537:, I'm afraid I disagree with you there. If THRoPF hadn't notified me I (very probably) wouldn't have found this discussion. He/she was not, in my view, canvassing but simply notifying editors he/she knew were interested in the topic about this discussion. And since we're an unruly lot in this area, I'd say the notion that editors would come over and dutifully line up and say 'delete!' would be wildly over-optimistic, and I'm sure THRoPF would agree with me. On the substantive matter at hand, I'd say Jeremy's detailed analysis and proposal just about sums it up as far as I'm concerned.
617:; we cannot have both. There are two possible solutions: (1) merge to that article (2) restructure that article so that this article can be a sub-article to one section, linked by a main template. I would prefer the merge option, but there is probably not very much content in this article to be trasferred in merging. Note I was also summoned here by
595:
the creation of the "empire" has significance, but as a geo-political entity, it is synonymous with "fascist Italy," or very nearly so. What is important is not the victory of this point of view or that, but the logical, coherent presentation of information in a way that will be most accessible and
299:
This is a goofy setup. It looks as though this article is not a content fork of the entire article, but a split-out of the section currently titled "Fascism and the "Italian Empire" (1922-1940)". However, the name
Italian Empire
563:
On the article, Iโll need to read them, but offhand Iโm not averse to separate pages on the various stages of a countryโs existence, if there is something worth saying; haven't we done that for other countries with empires?
474:. The fact that I neutrally notified only the small set of people who were involved with a similar issue and subject (and some of whom disagreed with me until we all found consensus) can be verified
178:
What content deserves to be at
Italian Empire (entity, 1936โ1943) but not Italian Colonial Empire? None, as far as I can see. Again, the two were one and the same thing after the declaration.
92:
87:
96:
79:
125:
168:
The "Italian Empire" was officially declared by
Mussolini in 1936 but he was just giving a name to something that was the same the day after his proclamation as the day before.
254:
declare the "Italian Empire" in 1936 (see Lowe, C.J. (2002). Italian
Foreign Policy 1870-1940. Routledge.,p289). So I personally don't dispute that this thing actually
138:
197:
has its own article, but this was a term that spanned eras and political administrations, and there is no German Reich (entity, 19XX-XX) article.
75:
67:
630:
605:
573:
546:
521:
488:
465:
443:
402:
341:
281:
268:
238:
207:
153:
61:
461:
337:
145:
17:
618:
493:
Why notify anyone on talk pages? If they are part of a project, that found the previous deleted page, they will find this one.
480:
408:
260:
222:
199:
83:
273:
What I meant was that the state did not become an "Empire". The King did not proclaim himself the "Emperor of Italy". --
645:
36:
542:
475:
457:
452:(which we eventually got a good consensus on). I think they contacted us because the article is a similar topic.
333:
644:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
448:
In defense of the nom, I don't think we'd all share one position. We were on differing sides on the merge of
626:
614:
172:
161:
412:
353:
193:, rather than have their own article (despite the latter being the official name from 1942). Admittedly,
149:
591:
blue? Without some coherence and plan to the presentation of the material, we end up duplicating. As a
324:
the sections "Fascism and the "Italian Empire" (1922-1940)" and "End of Empire (1943-1960)" into it, and
601:
588:
538:
453:
449:
329:
186:
57:
622:
583:
as a POV-fork, which is disallowed: We get a proliferation of articles along these lines. Is
478:. I have asked Ctjf83 to strike out his comment, we'll see if he is decent enough to do so.
470:
Thankyou Jeremy. That is exactly what I did. Ho hum, some people just shoot first and don't
250:
Although you're agreeing with my AfD, I have to say that's not true, Herr
Direktor: Mussolini
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
597:
569:
517:
439:
398:
471:
53:
317:
309:
49:
584:
275:
232:
258:, I just dispute that it requires a separate article from Italian Colonial Empire.
194:
190:
113:
171:
There is already an existing article for the "entity" that
Mussolini renamed, at
565:
534:
495:
417:
376:
182:
596:
logical for readers. This name and presentation fails those vital criteria.
413:
leave a note at the discussion itself that you sent out such friendly notices
304:
used only from 1936 to 1943, according to the article. At the same time, the
312:
redirects to this article; this was the official name. Therefore, I'd say
308:
sections of "Italian
Colonial Empire" don't seem to address the empire.
164:. I am proposing this article for deletion for the following reasons:
411:
was intentionally trying to sway votes for delete. Perhaps next time "
48:
Jeremy's solution seemed to have most support. I've moved this to
638:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
613:-- This article is covering the same ground as two section of
372:
369:
366:
363:
360:
357:
294:
120:
109:
105:
101:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
648:). No further edits should be made to this page.
