article is "According to Pakistan..." or alleged by Pakistan. The whole article is a POV and sourced to
1584:
From the above comment by Crown Prince, its clear that he is did not see the talk page of the article. The sources that few editors are calling reliable, in reality are
240:
640:
564:
were in there being accused of terrorism with absolutely no source at all. I would recommend anyone voting in this AFD to take a look at the talk page of the article,
1560:
Really? Please show us these "reliable sources" which say India is a state sponsor of terrorism? The article is full of SPS, it used opinions as facts, it relies on
1210:
Mar4d, I guess you just reinforced my point further. Did you even try to understand what those edit summaries you quoted above were trying to inform? You seem to be
1160:. Oh, and now we come to the big fish. An entire section of allegations gets deleted because another of our buddies has this irritating habit of labeling everything
947:) remember. If there are sources which say something, we put them forward. I'm afraid all of the voters here demonstrate an I-don't-like-it attitude to the article.
245:
2358:
1176:(so much for SPS). Yes, way to go for your "informative edit summaries to make such claims moot". Applause for the self-proclaimed NPOV-enforcers of this article.
1752:
Just allegations by
Pakistan, where? Some people are overlooking other sections of the article (not to forget ones that have already been deleted for no reason).
1772:
Just deleted for no reason, where? Some people are overlooking the rationales provided in the talk page (not to forget ones that have already been given here).
1653:
1565:
1315:
Now frankly, if all you can do here is accuse others of the things they didn't actually do, then it's better that you report other users on suitable pages and
1409:
Only rumors and unfounded allegations juxtaposed with fabricated assertions (and other conspiracy theories) by
Pakistani Leaders. Like Surajt88 said above, "
618:
2613:
RP, the Kachin rebels were fighting against the military junta, they not usually called a terrorist group as they were fighting against state terrorism.
1942:
1840:
519:
were removed and an incident on Indian Army trained militants infiltrating Azad
Kashmir was removed, a quote detailing RAW activities in Balochistan by
300:
2521:
You know there is a difference between the "whole nation" and the "state". Also, for you they might be theories but wikipedia is not censored. --
1270:
If you could check your way of expressing your colossal spite toward others who disagree with you, I would be grateful. But the allegations like
1164:
without checking. You ask him repeatedly to take it to the RSN thread. He does, and it is discovered that the text in question is a work of the
384:". Such flowery words are almost all that was produced in the talk page in favour of keeping the POV content which others were trying to remove.
267:
1911:(India and Nepal accuse each other of indifference, later collaborate against Maoists, ISI; not good enough for state sponsored terrorism),
2263:
2242:
2041:
libelous accusations, propaganda of any kind, be it commercial, political, religious, national, or otherwise. Knowledge is not a soap box.
1041:
2337:
And another one who can't tell the difference between state sponsored terrorism and state terrorism. These are entirely different things.
782:
source are very limited. A lightweight source may sometimes be acceptable for a lightweight claim, but never for an extraordinary claim.
673:
woven to allege India of supporting terrorism. The remaining content would be a bunch of unfounded allegations by Pakistan supported by
2710:
2622:
2608:
2557:
2536:
2507:
2410:
2391:
2346:
2328:
2295:
2250:
2219:
2181:
2138:
2076:
2049:
1979:
1893:
1815:
1789:
1767:
1743:
1713:
1678:
1613:
1577:
1551:
1514:
1483:
1462:
1447:
1425:
1374:
1337:
1231:
1205:
1191:
1117:
1083:
1065:
1019:
1002:
981:
962:
931:
914:
888:
846:
828:
745:
718:
694:
654:
632:
607:
575:
555:
502:
470:
425:
401:
371:
352:
326:
65:
1399:
claim is substantiated or validated by any conclusive investigation by any foreign government/department that shows Indian government
944:
261:
2314:
2115:
1165:
525:
98:
2567:
2267:
2119:
128:
257:
1903:
1867:
17:
2575:
2459:
2452:
credible evidence (i.e. reliable sources which go beyond the realm of "claims") for alleging India of "sponsoring terrorism".
1322:
204:
1963:
1945:
1939:
1936:
1933:
1921:
1918:
1915:
1912:
1909:
1906:
1870:
1864:
1861:
1858:
1855:
1852:
1849:
1846:
1843:
1837:
1834:
599:; because there is nothing stopping anyone from creating any article. That's a lame excuse and this is not the right place.
2281:- how do you know they are from India? And what has that got to do with this AfD? Does it make their assertions less true?
