346:). The Southern California Linux Expo page bio is promotional in nature and presumably not fully independent. The O'Reilly sources identify Bacon as an author of specific books, but that isn't enough for notability, and since O'Reilly published and is trying to sell these books, the independence of these sources can be questioned. All the referenced pages in Bacon's own blog are, well, right out per
227:
guider, he has collected a lot of material from willingly ubuntu user and created The
Official Ubuntu Book, he is mentioned in several relevant sites which are within internet scope, LinuxToday, Linoob, TechBytes, but also from mainstream news sites and newspaper such as
350:. Same with the page from Mark Shuttleworth's blog. If there is any other source here that meets the requirements of being "reliable" and "independent of the subject", it's hard to find a needle in a haystack.
152:
113:
196:
342:. Even accepting Ars Technica as a reliable source for the sake of discussion, the story mentions Jono Bacon only in the context of planned future accomplishments (see
287:
146:
448:
the independence of pretty much all those sources (except the Ars
Technica one) is really suspect. We need substantial coverage by independent third party sources.
229:
223:, which spawned a seminary which still occurs until recently every year, he is the one which also went from Ubuntu's developer to be its
17:
389:
Yes and no. O'Reilly is presumably a reliable source of information about its authors. However, what we're dealing with here is
52:
413:
375:
Are you seriously claiming that O'Reilly, a major publisher, cannot be used as a source for information as to its own authors?
362:
86:
81:
90:
167:
472:
134:
36:
73:
471:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
128:
453:
431:
In my opinion it was already adequately sourced, but I have added an interview in Ubuntu User as well.
124:
457:
440:
417:
384:
366:
326:
302:
278:
250:
210:
55:
298:
49:
343:
409:
358:
160:
219:- he has released a lot of relevant books and scientifical articles, those include the 2009 title
174:
393:— and the policy says that notability requires substantial coverage by reliable sources that are
275:
247:
449:
205:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
339:
436:
380:
347:
184:
322:
294:
77:
335:
192:
140:
402:
351:
314:
188:
261:
233:
202:
107:
432:
376:
259:
He has not only appeared in those magazines, but also contributed within them.
318:
69:
61:
231:, OnLamp, TechRadar, InfoWorld, PC Magazine, Linux Magazine, among others.
313:- while the article had no independent third party refs that showed
465:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
221:"The Art of Community: Building the new age of participation"
103:
99:
95:
197:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Matthew D. Sacks
159:
173:
317:I have now added one that does establish this. -
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
475:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
401:satisfy that requirement w/r/t Jono Bacon.
288:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
285:
195:independent of the subject; see also
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
397:of the subject — and O'Reilly does
24:
1:
458:00:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
418:02:30, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
56:09:24, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
492:
441:02:51, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
385:02:51, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
367:01:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
327:10:41, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
303:07:48, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
279:04:22, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
251:04:19, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
211:03:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
468:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
183:Contested PROD. Fails
44:The result was
305:
291:
187:; has no visible
483:
470:
292:
208:
193:reliable sources
191:references from
178:
177:
163:
111:
93:
34:
491:
490:
486:
485:
484:
482:
481:
480:
479:
473:deletion review
466:
201:
120:
84:
68:
65:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
489:
487:
478:
477:
461:
460:
443:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
370:
369:
329:
307:
306:
283:
282:
281:
254:
253:
228:ComputerWeekly
181:
180:
117:
64:
59:
50:Black Kite (t)
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
488:
476:
474:
469:
463:
462:
459:
455:
451:
447:
444:
442:
438:
434:
430:
427:
426:
419:
415:
411:
407:
405:
400:
396:
392:
388:
387:
386:
382:
378:
374:
373:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
354:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
330:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
289:
284:
280:
277:
276:
274:
273:
270:
267:
264:
258:
257:
256:
255:
252:
249:
248:
246:
245:
242:
239:
236:
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
214:
213:
212:
209:
207:
204:
198:
194:
190:
186:
176:
172:
169:
166:
162:
158:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
126:
123:
122:Find sources:
118:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
467:
464:
450:Stuartyeates
445:
433:Francis Bond
428:
403:
398:
394:
390:
377:Francis Bond
352:
331:
310:
271:
268:
265:
262:
260:
243:
240:
237:
234:
232:
224:
220:
216:
200:
182:
170:
164:
156:
149:
143:
137:
131:
121:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
395:independent
217:Strong keep
147:free images
391:notability
344:WP:CRYSTAL
295:Tom Morris
225:"official"
189:verifiable
70:Jono Bacon
62:Jono Bacon
414:contribs
363:contribs
114:View log
340:WP:INDY
153:WP refs
141:scholar
87:protect
82:history
446:Delete
348:WP:SPS
332:Delete
199:. —
185:WP:BIO
125:Google
91:delete
406:wales
355:wales
336:WP:RS
319:Ahunt
206:G. ツ
168:JSTOR
129:books
108:views
100:watch
96:links
16:<
454:talk
437:talk
429:Keep
410:talk
404:Rich
381:talk
359:talk
353:Rich
338:and
334:per
323:talk
315:WP:N
311:Keep
299:talk
203:Jeff
161:FENS
135:news
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
399:not
175:TWL
112:– (
53:(c)
456:)
439:)
416:)
412:·
383:)
365:)
361:·
325:)
301:)
290:.
272:ni
269:mo
266:ue
263:Ed
244:ni
241:mo
238:ue
235:Ed
155:)
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
48:.
452:(
435:(
408:(
379:(
357:(
321:(
297:(
293:—
179:)
171:·
165:·
157:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
132:·
127:(
119:(
116:)
110:)
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.