160:This article is essentially a content fork from
328:"Italian Colonial Empire" to "Italian Empire".
8:
139:list of History-related deletion discussions
230:. Open and shut, no such entity existed. --
555:Echo Jeremy and Alistair on "canvassing".
356:to get votes in favor of his/her position
137:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
352:It appears the nominator has been
76:Italian Empire (entity, 1936โ1943)
68:Italian Empire (entity, 1936โ1943)
24:
175:: the two were one and the same.
619:User:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick
409:User:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick
1:
52:and have proposed the merge.
407:After review, I don't think
181:The situation is similar to
631:21:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
606:16:41, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
574:16:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
547:14:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
522:11:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
489:10:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
466:09:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
444:04:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
403:03:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
342:00:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
282:00:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
269:00:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
239:00:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
208:00:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
154:00:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
62:05:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
665:
483:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick
263:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick
225:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick
202:The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick
641:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
615:Italian Colonial Empire
173:Italian Colonial Empire
162:Italian Colonial Empire
589:Italy in World War 2
450:Italian Mare Nostrum
187:Greater German Reich
293:DISCLAIMER: I WAS
189:which redirect to
46:Redirect and merge
44:The result was
472:assume good faith
298:
156:
142:
656:
643:
520:
514:
511:
508:
505:
502:
499:
487:
485:
442:
436:
433:
430:
427:
424:
421:
401:
395:
392:
389:
386:
383:
380:
292:
280:
278:
267:
265:
237:
235:
229:
227:
206:
204:
143:
133:
123:
117:
99:
34:
664:
663:
659:
658:
657:
655:
654:
653:
652:
646:deletion review
639:
539:AlasdairGreen27
512:
509:
506:
503:
500:
497:
494:
481:
479:
454:JeremyMcCracken
434:
431:
428:
425:
422:
419:
416:
393:
390:
387:
384:
381:
378:
375:
330:JeremyMcCracken
276:
274:
261:
259:
233:
231:
223:
221:
200:
198:
119:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
662:
660:
651:
650:
634:
633:
611:Probably merge
608:
577:
576:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
550:
549:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
405:
345:
344:
318:Italian Empire
310:Italian Empire
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
242:
241:
213:
211:
210:
179:
176:
169:
158:
157:
130:
129:
70:
65:
50:Italian empire
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
661:
649:
647:
642:
636:
635:
632:
628:
624:
623:Peterkingiron
620:
616:
612:
609:
607:
603:
599:
594:
593:political act
590:
586:
585:fascist Italy
582:
579:
578:
575:
571:
567:
562:
561:
554:
553:
552:
551:
548:
544:
540:
536:
533:
532:
523:
519:
516:
515:
492:
491:
490:
486:
484:
477:
473:
469:
468:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
446:
445:
441:
438:
437:
414:
410:
406:
404:
400:
397:
396:
374:
373:
370:
367:
364:
361:
358:
355:
350:
347:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
296:
291:
290:
283:
279:
272:
271:
270:
266:
264:
257:
253:
249:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
236:
228:
226:
219:
216:
215:
214:
209:
205:
203:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
167:
166:
165:
163:
155:
151:
147:
140:
136:
132:
131:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
640:
637:
610:
592:
580:
496:
482:
418:
377:
351:
348:
325:
321:
313:
305:
301:
262:
255:
251:
247:
224:
217:
212:
201:
195:German Reich
191:Nazi Germany
159:
146:65.78.13.238
134:
45:
43:
31:
28:
598:Utgard Loki
535:User:Ctjf83
297:TO COMMENT.
183:Third Reich
54:Tim Vickers
587:blue? Is
354:Canvassing
462:contribs
338:contribs
326:redirect
277:DIREKTOR
234:DIREKTOR
126:View log
349:Comment
256:existed
248:Comment
93:protect
88:history
581:Delete
566:Xyl 54
220:, per
218:Delete
121:delete
97:delete
322:merge
306:other
295:ASKED
124:) โ (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
627:talk
602:talk
570:talk
543:talk
518:Talk
476:here
458:talk
440:Talk
399:Talk
334:talk
314:move
185:and
150:talk
135:Note
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
621:.
460:) (
336:) (
316:to
302:was
252:did
141:.
629:)
604:)
572:)
545:)
464:)
415:"
371:,
368:,
365:,
362:,
359:,
340:)
320:,
152:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
625:(
600:(
568:(
541:(
513:3
510:8
507:f
504:j
501:t
498:C
456:(
435:3
432:8
429:f
426:j
423:t
420:C
394:3
391:8
388:f
385:j
382:t
379:C
332:(
148:(
144:โ
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.