516:
although I do see discussion of the term on g-scholar, it's not a lot for a term put forward in a 2004 book, and, a term that, according to comments above, was used in even earlier articles. More to the point, even where it is discussed, it is the context of discussion of the originator's book.
589:
Varshney mirrors Brash's focus on institutional production of Hindu-Muslim violence in India. I have looked at sources, and what I see is a number of authors, mostly on India, discussing Brash's model. What I do not see is much use or adoption of this term by scholars as a model to analyze
521:
applies because the gauge to judge whether a neologism is working it that it is being picked up by other scholars and applied to new contexts. I see no indication that this term is being used outside of the narrow context in which it was put forward by the term's
168:
642:
The sources provided by
Notecardforfree demonstrate that the subject "institutionalized riot systems" has been analyzed by independent reliable sources. It has been discussed directly and in detail, and the sources are
295:
Easy to find discussions of this theory on G-Scholar. Still considered new and all still mention the originator, but it's getting attention. Article needs to add some of the discussion (pro and con).
466:
439:
464:, a standalone article for this topic is appropriate because the concept of "institutionalized riot systems" was developed in a series of articles and studies that predate the publication of
162:
672:
argument for deletion is well thought out, but the issue I have with it is that simply because the term hasn't been used outside of India (or rarely), doesn't warrant non-inclusion.
121:
94:
89:
98:
364:
313:
81:
228:? I have already provided the reference to the work of the author who invented this term. In future I will further expand it by providing appropriate references.
347:
330:
128:
668:- While I understand E.M.Gregory's point, I think that the citations provided by Notecardforfree show that it barely passes the notability criteria. The
183:
399:
150:
85:
224:
Is there going to be any voting, if this article will be kept or not. May I know the reason why this article is nominated for deletion
683:
660:
632:
599:
584:
531:
508:
487:
451:
428:
404:
373:
356:
339:
322:
304:
287:
237:
219:
144:
63:
17:
499:- Afd is not a clean-up service. notable subject, article needs to be improved but clearly plenty of sources are available.--
77:
69:
140:
190:
612:
575:, citing Varshney's comparison between "institutionalized peace systems" and "institutionalized riot systems"). --
413:
702:
580:
483:
283:
225:
56:
are sufficient. That being said, there is also agreement here that the article needs serious editorial work. --
40:
626:
395:
270:, if you are the author of this page, you should incorporate the sources I cited in the previous sentence (per
572:
259:
156:
250:), but this does appear to be a concept that haas received coverage in reliable sources (see, for example,
471:
698:
595:
527:
424:
369:
352:
335:
318:
36:
563:
identifies as one of the prerequisites for a standalone article about relatively new terms (see, e.g.,
576:
479:
461:
279:
53:
442:. The topic adds to the notability of the book, but I fail to see its use as a stand-alone article.
622:
549:"when secondary sources become available, it will be appropriate to create an article on the topic"
518:
475:
385:
199:
176:
652:
447:
233:
60:
590:
conflicts and riots elsewhere, or even analysis that goes beyond repeating Brash's description.
568:
263:
216:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
697:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
564:
255:
251:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
656:
591:
540:
523:
504:
300:
673:
669:
648:
560:
544:
443:
267:
247:
229:
57:
204:
115:
500:
296:
271:
275:
571:) have used the term outside the context of Brass' works (see, e.g.,
567:, which analyzes the concept). Furthermore, other scholars (such as
691:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
615:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
467:
The
Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India
440:
The
Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India
416:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
438:
to the article about the book which introduced the theory:
52:. The general opinion here is that the sources provided by
111:
107:
103:
175:
274:) and you should restructure the article pursuant to
551:. Many of the sources cited in this discussion talk
621:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
422:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
705:). No further edits should be made to this page.
