212:
I was wondering why this page celebrating an otherwise unknown racist bigot is even in
Knowledge. I was under the impression that to qualify for an entry, the subject must be a person of some distinction or renown. Before I came across this entry, I had never heard of this individual before, and I
167:
358:, and no prejudice against renomination in the future if somebody can provide more compelling evidence that it's not suitable for some reason (e.g. he's just namechecked within the cited sources rather than being their
216:
This piece seems like an encomium to this person, or at the least a normalization of his “philosophy” - if that word can be used in conjunction with whatever passes for thought processes in such people.
283:
161:
309:
234:
120:
93:
88:
97:
127:
80:
182:
149:
58:
17:
354:
them; it just means people might be looking for the information. If you have concerns with the article's tone, flag it for
143:
342:
of what the person is notable for or not — racists and bigots do get into
Knowledge if they were the subject of enough
139:
387:
327:
301:
274:
250:
207:
62:
84:
406:
189:
40:
320:
294:
402:
262:
76:
68:
36:
155:
270:
242:
226:
213:
doubt if anyone else (outside of perhaps members of a white power movement) has heard of him either.
199:
175:
230:
203:
383:
315:
289:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
401:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
266:
238:
355:
347:
379:
343:
114:
374:
the reasons why someone is notable — but we do have to accept that some people
350:. The fact that Knowledge has an article on somebody does not mean that we
362:) — but we don't delete articles just because some or most editors don't
52:. Issues with the page can be discussed at the article talk page. --
261:
No valid deletion rationale has been provided. This is a case of
395:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
338:. Having a Knowledge article is not a question of whether we
284:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
110:
106:
102:
174:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
409:). No further edits should be made to this page.
235:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 5
310:list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions
188:
8:
308:Note: This debate has been included in the
282:Note: This debate has been included in the
307:
281:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
233:). I have transcluded it to
225:This AfD was not correctly
426:
63:04:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
388:18:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
378:notable for bad reasons.
328:17:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
302:17:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
275:21:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
251:21:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
208:20:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
398:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:Johnny Rebel (singer)
69:Johnny Rebel (singer)
370:. We don't have to
346:coverage to clear
223:Automated comment:
330:
304:
253:
249:
417:
400:
325:
323:
318:
299:
297:
292:
245:
244:Talk to my owner
240:
221:
193:
192:
178:
130:
118:
100:
34:
425:
424:
420:
419:
418:
416:
415:
414:
413:
407:deletion review
396:
344:reliable source
321:
316:
314:
295:
290:
288:
248:
243:
135:
126:
91:
75:
72:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
423:
421:
412:
411:
391:
390:
332:
331:
305:
278:
277:
263:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
255:
254:
241:
196:
195:
132:
71:
66:
57:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
422:
410:
408:
404:
399:
393:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
333:
329:
326:
324:
319:
311:
306:
303:
300:
298:
293:
285:
280:
279:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
256:
252:
246:
239:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
209:
205:
201:
191:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:Find sources:
133:
129:
125:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
60:
59:contributions
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
397:
394:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
351:
339:
335:
317:CAPTAIN RAJU
313:
291:CAPTAIN RAJU
287:
258:
229:to the log (
222:
215:
211:
197:
185:
179:
171:
164:
158:
152:
146:
136:
123:
54:Patar knight
49:
47:
31:
28:
336:Speedy keep
259:Speedy Keep
227:transcluded
162:free images
267:Exemplo347
403:talk page
37:talk page
405:or in a
200:Seamus45
121:View log
39:or in a
380:Bearcat
360:subject
356:WP:NPOV
352:endorse
340:approve
247::Online
198:Reason
168:WPÂ refs
156:scholar
94:protect
89:history
368:person
348:WP:GNG
231:step 3
140:Google
98:delete
183:JSTOR
144:books
128:Stats
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
384:talk
372:like
366:the
364:like
271:talk
237:. —
204:talk
176:FENS
150:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
50:keep
376:are
322:(✉)
296:(✉)
190:TWL
119:– (
56:- /
386:)
312:.
286:.
273:)
265:.
206:)
170:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
382:(
269:(
202:(
194:)
186:·
180:·
172:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
142:(
134:(
131:)
124:·
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.