Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Ireyomi - Knowledge

Source 📝

713:
the exact same article had been written with "Dutch" or "Greek" instead of "Yoruba" (both languages with fewer native speakers than Yoruba) it wouldn't have attracted such vitriolic criticism and calls for speedy deletion. Once again, these calls were clearly based on a racist view of "common sense", and you, as a self-professed liberal, need to consider carefully why you called for speedy deletion.
712:
But those comments were obviously untrue for the article, which was written in perfectly grammatical English but just with some quotation marks missing, so they were obviously based on the impossibility of any article about an African name being worthy of consideration for inclusion. I'm sure that if
532:
That is a subjective criterion that is not one of our criteria for speedy deletion. Please let's concentrate on whether this qualifies for plain old non-speedy deletion, rather than get into a feeding frenzy of editors calling for speedy deletion as some sort of punishment for an editor, probably not
675:
as notability has not been shown and my efforts to find such notability have been unsuccessful, but certainly not "speedy delete" on the basis of the racist "common sense" that says that African names "make no sense" or are "gibberish" or are "worthless" or are otherwise incapable of being notable.
618:
I suppose the common sense that you are talking about is the common sense that we can have loads of article about European names but that it is inconceivable that we should have an article about an African name. It's pretty obvious what type of thought process that common sense is based on, but I
377:
The only comprehensibility improvement that I made was to add two pairs of quotation marks - no change of wording was needed. Missing quotation marks don't turn grammatical sentences into gibberish, so please don't be so rude about other people's contributions.
350:
Or perhaps it's just a poorly-written, poorly-punctuated, one-line article which you had to go and fix in order to make more comprehensible. It could be that, too. In any case, it could be speedied entirely out of
555:
The fact that it was created by a new user does not save the article from being worthless. There's virtually no chance the article will be kept and it's thus better off speedily deleted as a time-saving measure.
163: 436:
My statement was based on the "clear evidence" of the fact that I didn't know just what the article was trying to tell me. You could have politely informed me, but you decided to be snippy instead.
332:
This may well not be a suitable topic for a Knowledge article, but anyone who says that this "makes no sense" or is "a bunch of gibberish" needs to improve their English comprehension skills.
533:
a native speaker of English, who had the temerity to create an article that doesn't meet our notability standards. Several editors in this discussion need to read, and act on,
574:
There you go again, being rude about another editor's efforts to create an article. And we don't speedily delete articles as a time-saving measure, but on the basis of
116: 236: 157: 714: 677: 620: 579: 538: 486: 419: 379: 333: 123: 699: 396:
Pot and kettle. You walked into this discussion saying that we "need to improve our English comprehension skills", and later, in
281: 640:. You are not being very constructive. I'm not interested in getting into a flame war over a one-line article, but my vote for 17: 741: 695: 277: 178: 89: 84: 145: 93: 764: 40: 737: 76: 718: 681: 624: 583: 542: 490: 423: 383: 337: 259:
At the moment, I see no evidence of notability. Couldn't find any scholarly works about the name either. --
298: 264: 244: 139: 760: 597: 352: 54: 36: 135: 645: 601: 557: 437: 401: 360: 315: 222: 171: 745: 722: 703: 685: 676:
There are several participants in this discussion who should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.
653: 628: 609: 587: 565: 546: 523: 494: 476: 445: 427: 409: 387: 368: 341: 323: 302: 285: 268: 248: 227: 206: 80: 58: 649: 605: 561: 519: 472: 441: 405: 400:, that we "seem unable to read English". I don't know what kind of responses you were expecting. 364: 319: 185: 294: 260: 240: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
759:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
600:. If you give me one reason why this article might be worth keeping, I may give it a chance. 72: 64: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
202: 637: 534: 216: 596:
Then we might have to look into being a bit more flexible with the rules, or, again,
575: 507: 468: 356: 195: 151: 311: 110: 198: 355:, being extremely short, unreferenced, and with no indication of passing 694:
They were most obviously talking about the article, not the name... --
753:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
418:
My statement was based on clear evidence. Yours was not.
