165:
Not really notable enough, I think. If he was a truly notable poet, would he have a day job as a lawyer? A few search hits, but most of them referred to other John M. FitzGeralds; not much that was obviously independent, either.
232:
without prejudice to future recreation should the subject become more notable in future. Achieving notability as a poet is difficult, and he's just not there yet, but he may be in the future. --
189:
You could probably count the number of poets in the last 200 years who didn't have a day job on the fingers of one hand. Notability is not the same as commercial success; if that were the case,
113:
207:
I could name a lot of poets who make their sole living from their writing and performing. But clearly my rhetorical question appeared too literal for some.
86:
81:
90:
73:
17:
137:, his wife; she has a few minor film credits but also appears unnotable. For both, accomplishment does not equal notability. --
269:
36:
268:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
254:
238:
222:
199:
181:
157:
145:
124:
55:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
77:
133:, no evidence of notability found in a quick Google. The same editor created only this article and one for
215:
174:
69:
61:
247:
134:
142:
52:
233:
210:
194:
169:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
251:
190:
121:
154:
138:
107:
120:
Orphaned article about a non-notable poet. Vanity page, if you like that angle.
262:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
246:
Single-use account created only this article and one other
103:
99:
95:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
272:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
250:- may consider for deletion as well. --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
289:
265:Please do not modify it.
255:17:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
239:09:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
223:16:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
200:09:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
193:would be non-notable. --
182:22:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
158:16:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
146:07:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
125:05:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
56:14:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
70:John M FitzGerald
62:John M FitzGerald
280:
267:
236:
218:
213:
197:
191:Vincent Van Gogh
177:
172:
111:
93:
48:
34:
288:
287:
283:
282:
281:
279:
278:
277:
276:
270:deletion review
263:
234:
216:
211:
195:
175:
170:
84:
68:
65:
46:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
286:
284:
275:
274:
258:
257:
248:Helene Cardona
241:
227:
226:
225:
202:
160:
148:
135:Helene Cardona
118:
117:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
285:
273:
271:
266:
260:
259:
256:
253:
249:
245:
242:
240:
237:
231:
228:
224:
221:
220:
219:
214:
206:
203:
201:
198:
192:
188:
185:
184:
183:
180:
179:
178:
173:
164:
161:
159:
156:
153:per above. /
152:
149:
147:
144:
140:
136:
132:
129:
128:
127:
126:
123:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
53:Mailer Diablo
50:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
264:
261:
243:
229:
209:
208:
204:
186:
168:
167:
162:
150:
130:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
252:Infrangible
163:Weak Delete
122:Gump Stump
235:Charlene
196:Charlene
155:Blaxthos
139:Dhartung
114:View log
244:Comment
205:Comment
187:Comment
87:protect
82:history
230:Delete
212:Adrian
171:Adrian
151:Delete
131:Delete
91:delete
217:M. H.
176:M. H.
108:views
100:watch
96:links
49:elete
16:<
143:Talk
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
51:. -
112:– (
141:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
116:)
110:)
72:(
47:d
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.