225:, as far as I can see the worse thing about this article is the title. With the given sources (and most of them from Prawda), one could construct a conspiracy theory. The question of debate is whether it should be included in a encyclopedia. Hitting a new editor with the whole book after one day of editing is certainly not the way to make him understand why we don't see room for a certain article. Instead someone should have started by leaving a message indicating the relevant guidelines.
384:
the same way as you should live in Poland to see how the joint forces of Nazi and
Communists in 1939 ripped the country. USSR denied that for 70 years. The article has the full right for existence as there is a real problem! If you did not see it, or just don't want to pay attention to it, it does
419:
I understand that article is controversial from different points of view, as many articles here. However there is no argumentation - just DELETE and POV?! I have made some amendments and complitely changed the Title, while I have added a list of references and links to the mass-media sources and
156:
New-ish user. Article should be tagged for the issues it has and some time given to fix them and perhaps fix the name etc. Obviously it is mostly rubbish but should at least be given some time (more than 1 day!) for the aurthor to fix it and provide sources in the media (which do apparently
302:
and renominate in a week. New article, give the POV name a renaming to something less inflammatory and clean up. if not fixed in 7 days, renominate. there are a lot of valid sources, but the article-as is isn't very good. Failing that, userfy and let him try again later. -
385:
not mean there is no problem! I agree that probably the name in not that OK. As well as if you live in UK, Germany, Canada and don't know that people in Africa die from hunger because they don't have 1$ a day does not mean that there is not such a problem.
371:
and salt. Usalvageably POV. No way to make an NPOV article under this name. The fact that a new editor wrote it does not bring about a whole different set of policies... just a moral responsibility to explain more than usual what we are doing and why.
86:
81:
90:
73:
144:
article but this would have to be written from scratch and the current text would have been totally useless for it. This so called article looks to me as a plainly ax-grinding exercise by someone. --
170:
title? In general it is possible to have an article about
Ukraine's coverage in Russia but that's gotta be under a neutral title (see above) and would have been written from scratch. --
113:
424:
412:
400:
389:
376:
361:
331:
307:
294:
282:
255:
229:
217:
200:
188:
174:
161:
148:
128:
55:
344:
349:
120:
POV-essay. There is no references to any
Information campaign of Russian government at all. Two reference about an extremist leader of a minority party
77:
141:
69:
61:
420:
opinions of the government officials. I still need your balanced & argumented (!) comments in order to improve the article. Thank you. --
408:. Attempt to turn WP into war zone. This topic needs time to be researched with hindsight and w/o emotions running full. OR if you want.
353:
17:
249:
322:
196:
per nom. On the general case, information operations are likely to be extremely difficult to hold wikipedia articles on.
439:
36:
124:, one about withdrawing some trade privileges and one (in an internet forum!) about a demonstration on Ukraine.
438:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
357:
275:
409:
121:
326:
304:
316:
245:
125:
52:
373:
291:
226:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
268:
213:
264:
238:
185:
107:
421:
397:
386:
209:
158:
140:. Horribly POV starting from the title itself. I could see a potential for the
171:
145:
345:
No POV or DELETE is not an argument! You just prove to be chauvinistic....
197:
166:
Are you saying that an encyclopedic NPOV article can be made under
432:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
382:ĂťOU SHOULD LIVE NOW IN UKRAINE TO UNDERSTAND THIS VERY PROBLEM
142:
News coverage of
Ukraine in Russia after the Orange Revolution
237:: Too much original research and POV to make it salvageable.
70:
Information warfare against
Ukraine after Orange revolution
62:
Information warfare against
Ukraine after Orange revolution
103:
99:
95:
339:- The article is relevant to the existing problem!
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
442:). No further edits should be made to this page.
210:Ă‹zhiki (Igels HĂ©rissonovich ĂŹzhakoff-Amursky)
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
208:. NPOV is nowhere near in sight.—
24:
263:Loads of NPOV and article fails
1:
425:17:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
413:19:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
401:13:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
390:10:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
377:01:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
362:01:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
332:00:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
308:23:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
295:19:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
283:17:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
256:16:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
230:15:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
218:13:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
201:11:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
189:09:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
175:04:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
162:04:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
149:00:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
129:00:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
56:09:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
459:
395:TITLE AND ARTICLE AMENDED
435:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
290:as inherently POV. --
352:comment was added by
184:, obvious bullsh*t.
122:Vladimir Zhirinovsky
365:
330:
248:
450:
437:
347:
321:
300:Keep but rename,
279:
272:
244:
241:
111:
93:
48:
34:
458:
457:
453:
452:
451:
449:
448:
447:
446:
440:deletion review
433:
410:Pavel Vozenilek
348:—The preceding
329:
277:
270:
239:
84:
68:
65:
46:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
456:
454:
445:
444:
428:
427:
416:
415:
403:
392:
379:
366:
334:
325:
310:
297:
285:
258:
232:
220:
203:
191:
179:
178:
177:
151:
133:
118:
117:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
455:
443:
441:
436:
430:
429:
426:
423:
418:
417:
414:
411:
407:
404:
402:
399:
396:
393:
391:
388:
383:
380:
378:
375:
370:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:64.231.172.91
351:
346:
342:
338:
335:
333:
328:
324:
320:
319:
314:
311:
309:
306:
301:
298:
296:
293:
289:
286:
284:
281:
280:
274:
273:
266:
262:
259:
257:
254:
253:
252:
247:
242:
236:
233:
231:
228:
224:
221:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
202:
199:
195:
192:
190:
187:
183:
180:
176:
173:
169:
165:
164:
163:
160:
155:
152:
150:
147:
143:
139:
136:
135:
134:
131:
130:
127:
126:Alex Bakharev
123:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
53:Mailer Diablo
50:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
434:
431:
405:
394:
381:
374:Jerry lavoie
368:
340:
336:
317:
312:
299:
292:Black Falcon
287:
276:
269:
260:
250:
243:
234:
227:Alf photoman
222:
205:
193:
181:
167:
154:Keep for now
153:
137:
132:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
350:unsigned
323:Contribs
240:Mr.Z-man
157:exist)--
114:View log
341:KEEP IT
337:KEEP IT
318:TeckWiz
315:-POV --
223:Comment
186:KNewman
87:protect
82:history
422:Olgerd
406:Delete
398:Olgerd
387:Olgerd
369:Delete
313:Delete
288:Delete
278:addict
261:Delete
235:Delete
206:Delete
194:Delete
182:Delete
159:Dacium
138:Delete
91:delete
305:Denny
271:Telly
265:WP:OR
172:Irpen
146:Irpen
108:views
100:watch
96:links
49:elete
16:<
358:talk
246:talk
168:this
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
51:. -
216:);
214:yo?
212:• (
198:MLA
112:– (
360:)
343:-
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
364:.
356:(
327:@
267:.
251:¢
116:)
110:)
72:(
47:d
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.