287:
parts of the world. So I ask each of you these questions: What are YOU notable for? What are YOU doing for
America? What are YOU doing to make the world a better place? I ask these questions not with malice, but with sincerity. Although I fully support free speech, I do not condone, nor will I tolerate, slanderous or libelous remarks made about me or my family, and have passed this review page on to my legal advisors. Sincerely, John J. Kennedy
277:
approved fully by me. Knowledge (XXG) posted my name and brief bio in 2004 after the election - without my knowledge - however, I was pleased to have this recognition for standing up for
America as a voice of Truth and Hope. I am again officially running for President in 2008, not as a write-in, but on the Democratic ticket, and have every right to have my biography and family biography posted and stated
131:
This biographical article is about and written by John Joseph
Kennedy, who has no relation to the famous political Kennedys. He's just a guy who creates write-in campaigns for himself and is not considered a serious contender by anyone. He's non-notable; if you search for him out there, all of the
286:
associated with
President John F. Kennedy's branch of the family, nor do I care to be. If you read my biography in it's entirety, it clearly states that I am from the Kennedy's of Charleston, South Carolina family, and we have a history far beyond the Boston Kennedy's, here in America, and in other
276:
It was brought to my attention today that my biography and history that were recently expanded by me and my campaign on
Knowledge (XXG) is in question and subject to speculation, authenticity and ridicule by some of the individuals below. First and foremost, it is my copyrighted property, and
165:
Because some newspapers will print almost any press release they receive in order to fill up white space. Those who do not perform research and who assume that a John
Kennedy running for office must be one of *those* Kennedys would be more prone in this case.
316:: Strong conflict of interest, no indication of passing notability requirements, apparently it may be some sort of copyvio (and thus speediable) as well, not to mention a boarderline issue with a mistaken beleif of article 'ownership'.
242:. Looking at the edit history, it appears that many of the edits this article has received came from the subject himself. His 2004 vice-presidential running mate as a write-in also had an article deleted a while back; see
281:
I stand behind every word that is written. I may be a "fringe" candidate as some have suggested because I am not well-known yet, however, I am a candidate none the less. My bio on
Knowledge (XXG) clearly states that I am
382:
243:
124:
375:
per nom, and per Mr. Kennedy's own assertions that he is "not well-known yet" and that he posted "copyrighted" material here without releasing it pursuant to the GFDL. --
180:
I didn't find a newspaper that reprinted them, just wire services like PRWeb, Eworldwire, Emediawire, and so forth that are explicitly publicity-distribution services.--
145:
I am not an expert in US politics so I am wondering: if the guy is not notable why would anybody bother to print his press release? I think there are big issues with
132:
articles are either 1) written by him, 2) press releases by him, or 3) clones of this
Knowledge (XXG) article. This is simply a vanity article. —
97:
92:
101:
84:
17:
348:
200:
I went through the article and all the self promotion in the world cant hide the fact that there nothing notable in there. --
303:
238:. The references to media coverage in this article are incomplete and thus impossible to use to confirm whether he meets
397:
36:
224:
Non-notable failed politician whose article does not assert sufficient notability. No reliable secondary sources. --
367:
320:
266:
250:
230:
216:
204:
188:
172:
153:
136:
66:
212:
This is no more than an election manifesto and biography of a minor politician who has no claim to notability.--
396:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
88:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
336:
291:
364:
213:
133:
332:: I normally don't do this, but I took out the bold in Mr. Kennedy's comments because it's an eyesore
344:
340:
258:, I found a couple of articles behind paywalls, but he's just one of oodles of fringe candidates. --
247:
80:
72:
295:
263:
185:
379:
299:
225:
201:
167:
150:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
146:
360:
239:
317:
49:
259:
181:
376:
149:
though and once re-written accordingly there would not be much of an article left.
118:
390:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
244:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Daniel Robert Rezac
114:
110:
106:
314:
delete, salt and indef. ban Jjk2007 for legal threats
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
400:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
274:Comment from John Joseph Kennedy.
1:
383:14:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
368:07:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
321:03:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
267:20:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
251:19:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
231:19:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
217:17:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
205:16:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
189:20:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
173:19:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
154:16:22, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
137:15:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
67:17:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
417:
393:Please do not modify it.
363:and for legal threats.
32:Please do not modify it.
81:John Joseph Kennedy
73:John Joseph Kennedy
353:
339:comment added by
308:
294:comment added by
134:Cleared as filed.
408:
395:
365:The Rambling Man
352:
333:
328:per consensus.
307:
288:
228:
214:Anthony.bradbury
170:
122:
104:
64:
58:
54:
34:
416:
415:
411:
410:
409:
407:
406:
405:
404:
398:deletion review
391:
334:
289:
226:
168:
95:
79:
76:
60:
56:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
414:
412:
403:
402:
386:
385:
370:
354:
323:
310:
309:
270:
269:
253:
248:Metropolitan90
233:
219:
207:
194:
193:
192:
191:
175:
157:
156:
129:
128:
75:
70:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
413:
401:
399:
394:
388:
387:
384:
381:
378:
374:
371:
369:
366:
362:
358:
355:
350:
346:
342:
338:
331:
327:
324:
322:
319:
315:
312:
311:
305:
301:
297:
293:
285:
280:
275:
272:
271:
268:
265:
261:
257:
254:
252:
249:
245:
241:
237:
234:
232:
229:
223:
220:
218:
215:
211:
208:
206:
203:
199:
196:
195:
190:
187:
183:
179:
176:
174:
171:
164:
161:
160:
159:
158:
155:
152:
148:
144:
141:
140:
139:
138:
135:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
63:
59:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
392:
389:
372:
356:
335:— Preceding
329:
325:
313:
290:— Preceding
283:
278:
273:
255:
235:
221:
209:
202:RaiderAspect
197:
177:
162:
151:Alf photoman
142:
130:
61:
55:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
279:accurately.
341:YechielMan
318:Wintermut3
349:contribs
337:unsigned
304:contribs
292:unsigned
260:Dhartung
227:Charlene
182:Dhartung
169:Charlene
125:View log
296:Jjk2007
178:Comment
163:Comment
147:WP:NPOV
143:Comment
98:protect
93:history
380:(talk)
373:Delete
361:WP:COI
357:Delete
326:Delete
256:Delete
240:WP:BIO
236:Delete
222:Delete
210:Delete
198:Delete
102:delete
46:Delete
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
377:Russ
359:per
345:talk
330:Note
300:talk
264:Talk
246:. --
186:Talk
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
52:Buck
284:not
123:- (
62:ofg
57:ets
351:)
347:•
306:)
302:•
262:|
184:|
166:--
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
48:.
343:(
298:(
127:)
121:)
83:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.