1948:
1917:(an isolated case of two arms smugglers claiming allegiance to R&AW, isn't good enough for state sponsored terrorism),
1873:
307:
533:
410:
suggest you mind and censor your language.Let your inner thoughts remain inside. Be somewhat civil while in a discussion.
196:
71:
537:
1564:, not one single fact is in the article, it is all one big long list of allegations form Pakistan. Perhaps a rename to
1656:
seems to be the perfect title for this article. I am considering changing my !vote to move the article to this title.
886:
842:
592:
114:
1923:(the author is representing an allegation, "are said to be..." ) cannot be used as reliable sources on this subject.
2708:
2389:
2370:
1977:
1741:
1153:", and then when you open the talk page... you find zero (zilch, nada, nil) discussion. An entire quote by senator
2566:
Please note that India withdrew support for the LTTE long before it was designated a terrorist organisation. (See
87:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
2727:
2665:
2645:
2618:
2473:
2354:
2342:
2134:
1955:
1709:
1573:
1201:
1079:
596:
571:
322:
273:
40:
2491:
a whole nation basing upon poxy conjectures, lofty fabrication and unfounded conspiracy theories, is beyond me
2310:
2259:
2246:
1635:
1634:" (also demonstrated by SMS above) might be relevant in a few Afds, in this context, gives the impression that
1211:
810:
529:
1796:
2649:
2056:
2381:. I don't think there are enough reliable sources here (for content other than LTTE) to justify a spinoff.
1547:
1507:
1196:
Please provide the source from the Federation of American Scientists so you can replace the SPS you used.
1154:
838:
520:
418:
160:
2255:
2212:
703:
So heads of state, politicians, academic sources, governments, they are all "unreliable"? Wow. Just wow.
2723:
2701:
2431:
2405:
2382:
2323:
2238:
2111:
2101:
2092:
2022:
have always alleged many radical things regarding India, but never supported their lofty allegations up
1970:
1734:
1701:
1605:
1531:
1479:
1389:
to be "harboring or harnessing terrorism"? If so, then where, by whom, and how can you impute that to a
1356:
supporting it. I don't see a reason to delete it. Content disputes are not resolved through deletion. --
1277:
1047:
1014:
976:
926:
677:. A further websearch has revealed nothing but further allegations by Pakistan from unreliable sources.
483:
462:
61:
36:
2353:
Agree, but does the Sri Lanka part alone justify a new article when the content can easily be added to
1733:. Agree with AshLin, Animesh and others that the article cannot just be about allegations by Pakistan.
2434:) - I don't understand what your point actually is. Are you saying that even though the article is a "
2614:
2338:
2130:
1705:
1569:
1197:
1075:
567:
516:
367:
318:
144:
118:
1458:
the edit which posted the AfD notice on the page, which was the last stable version of the article.
879:
453:
for obvious anti-India POV pushing. Moreover statements of allegations are being pushed as proof. --
2641:
1693:
1599:
1589:
884:
878:, and what makes it worse is that they have been used to support highly controversial allegations.
797:
to make India seem liable for "sponsoring-terrorism". This article is itself a wicked violation of
456:
450:
293:
103:
1169:
2600:
2417:
2173:
2068:
1781:
1670:
1223:
1109:
737:
686:
393:
150:
81:
2555:
2505:
2439:
2293:
2047:
2004:
1813:
1697:
1588:
and the article is a list of allegations/claims from poor sources with combined together with
1537:
1502:
1423:
1335:
867:
826:
776:
650:
628:
605:
561:
413:
348:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
2722:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
2529:
2427:
2400:
2318:
2107:
2097:
1475:
1443:
1173:
1009:
995:
971:
921:
907:
57:
2571:
2477:
2374:
2366:
2202:
2127:
2033:
1761:
1726:
1561:
1471:
1289:
1265:
1257:
1185:
1127:
1093:
1059:
956:
863:
816:
Moreover, not all coverage in reliable sources constitutes evidence of notability for the
712:
670:
586:
549:
496:
363:
1530:... i don't see any legitimate concerns to delete it, this nomination sounds a lot like
2668:
in State-sponsored terrorism is just two lines long. It does not warrant a new article.
2234:
2198:
2194:
2038:
1966:
1800:
1730:
1722:
1629:
1593:
1527:
1496:
1492:
1074:
I notice you have not removed three SPS sources from it. The first three refs are SPS.
