745:
85:
754:
495:
THE STRANGE THING IS - AGAIN - AND JOHNNY DE BREST IS TRAUMATIZED - EXACTLY AFTER PUBLISHING NEGATIVE EXPERIENCES WITH SCIENTOLOGY AND MADONNA (who is
Scientology too) IN GERMANY (Internet) - THERE IS A SABOTAGE ON JOHNNY DE BREST AT WIKIPEDIA (one Rule! of Knowledge (XXG) is, if an Article is
573:
I feel suspected mobbing, Scientology tried to kill Johnny de Brest in Los
Angeles 2002 and I wouldn't be surprised if they do everything - after de Brest published the Attacks on him - to suppress any Information about Johnny de Brest, and I bet Scientology has his Spys at
335:
I agree the one reference does not establish the notability of the person. However, I think there is enough notability on
Vladracul to justify saving that portion of the article. If more is not found to justify the notability of Breast, I suggest we move the article to
313:
Declined speedy. This is a vanity piece created, I suspect, by the subject himself. The tone is totally unencyclopaedic, and an inordinate effort would need to be made to bring it into conformity with our standards of a biography. The subject obviously has a serious
515:
If the
Artwork is important, the Artist is important too. Johnny de Brest had the whole "LA Weekly Good Times"-Page in Los Angeles in Summer 2002! It was a page about the Artist! Even Rainer Werner Fassbinder or German Director Wim Wenders had'n
739:
I began agreeing with Vejvančický , but looking at some of the Google News sources, I am unsure. I do not want to do a disservice to this subject, but I am concerned that there may be a hoax afoot, via adding ad material to editable
282:
664:: Scientologists, muslims, punkers, scuba divers, Mormons, miners etc. That's all I can say, the rest of your comment is a bit confusing, do you really believe we are Scientology conspirators?
839:- I like the pictures, but this needs a huge working over to get it up to WP standards, assuming something like notability can be demonstrated. No opinion as to inclusion-worthiness.
92:
614:. That's all, there's no conspiracy or spying. Please, familiarize yourself with the mentioned Knowledge (XXG) policies and comment constructively. Thanks for your understanding. --
415:
243:
535:
Johnny de Brest
Knowledge (XXG) is more than 1 Year online and one of the rules! of Knowledge (XXG) is, an Article can't be deleted after he was accepted, he was accepted.--
276:
590:
BergHollywood, your claims are extremely inappropriate for this forum. This discussion is intended to consider whether a subject of a
Knowledge (XXG) article meets the
438:
660:(standard, legitimate and established procedure here on Knowledge (XXG)), and this debate will decide whether or not the article stay. Anyone can comment here
641:
And the
Knowledge (XXG) Rules says if an Article was accepted, they can't delete it! And Johnny de Brest Knowledge (XXG) was accepted for more than one year!--
318:
in this case, as demonstrated by the media uploaded; he has also created an article about his grandfather, which I daresay passes muster, but I digress.
748:. It is clear, if you look at the preceding hit (excuse the length; it is the translator), that something is going on, but what exactly is unclear to me.
554:
I am surprised that nobody has
Problems with the Knowledge (XXG)-Madonna-Article, that's an Advertisment, and we all know that madonna is Scinetology!--
340:, and leave a short blurb about the artist as it relates to the notable project, but cut most of the material making it sound like a promo ad for him.
727:
673:
623:
402:
365:
and clean up would be probably the best solution. The cycle was internationally exhibited and attracted the attention of multiple reliable media:
751:
I am suspicious of the following hit's overflowing praise; from this many reviews, we should be able to get a hit that is not behind a paywall
101:
216:
211:
131:
220:
657:
17:
866:
based artist) and Johnny de Brest's street-art-Foto-Fix-placards "We Crash Them All" and "We Shot Them All" got a lot attention in
203:
297:
264:
117:
637:
It is a
Conspiracy, and it belongs to a Conspiracy that they'll never would confirm it, especially if they are involved!
