521:, we have been over this with you so very many times, and your willful flouting of notability criteria in deletion discussions is just plain bad faith. No pertinent ice hockey guideline accords presumptive notability to any level of women's hockey (with the exception of play in the Olympics, which as we all know falls under a different guideline), including the NWHL, and such players must stand or fall on the GNG. This subject fails it. Yes, it is a crying shame that society pays little attention to women's hockey, but
761:
links (let alone to actual qualifying sources), your challenge is scarcely in good faith. But if you would care to analyze any criterion on NHOCKEY, determine that too few players who meet that standard can meet the GNG, and present that evidence, go for it; unlike yourself, I'm quite willing to let
570:
I'm quite comfortable with the look in the mirror, thanks; I don't myself ignore the provisions of notability criteria even if I have a hobby horse in play. As far as "blocking notifications" go, that's cute, and I'd ask what exactly you believe you've enjoined me from doing if it were all pertinent
651:
minimum requirement for inclusion to become a hard-set guideline in NHOCKEY that meets GNG (at least 95–99% of the time, we cannot make an inclusion in NSPORTS that would violate not meeting GNG), thereby fast-tracking the arduous discussions from refining NHOCKEY previously though 1000s of AfDs. In
770:
accurately state in the
Ketchum AfD, the NHOCKEY criteria have been tested, and refined, and tested again, and refined again, over the course of many years and many archives. That this hasn't produced the result you want is obvious, but NHOCKEY was established many years before you became active on
355:
WP:SPORTSPERSON is just the generic description of NSPORTS which is why it links to that page with more detail, as the players claim on notability hails from hockey they fall under the hockey section. So no they don't pass sportsperson. And that league isn't the first, its just the first in the US.
414:
We don't accord presumptive notability to each and every player in the first collegiate league, and we don't accord presumptive notability to each and every player in the first organized pee wee league, and we don't accord presumptive notability to each and every player in the first pro league in
857:
I was actually thinking about making that proposal soon because I am tired of having to explain that women weren't forgotten in the SNG but that they were purposefully left off except for the World
Championships. To avoid the anti-criteria would just have to state it as women's players must have
395:
You said first in North
America....there have been two in Canada over the years. Unfortunately American media often ignores what goes on outside their own country. (and that article even mentions that it is not the only pro league pointing to the current one in Canada)
884:
if proposed (and it sounds less condescending than my phrasing). I highly doubt that would alleviate
Hmlarson's objectives though, hence my mention that each subject must meet GNG independently (which editors commonly seem to forget that NPSPORTS is subject to).
647:. NHOCKEY was developed and refined for over a decade for the men's leagues, however, the women's leagues were sparsely covered in media. I made a suggestion that the ice hockey project look into seeing if the only paid women's league (at the time) could meet
664:
in coverage (currently listed in NHOCKEY #3 as the lowest level of presumed notability). However, many women hockey players do meet GNG. The same women also typically meet NSPORTS as an
Olympian or NHOCKEY in the top-level of the IIHF World Championships.
694:
collegiate women's matches), but the unfortunate fact of the matter is that the world just doesn't care about women's hockey. The example I've used about the lack of coverage the sport receives is that when the Boston team won the CWHL championship, the
613:
We've had the conversations about this and most of us wish that the outcome was different, however every time we analyze female players that have not played for a senior national team or at the
Olympics. They cannot pass the standard required for the
644:
736:. If you'd like an example of how to start and derail a "consensus" discussion and make up standards that are conveniently only applied to women to make sure they are excluded from a sports notability guideline, see the example provided above
903:
I don't really think anything would alleviate
Hmlarson's concerns short of stating all professional players met it. My intention was more to stop the argument that we don't even mention them from others when we technically do in #6.
333:(NWHL), highest league in the United States, and the first pro women's hockey league in North America. Article could use improved referencing, expansion, including more links to season articles and not deletion, per
805:
For women hockey players and personnel that do not meet the above criteria, coverage in women's college and professional teams of individuals has been found to be inconsistent and therefore the player must meet GNG
166:
832:
618:, that is why we don't presume notability for any women's hockey league players. Until the level of coverage and interest in the women's game increases there really isn't much that we can do.
838:(As for "derail a "consensus" discussion", YOU asked for the links and hence pushed the discussion away from the AfD at hand with unfounded accusations, exactly as you are doing here.)
497:. The argument that this person should be considered directly as a sports person is just a poor attempt to save this article as the relevant criteria for inclusion for this athlete is
222:
737:
640:
302:
709:
site. As
Yosemiter states, for one of these discussions I examined ten prominent NWHL players, all of them national team members, some of them Olympians, and found that
262:
160:
119:
282:
242:
713:
could meet the GNG. (And that being said, surely you're aware that policies and guidelines on
Knowledge are set by community consensus, not by admins.)
858:
played in the world championships. Some other sports do it that way. Just make it clear that there is one of the criteria that they can meet. -
410:... quite aside from that it's irrelevant all the same, because there is nothing in NHOCKEY (or indeed in notability criteria generally) that
126:
690:
arguments. I don't believe I'm a cementhead here (for one thing, I bet I'm one of the only hockey contributors on
Knowledge who regularly
374:
92:
87:
96:
817:
740:. If my assessment is not true, some succinct links would be provided, not vague bs. The same standard does not exist for men.