859:
855:
798:
772:
768:
512:
442:
438:
340:
336:
2652:
of writing articles, split is only recommended after consideration has been given to:
482:
article are just a tip of the iceberg. This deletion discussion is simply a result of
2593:
2206:
2166:
2091:
took me ages to come up with a decision however unfortunately these delete votes are
2061:
1997:
1876:
1804:
1774:
1663:
1585:
1459:
1357:
1261:
1216:
1161:
1102:
1092:"? All the content that was removed was gross POV violations and classic examples of
875:
871:
806:
730:
679:
674:
446:
386:
53:
2550:
2500:
2288:
2230:
2042:
2029:
1830:
1808:
1625:
1523:
1418:
1353:
1330:
1131:
821:
666:
646:
624:
600:
344:
178:
166:
134:
2587:
understood by anyone who knows atleast something about Pakistan's stance on India.
234:
2278:
113:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
2692:
this has been pointed out numerous times in the discussion and in the talk page.
2523:
2488:
1439:
1349:
989:
901:
2193:- merely a list of allegations by Pakistan. Not at all encyclopedia-type. Per
445:. The article contains cherry picked Quotes and allegations many of them from
2157:
2154:
a case of censorship by people of that particular country we must move forward
1754:
1253:
1178:
1052:
949:
705:
582:
542:
489:
1212:
disagreeing with everything that intends to remove content from the article
1157:
is deleted because of another chap who thinks it is "inessential, lengthy"
2438:" it should be kept? Doesn't it sound perilously close to what we know as
1149:". Entire Bangladesh section was removed because one user thinks that it "
1654:
Allegations of Indian state sponsored terrorism by their old foe Pakistan
1566:
Allegations of Indian state sponsored terrorism by their old foe Pakistan
2001:
1136:
How Indian officials or Gov of India can be connected to it is beyond me
1499:.Violates NPOV and as AshLin already said, shows allegations as facts.
1415:
that was produced in the talk page in favour of keeping the POV content
1319:
alone, you've already voted, commented, responded, etc. haven't you?
1658:
866:, and a case of cherry picking, this article seems to be a case of
595:) please quit trying to make a convincing argument based solely on
2568:
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam#Proscription as a terrorist group
2229:
This topic/article has received significant coverage by secondary
2716:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
2362:
1959:
1951:
793:
concrete evidence (only fabricated claims) has been provided on
1592:
for obvious POV pushing. Concerns are genuine and one needs to
1126:
Yeah, Edolphus Town's entire quote was removed because it was "
2378:
2284:
1142:
76:
1803:
to what's being conveyed to you by multiple editors without
107:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
1321:
Nobody is being barred from checking or commenting on the
1130:" and his speech was offensive to some user's sentiments?
726:
heads of state, politicians, academic sources, governments
2576:
Talk:India and state sponsored terrorism#Section on Burma
2018:
condemned India for sponsoring terrorism. Yes, it's true
1288:
Edolphus Town's entire quote was removed because it was "
870:. The only argument the article creator has presented in
2000:
or National political party or Intelligence agencies or
1920:(Kalpaz is same as Gyan a known problematic publisher),
1260:) - You are constantly (intentionally or not) violating
837:- The article has a lot of accusations and less facts --
2583:
1393:
nation based on nothing more than some form of rumors?
1158:
1150:
1146:
1139:
897:
230:
226:
222:
2149:
others, but I have strong suspicions of foulplay here.
1008:
community are the delete !votes trying to override? --
292:
2283:
Nationality has nothing to do with it. Do not assume
2016:(i.e. on international podium like UN or any Summits)
1522:
topic has received significant coverage by secondary
767:
above me have already said, it iniquitously violates
1134:
section was removed because it's just "one report",
515:
statement was removed, Wikileaks allegations by the
1294:his speech was offensive to some user's sentiments
449:and questionable sources and merged together with
2126:This account has been blocked as a sockpuppet of
785:This article is actually imputing terrorism to a
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2730:). No further edits should be made to this page.
540:etc. Why should there be double standards here?
2359:Indian intervention in the Sri Lankan Civil War
1950:are about Indian/R&AW involvement with the
1799:things out of hand, Mar4d. And I recommend you
1145:section was removed because.... oh dear, it's "
2591:rewrite the article neutrally, you would fail.
728:" alleging India of terrorism without success.
641:list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions
380:I am yet to see a reliable source, much less "
1417:". And we say BLP-violation is unacceptable.
306:
127:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
97:among Knowledge contributors. Knowledge has
8:
1403:is using terrorism against other countries?
896:: even after the much blanking and renaming
639:Note: This debate has been included in the
617:Note: This debate has been included in the
566:] this section in particular is quite good.