908:
36:
723:
669:
619:
398:
90:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
258:
163:
907:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
496:
accepted, and
Knowledge (XXG) Johnny de Brest is around Year online and was accepted!) you can't delete him!--
893:
848:
831:
811:
774:
731:
697:
677:
650:
646:
627:
583:
579:
563:
559:
544:
540:
525:
521:
505:
501:
485:
453:
430:
406:
351:
326:
254:
68:
147:
121:
207:
719:
665:
615:
394:
106:
770:
393:(hidden behind the paywall). I think it is enough for an informative article here on Knowledge (XXG). --
324:
304:
199:
74:
884:
A lot of attention in such places implies a lot of press coverage. Where is this press coverage? --
762:
712:
382:
290:
784:
604:
823:
808:
711:
I added the sources mentioned here at AfD to the article. Additionally, I found another coverage
642:
575:
555:
536:
517:
497:
346:
153:
84:
859:
362:
337:
49:
844:
693:
481:
449:
426:
366:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
270:
827:
766:
319:
610:
592:
473:
469:
370:
315:
53:
889:
390:
386:
374:
598:
465:
59:
794:
341:
684:
I've been accused on lots of things at Knowledge (XXG), but favoring Scientology is
840:
689:
477:
445:
422:
181:
169:
137:
237:
116:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
879:
885:
871:
787:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
378:
688:
one of them, LOL! As may be seen from my user page, I am an Episcopalian.
48:. Without prejudice to creating an article about his possibly notable work
875:
715:
758:
867:
863:
746:
A hit on Google News, that (no longer?) has any mention of Vladracula
822:
Terrible vanity article, falls short on enough decent sources too.--
901:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
320:
79:
110:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
100:
among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
656:
This debate is a part of Knowledge (XXG) process called
56:; the article can be userfied to that end if necessary.
233:
229:
225:
289:
608:. If the sources aren't provided, the article can be
792:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
303:
389:Hong Kong, G-News archives contain reviews in the
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
911:). No further edits should be made to this page.
416:list of Photography-related deletion discussions
130:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
437:Note: This debate has been included in the
414:Note: This debate has been included in the
439:list of People-related deletion discussions
436:
413:
104:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
124:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
596:. The notability must be supported by
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
377:Washington, the article cites also
761:article, too, for a real feast of
24:
373:(review of the exhibition in the
83:
858:Between February and June 1997
385:mentions the exhibition in the
1:
120:on the part of others and to
856:: The article tells us that
928:
832:21:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
812:03:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
775:11:04, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
732:16:07, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
698:01:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
678:15:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
651:12:47, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
628:07:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
584:02:17, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
564:02:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
545:02:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
526:02:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
506:02:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
486:23:23, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
454:17:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
431:17:30, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
407:11:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
352:02:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
327:02:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
894:07:26, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
849:01:15, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
755:Vladracula on ArtNews.org
464:-- I do not see a single
69:07:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
904:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
593:notability requirements
162:; accounts blocked for
132:single-purpose accounts
102:policies and guidelines
52:by somebody without a
658:Articles for deletion
367:Washington City Paper
757:(and check out that
316:conflict of interest
605:independent sources
114:by counting votes.
93:not a majority vote
371:Filmmaker Magazine
44:The result was
814:
456:
442:
433:
419:
350:
195:
194:
191:
118:assume good faith
67:
919:
906:
791:
789:
472:, thus it fails
443:
420:
344:
333:Modify topic/cut
322:
308:
307:
293:
241:
223:
189:
177:
161:
145:
126:
96:, but instead a
87:
80:
66:
64:
57:
34:
927:
926:
922:
921:
920:
918:
917:
916:
915:
909:deletion review
902:
782:
466:reliable source
391:Washington Post
387:Goethe-Institut
381:), the website
375:Goethe-Institut
349:
250:
214:
200:Johnny de Brest
198:
179:
167:
151:
135:
122:sign your posts
78:
75:Johnny de Brest
60:
58:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
925:
923:
914:
913:
897:
896:
851:
834:
816:
815:
790:
779:
778:
777:
752:
749:
742:
741:
734:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
662:constructively
639:
638:
631:
630:
587:
586:
567:
566:
548:
547:
529:
528:
509:
508:
489:
488:
458:
457:
434:
410:
409:
355:
354:
345:
311:
310:
247:
193:
192:
88:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
924:
912:
910:
905:
899:
898:
895:
891:
887:
883:
881:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
855:
852:
850:
846:
842:
838:
835:
833:
829:
825:
821:
818:
817:
813:
810:
809:
807:
806:
803:
800:
797:
788:
786:
781:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
760:
756:
753:
750:
747:
744:
743:
738:
735:
733:
729:
725:
721:
718:(in German).
