361:. 17 seconds of fame is not enough, guidelines clearly state notability is based upon a full 15 minutes. Okay, seriously, I don't think a single article is quite enough. If it were, I could get my brother an article, he's been in paper a few times. If this is still getting buzz in 3 months (or at least in 14 minutes and 43 seconds), then we can re-create.--
175:. If it was just that he was popular on youtube, that'd be one thing, but he's gained national coverage. Notability is not temporary. Also, the "17 seconds of fame" is a reference to his initial video being 17 seconds long.--
310:
Being the subject of one article is hardly the sole basis for it. Its that, along with numerous other media coverage as well as the merchandising with his likeness, tv appearences and general fandom surrounding
121:. Everybody who gets interviewed on TV does not a Knowledge article make. Find something else that he's noted for, find reliable sources that you can write a biography on, or else he's not notable.
117:
Yet again another non-notable
Youtube "celebrity". Yes, he's been interviewed on television. Yes, the Washington Post has talked about him. But even the post called his interview
254:
110:
436:
Actually that wouldn't work, as that would qualify as trival coverage since the kid's name is never mentioned, as it is about the incident, and not about him.
424:
184:
And to the Post's columnist's reference to "the golden age of inanity", which this "article" would cause to be applied to
Knowledge if kept.
194:
83:
78:
87:
385:- not notable. Notability is not established by a cute, we have no news tonight, so we will tell you about this youtube kid...
17:
70:
329:
325:
321:
118:
471:
36:
470:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
456:
440:
431:
415:
389:
377:
365:
349:
340:
315:
302:
210:
201:
188:
179:
163:
143:
125:
52:
74:
230:
172:
428:
346:
312:
246:
226:
198:
176:
66:
58:
337:
207:
185:
160:
122:
386:
285:
260:
242:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
437:
412:
139:
152:
49:
374:
362:
453:
407:
402:
156:
398:
104:
250:
135:
345:
Washington Post is hardly the only published source Ware has been found on.--
238:
234:
411:) that are not trivial coverage, and then it would meet the guidelines.
330:
Peter
Mullenhard, Steven McCormick, Gregory Toms and Ronald S. Sheinson
427:? Obviously he's not going to be the subject of a major news story.--
253:. I mean, it's not like someone went and created an article about an
464:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
452:
Doesn't coverage in the
Washington Post carry some weight?--
241:. The Post is a very notable newspaper. Also appeared on
100:
96:
92:
193:
You mean it wasn't already when we got an article on
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
474:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
373:per UsaSats. NN. I too like turtles
225:Ware had an article devoted to him in
7:
249:, I think that's enough to satisfy
24:
401:, this is subject does not meet
229:, which is a major newspaper in
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
282:per nom. Corvus has a point.
457:19:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
441:23:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
432:22:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
416:22:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
390:14:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
378:10:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
366:21:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
350:21:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
341:21:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
320:Should we have articles on
316:01:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
303:21:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
277:21:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
255:obscure wannabe "celebrity"
247:notability is not inherited
211:21:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
202:21:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
189:20:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
180:20:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
164:20:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
144:20:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
126:20:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
53:05:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
491:
233:, and a large portion of
467:Please do not modify it.
405:. Add a few more (maybe
119:his "17 seconds of fame"
32:Please do not modify it.
332:? Why not? There are
171:. It satisfies all the
336:columns about them.
245:. Though I know that
173:notability guidelines
134:. Non-notable meme.
243:Jimmy Kimmel Live
482:
469:
322:Sylvia Blackwood
298:
294:
291:
288:
273:
269:
266:
263:
108:
90:
44:The result was
34:
490:
489:
485:
484:
483:
481:
480:
479:
478:
472:deletion review
465:
397:- without more
326:Joshua Calloway
296:
292:
289:
286:
271:
267:
264:
261:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
488:
486:
477:
476:
460:
459:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
429:CyberGhostface
392:
380:
368:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
347:CyberGhostface
318:
313:CyberGhostface
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
199:CyberGhostface
177:CyberGhostface
166:
146:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
487:
475:
473:
468:
462:
461:
458:
455:
451:
448:
442:
439:
435:
434:
433:
430:
426:
422:
419:
418:
417:
414:
410:
409:
408:The Oregonian
404:
400:
396:
393:
391:
388:
384:
381:
379:
376:
372:
369:
367:
364:
360:
357:
351:
348:
344:
343:
342:
339:
338:Corvus cornix
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
317:
314:
309:
306:
305:
304:
301:
300:
299:
281:
278:
276:
275:
274:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
212:
209:
208:Corvus cornix
205:
204:
203:
200:
196:
195:Chris Crocker
192:
191:
190:
187:
186:Corvus cornix
183:
182:
181:
178:
174:
170:
167:
165:
162:
158:
154:
150:
147:
145:
141:
137:
133:
132:Strong delete
130:
129:
128:
127:
124:
123:Corvus cornix
120:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:Jonathon Ware
64:
63:
60:
59:Jonathon Ware
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
466:
463:
449:
420:
406:
394:
387:Iamchrisryan
382:
370:
358:
333:
307:
284:
283:
279:
259:
258:
222:
221:
168:
148:
131:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
438:Aboutmovies
413:Aboutmovies
359:Weak Delete
50:Eluchil404
450:Weak keep
425:like this
423:You mean
375:Tiptopper
363:UsaSatsui
206:Indeed.
454:Bedivere
239:Maryland
235:Virginia
227:The Post
157:Dhartung
153:WP:BLP1E
111:View log
421:Comment
308:Comment
84:protect
79:history
403:WP:BIO
395:Delete
383:delete
371:Delete
311:him.--
280:Delete
149:Delete
136:Stifle
88:delete
46:Delete
399:WP:RS
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
334:Post
251:WP:N
237:and
231:D.C.
223:Keep
169:Keep
161:Talk
155:. --
151:per
140:talk
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
328:?
324:?
295:Fan
270:Fan
197:?--
109:– (
48:.
297:24
293:AR
290:SC
287:NA
272:24
268:AR
265:SC
262:NA
257:.
159:|
142:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
138:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.