2371:Research and Analysis Wing#Major operations
2458:" (Sri Lanka) - wow, did you even care to
2039:Knowledge is not a means for disseminating
1914:(accusations of espionage not terrorism),
1568:, which is basically what the article is.
1090:Insensitivities of the WP:IDONTLIKEIT CAMP
638:
619:list of India-related deletion discussions
616:
101:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
2484:As a side note, How one could be able to
2241:and pov pushing by certain Indian editors
1908:(allegations by a Pakistani politician),
1902:Out of the references you have provided,
811:indiscriminate collection of information
121:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
2237:I concur with above these deletes are
1622:@Crown Prince, although the typical "
597:what other articles do or do not exist
1098:Indian editors want it to be censored
7:
2492:
1274:content have been removed ...due to
1151:has no specific mention of terrorism
2024:with any credible or tangible proof
854:Being a crystal clear violation of
197:India and state sponsored terrorism
72:India and state sponsored terrorism
2367:LTTE Insurgency#Indian involvement
1096:. This comment and comments like "
945:Knowledge:Verifiability, not truth
24:
2315:United States and state terrorism
2156:"? I seriously hope it is not an
1166:Federation of American Scientists
526:United States and state terrorism
2684:
2672:
2656:
2493:
2233:furthermore the topic is highly
1657:
80:
2355:State-sponsored terrorism#India
2028:This whole article is built on
2026:on any international platform.
801:. An article on the subject of
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
2644:from the top level article on
2005:counter-terrorism organization
1411:Such flowery words are almost
1304:self-proclaimed NPOV-enforcers
560:Yes, it looked great when the
1:
2104:) 22:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
1327:don't assume stuff beforehand
534:Sri Lanka and state terrorism
117:on the part of others and to
1833:which discuss this subject (
538:Pakistan and state terrorism
2711:19:06, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2623:17:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2609:17:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2558:17:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2537:17:04, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2508:17:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2411:17:33, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2392:16:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2347:16:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2329:16:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2296:14:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2251:12:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2220:05:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2182:04:40, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2139:11:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2077:04:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2050:08:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
1980:00:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
1894:22:09, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
1816:11:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
1790:07:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
1768:05:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
1744:23:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
1714:16:47, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
1679:16:34, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
1614:15:19, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
1578:15:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
1552:15:07, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
1515:14:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
1484:07:49, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
1463:17:51, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
1426:09:52, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
1385:Do you mean India has been
426:14:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
66:19:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
2747:
1636:you did not bother to read
1448:17:17, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
1375:16:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
1338:09:33, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
1232:04:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
1206:04:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
1192:04:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
1118:03:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
1084:00:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
1066:00:52, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
1020:02:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
1003:01:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
982:01:45, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
963:01:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
932:00:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
915:00:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
889:12:25, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
847:09:45, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
829:08:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
759:- Yes, I concur with what
746:09:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
719:08:30, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
695:03:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
655:00:12, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
633:00:12, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
608:09:12, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
576:07:49, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
556:00:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
503:00:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
471:20:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
402:13:10, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
372:20:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
353:19:55, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
327:19:50, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
2646:State-sponsored terrorism
2474:State-sponsored terrorism
2311:India and state terrorism
2279:by certain Indian editors
2152:And what do you mean by "
1652:And as a side note, DS's
2719:Please do not modify it.
2209:, it is a clear delete.
1624:KEEP blah.. blah.. has
1470:It is a good example of
1325:of this article. Please
1214:regardless of rationale.
530:Iran and state terrorism
32:Please do not modify it.
335:- shamelessly violates
159:; accounts blocked for
129:single-purpose accounts
99:policies and guidelines
2655:Size of the article —
2482:
1829:There are abundant of
1586:Self published sources
1526:& topic is highly
1155:Mushahid Hussain Sayed
809:. Knowledge is not an
675:self published sources
671:misrepresented content
521:Mushahid Hussain Sayed
2471:
2268:few or no other edits
2120:few or no other edits
1962:. Your final source (
1387:irrefutably confirmed
1276:sensitivities of the
382:most reliable sources
56:that it be restored.
2683:Neutrality issues —
2671:Notability issues —
2270:outside this topic.
2122:outside this topic.
2011:foreign country has
1348:The article is on a
795:international podium
789:nation, even though
517:United Arab Emirates
2680:was this discussed?
2363:LTTE#Indian support
111:by counting votes.
90:not a majority vote
2456:beyond allegations
2055:@SMS, please read
1969:content. Regards.
