479:. But I differ with what Utcursch says of redirecting it to Indian nationalism or Hindutva as the term hasn't really got any analysis done by others. Its just verbatim replication of what KRN said and maybe a redirect to his article would be okay, that too is a thin chance as this term doesn't seem much popular for someone to look on Wiki. §§
297:
243:. The term has also been used in the book the "Demons of Chitrakoot" by Ashok K Banker published by Penguin publishers. The ref is: "...You understood that it's not about 'hindutva' and the religion of politics, but about 'Inditva', Indian pride, and a story too great to be either saffronized or sanitized."
406:
The article, written by K R Narayanan, Former
President of India, who had his Advanced Higher Education from London, and also served as an Ambassador of English speaking countries viz., United Kingdom and United States of America, has an entry of a new word 'Inditva'. Since the word had been coined
345:
The main thing here I feel is the relative importance to the term: "the fourth in Banker's modern retelling of Rama's story, and takes on his journey to the kingdom of Lanka. For Banker, this story is 'not about 'hindutva' and the politics of religion, but about 'inditva', Indian pride, and a story
265:
Yes, I saw the use in "Demons of
Chitrakoot;" but that's the foreword to a work of fiction, and so not exactly an academic discussion of the topic. Besides for an article about a neologism, you really need sources discussing the term, not simply using it. I checked google scholar myself before
270:, the aforementioned "Demons of Chitrakoot;" there is no indication that the sources in other languages are treating the same term. Yes, it was coined by an ex-Indian President; does that make it notable in and of itself? Personally, I don't think so.
407:
by an eminent academician with profound
English knowledge, who was also heading a biggest democratic state of the world, same should be accepted in the similar way as words,coined by the other heads of the states, have been already accepted
446:
Google results, a large number of them about the
Hungarian language word for "started". If we restrict the search to Google Scholar / Books, tthere are one or two results that are actually about this topic. At best, this can be a redirect to
244:
563:: Dharmadhyaksha has it about right. I'm a little surprised at the early comments here but presume they follow Narayanan's activities much more closely than me. It is a non-notable neologism, pure and simple. -
318:
I respect your opinion, I honestly do; if you were to find substantive coverage, I would willingly withdraw the nomination. You do realise, though, that what you are presenting as a different source is the
168:
207:. The only real coverage is a couple of sources about the original statement in which this was used; the sources after that are blog sources, and a single quote of the original.
121:
508:
162:
224:
397:
383:
393:
379:
526:
494:
128:
411:. Besides this the article is the need of the day to strengthen the fabric Humanity. I strongly appeal to retain 'Inditva'. --
17:
408:
375:
239:
This term has been coined by one of the former presidents of India. As regards to the usage of the terms, please refer to the
267:
355:
305:
252:
183:
94:
89:
150:
98:
608:
40:
374:
Very informative article, must NOT delete. Yes coined by ex president and report by journalist make it notable.
551:
522:
490:
81:
57:
351:
301:
248:
144:
604:
332:
275:
212:
36:
347:
240:
140:
585:
547:
512:
480:
416:
176:
53:
589:
572:
555:
531:
499:
467:
434:
420:
401:
387:
359:
336:
309:
279:
256:
231:
216:
85:
63:
464:
452:
190:
430:
425:
Strongly in favor of this article. Please do not delete this article, this must be retain it--
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
603:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
77:
69:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
568:
328:
271:
208:
443:
392:
I am also in favor of this article. This is a common term, hope it will not be deleted :)
199:
This is an article about a neologism of insufficient importance, and is inappropriate per
296:. As regards to the usage of the term, it is also used in other published works such as
581:
412:
543:
476:
460:
448:
228:
204:
200:
156:
426:
115:
266:
nominating this; although the 63 results look impressive at first, there is only
564:
292:
That the term is gaining currency can be gauged from some sources such as
456:
293:
442:. This is non-notable neologism. Minus Knowledge mirrors, there are
597:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
475:: I agree with nominator's rationale of the term failing
111:
107:
103:
175:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
611:). No further edits should be made to this page.
580:: as per nominator. Non-notable neologism. -
509:list of Language-related deletion discussions
346:too great to be saffronised or sanitised.'" (
189:
8:
507:Note: This debate has been included in the
223:Note: This debate has been included in the
506:
225:list of India-related deletion discussions
222:
378:are coined by presidents are now common.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
590:15:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
573:12:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
556:19:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
532:04:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
500:03:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
468:14:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
435:07:50, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
421:07:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
402:20:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
388:18:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
360:18:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
337:18:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
323:to a different volume of the
310:18:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
300:. Hence it should be KEPT. --
280:17:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
257:16:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
232:15:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
217:13:51, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
203:, as well as failing to meet
64:08:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
628:
600:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
268:only 1 english result
241:Google Scholar Search
325:same work of fiction
348:Review by Telegraph
453:Indian nationalism
534:
530:
498:
298:Armies of Hanuman
234:
619:
602:
520:
488:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
60:
34:
627:
626:
622:
621:
620:
618:
617:
616:
615:
609:deletion review
598:
394:Muhammad Shuaib
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
62:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
625:
623:
614:
613:
593:
592:
575:
558:
548:Yogesh Khandke
536:
535:
515:Dharmadhyaksha
503:
502:
483:Dharmadhyaksha
470:
437:
423:
404:
390:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
340:
339:
313:
312:
285:
284:
283:
282:
260:
259:
236:
235:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
56:
54:The Bushranger
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
624:
612:
610:
606:
601:
595:
594:
591:
587:
583:
579:
576:
574:
570:
566:
562:
559:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
538:
537:
533:
528:
524:
518:
517:
516:
510:
505:
504:
501:
496:
492:
486:
485:
484:
478:
474:
471:
469:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
449:K R Narayanan
445:
441:
438:
436:
432:
428:
424:
422:
418:
414:
410:
409:So many words
405:
403:
399:
395:
391:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:So many words
373:
372:
361:
357:
353:
349:
344:
343:
342:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
321:same foreword
317:
316:
315:
314:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
281:
277:
273:
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:
233:
230:
226:
221:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
59:One ping only
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
599:
596:
577:
560:
539:
514:
513:
482:
481:
472:
439:
324:
320:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
49:
47:
31:
28:
380:Ameen Akbar
329:Vanamonde93
272:Vanamonde93
209:Vanamonde93
163:free images
294:Unionpedia
605:talk page
582:Kautilya3
413:Drcenjary
37:talk page
607:or in a
542:: Fails
461:utcursch
457:Hindutva
352:Muzammil
302:Muzammil
249:Muzammil
122:View log
39:or in a
427:Arif80s
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
78:Inditva
70:Inditva
578:Delete
565:Sitush
561:Delete
544:WP:GNG
540:Delete
477:WP:NEO
473:Delete
440:Delete
205:WP:GNG
201:WP:NEO
141:Google
99:delete
50:delete
527:Edits
495:Edits
444:8,730
350:). --
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
586:talk
569:talk
552:talk
523:Talk
511:. §§
491:Talk
465:talk
431:talk
417:talk
398:talk
384:talk
356:talk
333:talk
306:talk
276:talk
253:talk
229:sst✈
213:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
519:§§
487:§§
455:or
245:ref
191:TWL
120:– (
52:.
588:)
571:)
554:)
546:.
525:/
493:/
463:|
459:.
451:,
433:)
419:)
400:)
386:)
358:)
335:)
327:?
308:)
278:)
255:)
247:--
227:.
215:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
584:(
567:(
550:(
529:}
521:{
497:}
489:{
429:(
415:(
396:(
382:(
354:(
331:(
304:(
274:(
251:(
211:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.