260:(now dead--and "Kraftbrands" is accepted here as a reliable source?) supposedly verifies that the thing has lots of pieces. But it's dead and unreliable. Well, I could go on, but I think the point is made: there are no reliable, independent sources, just blogs and fansites and in-universe books (which list all these things because they're part of the universe, and so don't contribute to notability).
375:
Nomination is inaccurate as of my review. It talks about reception, movie adaptations, and others, and has well more than enough sourcing to meet the GNG. Once the GNG is met, additional questionable or self-published sources don't magically harm notability.
283:
There are 52 in-line citations and 2 book sources in the bibliography. 52+2=54. If we look at the first of the citations, that's a reference to an article in IGN which ranks the subject as the third best
Autobot. This seems fine as coverage.
201:
No references but in-universe guides and toy catalogs, so no kind of notability is established. No surprise then that this article contains nothing more than plot (OR) and details about dimensions of toys and such.
170:
336:
306:
220:
The page has 54 sources and the nomination is quite unconvincing in its airy dismissal of these. This seems to be a blatantly frivolous nomination without a trace of due diligence per
123:
321:
164:
238:
You miscounted. There are 52 references; perhaps you simply copied this from another AfD. The same objection applies: 18 of those "sources" are of
130:
250:, explain to me how that "source" verifies that something was "remolded into Ratchet", whatever the hell that's supposed to mean.
17:
96:
91:
185:
100:
53:
152:
404:
83:
61:
40:
289:
229:
239:
146:
400:
340:
325:
310:
36:
142:
57:
385:
367:
343:
328:
313:
293:
285:
269:
253:
247:
233:
225:
211:
178:
65:
381:
257:
192:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
399:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
355:
265:
221:
207:
243:
158:
377:
363:
87:
117:
261:
203:
359:
79:
71:
393:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
246:
is a reliable source? A picture on another fansite? Please,
337:
list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions
307:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
113:
109:
105:
177:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
407:). No further edits should be made to this page.
322:list of Television-related deletion discussions
354:per Colonel Warden. Alternatively, a merge to
191:
8:
335:Note: This debate has been included in the
320:Note: This debate has been included in the
305:Note: This debate has been included in the
334:
319:
304:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
386:08:41, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
368:16:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
344:14:29, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
329:14:29, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
314:14:29, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
294:00:39, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
270:18:54, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
234:12:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
212:01:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
66:17:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
358:is preferable to deletion.
424:
256:is explicitly a fansite.
396:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
242:--pages on a fansite.
48:The result was
346:
331:
316:
54:non-admin closure
415:
398:
356:List of Autobots
341:Northamerica1000
326:Northamerica1000
311:Northamerica1000
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
423:
422:
418:
417:
416:
414:
413:
412:
411:
405:deletion review
394:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
58:DavidLeighEllis
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
421:
419:
410:
409:
389:
388:
370:
348:
347:
332:
317:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
276:
275:
274:
273:
252:Need I go on?
248:Colonel Warden
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
420:
408:
406:
402:
397:
391:
390:
387:
383:
379:
374:
371:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:
349:
345:
342:
338:
333:
330:
327:
323:
318:
315:
312:
308:
303:
302:
295:
291:
287:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
272:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
395:
392:
372:
351:
251:
217:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
218:Speedy Keep
165:free images
401:talk page
240:this kind
222:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
403:or in a
378:Jclemens
124:View log
80:Ironhide
72:Ironhide
39:or in a
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
286:Warden
262:Drmies
226:Warden
204:Drmies
143:Google
101:delete
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
382:talk
373:Keep
364:talk
352:Keep
290:talk
266:talk
258:This
254:This
244:This
230:talk
208:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
50:keep
360:BOZ
193:TWL
122:– (
52:. (
384:)
366:)
339:.
324:.
309:.
292:)
268:)
232:)
224:.
210:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
56:)
380:(
362:(
288:(
264:(
228:(
206:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.