1905:(no page number),
1805:assuming bad faith
881:♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛
48:The result was
2704:Correct Knowledge
2421:
2409:
2385:Correct Knowledge
2327:
2271:
2141:
2123:
2020:Pakistani leaders
2017:
1973:Correct Knowledge
1737:Correct Knowledge
1632:blah.. blah..~~~~
1628:blah.. blah.. is
1317:leave this thread
1302:Applause for the
1018:
980:
930:
667:original research
657:
644:
635:
622:
562:Northern alliance
192:
191:
188:
115:assume good faith
2738:
2721:
2706:
2691:
2688:
2687:
2679:
2676:
2675:
2666:section on India
2663:
2660:
2659:
2640:This article is
2607:
2605:
2598:
2553:
2535:
2503:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2440:I SIMPLY LIKE IT
2415:
2403:
2387:
2321:
2291:
2280:
2253:
2231:reliable sources
2215:
2180:
2178:
2171:
2125:
2105:
2075:
2073:
2066:
2057:WP:LOTSOFSOURCES
2045:
2015:
1975:
1891:
1886:
1881:
1831:reliable sources
1811:
1788:
1786:
1779:
1764:
1757:
1739:
1677:
1675:
1668:
1661:
1626:reliable sources
1611:
1609:
1603:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1524:reliable sources
1512:
1510:
1505:
1421:
1372:
1367:
1362:
1354:reliable sources
1333:
1306:of this article.
1230:
1228:
1221:
1188:
1181:
1174:Steven Aftergood
1116:
1114:
1107:
1062:
1055:
1012:
1001:
974:
959:
952:
924:
913:
882:
824:
744:
742:
735:
715:
708:
693:
691:
684:
645:
623:
603:
552:
545:
499:
492:
468:
466:
460:
423:
421:
416:
400:
398:
391:
311:
310:
296:
248:
238:
220:
186:
174:
158:
142:
123:
93:, but instead a
84:
77:
34:
2746:
2745:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2728:deletion review
2717:
2702:
2689:
2685:
2677:
2673:
2661:
2657:
2615:Darkness Shines
2601:
2594:
2592:
2551:
2522:
2501:
2494:
2478:State terrorism
2383:
2339:Darkness Shines
2289:
2213:
2174:
2167:
2165:
2131:Darkness Shines
2128:User:Nangparbat
2069:
2062:
2060:
2043:
2013:ever officially
1971:
1887:
1882:
1877:
1809:
1801:try to pay heed
1782:
1775:
1773:
1762:
1755:
1735:
1706:AnimeshKulkarni
1671:
1664:
1662:
1607:
1601:
1598:
1570:Darkness Shines
1549:
1541:
1539:
1538:
1508:
1503:
1501:
1419:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1331:
1312:are gratuitous.
1224:
1217:
1215:
1198:Darkness Shines
1186:
1179:
1110:
1103:
1101:
1076:Darkness Shines
1060:
1053:
988:
957:
950:
900:
880:
822:
738:
731:
729:
713:
706:
687:
680:
678:
601:
568:Darkness Shines
550:
543:
497:
490:
464:
458:
455:
419:
414:
412:
394:
387:
385:
319:Darkness Shines
253:
244:
211:
195:
176:
164:
148:
132:
119:sign your posts
75:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2744:
2742:
2733:
2732:
2713:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2681:
2669:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2611:
2588:
2579:
2561:
2560:
2514:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2468:
2467:
2443:
2423:
2422:
2413:
2395:
2394:
2350:
2349:
2332:
2331:
2313:(in line with
2302:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2273:
2272:
2256:141.241.13.254
2243:141.241.13.254
2239:I DONT LIKE IT
2223:
2222:
2214:TheSpecialUser
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2161:
2150:
2143:
2142:
2093:I DONT LIKE IT
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2027:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1983:
1982:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1897:
1896:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1793:
1792:
1747:
1746:
1716:
1702:WP:SELFPUBLISH
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1617:
1616:
1581:
1580:
1555:
1554:
1536:
1532:I DONT LIKE IT
1517:
1486:
1465:
1451:
1450:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1408:
1404:
1394:
1378:
1377:
1342:
1341:
1313:
1310:
1309:
1298:
1284:
1278:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
1269:
1250:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1069:
1068:
1048:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
937:
936:
935:
934:
891:
849:
832:
803:this magnitude
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
698:
697:
659:
658:
636:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
579:
578:
513:Edolphus Towns
506:
505:
484:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
473:
431:
430:
429:
428:
404:
375:
374:
356:
355:
314:
313:
250:
190:
189:
85:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2743:
2731:
2729:
2725:
2720:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2705:
2698:
2697:
2682:
2670:
2667:
2654:
2653:
2651:
2650:summary style
2648:. As per the
2647:
2643:
2639:
2636:
2635:
2624:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2610:
2606:
2604:
2599:
2597:
2589:
2585:
2580:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2565:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2559:
2556:
2554:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2539:
2538:
2533:
2532:
2527:
2526:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2510:
2509:
2506:
2504:
2490:
2487:
2481:
2479:
2475:
2470:
2469:
2466:
2464:
2462:
2457:
2451:
2447:
2441:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2424:
2419:
2418:edit conflict
2414:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2396:
2393:
2390:
2388:
2386:
2380:
2376:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2351:
2348:
2344:
2340:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2330:
2325:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2307:
2304:
2303:
2298:
2297:
2294:
2292:
2286:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2269:
2265:
2261:
2257:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2228:
2225:
2224:
2221:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2189:
2188:
2183:
2179:
2177:
2172:
2170:
2162:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2129:
2124:
2121:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2103:
2099:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2085:
2078:
2074:
2072:
2067:
2065:
2058:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2048:
2046:
2040:
2035:
2031:
2025:
2021:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2003:
1999:
1998:Head of state
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1985:
1984:
1981:
1978:
1976:
1974:
1968:
1964:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1946:
1943:
1940:
1937:
1934:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1922:
1919:
1916:
1913:
1910:
1907:
1904:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1895:
1892:
1890:
1885:
1880:
1874:
1871:
1868:
1865:
1862:
1859:
1856:
1853:
1850:
1847:
1844:
1841:
1838:
1835:
1832:
1828:
1825:
1824:
1817:
1814:
1812:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1795:
1794:
1791:
1787:
1785:
1780:
1778:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1765:
1759:
1758:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1745:
1742:
1740:
1738:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1717:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1688:
1687:
1680:
1676:
1674:
1669:
1667:
1660:
1655:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1637:
1633:
1631:
1627:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1604:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1582:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1546:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1518:
1516:
1513:
1511:
1506:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1487:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1466:
1464:
1461:
1456:
1453:
1452:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1434:
1433:
1428:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1416:
1414:
1407:
1402:
1398:
1392:
1388:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1376:
1373:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1355:
1352:subject with
1351:
1347:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1328:
1324:
1318:
1314:
1311:
1307:
1305:
1299:
1296:
1295:
1291:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1279:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1249:
1233:
1229:
1227:
1222:
1220:
1213:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1183:
1182:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1113:
1108:
1106:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1063:
1057:
1056:
1049:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1038:
1035:
1034:
1021:
1016:
1011:
1006:
1005:
1004:
999:
998:
993:
992:
985:
984:
983:
978:
973:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
960:
954:
953:
946:
941:
940:
939:
938:
933:
928:
923:
918:
917:
916:
911:
910:
905:
904:
898:
895:
892:
890:
887:
885:
883:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
