220:: What you have said is basically that you don't like him so he shouldn't have an article. Numerous sources have documented his hoaxes and crimes, and there's a fuck load of articles which would need deleting if we were to delete criminals from wikipedia. This is so close to trolling in itself, that's why I kept deleting the deletion tag.
595:: While I take the point that there are many artcles on people who've broken the law, this doesn't mean that everyone with a criminal record qualifies for a Knowledge article. This guy is a racist who uses the internet to spread his propaganda, and has paid the price in court. That of itself doesn't make him notable, surely?
201:
Joshua
Bonehill-Paine tries very hard to spread lies about himself across the internet. In reality he is a 21-year-old unemployed criminal with no achievements of note, and certainly doesn't warrant a wikipedia page or any biography. He is not, by any stretch of the imagination, notable.
473:: On the contrary, I have merely cleared up a few issues and given valid reasons for doing so. As noted in the comment above by Rodw and the "few or no other edits outside this topic" tag above, the article was created by the subject himself, and should be deleted for that reason alone.
170:
555:: What an odious chap, but he has made himself notorious enough. Does this fellow have any redeeming qualities? Do we know if he loves his mum? Does he help old ladies across the road? -
616:; this liar/hoaxer/hater has garnered coverage. However, this individual is a publicity hound and it might be more useful to readers to have the article open with something like:
423:
to be a rival of
Bonehill's and his occupation of this article is akin to Bonehill creating the article to fit his agenda. This form of corruption can not be allowed on Knowledge
123:
164:
303:
263:
323:
283:
576:, unless you are in a roundabout way stating that the article has a negative bias, which is kind of easy to do when writing about a criminal
130:
96:
91:
100:
463:
83:
17:
185:
620:
And the page should be protected because this
Bonehead will very likely be back to try to edit-in self-aggrandizing material.
459:
439:
152:
581:
495:
225:
419:
you will note that he has changed very small but significant details that were noted officially in newspapers. I believe
543:
478:
207:
53:
400:, this could be seen as a successful example of self promotion, which, in its own circular fashion, may be notable.—
648:
509:. The subject gets nontrivial coverage from multiple reliable sources and the article does not seem promotional.
146:
40:
389:
577:
491:
221:
629:
604:
585:
564:
547:
539:
518:
499:
482:
474:
443:
420:
416:
412:
404:
376:
359:
335:
315:
295:
275:
254:
229:
211:
203:
142:
65:
560:
372:
644:
347:
242:
36:
192:
527:
427:
250:
87:
625:
600:
178:
573:
455:
435:
415:
is clearly trolling this article with a biased agenda. If you look at the recent edits made by
237:
receives sufficient coverage in reliable sources which address him directly, therefore meeting
556:
514:
368:
331:
311:
291:
271:
61:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
643:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
158:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
355:
246:
79:
71:
621:
596:
535:
613:
451:
431:
385:
238:
531:
510:
327:
307:
287:
267:
57:
117:
392:
as the subject of the article. As the article says part of his notability is for
351:
490:: Not true. I created this and reverted Bonehill's unverifiable claims from it
401:
393:
367:
We cover the infamous, as well as the famous. He's not unfamous.
637:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
397:
526:: I disagree with nom and agree with previous keep arguments.
538:
issues can be resolved through consensus and editing.--
113:
109:
105:
177:
534:, does not seem promotional to me, and any possible
384:I note significant contributions to the article by
618:Notorious racist, hoax activist Joshua Bonehill...
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
651:). No further edits should be made to this page.
304:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
241:. Argument for deletion seems to be based on
191:
8:
322:Note: This debate has been included in the
302:Note: This debate has been included in the
282:Note: This debate has been included in the
264:list of England-related deletion discussions
262:Note: This debate has been included in the
324:list of People-related deletion discussions
321:
301:
284:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
281:
261:
245:, which is specifically discouraged.
7:
24:
350:is not a reason for deletion.--
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
444:02:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
1:
630:01:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
605:00:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
586:19:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
565:18:54, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
548:09:01, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
519:18:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
500:00:15, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
483:18:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
405:16:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
377:03:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
360:00:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
336:23:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
316:23:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
296:23:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
276:23:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
255:22:49, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
230:20:04, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
212:19:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
66:01:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
668:
530:is established by various
640:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
464:few or no other edits
466:outside this topic.
540:Crystallizedcarbon
48:The result was
475:AntiCauliflower92
467:
447:
430:comment added by
421:AntiCauliflower92
417:AntiCauliflower92
413:AntiCauliflower92
338:
318:
298:
278:
204:AntiCauliflower92
54:non-admin closure
659:
642:
449:
446:
424:
390:declared himself
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
667:
666:
662:
661:
660:
658:
657:
656:
655:
649:deletion review
638:
425:
138:
129:
94:
80:Joshua Bonehill
78:
75:
72:Joshua Bonehill
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
665:
663:
654:
653:
633:
632:
607:
590:
589:
588:
550:
521:
504:
503:
502:
468:
448:
407:
379:
362:
348:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
340:
339:
319:
299:
279:
258:
257:
243:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
232:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
664:
652:
650:
646:
641:
635:
634:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
608:
606:
602:
598:
594:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
568:
567:
566:
562:
558:
557:Roxy the dog™
554:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
528:WP:Notability
525:
522:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
486:
485:
484:
480:
476:
472:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
422:
418:
414:
411:
408:
406:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
386:User:Jooner29
383:
380:
378:
374:
370:
366:
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
320:
317:
313:
309:
305:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
280:
277:
273:
269:
265:
260:
259:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
639:
636:
617:
609:
592:
569:
552:
523:
506:
487:
470:
426:— Preceding
409:
381:
369:Andy Dingley
364:
343:
234:
217:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
574:WP:NOTFORUM
462:) has made
165:free images
247:Valenciano
645:talk page
622:ShulMaven
612:It meets
610:Keep, but
597:Neiltonks
578:'''tAD'''
511:• Gene93k
492:'''tAD'''
328:• Gene93k
308:• Gene93k
288:• Gene93k
268:• Gene93k
222:'''tAD'''
37:talk page
647:or in a
561:resonate
460:contribs
452:Jooner29
440:contribs
432:Jooner29
428:unsigned
394:trolling
388:who has
124:View log
39:or in a
570:COMMENT
536:WP:NPOV
488:Comment
382:Comment
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
58:Natg 19
593:Delete
471:Oppose
398:hoaxes
352:BabbaQ
239:WP:BIO
218:Oppose
143:Google
101:delete
532:WP:RS
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
626:talk
601:talk
582:talk
553:Keep
544:talk
524:Keep
515:talk
507:Keep
496:talk
479:talk
456:talk
436:talk
410:Keep
396:and
373:talk
365:Keep
356:talk
344:Keep
332:talk
312:talk
292:talk
272:talk
251:talk
235:Keep
226:talk
208:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
50:keep
614:GNG
402:Rod
193:TWL
122:– (
52:. (
628:)
603:)
584:)
572::
563:)
546:)
517:)
498:)
481:)
458:•
450:—
442:)
438:•
375:)
358:)
346:-
334:)
326:.
314:)
306:.
294:)
286:.
274:)
266:.
253:)
228:)
210:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
56:)
624:(
599:(
580:(
559:(
542:(
513:(
494:(
477:(
454:(
434:(
371:(
354:(
330:(
310:(
290:(
270:(
249:(
224:(
206:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.