409:. Sadly there is no full list of recipients for these on no.wikipedia as there is for the preceding and overlapping awards, but I find no mention anywhere of there being only 27 recipients of either, and it's also suspicious that the article states he also received the Norwegian War medal, but the articles on the Haakon VII awards say that they are the third grade of the Norwegian War Medal. There may well be sources that show that the original contributor merely misinterpreted details and that this guy does indeed merit an article - albeit I think more logically on the 2 Norwegian wikipedias - but if so I think those sources are either newspapers that aren't indexed by Google, or sources like those given for the 2 Haakon VII awards, of which the first 2 look especially interesting. If someone can get access to such confirmatory material, great, and I tidied up the English in case, but in its absence and given the discrepancies, I can't support keeping the article.
457:
several other articles. Similarly, the fact that someone isn't mentioned anywhere on
Knowledge (XXG) shouldn't be taken as evidence (strong or weak) that they are non-notable. In this case, with the circumstances of his merited act being withheld, it would be easy to imagine how he would not be mentioned. __
441:
Neither is en.wikipedia complete! It would be pretty simple to translate the en. article; it indicates no one over there thinks he's notable enough to justify an article. But actually, I think you mistake my point. He doesn't come up at all, with or without an umlaut. Given the claims in the article
479:
Going back to the original article - which is basically all we have to go on - we find the statement "In 1943 Mr. Klüver and his crew at the d / S Lysefjord was bombed by japaneese submarines outside the coast of Cuba." I don't think we need to dwell on how remarkably implausible this is... The "H7"
517:
mate, and he could not have returned to serving on it - it gone. So as I say, assuming good faith, maybe the original editor misinterpreted some stuff, but the contradictions and absence of mentions of any such extraordinary person make me less confident we can find the evidence to show that that's
496:
Basically, we've taken a terrible article making silly claims and polished it a bit until it looks superficially plausible, but the underlying claims are still completely and comprehensively unsupported - and they don't appear to accord with what we know about
Norwegian decorations, which is where
456:
I maintain the same position. I don't find it particularly telling that he is not mentioned on the
Norwegian Knowledge (XXG), and I don't think that is a strong indicator of his non-notability. There are many orphaned pages, so it's not even necessary for someone who has a page to be mentioned in
308:
Interesting mystery. He has received a medal for heroism which only 27 other people (presumably all
Norwegians) have received, and the circumstances of his deed appear to be classified. I dislike seeing the AfD instrument applied to articles basically on the grounds of poor references, of course
400:
make me less confident of the accuracy of the article. It's also suspicious that he's utterly absent from
Norwegian Knowledge (XXG). However, there are 2 medals simultaneously created for WW2 service that the original editor may have meant by "H7 medal": it could be the
169:
539:
I think, though, we still ought to delete. None of the significant material is actually cited in any way - the award of the medal, etc - and all we can actually confirm is that someone by this name existed and went to sea.
387:
Sharing the feeling that it would be sad to lose this one in view of its claims, I've just done a big search and found only one mention of him, which I added to the article. That source has him as second mate on the
345:
I don't have any specific suggestions, but I still think giving the issue time is more appropriate and beneficial than attempting to remove the article. As I wrote, unless it's a hoax, this man is notable.
492:
recipients alone - and easily as many again listed in other issues of the
Gazette. Unless "the highest accomondation a civillian can recieve in Norway" was mostly awarded to foreigners, this again seems
427:
I would just interject that it is not suspicious that he isn't mentioned on the
Norwegian Knowledge (XXG). It is not completed, and lacking an article like this would be not particularly spectacular. __
366:
vote. I will not however support deletion. This article is somewhat of a conundrum, and I don't really see the big harm in keeping it for further investigations into the issues presented here. __
536:
submarine, though! I'm a bit torn here - there's just enough connection to reality I can't write it off as a silly hoax, but the rest of it is sufficiently wrong and/or vague that I'd want to.
200:
A search for sources in several places have not succeeded, so It is not possible to verify the contents of this article. If anyone find sources I am happy to withdraw this nomination.
163:
442:
I'd expected to find a fleeting mention, maybe with a variant spelling, maybe only on nn.wikipedia, maybe not even by name but somewhere in articles on the medals or on the ships.
124:
309:
unless a substantial work has been done to dig up references, which I cannot see in this case. I'd say this person is clearly notable unless the article is a hoax. __
282:
256:
129:
97:
92:
101:
392:, not first, and the ship sank and is not mentioned as recovered, so how could he have returned to service on it? I was not able to connect him to the
84:
219:. I picked that up in the Google News link and it gives a interesting information, but it's still leaving the rest of the article uncited. --
481:
220:
216:
184:
151:
17:
145:
570:
549:
527:
506:
466:
451:
436:
418:
375:
355:
340:
318:
297:
271:
242:
228:
209:
66:
585:
36:
141:
191:
584:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
88:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
233:
Thanks, but that does not seem to be the same guy. Correct name, but wrong birthyear, country and occupation.