850:
848:
844:
840:
836:
833:
831:
830:
827:
825:
819:
814:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
783:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
755:
754:
747:
743:
741:
736:
734:
727:
722:
721:
720:
716:
710:
709:
702:
701:
700:
699:
696:
692:
690:
685:
683:
676:
672:
668:
664:
661:
660:
656:
652:
648:
642:
637:
634:
630:
626:
620:
615:
609:
606:
604:
598:
594:
591:
588:
584:
581:
580:
577:
573:
569:
565:
563:
559:
558:
557:
553:
547:
546:
539:
535:
531:
527:
522:
518:
514:
510:
509:
508:
507:
504:
500:
494:
493:
485:
480:
477:
474:
472:
469:
467:
461:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
432:
427:
424:
422:
417:
409:
408:very strongly
406:@Justice...I
405:
403:
399:
397:
392:
390:
383:
379:
378:
377:
376:
373:
369:
365:
361:
358:
357:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
330:
329:
328:
324:
320:
309:
305:
302:
299:
295:
291:
287:
284:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
266:
263:
259:
256:
255:Find sources:
251:
247:
242:
236:
232:
228:
224:
219:
215:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
193:
184:
180:
172:
168:
162:
156:
152:
146:
140:
136:
130:
126:
122:
120:
116:
110:
106:
105:
100:
96:
92:
91:
86:
83:
79:
78:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
2718:
2715:
2703:
2637:
2602:
2595:
2546:
2542:
2530:
2524:
2485:
2483:
2472:
2460:
2455:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2435:
2384:
2375:content fork
2305:
2282:
2226:
2211:
2210:
2190:
2175:
2168:
2153:
2088:
2087:
2070:
2063:
2037:
2023:
2019:
2012:
2008:
1972:
1932:The sources
1888:
1883:
1878:
1826:
1797:Don't assume
1783:
1776:
1753:
1736:
1718:
1694:WP:SYNTHESIS
1689:
1672:
1665:
1623:
1597:
1590:WP:SYNTHESIS
1535:
1519:
1500:
1488:
1467:
1454:
1435:
1412:
1410:
1405:
1400:
1396:
1390:
1386:
1384:
1369:
1364:
1359:
1345:
1326:
1320:
1316:
1303:
1301:
1293:
1287:
1275:
1273:
1225:
1218:
1177:
1170:John E. Pike
1135:
1132:Azad Kashmir
1111:
1104:
1097:
1089:
1051:
1040:
1039:
1036:
996:
990:
948:
908:
902:
893:
851:
834:
817:
815:
802:
794:
790:
786:
784:
780:
775:and perhaps
764:
760:
756:
739:
732:
725:
704:
688:
681:
662:
589:
541:
488:
478:
475:
454:
451:WP:SYNTHESIS
434:
411:
407:
395:
388:
381:
359:
332:
315:
303:
297:
289:
282:
276:
270:
264:
254:
182:
170:
161:sockpuppetry
154:
143:; suspected
138:
124:
112:
108:
102:
94:
88:
49:
47:
31:
28:
2543:conjectures
2444:There have
2428:RegentsPark
2401:regentspark
2379:CIA#History
2319:regentspark
2266:) has made
2118:) has made
2108:Westwoodzie
2098:Westwoodzie
1639:discussion.
1476:Shyamsunder
1455:Admin note:
1010:regentspark
972:regentspark
922:regentspark
894:Strong keep
757:Delete ASAP
360:Strong keep
280:free images
58:Mark Arsten
2489:stigmatize
2158:Ad hominem
1698:WP:SOAPBOX
868:WP:ILIKEIT
777:WP:NOTCASE
364:Justice007
95:discussion
2724:talk page
2486:neutrally
2463:talk page
2285:bad faith
1534:to me...
1504:TheStrike
1323:talk page
647:• Gene93k
625:• Gene93k
415:TheStrike
151:canvassed
145:canvassed
104:consensus
37:talk page
2726:or in a
2572:WP:SYNTH
2525:lTopGunl
2436:POV mess
2264:contribs
2203:WP:SYNTH
2116:contribs
2034:WP:SYNTH
1827:Comment:
1727:WP:SYNTH
1562:WP:SYNTH
1472:WP:SYNTH
1460:ItsZippy
1383:Really?
1266:WP:CIVIL
1147:coatrack
1094:WP:SYNTH
991:lTopGunl
903:lTopGunl
864:WP:SYNTH
839:sarvajna
818:purposes
765:DBigXray
593:contribs
241:View log
183:username
177:{{subst:
171:username
165:{{subst:
155:username
149:{{subst:
139:username
133:{{subst:
39:or in a
2638:Comment
2574:. (See
2552:Mrt3366
2502:Mrt3366
2406:comment
2324:comment
2290:Mrt3366
2235:notable
2199:WP:FORK
2195:WP:SOAP
2160:attack.
2044:Mrt3366
1967:SOAPish
1810:Mrt3366
1731:WP:SOAP
1723:WP:FORK
1630:notable
1594:WP:HEAR
1528:notable
1497:WP:SOAP
1493:WP:FORK
1420:Mrt3366
1350:notable
1332:Mrt3366
1037:COMMENT
1015:comment
987:now. --
977:comment
927:comment
876:WP:SPSs
860:WP:SOAP
856:WP:FORK
823:Mrt3366
799:WP:NPOV
773:WP:COAT
769:WP:SOAP
761:Suraj88
602:Mrt3366
479:Nothing
443:WP:FORK
439:WP:SOAP
345:Bearian
341:WP:FORK
337:WP:SOAP
286:WP refs
274:scholar
214:protect
209:history
147:users:
2207:WP:SPA
2205:, and
2191:Delete
2002:renown
1987:media.
1719:Delete
1690:Delete
1542:Prince
1540:Crown
1489:Delete
1468:Delete
1440:AshLin
1436:Delete
1401:itself
1292:" and
1262:WP:AGF
1162:WP:SPS
1050:camp.
