Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Journal of Applied Biomedicine - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

337:
Being listed in databases did not achieve consensus as a method of determining notability. Even so, there is a rough correlation between treatment in secondary sources and being indexed by selective databases. I have found that I can judge journals' notability best using a Google Books search. The
293:
although it is an essay, not accepted policy. One of its criteria is what indexes list the journal, and on that criteria this is borderline. It is listed at Google Scholar, where its articles do get a few citations (41 in one case), although many get none. It is not indexed at PubMed, though its
318:
Personally, I don't think Google Scholar does not contribute anything to notability (to the point that I don't think this should even be listed in journal articles). GS tries to be all inclusive and while that is perhaps a laudable goal, it does mean that being "selected for inclusion" by GS is
319:
rather meaningless. Scopus is slowly becoming a bit like GS, too. PubMed is only important in my eyes if inclusion is because of inclusion in Medline. Many open-access journals are automatically included in PubmedCentral, meaning about as much as being included in GS... --
154: 399:. Besides some trivial databases (GS, DOAJ, etc), the journal is also included in some more discriminating ones (Web of Science, Current Contents, BIOSIS Previews, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service, EBSCO). -- 148: 297:. It claims to be indexed at Web Of Science but I could not find it there. It claims to be listed at Scopus but I don't have access to that database. All in all, not very notable. -- 110: 83: 78: 219: 87: 245: 70: 269:
Open access journals are weird and some tend to catch up. I am guessing there are a lot of journals out there in the field so I doubt that this one will catch up.
290: 169: 136: 74: 17: 434: 408: 388: 357: 328: 306: 278: 260: 234: 208: 130: 52: 66: 58: 189:, presently the only applicable guideline to achieve consensus. No secondary sources discuss this journal. Furthermore, its 126: 448: 36: 176: 115: 447:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
142: 384: 352: 203: 162: 418: 371: 302: 274: 256: 230: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
428: 404: 380: 324: 342:
the journal, and a large number of returns indicates academics read it more than a little.
286: 186: 49: 344: 195: 298: 270: 252: 226: 104: 400: 320: 421:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
374:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
295: 193:
article gets about 40 cites; I don't know what its impact factor is.
441:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
100: 96: 92: 161: 426:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 379:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 175: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 451:). No further edits should be made to this page. 338:Book search may reveal real secondary sources 291:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academic journals) 220:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions 8: 246:list of Science-related deletion discussions 185:This young (2003) journal does not meet the 240: 214: 289:isn't the only guideline; there is also 244:: This debate has been included in the 218:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 294:existence is acknowledged there 67:Journal of Applied Biomedicine 59:Journal of Applied Biomedicine 1: 435:05:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC) 53:08:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC) 409:14:11, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 389:13:40, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 358:22:01, 30 October 2010 (UTC) 329:19:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) 307:18:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC) 279:19:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 261:16:51, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 235:16:51, 28 October 2010 (UTC) 209:03:13, 27 October 2010 (UTC) 187:General Notability Guideline 468: 444:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 437: 391: 263: 249: 237: 223: 459: 446: 431: 425: 423: 378: 376: 356: 349: 250: 224: 207: 200: 180: 179: 165: 118: 108: 90: 34: 467: 466: 462: 461: 460: 458: 457: 456: 455: 449:deletion review 442: 429: 416: 369: 345: 343: 196: 194: 122: 114: 81: 65: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 465: 463: 454: 453: 438: 424: 413: 412: 411: 393: 392: 377: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 332: 331: 310: 309: 281: 264: 238: 183: 182: 119: 116:Afd statistics 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 464: 452: 450: 445: 439: 436: 433: 432: 422: 420: 415: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 395: 394: 390: 386: 382: 375: 373: 368: 367: 359: 354: 350: 348: 341: 336: 335: 334: 333: 330: 326: 322: 317: 314: 313: 312: 311: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 285: 282: 280: 276: 272: 268: 265: 262: 258: 254: 247: 243: 239: 236: 232: 228: 221: 217: 213: 212: 211: 210: 205: 201: 199: 192: 191:highest-cited 188: 178: 174: 171: 168: 164: 160: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 128: 125: 124:Find sources: 120: 117: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 443: 440: 427: 417: 396: 370: 346: 339: 315: 283: 266: 241: 215: 197: 190: 184: 172: 166: 158: 151: 145: 139: 133: 123: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 430:Jujutacular 381:Ron Ritzman 284:Weak delete 149:free images 50:Courcelles 397:Weak keep 353:reasoning 347:Abductive 253:• Gene93k 227:• Gene93k 204:reasoning 198:Abductive 419:Relisted 372:Relisted 299:MelanieN 111:View log 316:Comment 271:Nergaal 267:Neutral 155:WP refs 143:scholar 84:protect 79:history 401:Crusio 321:Crusio 287:WP:GNG 127:Google 88:delete 340:about 170:JSTOR 131:books 113:) • 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 405:talk 385:talk 325:talk 303:talk 275:talk 257:talk 242:Note 231:talk 216:Note 163:FENS 137:news 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 251:-- 225:-- 177:TWL 109:– ( 407:) 387:) 327:) 305:) 277:) 259:) 248:. 233:) 222:. 157:) 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 403:( 383:( 355:) 351:( 323:( 301:( 273:( 255:( 229:( 206:) 202:( 181:) 173:· 167:· 159:· 152:· 146:· 140:· 134:· 129:( 121:( 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Courcelles
08:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Journal of Applied Biomedicine
Journal of Applied Biomedicine
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Afd statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
General Notability Guideline
Abductive
reasoning
03:13, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.