Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Joel Case - Knowledge

Source 📝

135:, who has no edits beyond this page and has reinserted irrelevant material with BLP concerns. Careful Google Scholar searches have failed to uncover more than a possible one or two research papers; however, I do not have access to specialised chemistry publications databases and might have missed something. 446:
Created as a borderline attack page (presumably one of his students' idea of a joke), now that the inappropriate content has been removed there's virtually nothing left. And apparently nothing to add; in addition to the databases already mentioned, Scifinder turns up nothing at all for a Joel Case or
403:
The operative word here is "typically". Yes, that's true, but not invariably. I think I know several non-notable full professors, even at major universities who are not notable. As they are friends of mine, however, I'll refrain from giving examples... :-)
330:
we should have an article about him. The (deleted) comment that "His prefered method of teaching is through sarcasm and bad jokes" is hardly a claim to notability among chemistry teachers, but rather a statement of common practice in the field!
461:. Indeed, created as a personal attack, and probably had the desired effect if the subject of the article and/or the class have been reading this deletion discussion. Not very good timing though - grades (and possibly finals) still to come.-- 174: 480: 120: 205: 374: 370: 289: 233: 17: 207:
and WebOfScience and no other information indicating possible notability given in the article or at the university website.
87: 82: 91: 228:. Likewise, only a associate professor. If Mr. Case had tenure, than I would reconsider my opinion. Likewise, as 74: 514: 186: 141: 36: 513:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
466: 335: 229: 181: 136: 495: 470: 453: 438: 413: 391: 355: 338: 306: 278: 250: 216: 191: 164: 146: 78: 56: 379: 294: 258: 238: 132: 434: 70: 62: 491: 232:
pointed out, if I missed something, just let me know. I have a special place in my heart for
160: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
462: 409: 351: 346:
Even if he were tenured full professor, that in itself would not make him notable either. --
447:
a J C Case, and none of the J Cases it finds seem to work at the University of Wisconsin.
332: 274: 212: 128: 321: 262: 225: 201: 430: 266: 324:, if Dr. Case does something that would merit a Knowledge article in its own right, 487: 373:, especially at a larger university, they have meet the criteria as established at 156: 49: 108: 449: 405: 347: 270: 208: 261:
rank. But simply having tenure is far from sufficient for passing either
224:– At this time. Could find no information, other than one reference in 155:
Searched and found no notability at all, and I would have loved to.
369:– Typically, when an individual rises to the appointment of full 507:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
175:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
257:
Actually, he fairly likely does have tenure, based on his
127:
Apparently non-notable chemistry professor. Prodded by
115: 104: 100: 96: 429:. And I'm an academic chemist, so I should know ;) 481:list of Living people-related deletion discussions 131:; prod removed by page creator & sole author 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 517:). No further edits should be made to this page. 288:- I should have expressed myself differently. 8: 479:: This debate has been included in the 173:: This debate has been included in the 377:. Man, this crowd is tough today :-). 7: 24: 375:Knowledge:Notability (academics) 204:: no citability in googlescholar 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 496:04:09, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 471:01:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 454:18:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 439:17:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 414:17:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 392:16:18, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 356:16:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 339:15:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 307:15:37, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 292:is what I should have said. 279:15:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 251:15:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 217:15:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 192:15:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 165:15:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 147:14:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 57:00:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) 534: 200:. No evidence of passing 510:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 318:Delete without malice 259:Associate Professor 290:Full Professorship 498: 484: 194: 190: 178: 145: 525: 512: 485: 475: 390: 305: 249: 184: 179: 169: 139: 118: 112: 94: 54: 44:The result was 34: 533: 532: 528: 527: 526: 524: 523: 522: 521: 515:deletion review 508: 378: 293: 237: 230:Espresso Addict 182:Espresso Addict 137:Espresso Addict 114: 85: 69: 66: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 531: 529: 520: 519: 502: 500: 499: 473: 456: 441: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 395: 394: 359: 358: 341: 320:To paraphrase 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 254: 253: 226:Google Scholar 219: 195: 167: 125: 124: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 530: 518: 516: 511: 505: 504: 503: 497: 493: 489: 482: 478: 474: 472: 468: 464: 460: 457: 455: 452: 451: 445: 442: 440: 436: 432: 428: 425: 424: 415: 411: 407: 402: 399: 398: 397: 396: 393: 389: 388: 385: 382: 376: 372: 371:Prosessorship 368: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 357: 353: 349: 345: 342: 340: 337: 334: 329: 328: 323: 319: 316: 315: 308: 304: 303: 300: 297: 291: 287: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 255: 252: 248: 247: 244: 241: 235: 231: 227: 223: 220: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203: 199: 196: 193: 188: 183: 176: 172: 168: 166: 162: 158: 154: 151: 150: 149: 148: 143: 138: 134: 130: 122: 117: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 509: 506: 501: 476: 458: 448: 443: 426: 400: 386: 383: 380: 366: 343: 326: 325: 317: 301: 298: 295: 285: 245: 242: 239: 221: 197: 170: 152: 126: 51: 45: 43: 31: 28: 463:Eric Yurken 333:Physchim62 129:Royalbroil 488:• Gene93k 234:academics 71:Joel Case 63:Joel Case 121:View log 401:comment 322:WP:PROF 263:WP:PROF 202:WP:PROF 157:Collect 133:Jrrkulp 88:protect 83:history 52:JForget 459:Delete 450:Iain99 444:Delete 427:Delete 406:Crusio 384:hoesss 348:Crusio 344:Delete 336:(talk) 299:hoesss 267:WP:BIO 243:hoesss 222:Delete 198:Delete 153:Delete 116:delete 92:delete 46:Delete 431:Chris 367:Reply 286:Reply 271:Nsk92 209:Nsk92 119:) – ( 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 492:talk 477:Note 467:talk 435:talk 410:talk 352:talk 327:then 275:talk 213:talk 187:talk 171:Note 161:talk 142:talk 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 486:-- 483:. 265:or 177:. 494:) 469:) 437:) 412:) 404:-- 354:) 277:) 269:. 236:. 215:) 163:) 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 48:-- 490:( 465:( 433:( 408:( 387:S 381:S 350:( 302:S 296:S 273:( 246:S 240:S 211:( 189:) 185:( 180:— 159:( 144:) 140:( 123:) 113:( 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
JForget
00:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Joel Case
Joel Case
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Royalbroil
Jrrkulp
Espresso Addict
talk
14:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Collect
talk
15:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
Espresso Addict
talk
15:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
WP:PROF

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.