422:: I agree and at the point of nomination for AfD I was unable to find any reliable refs, as the nomination notes. But that said, all we have is the rumour that a couple of sources may exist. They may not exist or they may just be passing mentions that do not confer notability or enough material for a standalone article. The two "refs" that have been recently added are just passing mentions that do not show notability. At this point in time we have an article that seems to just exist to promote a website, two refs that are vague passing mentions of the topic and an unsubstantiated statement that there maybe some paper refs available that may support some of the text in then article. I ask that if the paper refs exist then please add them as footnotes in support of the text that they actually do support and then we can see where we are then for notability. As it stands today the subject still does not seem to be notable. -
31:
475:. The article fails to explain in layman's terms what the technique actually is, even after visiting the subject's website I'm none the wiser. No sources/inline citations have been given, in the external links section there is a link to a self-published website, one to some kind of non-accessible paper and another that says that the technique has been mentioned in
771:
already doing, making it more precise." I think this Flight
International article provides enough detail to clearly state that the "Jacobson Flare" is just a refinement of normal airplane landing techniques and confirms that it should not have its own article, but as indicated above should be a sentence or two in the
791:
Nowhere in notability guidelines does it specify that for us to have an article about a procedure it should be "a radical departure from current practice". The important thing is that there is significant coverage in reliable sources, and the information provided by those sources, such as what you
81:
puts the responsibility on those who wish to keep the article to research the sources and include them. Further, Northamerica1000's copy/paste rationale refuting the delete !voters and article nominator's rationale is useless to this discussion and a waste of database space (yes, all 2kb of it).
770:
Adding that link was very helpful. I have read the article carefully and as the article itself says
Jacobson "stresses that he is not promoting any radical departure from current practice" and "Users affirm that it is in no way a radical departure from current practice - it defines what they are
224:
subject, virtually unheard of in aviation. Search for refs turns up only the proponent website currently in the article's external links and a few forums. The
Knowledge (XXG) article seems to exist just to promote the website and the theory/technique. This article was successfully
444:...the Jacobson flare method seemed the most suitable to provide flare initi- ation and flare control cues. Offline, linear simulation results indicated that the Jacobson method was robust and its performance was comparable to an automatic landing system
860:- what I can see from my search results and what has been presented herer and what is currently in this article, is more of an attempt to get the expressions notability raised rather than a reporting of such current or historic notability.
77:. This one should probably be closed no consensus per !votes, but I feel the discussion very clearly argues that the keep !voter's rationale is all bark and no bite. Rumors of reliable sources do not help the discussion.
334:: If you have access to those refs by all means do add them to the article to show exactly which text can be supported by third party refs, as that will help our discussion here whether to delete, keep or merge into
186:
450:
article appears, from the abstract, to use
Jaconson Flare as its primary focus, and hence is definitely notable coverage (although if anyone can find the full article text, it would be useful).
354:
147:
40:
180:
806:
I agree, but the ref makes it clear the subject only has the potential to be a sentence or two as a stand alone encyclopedia article if the article is to avoid
687:. The sources added to the article are far from passing mentions. They are articles in an academic journal and an avaiation magazine about this precise topic.
315:. The claim of "virtually unheard of in aviation" is systematic bias. It is well known in Australian aviation and taught to commercial pilots.
120:
115:
511:
387:
17:
902:
124:
305:
107:
201:
311:
magazine (July 1999) address the subject directly in great detail. These are more than trivial mentions, therefore it meets
168:
884:
65:
46:
613:
sources. Merely claiming that sources exist doesn't mean they do. I'm going to see if I can locate them myself now.
82:
Had he read the nominator's statement he would've seen "Search for refs turns up only the proponent website". v/r -
592:
523:
402:
749:
162:
883:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
436:
I would argue that these are a little bit more than passing references. Jacobson Flare is not the topic of the
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
869:
844:
823:
801:
784:
765:
738:
720:
696:
673:
651:
626:
596:
571:
548:
527:
494:
459:
431:
406:
369:
347:
324:
286:
260:
238:
158:
89:
797:
734:
692:
229:
without comment in May 2011 and then restored by an Admin at the request of the original article creator.
