264:
268:
376:
dozens of pages of other-than-kosher sites. If you want to have a more satisfactory search you should have always to look at Google News, Google News archives, Google books and Google scholar. Or add to your search more specific key words such as "News" or "Review" (in this case "Notizie" or
164:
368:
and the first ten or so pages of a search with the film's name in Google yields a number of results from Amazon, YouTube, and other-than-kosher sites), as usual, but wasn't sure what to make of this. Thanks.
272:
308:
to contain sources, as long as they are available. Notability is determined through sources available for a topic, and not whether or not the have been used within an article. See
158:
119:
212:
234:
124:
92:
87:
96:
276:
79:
179:
146:
17:
140:
461:
423:
402:
386:
359:
336:
288:
248:
226:
204:
61:
480:
420:
356:
333:
40:
136:
83:
393:
Clearly, the film has a page on the
Italian Knowledge and there are references there. In any case, my bad. --
398:
200:
186:
476:
456:
57:
36:
413:
349:
326:
382:
342:
313:
284:
172:
75:
67:
394:
196:
152:
244:
222:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
475:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
321:
260:
53:
195:
Non-notable film with no independent reliable sources to support any claim of notability.
438:
378:
317:
309:
280:
450:
296:
per flawed deletion rationale. What the nominator should understand that no article
411:
of your nom statement and add "Withdraw nomination", we can close this discussion.
240:
218:
113:
442:
324:, than it took to create this unneccessary AFD. Close this and let's move on.
345:
to User:Cavarrone for showing just what due diligence at AFD is all about.
312:. The article was less than one month old when nominated. So what? It
364:
Noted; did research (learnt that the film is also known by the name
320:. It would have taken a lot less time to actually have done even
469:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
453:, rather than whether or not sources are present in articles.
346:
109:
105:
101:
171:
372:A search about any topic on "Google search" gives
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
483:). No further edits should be made to this page.
185:
8:
273:topped the box office of its year of release
233:Note: This debate has been included in the
211:Note: This debate has been included in the
232:
213:list of Italy-related deletion discussions
210:
235:list of Film-related deletion discussions
451:significant coverage in reliable sources
314:does not have to be immediately perfect
277:sixth gross in Italian market history
7:
304:of notability, nor does an article
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
275:and, as per 1999, it was the
462:03:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
424:00:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
403:05:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
387:06:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
366:The Taming of the Scoundrel
360:00:13, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
337:20:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
289:18:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
249:16:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
227:16:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
205:11:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
62:03:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
500:
341:And by the way... I offer
472:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
279:. Obviously notable.
269:multiple news sources
259:per patent lack of
76:Il Bisbetico Domato
68:Il Bisbetico Domato
445:is based upon the
48:The result was
460:
251:
238:
229:
216:
491:
474:
459:
457:Northamerica1000
454:
443:Topic notability
416:
352:
329:
322:minimal research
239:
217:
190:
189:
175:
127:
117:
99:
34:
499:
498:
494:
493:
492:
490:
489:
488:
487:
481:deletion review
470:
455:
414:
377:"Recensione").
350:
327:
316:. I agree with
132:
123:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
497:
495:
486:
485:
465:
464:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
409:strike-through
391:
390:
389:
318:User:Cavarrone
291:
253:
252:
230:
193:
192:
129:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
496:
484:
482:
478:
473:
467:
466:
463:
458:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
425:
422:
421:
418:
417:
410:
406:
405:
404:
400:
396:
395:Qwerty Binary
392:
388:
384:
380:
375:
371:
370:
367:
363:
362:
361:
358:
357:
354:
353:
347:
344:
340:
339:
338:
335:
334:
331:
330:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
255:
254:
250:
246:
242:
236:
231:
228:
224:
220:
214:
209:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
197:Qwerty Binary
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
471:
468:
447:availability
446:
434:
419:
412:
408:
407:If you do a
373:
365:
355:
348:
332:
325:
305:
301:
297:
293:
265:book sources
256:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
435:Speedy Keep
300:to make an
294:Speedy Keep
271:, the film
159:free images
54:Mark Arsten
50:Speedy Keep
263:, tons of
477:talk page
379:Cavarrone
302:assertion
281:Cavarrone
261:WP:BEFORE
257:Snow Keep
241:• Gene93k
219:• Gene93k
37:talk page
479:or in a
415:Schmidt,
351:Schmidt,
328:Schmidt,
120:View log
39:or in a
439:WP:NRVE
310:WP:NRVE
165:WP refs
153:scholar
93:protect
88:history
374:always
137:Google
97:delete
343:kudos
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
437:per
399:talk
383:talk
306:need
285:talk
267:and
245:talk
223:talk
201:talk
173:FENS
147:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
449:of
298:has
187:TWL
122:•
118:– (
441:.
401:)
385:)
287:)
247:)
237:.
225:)
215:.
203:)
167:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
397:(
381:(
283:(
243:(
221:(
199:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.