872:WP:WAX
852:Delete
835:Delete
807:WP:GNG
663:Delete
447:WP:SPS
435:Delete
333:Delete
258:Google
218:delete
54:WP:DRV
50:delete
2642:split
2596:Suraj
2547:facts
2448:been
2317:). --
2169:Suraj
2064:Suraj
2030:WP:OR
1777:Suraj
1756:Mar4d
1666:Suraj
1509:Σagle
1391:whole
1290:undue
1254:Mar4d
1219:Suraj
1180:Mar4d
1168:, by
1128:undue
1105:Suraj
1054:Mar4d
951:Mar4d
787:whole
733:Suraj
707:Mar4d
682:Suraj
583:Mar4d
544:Mar4d
491:Mar4d
420:Σagle
389:Suraj
301:JSTOR
262:books
246:Stats
235:views
227:watch
223:links
125:Note:
16:<
2664:the
2619:talk
2584:This
2545:and
2531:talk
2461:read
2432:talk
2369:and
2343:talk
2306:Keep
2260:talk
2247:talk
2227:keep
2197:and
2135:talk
2112:talk
2102:talk
2089:Keep
2032:and
1960:here
1958:and
1956:here
1952:LTTE
1763:talk
1729:and
1721:per
1710:talk
1704:. §§
1696:and
1692:per
1596:. --
1574:talk
1520:KEEP
1495:and
1491:Per
1480:talk
1444:talk
1397:your
1346:Keep
1280:camp
1258:talk
1202:talk
1187:talk
1172:and
1080:talk
1061:talk
1042:This
997:talk
958:talk
909:talk
843:talk
714:talk
651:talk
629:talk
587:talk
572:talk
551:talk
498:talk
476:Keep
441:and
437:per
368:talk
349:talk
339:and
323:talk
294:FENS
268:news
231:logs
205:talk
201:edit
62:talk
2499:!
2450:any
2446:not
2377:of
2009:any
2007:of
1996:No
1712:)
1608:ray
1602:Big
1413:all
1406:No.
1395:Is
1143:UAE
669:or
465:ray
459:Big
308:TWL
243:•
239:– (
179:csp
175:or
167:csm
135:spa
109:not
2621:)
2549:.
2476:≠
2442:?
2365:,
2361:,
2357:,
2345:)
2287:.
2262:•
2254:—
2249:)
2201:,
2137:)
2114:•
2106:—
2036:.
1947:,
1944:,
1941:,
1938:,
1935:,
1872:,
1869:,
1866:,
1863:,
1860:,
1857:,
1854:,
1851:,
1848:,
1845:,
1842:,
1839:,
1836:,
1807:.
1766:)
1760:p(
1725:,
1576:)
1482:)
1446:)
1329:.
1283:".
1268:.
1264:,
1204:)
1190:)
1141:.
1138:"
1082:)
1064:)
970:--
961:)
920:--
862:,
858:,
845:)
813:.
791:NO
779:.
771:,
763:,
717:)
653:)
643:.
631:)
621:.
574:)
554:)
536:,
532:,
528:,
501:)
370:)
351:)
343:.
325:)
288:)
233:|
229:|
225:|
221:|
216:|
212:|
207:|
203:|
185:}}
173:}}
163::
157:}}
141:}}
131::
64:)
2690:N
2678:N
2662:N
2617:(
2603:T
2578:)
2534:)
2528:(
2480:.
2465:?
2454:"
2430:(
2426:@
2420:)
2416:(
2408:)
2404:(
2341:(
2326:)
2322:(
2258:(
2245:(
2176:T
2133:(
2110:(
2100:(
2071:T
1889:S
1884:M
1879:S
1784:T
1708:(
1673:T
1606:X
1600:D
1572:(
1478:(
1474:.
1442:(
1370:S
1365:M
1360:S
1308:"
1300:"
1297:"
1286:"
1272:"
1256:(
1252:@
1226:T
1200:(
1184:(
1112:T
1088:"
1078:(
1058:(
1017:)
1013:(
1000:)
994:(
979:)
975:(
955:(
943:(
929:)
925:(
912:)
906:(
841:(
740:T
724:"
711:(
689:T
649:(
627:(
590:·
585:(
570:(
548:(
495:(
463:X
457:D
396:T
366:(
347:(
321:(
312:)
304:·
298:·
290:·
283:·
277:·
271:·
265:·
260:(
252:(
249:)
237:)
199:(
187:.
181:|
169:|
153:|
137:|
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