224:
80:
72:
523:
447:
414:
157:
566:
513:
Well found! But I did find confirmation the ship was sunk by a sub, and he served on it . . . but as
336:
238:
205:
177:
545:
502:
485:
293:
267:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
519:
443:
410:
562:
462:
432:
371:
351:
332:
314:
234:
201:
541:
498:
289:
263:
118:
480:
medal - it's hard to find any specific evidence of the number of recipients of
362:
With the present status of findings related to this article I will retract my
328:
327:
I have searched A-tekst, bokhylla.no, the usuual google-searches, DIS-norges
458:
428:
367:
347:
310:
402:
406:
578:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
405:
as someone inferred and that is depicted in the article, or the
484:, which is the higher of the two plausible awards, but
114:
110:
106:
176:
190:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
588:). No further edits should be made to this page.
331:and kongehuset.no. Do you have any other ideas?
8:
561:per lack of convincing arguments otherwise.
283:list of People-related deletion discussions
257:list of Norway-related deletion discussions
277:
251:
281:: This debate has been included in the
255:: This debate has been included in the
396:, and the discrepancies regarding the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
497:the claim of notability comes from.
482:King Haakon VII's Cross of Liberty
24:
1:
605:
571:11:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
550:23:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
528:20:27, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
507:11:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
467:18:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
452:16:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
437:14:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
419:12:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
376:09:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
356:11:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
341:10:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
319:08:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
298:01:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
272:01:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
243:13:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
229:13:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
210:11:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
67:20:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
403:Haakon VII Frihetsmedalje
581:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
532:It certainly wasn't a
407:Haakon VII Frihetskors
329:find a grave database
81:Johan Wilhelm Klüver
73:Johan Wilhelm Klüver
44:The result was
394:General Fleischer
300:
286:
274:
260:
596:
583:
287:
261:
215:He's related to
195:
194:
180:
132:
122:
104:
64:
34:
604:
603:
599:
598:
597:
595:
594:
593:
592:
586:deletion review
579:
137:
128:
95:
79:
76:
60:
56:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
602:
600:
591:
590:
574:
573:
555:
554:
553:
552:
537:
518:what happened.
510:
509:
494:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
422:
421:
381:
380:
379:
378:
360:
359:
358:
322:
321:
301:
275:
248:
247:
246:
245:
198:
197:
134:
130:AfD statistics
75:
70:
58:
54:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
601:
589:
587:
582:
576:
575:
572:
568:
564:
560:
557:
556:
551:
547:
543:
538:
535:
531:
530:
529:
525:
521:
516:
512:
511:
508:
504:
500:
495:
491:
487:
483:
478:
477:
468:
464:
460:
455:
454:
453:
449:
445:
440:
439:
438:
434:
430:
426:
425:
424:
423:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
399:
395:
391:
386:
383:
382:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
325:
324:
323:
320:
316:
312:
307:
306:
302:
299:
295:
291:
284:
280:
276:
273:
269:
265:
258:
254:
250:
249:
244:
240:
236:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
221:15.195.201.87
218:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
63:
62:
61:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
580:
577:
558:
533:
514:
489:
397:
393:
389:
384:
363:
304:
303:
278:
252:
217:Billy Kluver
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
53:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
520:Yngvadottir
444:Yngvadottir
411:Yngvadottir
385:weak delete
164:free images
563:Geschichte
488:we see 23
57:rbitrarily
493:spurious.
398:Lysefjord
390:Lysefjord
333:Rettetast
290:• Gene93k
264:• Gene93k
235:Rettetast
202:Rettetast
542:Shimgray
534:Japanese
499:Shimgray
125:View log
490:British
170:WP refs
158:scholar
98:protect
93:history
559:Delete
515:second
142:Google
102:delete
46:delete
185:JSTOR
146:books
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
567:talk
546:talk
524:talk
503:talk
486:here
463:talk
459:meco
448:talk
433:talk
429:meco
415:talk
372:talk
368:meco
364:keep
352:talk
348:meco
337:talk
315:talk
311:meco
305:Keep
294:talk
279:Note
268:talk
253:Note
239:talk
225:talk
206:talk
178:FENS
152:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
288:--
262:--
192:TWL
127:•
123:– (
569:)
548:|
544:|
526:)
505:|
501:|
465:)
450:)
435:)
417:)
374:)
354:)
346:__
339:)
317:)
296:)
285:.
270:)
259:.
241:)
227:)
208:)
172:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
48:.
565:(
522:(
461:(
446:(
431:(
413:(
370:(
350:(
335:(
313:(
292:(
266:(
237:(
223:(
204:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
121:)
83:(
59:0
55:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.