330:
79:
17:
956:. I've lost track of how many times we've had this discussion that playing in the NWHL does not grant automatic notability.
597:
doesn't presume nobability for any women's hockey league. This needs to be changed. Admin please move to change this policy.
181:
148:
465:
757:
Given your near-complete refusal in many such AfDs to back up your assertions that the subjects meet the GNG with
982:
936:
310:
290:
270:
250:
230:
40:
142:
415:
California, either, and I'm at a bit of a loss as to why we keep hearing this discredited argument from you.
965:
940:
913:
894:
867:
847:
827:
But something tells me you would still not be happy about. Not to mention if I brought that proposal up at
781:
749:
723:
674:
627:
606:
581:
561:
539:
510:
483:
456:
425:
405:
386:
365:
346:
314:
294:
274:
254:
234:
214:
138:
61:
828:
687:
453:
411:
326:
978:
733:
526:
479:
36:
188:
932:
813:
772:
714:
623:
572:
530:
506:
416:
306:
286:
266:
246:
226:
890:
843:
670:
174:
83:
961:
745:
602:
557:
382:
342:
812:
For participants in defunct leagues who satisfy any of these achievement standards, please see
953:
909:
863:
790:
include women in NHOCKEY, but it would be some form in the last section that could consist of:
771:
Knowledge, and we are not required to secure your personal approval to maintain the standard.
657:
594:
522:
498:
450:
442:
401:
361:
210:
202:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
977:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
801:
of ice hockey teams, substitute "coached" or "managed" for "played" in the player guidelines.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
475:
154:
835:, is not used for all the other NSPORTS guidelines that have no mention of women's leagues.
653:
619:
549:
502:
886:
839:
822:
For leagues still in existence, only those listed above satisfy the specified criteria.
767:
666:
75:
67:
957:
949:
741:
681:
634:
615:
598:
553:
518:
494:
446:
378:
338:
334:
198:
905:
859:
763:
697:
412:
accords presumptive notability to anyone participating in the "first" of something.
397:
357:
206:
53:
701:-- a paper with multiple Pulitzers for its nationally renowned sports coverage --
113:
552:, before you decide to sling more mud. I blocked your notifications long ago.
882:
World Championship, in the highest pool the IIHF maintained in any given year
762:
the facts be shaped by the evidence as opposed to the other way around. As
831:, I would get shot down as it is unusual to have an anti-criterion and, as
686:, as with every other notability guideline on Knowledge, we just don't use
931:
does not meet the very broad notability guidelines for hockey players.
645:"notability guidelines have completely disregarded Women's Ice Hockey"
375:
NWHL, first paid women's pro hockey league, drops puck on first season
660:
reasons), the NWHL was found slightly lacking and slightly under the
661:
973:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
738:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Archive69#Women's hockey
641:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Archive69#Women's hockey
468:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
445:, which this person fails. More importantly, they also fail
109:
105:
101:
493:
as this a very simple case of someone clearly failing
173:
732:
For the record, the most recent discussion was here:
705:. I only learned of the win from a blogpost on the
474:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
223:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
985:). No further edits should be made to this page.
639:for reference, the most recent discussion is at
303:list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions
301:Note: This discussion has been included in the
281:Note: This discussion has been included in the
261:Note: This discussion has been included in the
241:Note: This discussion has been included in the
221:Note: This discussion has been included in the
197:Non-notable ice hockey player who fails to meet
263:list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions
187:
8:
833:Ravenswing correctly points out in this AfD
643:. It was based on the accusations that the
283:list of Quebec-related deletion discussions
300:
280:
260:
243:list of Women-related deletion discussions
240:
220:
878:Played on a senior national team for the
356:There have been a number before it. -
7:
876:I would support #6 being changed to
652:the discussion of actual sources (
571:to the AfD or I was that curious.
548:Please take a look in the mirror,
24:
814:the ice hockey league assessment
523:Knowledge is still not a soapbox
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
331:National Women's Hockey League
1:
527:a place to right great wrongs
441:- the correct guideline is
1002:
975:Please do not modify it.
966:01:39, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
941:01:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
914:15:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
895:15:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
868:13:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
848:13:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
782:10:32, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
750:07:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
724:06:47, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
703:didn't mention it at all
675:21:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
628:21:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
607:20:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
582:19:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
562:16:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
540:14:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
511:12:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
501:, which she also fails.