807:
111:
588:
555:
519:
398:
256:
704:
558:, the sources mentioned are already in the article - quoting this bit of policy is pretty irrelevant.
208:
865:
642:
mentioned and the ones that were added are just passing mentions that do not establish notability. -
300:
247:
as not notable, if any secondary references of notability are found it can be added as a sentence in
103:
95:
483:
194:
518:, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination.”
539:- You have said that twice, but we still haven't seen any sources that establish notability. -
840:
793:
761:
730:
716:
688:
669:
660:
I must have my easily-confused head on toady - you're right, of course, although the proposed
622:
567:
455:
396:
the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination.”
365:
320:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
792:
quoted about this being a refinement of existing techniques, can be included in the article.
226:
217:
78:
252:
174:
86:
312:
861:
819:
780:
647:
544:
427:
343:
282:
234:
514:, Section D, “Sourcing Search”, #3 states - “In the event you find that adequate sources
390:, Section D, “Sourcing Search”, #3 states - “In the event you find that adequate sources
480:
221:
896:
836:
833:
757:
712:
665:
639:
618:
610:
584:
563:
451:
361:
316:
141:
835:. Definitely only a minor passing mention, not really useful as a source at all.
83:
815:
776:
643:
559:
540:
423:
339:
278:
230:
810:
and therefore it is not a large enough topic for a separate article from
748:
On a related note, I've now changed the link in the article to direct to
277:
as it is not a sufficient or large enough subject for its own article. -
811:
772:
335:
274:
248:
664:
article appears to be the same source as the CSA one already listed.
877:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
711:- it doesn't mention Jacobson Flare at all as far as I can see.
273:
proper refs can be found it should be a sentence in the article
510:
articles is not a valid argument for article deletion. Rather,
386:
articles is not a valid argument for article deletion. Rather,
638:- actually the two refs that have been added are not the ones
25:
756:, which is most definitely more than a passing mention.
729:
That pdf only contains pages 11 to 15 of the magazine.
137:
133:
129:
193:
355:
207:
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
887:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
583:- Per reliable sources stated above by user
446:, which is more than a passing mention. The
353:Note: This debate has been included in the
352:
705:Here's a PDF of the July 1999 issue of
45:For an explanation of the process, see
745:So it does. Anyone got the rest of it?
562:- see my reply to your comment above.
512:Knowledge (XXG): Articles for deletion
388:Knowledge (XXG): Articles for deletion
442:ARIC article, but it does state that
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
41:deletion review on 2011 September 27
506:– The presence of reliable sources
382:- The presence of reliable sources
24:
304:magazine (February 1998) and the
298:and cleanup/despam. Articles in
29:
306:Civil Aviation Safety Authority
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
870:19:21, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
845:12:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
824:22:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
802:22:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
785:21:59, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
766:12:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
739:12:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
721:12:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
697:12:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
674:12:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
652:12:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
627:12:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
615:Sources are already in article
597:11:50, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
572:12:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
549:11:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
528:02:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
495:19:28, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
460:12:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
432:13:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
407:11:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
370:15:46, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
348:12:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
325:04:07, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
287:12:10, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
261:22:25, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
239:22:05, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
90:00:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
919:
609:dependant on inclusion of
903:Pages at deletion review
880:Please do not modify it.
61:Please do not modify it.