717:
714:published by
713:
710:
707:
706:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
654:
653:
652:
648:
644:
643:BergHollywood
636:
633:
632:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
612:
607:
606:
601:
600:
595:
594:
589:
588:
585:
581:
577:
576:BergHollywood
572:
569:
568:
565:
561:
557:
556:BergHollywood
553:
550:
549:
546:
542:
538:
537:BergHollywood
534:
531:
530:
527:
523:
519:
518:BergHollywood
514:
511:
510:
507:
503:
499:
498:BergHollywood
494:
491:
490:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
459:
455:
451:
447:
440:
435:
432:
428:
424:
417:
412:
411:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
357:
356:
353:
348:
343:
339:
334:
331:
330:
329:
328:
325:
323:
317:
306:
302:
299:
296:
292:
288:
284:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
266:
263:
260:
256:
253:
252:Find sources:
248:
245:
239:
235:
231:
227:
222:
218:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
196:
187:
183:
175:
171:
165:
159:
155:
149:
143:
139:
133:
129:
125:
123:
119:
113:
109:
108:
103:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
82:
81:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
63:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
903:
900:
857:
853:
836:
819:
804:
801:
798:
795:
793:
783:
736:
708:
685:
661:
640:
634:
609:
603:
597:
591:
574:Wikiepdia!--
570:
551:
532:
512:
492:
461:
383:kunstaspekte
358:
332:
312:
300:
294:
286:
279:
273:
267:
261:
251:
185:
173:
164:sockpuppetry
157:
146:; suspected
141:
127:
115:
111:
105:
97:
91:
61:
45:
43:
31:
28:
880:Los Angeles
874:(Germany),
767:Anarchangel
720:Vejvančický
666:Vejvančický
616:Vejvančický
395:Vejvančický
321:Ohconfucius
277:free images
763:WP:PEACOCK
474:notability
98:discussion
62:Sandstein
860:Phoinissa
446:• Gene93k
423:• Gene93k
379:LA Weekly
363:Vladracul
338:Vladracul
154:canvassed
148:canvassed
107:consensus
50:Vladracul
876:New York
854:Question
785:Relisted
740:sources.
728:contribs
716:Die Welt
674:contribs
624:contribs
599:reliable
468:in this
403:contribs
359:Redirect
244:View log
186:username
180:{{subst:
174:username
168:{{subst:
158:username
152:{{subst:
142:username
136:{{subst:
872:Münster
841:Carrite
837:Comment
759:ArtNews
737:Comment
709:Comment
690:Bearian
611:deleted
478:Bearian
283:WP refs
271:scholar
217:protect
212:history
150:users:
868:Berlin
864:Bombay
824:Sloane
820:Delete
462:Delete
255:Google
221:delete
54:WP:COI
46:delete
886:Hoary
516:it!--
342:Monty
298:JSTOR
259:books
238:views
230:watch
226:links
128:Note:
16:<
890:talk
878:and
845:talk
828:talk
771:talk
724:talk
694:talk
670:talk
647:talk
635:Stay
620:talk
602:and
580:talk
571:Stay
560:talk
552:Stay
541:talk
533:Stay
522:talk
513:Stay
502:talk
493:Stay
482:talk
450:talk
427:talk
399:talk
291:FENS
265:news
234:logs
208:talk
204:edit
686:not
470:BLP
444:--
421:--
361:to
347:845
305:TWL
242:– (
182:csp
178:or
170:csm
138:spa
112:not
892:)
870:,
847:)
830:)
805:ni
802:mo
799:ue
796:Ed
773:)
765:)
730:)
726:|
696:)
676:)
672:|
649:)
626:)
622:|
582:)
562:)
543:)
524:)
504:)
484:)
476:.
452:)
441:.
429:)
418:.
405:)
401:|
369:,
285:)
236:|
232:|
228:|
224:|
219:|
215:|
210:|
206:|
188:}}
176:}}
166::
160:}}
144:}}
134::
888:(
882:.
862:(
843:(
826:(
769:(
722:(
692:(
668:(
645:(
618:(
578:(
558:(
539:(
520:(
500:(
480:(
448:(
425:(
397:(
309:)
301:·
295:·
287:·
280:·
274:·
268:·
262:·
257:(
249:(
246:)
240:)
202:(
190:.
184:|
172:|
156:|
140:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