484:08:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
457:19:14, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
426:19:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
406:18:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
387:16:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
366:23:27, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
347:17:54, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
315:14:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
295:14:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
275:14:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
255:14:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
235:14:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
215:14:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
62:14:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
818:Ice Hockey WikiProject
201:. Also fails to meet
329:. Player played in
816:maintained by the
593:I'm baffeled that
933:John Pack Lambert
486:
317:
297:
277:
257:
237:
993:
883:
881:
880:men's or women's
825:
809:
807:
778:
720:
685:
638:
578:
536:
473:
471:
469:
422:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
1001:
1000:
996:
995:
994:
992:
991:
990:
989:
983:deletion review
879:
877:
810:
804:
791:
774:
716:
688:WP:ITSIMPORTANT
679:
632:
574:
532:
487:
464:
462:
418:
327:WP:SPORTSPERSON
307:The Mighty Glen
287:The Mighty Glen
267:The Mighty Glen
247:The Mighty Glen
227:The Mighty Glen
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
999:
997:
988:
987:
969:
968:
943:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
898:
897:
871:
870:
852:
851:
806:independently.
784:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
677:
654:not just votes
610:
609:
587:
586:
585:
584:
565:
564:
543:
542:
513:
472:
461:
460:
459:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
408:
390:
389:
369:
368:
350:
349:
319:
318:
298:
278:
258:
238:
195:
194:
131:
76:Jaimie Leonoff
70:
68:Jaimie Leonoff
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
998:
986:
984:
980:
976:
971:
970:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
948:Doesn't meet
947:
944:
942:
938:
934:
930:
927:
926:
915:
911:
907:
902:
901:
900:
899:
896:
892:
888:
875:
874:
873:
872:
869:
865:
861:
856:
855:
854:
853:
850:
849:
845:
841:
836:
834:
830:
824:
823:
819:
815:
808:
802:
800:
796:
789:
785:
783:
780:
779:
777:
769:
765:
760:
756:
753:
752:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
725:
722:
721:
719:
712:
708:
704:
700:
699:
693:
689:
683:
678:
676:
672:
668:
663:
659:
655:
650:
646:
642:
636:
631:
630:
629:
625:
621:
617:
612:
611:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
589:
588:
583:
580:
579:
577:
569:
568:
567:
566:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
545:
544:
541:
538:
537:
535:
528:
524:
520:
517:
514:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
489:
488:
485:
481:
477:
470:
467:
458:
455:
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:
436:
427:
424:
423:
421:
413:
409:
407:
403:
399:
394:
393:
392:
391:
388:
384:
380:
376:
373:
372:
371:
370:
367:
363:
359:
354:
353:
352:
351:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
299:
296:
292:
288:
284:
279:
276:
272:
268:
264:
259:
256:
252:
248:
244:
239:
236:
232:
228:
224:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
974:
972:
945:
928:
837:
826:
821:
811:
803:
798:
794:
792:
787:
775:
773:
758:
754:
734:Bray Ketchum
717:
715:
710:
706:
702:
698:Boston Globe
696:
691:
648:
590:
575:
573:
533:
531:
515:
490:
463:
438:
419:
417:
377:(CBS News).
322:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
776:Ravenswing
718:Ravenswing
707:Hockey News
576:Ravenswing
534:Ravenswing
476:Steve Smith
420:Ravenswing
161:free images
954:WP:NHOCKEY
829:WT:NSPORTS
658:WP:ILIKEIT
620:Deadman137
595:WP:NHOCKEY
550:Ravenswing
503:Deadman137
499:WP:NHOCKEY
443:WP:NHOCKEY
203:WP:NSPORTS
979:talk page
887:Yosemiter
840:Yosemiter
768:Yosemiter
667:Yosemiter
37:talk page
981:or in a
958:Papaursa
799:managers
755:Comment:
742:Hmlarson
682:Emass100
635:Emass100
599:Emass100
554:Hmlarson
519:Hmlarson
466:Relisted
379:Hmlarson
339:Hmlarson
120:View log
39:or in a
906:DJSasso
860:DJSasso
795:coaches
764:Djsasso
692:attends
591:Comment
516:Delete:
454:Snowman
398:DJSasso
358:DJSasso
207:DJSasso
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
54:Rlendog
950:WP:GNG
946:Delete
929:Delete
616:WP:GNG
495:WP:GNG
491:Delete
447:WP:GNG
439:Delete
335:WP:ATD
199:WP:GNG
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
788:could
656:with
451:Giant
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
962:talk
937:talk
910:talk
891:talk
864:talk
844:talk
793:For
766:and
746:talk
711:none
671:talk
662:ECHL
624:talk
603:talk
558:talk
507:talk
480:talk
402:talk
383:talk
362:talk
343:talk
325:per
323:Keep
311:talk
291:talk
271:talk
251:talk
231:talk
211:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
952:or
797:or
786:We
759:any
649:any
525:or
189:TWL
118:– (
964:)
939:)
912:)
893:)
866:)
846:)
820:.
748:)
673:)
626:)
605:)
560:)
529:.
509:)
482:)
449:.
404:)
385:)
364:)
345:)
337:.
313:)
305:.
293:)
285:.
273:)
265:.
253:)
245:.
233:)
225:.
213:)
205:.
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
960:(
935:(
908:(
904:-
889:(
862:(
842:(
744:(
684::
680:@
669:(
637::
633:@
622:(
601:(
556:(
505:(
478:(
400:(
396:-
381:(
360:(
341:(
309:(
289:(
269:(
249:(
229:(
209:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.