440:
444:
461:
Additionally, the original 1956 Playboy presumably contained more than just a photo. There's typically an article or biography included. This means that she was the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources in 1956, 1986, 1994 and 1995. Notability isn't a matter of opinion or importance.
409:
suggestion that "Multiple sources are generally expected." (emphasis on plural) The Times piece is (to me) a puff piece about a woman that was a bunny and then worked in a factory. I don't consider that notable. Again, per
157:
118:
151:
269:
249:
508:
416:
326:
246:
91:
86:
53:
95:
17:
78:
172:
139:
511:. Maybe there's a borderline notability, but anyway, as the article is very short, it could be easily merged there.
539:
40:
133:
325:, the LA Times piece really just reinforces that there's nothing particularly notable about her. She's listed
233:
520:
499:
475:
456:
434:
397:
372:
343:
313:
283:
261:
237:
217:
198:
129:
60:
535:
495:
309:
213:
194:
36:
225:
179:
516:
430:
339:
165:
229:
82:
57:
411:
368:
279:
257:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
534:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
490:
471:
452:
393:
353:
305:
294:
209:
190:
145:
512:
424:
333:
463:
406:
385:
74:
66:
364:
275:
253:
112:
467:
448:
389:
356:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
297:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
528:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
208:
the additional sources helps, but still falls short of GNG.
108:
104:
100:
164:
439:
GNews shows at least two other LA Times articles in
363:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
304:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
542:). No further edits should be made to this page.
462:It's based on the simple criteria set forth in
178:
8:
420:and does not warrant an article of her own.
268:Note: This debate has been included in the
270:list of People-related deletion discussions
447:. Unfortunately they're behind a paywall.
267:
329:. Suggest the ref be moved to that page.
245:Note: This debate has been added to the
7:
24:
509:List of Playboy Playmates of 1956
384:. The LA Times article satisfies
226:Here's a lengthy LA Times article
54:List of Playboy Playmates of 1956
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
466:which this article satisfies.
1:
487:the list is more then enough.
559:
521:20:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
500:18:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
476:22:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
457:23:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
435:22:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
398:21:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
373:21:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
228:with biographical info. --
218:00:42, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
61:20:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
344:12:50, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
314:00:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
284:13:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
262:13:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
238:13:01, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
199:06:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
531:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
247:WikiProject Pornography
405:, i can't get by the
505:Merge and Redirect
417:in another article
201:
48:The result was
375:
316:
286:
273:
250:list of deletions
188:
550:
533:
498:
493:
432:
427:
362:
358:
341:
336:
303:
299:
274:
264:
183:
182:
168:
116:
98:
34:
558:
557:
553:
552:
551:
549:
548:
547:
546:
540:deletion review
529:
489:
488:
425:
422:
414:, she's listed
351:
334:
331:
292:
244:
125:
89:
73:
70:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
556:
554:
545:
544:
524:
523:
502:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
400:
378:
377:
376:
360:
359:
348:
347:
346:
319:
318:
317:
301:
300:
289:
288:
287:
265:
241:
240:
220:
186:
185:
122:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
555:
543:
541:
537:
532:
526:
525:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
501:
497:
492:
486:
483:
477:
473:
469:
465:
460:
459:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
433:
431:
429:
428:
419:
418:
413:
408:
404:
401:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
380:
379:
374:
370:
366:
361:
357:
355:
350:
349:
345:
342:
340:
338:
337:
328:
324:
321:
320:
315:
311:
307:
302:
298:
296:
291:
290:
285:
281:
277:
271:
266:
263:
259:
255:
251:
248:
243:
242:
239:
235:
231:
230:Colapeninsula
227:
224:
221:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
203:
202:
200:
196:
192:
181:
177:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
131:
128:
127:Find sources:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:Jonnie Nicely
72:
71:
68:
67:Jonnie Nicely
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
530:
527:
504:
484:
423:
421:
415:
402:
381:
352:
332:
330:
322:
293:
222:
205:
189:Non notable
187:
175:
169:
161:
154:
148:
142:
136:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
306:Ron Ritzman
210:Fasttimes68
191:Fasttimes68
152:free images
412:wp:notable
536:talk page
513:Cavarrone
426:Wikipelli
335:Wikipelli
276:• Gene93k
254:• Gene93k
37:talk page
538:or in a
354:Relisted
295:Relisted
206:Redirect
119:View log
58:MuZemike
50:redirect
39:or in a
403:Comment
365:BusterD
223:Comment
158:WP refs
146:scholar
92:protect
87:history
485:Delete
468:Pburka
464:WP:GNG
449:Pburka
407:wp:gng
390:Pburka
386:WP:GNG
327:here.
323:Delete
130:Google
96:delete
173:JSTOR
134:books
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
517:talk
496:talk
472:talk
453:talk
445:1994
443:and
441:1986
394:talk
382:Keep
369:talk
310:talk
280:talk
258:talk
234:talk
214:talk
195:talk
166:FENS
140:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
56:. --
507:to
180:TWL
117:– (
52:to
519:)
494:;
491:BO
474:)
455:)
396:)
388:.
371:)
312:)
282:)
272:.
260:)
252:.
236:)
216:)
197:)
160:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
515:(
470:(
451:(
392:(
367:(
308:(
278:(
256:(
232:(
212:(
193:(
184:)
176:·
170:·
162:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
137:·
132:(
124:(
121:)
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.