165:
183:. It may be a "major storyline" but it all the information is on Craig and John Paul's pages. I removed the timeline not long ago because it was far too long but still the page isn't relevant.
295:
This actually does now have some decent real-world context, that I must have missed on first viewing. Much better than some of the other crap that exists on here. Sorry for my original vote.
87:
82:
150:) as the show won a Stonewall Award due to these characters, but that does not justify the need for this duplicate article and the rest of that section appears to be trivial (
120:
91:
74:
387:. Notability is clearly established within the article; the nominator even points this out. The article is not excessive plot summary, is not fanboy-ism,
279:
without prejudice for recreation if written with real-world context (reception, production, etc.). As it stands, this is only excessive plot detail.
317:
The article is written with real-world context. The only thing that is not is the plot summary, which is typical (as is with film articles).
78:
17:
420:
404:
379:
363:
349:
326:
309:
266:
233:
208:
172:
158:
56:
337:
70:
62:
395:. Nor is most of this stuff in either of their individual articles. Their individual articles are what are mostly plot.
435:
356:
36:
434:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
373:
I think the nominator must have been looking at a different article, this certainly isn't just a plot summary.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
224:. The rest of the article, disregarding the plot summary, however, is not. The article is certainly relevant.
130:
An article on two characters from a soap opera, who both appear to have their own separate articles anyway (
255:
197:
388:
143:
345:
139:
241:. I have taken time to rethink my first answer and I've decided to back the article, so yeah keep!
392:
151:
400:
322:
305:
289:
242:
229:
184:
131:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
360:
169:
155:
341:
142:) and, due to the unsourced mention of internet forums in the lead, I smell fanboy-ism (
147:
413:
396:
318:
296:
280:
225:
49:
108:
221:
135:
374:
164:
I have also nominated a range of "supercouple" articles for deletion at
428:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
166:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Soap Opera "supercouples"
412:
seems well referenced notability appears to be established.
146:). However, the section on reception shows some notability (
115:
104:
100:
96:
220:
We both agreed to remove the timeline because it was
138:). The article appears to be excessive plot summary (
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
438:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
340:have their own articles as well. --
24:
71:John Paul McQueen and Craig Dean
63:John Paul McQueen and Craig Dean
1:
455:
421:20:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
405:13:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
380:13:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
364:06:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
350:04:18, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
327:13:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
310:17:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
293:12:46, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
267:14:02, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
234:13:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
209:10:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
173:09:18, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
159:10:47, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
57:22:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
431:Please do not modify it.
154:) quotes from the cast.
32:Please do not modify it.
336:. Many other popular
357:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
44:The result was
419:
264:
206:
132:John Paul McQueen
446:
433:
418:
416:
377:
303:
287:
263:
256:
252:
249:
246:
205:
198:
194:
191:
188:
118:
112:
94:
54:
34:
454:
453:
449:
448:
447:
445:
444:
443:
442:
436:deletion review
429:
414:
375:
297:
281:
257:
250:
247:
244:
211:
199:
192:
189:
186:
114:
85:
69:
66:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
452:
450:
441:
440:
424:
423:
407:
382:
367:
366:
353:
352:
331:
330:
329:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
178:
176:
175:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
451:
439:
437:
432:
426:
425:
422:
417:
411:
408:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
381:
378:
372:
369:
368:
365:
362:
358:
355:
354:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
313:
312:
311:
308:
307:
304:
301:
294:
292:
291:
288:
285:
278:
274:
268:
265:
262:
261:
254:
253:
240:
237:
236:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
210:
207:
204:
203:
196:
195:
182:
174:
171:
167:
163:
162:
161:
160:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
430:
427:
409:
384:
370:
338:soap couples
333:
314:
306:
299:
290:
283:
276:
275:
259:
258:
243:
238:
217:
201:
200:
185:
180:
177:
127:
126:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
389:WP:FANCRUFT
222:in-universe
144:WP:FANCRUFT
342:Silvestris
140:WP:NOTPLOT
136:Craig Dean
393:WP:TRIVIA
179:*I agree
152:WP:TRIVIA
315:Comment.
218:Comment.
121:View log
415:AniMate
397:Flyer22
319:Flyer22
248:niverse
226:Flyer22
190:niverse
128:Delete.
88:protect
83:history
52:JForget
277:Delete
181:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
391:, or
260:talk?
202:talk?
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
410:Keep
401:talk
385:Keep
376:Jeni
371:Keep
346:talk
334:Keep
323:talk
298:The
282:The
239:Keep
230:talk
148:WP:N
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
46:keep
245:Who
187:Who
403:)
361:DJ
359:.
348:)
325:)
300:JP
284:JP
251:93
232:)
193:93
170:DJ
168:.
156:DJ
134:,
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
399:(
344:(
321:(
302:S
286:S
228:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.