397: 106: 102: 98: 170: 619:don't think that spelling it out would be helpful. 314:. Just a bunch of gibberish, as far as I can tell. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 767:). No further edits should be made to this page. 184: 8: 237:list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions 235:Note: This debate has been included in the 234: 485:But the nom didn't say "speedy delete". 7: 736:Will someone please get the hook? 24: 194:Unreferenced and non-notable per 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 576:specific, limited, criteria 784: 578:, which don't apply here. 276:Could've been speedied. -- 756:Please do not modify it. 746:11:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC) 723:19:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC) 704:14:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC) 686:19:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC) 654:21:06, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 629:20:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 610:20:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 588:20:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 566:20:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 547:17:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 524:04:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 495:17:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 477:21:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 446:20:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 428:20:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 410:20:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 388:17:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 369:14:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 342:17:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 324:14:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 303:10:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 286:08:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 269:06:55, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 249:06:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 228:05:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 207:17:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC) 59:00:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 738:And Adoil Descended 293:makes no sense. --— 598:using common sense 506:Utterly needless. 521: 251: 775: 758: 520: 517: 512: 398:this edit reason 225: 189: 188: 174: 126: 114: 96: 57: 34: 783: 782: 778: 777: 776: 774: 773: 772: 771: 765:deletion review 754: 734:Snowball Delete 642:speedy deletion 513: 508: 223: 131: 122: 87: 71: 68: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 781: 779: 770: 769: 749: 748: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 707: 706: 689: 688: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 632: 631: 613: 612: 591: 590: 569: 568: 550: 549: 527: 526: 500: 499: 498: 497: 480: 479: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 431: 430: 413: 412: 391: 390: 372: 371: 353:WP:COMMONSENSE 345: 344: 327: 326: 305: 288: 271: 253: 252: 231: 230: 192: 191: 128: 67: 62: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 780: 768: 766: 762: 757: 751: 750: 747: 743: 739: 735: 732: 731: 724: 720: 716: 715:86.17.222.157 711: 710: 709: 708: 705: 701: 697: 693: 692: 691: 690: 687: 683: 679: 678:86.17.222.157 674: 671: 670: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 636: 635: 634: 633: 630: 626: 622: 621:86.17.222.157 617: 616: 615: 614: 611: 607: 603: 599: 595: 594: 593: 592: 589: 585: 581: 580:86.17.222.157 577: 573: 572: 571: 570: 567: 563: 559: 554: 553: 552: 551: 548: 544: 540: 539:86.17.222.157 536: 531: 530: 529: 528: 525: 522: 518: 516: 511: 505: 504:Speedy delete 502: 501: 496: 492: 488: 487:86.17.222.157 484: 483: 482: 481: 478: 474: 470: 466: 465:Speedy delete 463: 462: 447: 443: 439: 435: 434: 433: 432: 429: 425: 421: 420:86.17.222.157 417: 416: 415: 414: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 394: 393: 392: 389: 385: 381: 380:86.17.222.157 376: 375: 374: 373: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 349: 348: 347: 346: 343: 339: 335: 334:86.17.222.157 331: 330: 329: 328: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308:Speedy delete 306: 304: 300: 296: 292: 291:Speedy Delete 289: 287: 283: 279: 275: 274:Speedy Delete 272: 270: 266: 262: 258: 255: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 233: 232: 229: 226: 220: 219: 214: 211: 210: 209: 208: 204: 200: 197: 187: 183: 180: 177: 173: 169: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 137: 134: 133:Find sources: 129: 125: 121: 118: 112: 108: 104: 100: 95: 91: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 69: 66: 63: 61: 60: 56: 55:North America 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 755: 752: 733: 672: 641: 514: 509: 503: 464: 307: 295:Oluwa2Chainz 290: 273: 261:Lemongirl942 256: 241:Lemongirl942 217: 212: 193: 181: 175: 167: 160: 154: 148: 142: 132: 119: 49: 47: 31: 28: 467:per nom. -- 224:talk to me? 158:free images 299:talk to me 761:talk page 696:Mr. Magoo 278:Mr. Magoo 218:Jimfbleak 37:talk page 763:or in a 646:WPancake 644:stands. 638:WP:ADHOM 602:WPancake 558:WPancake 469:Dcirovic 438:WPancake 402:WPancake 361:WPancake 316:WPancake 215:per nom 117:View log 39:or in a 535:WP:BITE 164:WP refs 152:scholar 90:protect 85:history 73:Ireyomi 65:Ireyomi 673:Delete 357:WP:GNG 257:Delete 213:Delete 199:Drm310 196:WP:GNG 136:Google 94:delete 50:delete 510:sixty 312:WP:G1 179:JSTOR 140:books 124:Stats 111:views 103:watch 99:links 16:< 742:talk 719:talk 700:talk 682:talk 650:talk 625:talk 606:talk 584:talk 562:talk 543:talk 515:nine 491:talk 473:talk 442:talk 424:talk 406:talk 384:talk 365:talk 338:talk 320:talk 310:per 297:»» ( 282:talk 265:talk 245:talk 203:talk 172:FENS 146:news 107:logs 81:talk 77:edit 186:TWL 115:– ( 52:. 744:) 721:) 702:) 684:) 652:) 627:) 608:) 586:) 564:) 545:) 537:. 493:) 475:) 444:) 426:) 408:) 386:) 367:) 359:. 340:) 322:) 301:) 284:) 267:) 247:) 239:. 221:- 205:) 166:) 109:| 105:| 101:| 97:| 92:| 88:| 83:| 79:| 740:( 717:( 698:( 680:( 648:( 623:( 604:( 582:( 560:( 541:( 489:( 471:( 440:( 422:( 404:( 382:( 363:( 336:( 318:( 280:( 263:( 243:( 201:( 190:) 182:· 176:· 168:· 161:· 155:· 149:· 143:· 138:( 130:( 127:) 120:· 113:) 75:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
North America
00:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Ireyomi
Ireyomi
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:GNG
Drm310
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.