476:this 1998 article that discusses Brass' theory
365:list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions
314:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
189:
8:
363:Note: This debate has been included in the
346:Note: This debate has been included in the
329:Note: This debate has been included in the
312:Note: This debate has been included in the
362:
348:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
345:
331:list of India-related deletion discussions
328:
311:
474:(tracing its origin to a 1998 study) and
647:the term instead of merely using it, so
548:
246:This article needs work (perhaps even
7:
478:(note: subscription required). --
24:
555:the article (rather than merely
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
78:Institutionalized Riot Systems
70:Institutionalized Riot Systems
1:
405:11:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
374:08:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
357:08:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
340:08:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
323:08:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
305:19:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
288:16:33, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
238:08:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
220:07:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
684:13:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
661:01:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
633:03:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
64:18:11, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
600:18:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
585:17:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
532:17:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
509:17:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
488:20:38, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
452:09:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
429:01:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
722:
226:Knowledge:Deletion_policy
694:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
573:this 2012 book at p.22
470:. See, for example,
384:per WP:NEOLOGISM. §§
635:
569:Ashutosh Varshney
559:the term), which
547:also states that
472:this 2001 article
431:
403:
376:
359:
342:
325:
713:
696:
680:
677:
651:does not apply.
629:
620:
618:
616:
427:
421:
419:
417:
393:
372:
355:
338:
321:
218:
214:
209:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
34:
721:
720:
716:
715:
714:
712:
711:
710:
709:
703:deletion review
692:
678:
675:
636:
631:
627:
611:
609:
577:Notecardforfree
480:Notecardforfree
432:
423:
412:
410:
368:
351:
334:
317:
280:Notecardforfree
210:
205:
203:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
54:Notecardforfree
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
719:
717:
708:
707:
687:
686:
663:
625:
623:The Bushranger
619:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
535:
534:
511:
493:
492:
491:
490:
455:
454:
420:
409:
408:
407:
388:Dharmadhyaksha
378:
377:
360:
343:
326:
308:
307:
290:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
718:
706:
704:
700:
695:
689:
688:
685:
682:
681:
671:
667:
664:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
641:
638:
637:
634:
630:
628:One ping only
624:
617:
614:
601:
597:
593:
588:
587:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
539:
538:
537:
536:
533:
529:
525:
520:
515:
512:
510:
506:
502:
498:
495:
494:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
468:
463:
462:WP:PAGEDECIDE
459:
458:
457:
456:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
434:
433:
430:
426:
425:North America
418:
415:
406:
401:
397:
391:
390:
389:
383:
380:
379:
375:
371:
370:North America
366:
361:
358:
354:
353:North America
349:
344:
341:
337:
336:North America
332:
327:
324:
320:
319:North America
315:
310:
309:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
222:
221:
217:
215:
213:
208:
201:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
693:
690:
674:
665:
644:
639:
610:
556:
552:
519:WP:NEOLOGISM
513:
496:
465:
435:
411:
387:
386:
381:
292:
243:
223:
211:
206:
200:WP:NEOLOGISM
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
49:
47:
31:
28:
592:E.M.Gregory
541:E.M.Gregory
524:E.M.Gregory
522:originator.
163:free images
276:MOS:LAYOUT
699:talk page
666:Weak keep
565:this book
264:this book
260:this book
256:this book
252:this book
37:talk page
701:or in a
613:Relisted
444:Dimadick
414:Relisted
268:Bhvintri
230:Bhvintri
122:View log
58:RoySmith
39:or in a
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
670:WP:NEO
653:Cunard
649:WP:NEO
561:WP:NEO
545:WP:NEO
514:Delete
501:BabbaQ
382:Delete
297:LaMona
262:, and
248:WP:TNT
141:Google
99:delete
61:(talk)
645:about
557:using
553:about
436:Merge
400:Edits
278:. --
244:Keep.
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
679:5969
676:Onel
657:talk
640:Keep
596:talk
581:talk
528:talk
505:talk
497:Keep
484:talk
460:Per
448:talk
396:Talk
301:talk
293:Keep
284:talk
272:WP:V
234:talk
212:4444
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
50:keep
392:§§
266:).
207:KDS
191:TWL
120:– (
659:)
598:)
583:)
543:,
530:)
507:)
486:)
450:)
398:/
367:.
350:.
333:.
316:.
303:)
286:)
258:,
254:,
236:)
202:.
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
655:(
594:(
579:(
526:(
503:(
482:(
446:(
402:}
394:{
299:(
282:(
232:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.