585:
the area he lives in is not a show of notability, it is what is expected. However having long followed these debates on local politicians even that is often not what is brought up. In the case of
Richard Notte the keep faction was trying to use articles about the redevelopment of a large automotive assembly plant that named dropped Notte as one of the members of the city council involved in tax incentive plans to create this outcome, without telling us anything more about Notte that he held the title of mayor, that was not the level of indepth coverage neeeded to pass GNG. For too long those who say "the person passes GNG", have assumed that having an article published in a newspaper with your name mentioned in it constituted a pass of GNG. Well it does not, and so unless we can see the actual claimed substantive articles used and linked to in the Knowledge (XXG) article, we should go ahead and delete over these boys who cried wolf, I mean GNG.
561:, information which isn't currently in the article. There was an article which mentioned him from Idaho, but it was only a short quote showing how the Washington metro area was rationing gasoline. Right now we have four sources, two from the same website; one is his obituary, another is primary, the other two a campaign database website. While there was significant coverage for his crime, there's nowhere near enough here to get him past
420:
Until you actually produce sources, I am going to continue to assume that they do not exist. Accusing me and others of not doing searches is both uncivil and a waste of time. Somehow you have the time to dig through old AfDs to critize but linking to sources is too much work for you. I did a search
584:
What is needed is broad coverage that goes above and beyond what would be found about any politician. I can find this or more coverage of the first directly elected figure head mayor we had in my city of 135,000 people. A few articles here and there on a local politician in a newspaper that covers
387:
is easy! Serially dropping delete opinions, such as one participant below, including one of the most decorated German actresses -- that's easy! At WP we have a class of serial nominators who nominate articles and support nominations without sufficient references in the texts, instead of tagging
368:
Regardless of whether you want to put the work in to add the sources to the article, now would be a great time to share them with everyone (even by just posting links here). It's easy to claim "there are sources" without actually providing
453:
No, you didn't, I'm still waiting to see the sources. You're either withholding the sources which is really pointless and childish OR they don't exist. Either way, telling us sources exist, but refusing to provide them is a bad faith
557:
169:
394:
I do not think it is a fair expectation from those who disagree with deletions to reference any article at hand, whether at AFDs or elsewhere. It takes a lot of time to do this right.
221:
163:
238:
122:
556:
Unfortunately, I do not understand the keep votes above. The best sources I can find on him were articles involving his year's probation for violating elections laws
388:{{cn}}, {{references}}, and {{refimprove}}. They claim to have looked at other sources but the amount and depth that is out there often makes one wonder.
421:
and found basically nothing, so did everyone else so far. So I'll ask again, if you found sources, may we please see them? Is that too much to ask? The
129:
506:
95:
90:
99:
82:
522:
concerns here. Knowledge (XXG) has an unfortunate tendency towards recentism, so we should cherish our articles on historic politicians.
502:
17:
501:. Newspapers.com has a dozen articles on him starting in 1978 through the 1980s as well as multiple obits from various outlets. --
184:
151:
611:
40:
354:
Haven't put in much yet. There is so much more. In any case, what counts are the sources "out there", not "in here".
145:
594:
576:
548:
531:
510:
463:
448:
434:
406:
378:
363:
349:
335:
317:
303:
289:
271:
247:
230:
213:
64:
590:
141:
86:
571:
392:
201:
191:
78:
70:
607:
395:
389:
36:
586:
242:
225:
177:
422:
566:
157:
280:
How does it pass GNG? outside of an obituary, there's a clear lack of reliable sources here.--
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
606:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
544:
527:
459:
444:
430:
402:
374:
359:
345:
331:
313:
299:
285:
267:
209:
562:
519:
384:
323:
55:
116:
559:
540:
523:
455:
440:
426:
415:
398:
370:
355:
341:
327:
309:
295:
281:
263:
205:
425:
is on you to provide the sources, not on us to prove that they do not exist.--
391:
The importance of the people or organizations at hand often makes one wonder.
52:. Both "keep" opinions do not actually cite the sources they assert exist.
322:
In my research, I found sufficient reliable sources for keeping under the
397:
If all can check and provide their opinions then all can do this.
602:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
498:
259:
383:
Thorough research is never easy. Nominating and skipping the
518:. As the county executive has died in 2011, there are no
326:. Given the time, I'll try to add some to the article.
112:
108:
104:
176:
190:
539:as typical local coverage of a local politician.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
614:). No further edits should be made to this page.
237:Note: This discussion has been included in the
222:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
220:Note: This discussion has been included in the
239:list of Maryland-related deletion discussions
8:
236:
219:
308:Yes, there, here, or anywhere else.--
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
294:"Here" as in the WP article?
439:I answered all that above.
631:
604:Please do not modify it.
595:03:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
577:08:28, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
549:11:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
532:11:35, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
511:14:58, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
464:03:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
449:02:35, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
435:16:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
407:13:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
379:03:38, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
364:03:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
350:03:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
336:03:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
318:03:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
304:03:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
290:02:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
272:02:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
248:13:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
231:13:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
214:04:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
200:County executive, fails
65:09:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
79:J. Thomas Barranger
71:J. Thomas Barranger
587:John Pack Lambert
250:
233:
63:
622:
574:
419:
340:Ok, we'll see.--
245:
228:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
630:
629:
625:
624:
623:
621:
620:
619:
618:
612:deletion review
570:
413:
243:
226:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
628:
626:
617:
616:
598:
597:
579:
551:
534:
513:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
275:
274:
252:
251:
234:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
627:
615:
613:
609:
605:
600:
599:
596:
592:
588:
583:
582:Strong delete
580:
578:
575:
573:
568:
567:SportingFlyer
564:
560:
558:
555:
552:
550:
546:
542:
538:
535:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
514:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
493:
492:
465:
461:
457:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
432:
428:
424:
417:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
390:
386:
382:
381:
380:
376:
372:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
353:
352:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
320:
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
305:
301:
297:
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
276:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
253:
249:
246:
240:
235:
232:
229:
223:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
202:WP:POLITICIAN
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
603:
601:
581:
569:
553:
536:
515:
494:
255:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
164:free images
58:Sandstein
608:talk page
423:WP:BURDEN
37:talk page
610:or in a
244:MT Train
227:MT Train
123:View log
39:or in a
516:Comment
369:them.--
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
563:WP:GNG
554:Delete
541:Mangoe
537:delete
524:gidonb
520:WP:BLP
456:Rusf10
454:act.--
441:gidonb
427:Rusf10
416:Gidonb
399:gidonb
385:WP:GNG
371:Rusf10
356:gidonb
342:Rusf10
328:gidonb
324:WP:GNG
310:Rusf10
296:gidonb
282:Rusf10
264:gidonb
206:Rusf10
142:Google
100:delete
50:delete
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
591:talk
572:talk
545:talk
528:talk
507:talk
497:per
495:Keep
460:talk
445:talk
431:talk
403:talk
375:talk
360:talk
346:talk
332:talk
314:talk
300:talk
286:talk
268:talk
258:per
256:Keep
210:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
503:RAN
499:GNG
260:GNG
192:TWL
121:– (
593:)
565:.
547:)
530:)
509:)
462:)
447:)
433:)
405:)
377:)
362:)
348:)
334:)
316:)
302:)
288:)
270:)
262:.
241:.
224:.
212:)
204:.
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
589:(
543:(
526:(
505:(
458:(
443:(
429:(
418::
414:@
401:(
373:(
358:(
344:(
330:(
312:(
298:(
284:(
266:(
208:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.