269:I would support that -
752:Flight International
662:Flight International
477:Flight International
448:Flight International
301:Flight International
516:do appear to exist
392:do appear to exist
73:The result was
372:
358:
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
910:
882:
589:Northamerica1000
556:Northamerica1000
520:Northamerica1000
492:
491:
490:
399:Northamerica1000
359:
338:and redirect. -
212:
211:
197:
145:
127:
63:
33:
32:
26:
918:
917:
913:
912:
911:
909:
908:
907:
893:
892:
891:
885:deletion review
878:
616:
607:!vote withdrawn
605:
488:
486:
484:
441:
154:
118:
102:
99:
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
916:
914:
906:
905:
895:
894:
890:
889:
873:
872:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
746:
742:
741:
724:
723:
699:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
655:
654:
630:
629:
614:
601:
599:
577:
576:
575:
574:
553:
552:
551:
531:
530:
498:
497:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
437:
412:
411:
410:
409:
374:
373:
350:
328:
327:
292:
291:
290:
289:
264:
263:
215:
214:
151:
104:Jacobson Flare
98:
96:Jacobson Flare
93:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
915:
904:
901:
900:
898:
888:
886:
881:
875:
874:
871:
867:
863:
859:
856:
855:
846:
842:
838:
834:
831:
825:
821:
817:
813:
809:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
782:
778:
774:
769:
768:
767:
763:
759:
755:
753:
747:
744:
743:
740:
736:
732:
728:
727:
726:
725:
722:
718:
714:
710:
708:
707:Flight Safety
703:
700:
698:
694:
690:
686:
683:
682:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
658:
657:
656:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
634:
633:
632:
631:
628:
624:
620:
612:
608:
604:
600:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
579:
578:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
535:
534:
533:
532:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
502:
501:
500:
499:
496:
493:
482:
478:
474:
471:
470:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
440:
439:Flight Safety
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
421:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
408:
404:
400:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
377:
376:
375:
371:
367:
363:
356:
351:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
330:
329:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
309:Flight Safety
307:
303:
302:
297:
294:
293:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
266:
265:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
243:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
220:article on a
219:
210:
206:
203:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
160:
157:
156:Find sources:
152:
149:
143:
139:
135:
131:
126:
122:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
100:
97:
94:
92:
91:
88:
85:
80:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
879:
876:
857:
808:WP:NOTMANUAL
794:Phil Bridger
751:
731:Phil Bridger
706:
701:
689:Phil Bridger
684:
661:
640:User:ShipFan
635:
606:
602:
580:
536:
515:
507:
503:
476:
472:
447:
443:
438:
419:
395:
391:
383:
379:
331:
308:
299:
295:
270:
244:
216:
204:
198:
190:
183:
177:
171:
165:
155:
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
775:article. -
253:MilborneOne
222:non-notable
181:free images
862:Off2riorob
489:floats by)
750:the full
611:ShipFan's
485:(Cumulus
362:• Gene93k
897:Category
832:Got it:
709:magazine
148:View log
837:Yunshui
812:Landing
773:Landing
758:Yunshui
754:article
713:Yunshui
666:Yunshui
636:Comment
619:Yunshui
585:ShipFan
564:Yunshui
537:Comment
504:Comment
487:nimbus
452:Yunshui
420:Comment
380:Comment
336:Landing
332:Comment
317:ShipFan
275:Landing
249:Landing
187:WPÂ refs
175:scholar
121:protect
116:history
79:WP:ONUS
858:Delete
508:within
481:Nimbus
473:Delete
384:within
313:WP:GNG
245:Delete
227:PRODed
159:Google
125:delete
75:delete
816:Ahunt
777:Ahunt
644:Ahunt
560:Ahunt
541:Ahunt
424:Ahunt
340:Ahunt
279:Ahunt
231:Ahunt
202:JSTOR
163:books
142:views
134:watch
130:links
16:<
866:talk
841:talk
820:talk
814:. -
798:talk
781:talk
762:talk
735:talk
717:talk
702:Note
693:talk
685:Keep
670:talk
648:talk
623:talk
603:Keep
593:talk
581:Keep
568:talk
545:talk
524:talk
456:talk
428:talk
403:talk
366:talk
344:talk
321:talk
296:Keep
283:talk
257:talk
235:talk
218:Spam
195:FENS
169:news
138:logs
112:talk
108:edit
209:TWL
146:– (
899::
868:)
843:)
822:)
800:)
783:)
764:)
737:)
719:)
695:)
672:)
650:)
625:)
617:.
595:)
587:.
570:)
547:)
526:)
479:.
458:)
430:)
405:)
394:,
368:)
360:—
357:.
346:)
323:)
285:)
271:if
259:)
251:.
237:)
189:)
140:|
136:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
43:.
864:(
839:(
818:(
796:(
779:(
760:(
733:(
715:(
691:(
668:(
646:(
621:(
591:(
566:(
543:(
522:(
454:(
426:(
401:(
364:(
342:(
319:(
281:(
255:(
233:(
213:)
205:·
199:·
191:·
184:·
178:·
172:·
166:·
161:(
153:(
150:)
144:)
106:(
87:P
84:T
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.