486:, people are unlikely to find it other than via Pope Ben 16 anyway, and I'm not sure a 300 word article with a dozen relevant links is necessarily entirely out of place, especially if a photo can be added, maybe a few more biographical details. The way it's reading at the moment seems to be an attempt to distance as much as possible Herr Ratzinger from the
294:
It's rather obvious that this is all the rather scanty material dredged up in not-especially-successful attempts to make a connection between the pope emeritus and the Nazis. What they found is that the pope's father was just a pious, "sternly anti-Nazi" (as the article puts it) policeman whose son
216:
Delete, this is a case where we have an article that the subject is notable only through his sons. We do not have inherited notability or notability by proxy. As such this article fails to provide reliable sources for it's claims. I realize this isn't a BLP that requires sources or it's deleted but
333:- Notability is not inherited, this person has done nothing in his own right to warrant an article in an encyclopedia. The findings AfD #1 has no relevance to this discussion, for the record; it is hard to imagine a Knowledge (XXG) era where
295:
became famous long, long after he died. This is material for a couple of sentences in the ex-pope's article(s), not substance enough of a man who plainly enjoys no independent notability whatsoever. Possibly it could be redirected to
84:
185:
433:
do acquire some notability (and especially academic interest) by association. The testament to this is that there are articles in the encyclopedia on these people in existence. (I could for example nominate
79:
179:
145:
357:
138:
378:
398:
483:
111:
106:
115:
98:
478:
Thanks for the understanding. Actually, I'm not sure that Herr
Ratzinger here is necessarily notable. But, if we imagine articles as nodes (
499:
469:
451:
410:
390:
369:
346:
323:
308:
286:
269:
248:
226:
63:
425:
it appears to have started as a "we sortof don't think this is a good argument to use" and then morphed into "this is policy" by means of
320:
495:
447:
200:
17:
167:
421:
I have serious concerns that "notability isn't inherited" is a bit idealistic and doesn't reflect reality. If you actually look at
442:). The deletion argument should that Pope Ben 16 isn't notable enough that a close relative of his would acquire notability.
316:, no individual notability. Notability is not inherited (and that means, not inherited backwards on somebody's father either.)
296:
317:
161:
520:
40:
435:
157:
491:
443:
222:
102:
460:
I see your point but it also appears to me that the volume of material on
Hathaway is quite a bit more extensive.
217:
unless anyone can show how this man was notable other then being a father to a former pope it shouldn't be here.
422:
207:
479:
265:
490:, which makes it awkwardly political, and I think there may be room for possible expansion on this theme.
516:
218:
94:
69:
36:
257:
173:
282:
193:
261:
439:
426:
406:
386:
244:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
515:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
236:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
465:
365:
304:
342:
278:
277:
into an appropriate article on the family or to the main article on the Pope himself. -
58:
402:
382:
299:
given that someone is sure to try to recreated it in defiance/ignorance of policy.
240:
132:
260:; they could be merged, or maybe both deleted/merged to the ex-pope's article. --
487:
461:
361:
300:
338:
54:
509:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
85:
Articles for deletion/Joseph
Ratzinger, Sr. (2nd nomination)
128:
124:
120:
358:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Ratzinger family
192:
206:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
523:). No further edits should be made to this page.
337:was actually considered an acceptable argument.
429:. The truth is that individuals connected to
8:
397:Note: This debate has been included in the
379:list of Germany-related deletion discussions
377:Note: This debate has been included in the
484:special:whatlinkshere/Joseph Ratzinger, Sr.
399:list of People-related deletion discussions
80:Articles for deletion/Joseph Ratzinger, Sr.
396:
376:
77:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
76:
24:
335:"Keep -- he's the popes' old man"
297:Early life of Pope Benedict XVI
235:as not noteworthy enough; per
1:
436:Anne Hathaway (Shakespeare)
540:
431:Highly notable individuals
500:22:08, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
482:) with incoming links at
470:21:08, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
452:20:58, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
411:00:17, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
391:00:17, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
370:18:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
347:17:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
324:17:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
309:17:17, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
287:17:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
270:15:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
249:15:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
227:13:16, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
64:23:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
512:Please do not modify it.
492:Barney the barney barney
444:Barney the barney barney
256:There's another article
32:Please do not modify it.
75:AfDs for this article:
95:Joseph Ratzinger, Sr.
70:Joseph Ratzinger, Sr.
237:Knowledge (XXG):NOTE
48:The result was
413:
393:
531:
514:
258:Ratzinger family
219:Hell In A Bucket
211:
210:
196:
148:
136:
118:
62:
34:
539:
538:
534:
533:
532:
530:
529:
528:
527:
521:deletion review
510:
423:WP:NOTINHERITED
153:
144:
109:
93:
90:
73:
53:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
537:
535:
526:
525:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
480:WP:BUILDTHEWEB
473:
472:
455:
454:
415:
414:
394:
373:
372:
350:
349:
327:
326:
311:
289:
272:
251:
214:
213:
150:
89:
88:
87:
82:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
536:
524:
522:
518:
513:
507:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
476:
475:
474:
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:
457:
456:
453:
449:
445:
441:
438:, to prove a
437:
432:
428:
424:
420:
417:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
395:
392:
388:
384:
380:
375:
374:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
351:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
328:
325:
322:
319:
315:
312:
310:
306:
302:
298:
293:
290:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:
271:
267:
263:
262:Colapeninsula
259:
255:
252:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
209:
205:
202:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
159:
156:
155:Find sources:
151:
147:
143:
140:
134:
130:
126:
122:
117:
113:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
91:
86:
83:
81:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
511:
508:
430:
418:
353:
334:
330:
313:
291:
274:
253:
232:
215:
203:
197:
189:
182:
176:
170:
164:
154:
141:
49:
47:
31:
28:
488:Nazi regime
180:free images
517:talk page
403:• Gene93k
383:• Gene93k
318:Fut.Perf.
279:OberRanks
59:talk page
37:talk page
519:or in a
440:WP:POINT
427:WP:CREEP
139:View log
39:or in a
419:Comment
360:above.
354:comment
254:Comment
241:Kierzek
186:WP refs
174:scholar
112:protect
107:history
462:Mangoe
362:Mangoe
331:Delete
314:delete
301:Mangoe
292:delete
233:Delete
158:Google
116:delete
50:delete
275:Merge
201:JSTOR
162:books
146:Stats
133:views
125:watch
121:links
16:<
496:talk
466:talk
448:talk
407:talk
387:talk
366:talk
356:See
343:talk
339:Tarc
305:talk
283:talk
266:talk
245:talk
223:talk
194:FENS
168:news
129:logs
103:talk
99:edit
55:J04n
208:TWL
137:– (
498:)
468:)
450:)
409:)
401:.
389:)
381:.
368:)
345:)
307:)
285:)
268:)
247:)
239:.
225:)
188:)
131:|
127:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
52:.
494:(
464:(
446:(
405:(
385:(
364:(
341:(
321:☼
303:(
281:(
264:(
243:(
221:(
212:)
204:·
198:·
190:·
183:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
160:(
152:(
149:)
142:·
135:)
97:(
61:)
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.