Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Jak & Daxter vehicles - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

446:
time now consistently urged the deletion and merging of the possible individual articles, and, hoped to see no further attempts to delete the combined ones. There is no consensus that notability outside of a game is required for elements of the game. Attempts to say so have consistently failed to be adopted as a general proposition. Thus the attempt to remove them individually by Afd--as AfD is notoriously erratic, only some will be removed--and I must admit that I consider this particular game of relatively minor importance and would support a greater brevity than for more notable games. F But the important thing is to promote a compromise consensus, and not have to devote our energy to the repeated individual attacks and defenses. There are better things to do for Knowledge (XXG) than AfD for harmless articles
306:; as a separate article, Jak and Daxter Vehicles would have to be notable on their own merit (i.e. talked about outside gamers playing), or at least a list of them would be. They are not, and are only relevant/useful within the context of their individual games. There's not really much content there, ThaddeusB, just a few, broad sentences would be appropriate in "Gameplay" for each of the trilogy, so a three-way-merge would probably be more work than it's worth. I removed the TitanSuit, fyi, as it was a direct copy of the manual. ~ 52:
is valid and mentioned by several in the delete camp, whereas DGG is really the only editor who articulates a keep rationale, and it is not particularly persuasive or rooted in policy but rather more akin to personal opinion (it's not necessarily a bad point though). DGG is obviously right that AfD
445:
The compromise solution to fictional elements is combination articles like this one. It avoids the two extremes: multiple very small fansite-like articles on individual elements, and inadequate coverage of relevant material that users of an encyclopedia might reasonably look for. I have for some
253: 227: 83: 53:
can be quite erratic (particularly when it comes to this kind of fictional universe stuff), but that's the process we have and the consensus on this article seems to be to delete.
143: 277:- I agree with everything the nominator said. However, the better option than deletion is to trim the article & merge it into a move general, relevant article. 376: 110: 105: 580:
Actually it should be deleted, DGG just said keep it because "there are better things to do for Knowledge (XXG) than AfD for harmless articles" and that is
114: 97: 411:
the nom sums it up. The major problem is the lack of sources and the questionable notability of the topic. Add stylistic issues regarding
565: 530: 431: 362: 326: 63: 17: 281:
might work. Alternatively, the characters article and this one could be combined into a "Jak and Daxter universe" article. --
625: 610: 593: 571: 536: 501: 487: 457: 437: 403: 385: 366: 335: 290: 268: 242: 217: 200: 175: 67: 36: 101: 482: 624:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
560: 525: 93: 73: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
466: 358: 426: 278: 48:. I read a fairly strong consensus for deletion here. The argument that this is not up to snuff in terms of 320: 264: 238: 171: 59: 551:
and relisting this; it really can't be called a consensus to delete given the keep !votes at the end. --
346: 188: 589: 475: 399: 470: 555: 552: 520: 517: 286: 196: 421: 354: 314: 260: 234: 167: 54: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
584:
a valid reason to keep an article. The next two just referred to DGG's illogical comments.
497: 213: 548: 416: 412: 299: 585: 395: 380: 185: 282: 192: 350: 303: 49: 453: 131: 493: 209: 511:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
448: 618:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
254:
list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions
228:
list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
138: 127: 123: 119: 465:
DGG has summerized this quite well. The nominator's
516:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 628:). No further edits should be made to this page. 377:list of video game related deletion discussions 84:Articles for deletion/Jak & Daxter vehicles 8: 605:No reliably-sourced content worth merging. 419:and its clear that this shouldn't be here. 150:I propose this article be deleted because: 248: 222: 154:The assertion of notability is not stated 375:: This debate has been included in the 252:: This debate has been included in the 226:: This debate has been included in the 81: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 394:as unreferenced original research. 80: 24: 609:, his otters and a clue-bat • 160:It's too much in-universe cruft 1: 163:It's listed like a game guide 645: 611:03:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 594:03:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 572:02:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 537:02:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 502:22:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 492:Keep per Dgg reason given 488:21:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 458:19:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 438:22:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC) 404:05:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC) 386:17:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 367:16:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 336:15:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 291:14:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 269:11:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 243:11:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 218:11:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 201:11:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 176:04:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 94:Jak & Daxter vehicles 74:Jak & Daxter vehicles 68:07:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 621:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 279:Jak and Daxter (series) 79:AfDs for this article: 469:are best met through 157:There are no sources 44:The result was 539: 388: 333: 271: 257: 245: 231: 66: 636: 623: 608: 607:Ten Pound Hammer 568: 563: 558: 533: 528: 523: 515: 513: 478: 473:, not deletion. 434: 429: 424: 371: 334: 329: 323: 317: 311: 309: 275:Trim & Merge 258: 232: 141: 135: 117: 57: 34: 644: 643: 639: 638: 637: 635: 634: 633: 632: 626:deletion review 619: 606: 566: 561: 556: 531: 526: 521: 509: 476: 432: 427: 422: 327: 321: 315: 310: 307: 137: 108: 92: 89: 77: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 642: 640: 631: 630: 614: 613: 599: 598: 597: 596: 575: 574: 541: 540: 514: 506: 505: 504: 490: 460: 440: 406: 389: 369: 340: 339: 338: 272: 246: 220: 208:agree w/ nom. 203: 165: 164: 161: 158: 155: 148: 147: 88: 87: 86: 78: 76: 71: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 641: 629: 627: 622: 616: 615: 612: 604: 601: 600: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 578: 577: 576: 573: 569: 564: 559: 554: 550: 546: 543: 542: 538: 534: 529: 524: 519: 512: 508: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 489: 486: 485: 484: 480: 479: 472: 468: 464: 461: 459: 455: 451: 450: 444: 441: 439: 436: 435: 430: 425: 418: 414: 410: 407: 405: 401: 397: 393: 390: 387: 384: 383: 378: 374: 370: 368: 364: 363:contributions 360: 356: 355:Haipa Doragon 352: 348: 344: 341: 337: 332: 330: 324: 318: 305: 301: 297: 294: 293: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 273: 270: 266: 262: 255: 251: 247: 244: 240: 236: 229: 225: 221: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189:gamers' guide 187: 183: 180: 179: 178: 177: 173: 169: 162: 159: 156: 153: 152: 151: 145: 140: 133: 129: 125: 121: 116: 112: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 90: 85: 82: 75: 72: 70: 69: 65: 61: 56: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 620: 617: 602: 581: 547:: I'm going 544: 510: 483: 481: 474: 462: 447: 442: 420: 408: 391: 381: 372: 347:WP:GAMEGUIDE 342: 312: 300:WP:NOT#HOWTO 295: 274: 261:TexasAndroid 249: 235:TexasAndroid 223: 205: 181: 168:Magiciandude 166: 149: 55:Bigtimepeace 45: 43: 31: 28: 586:Drawn Some 471:WP:CLEANUP 396:Drawn Some 382:Greg Tyler 283:ThaddeusB 193:Alexius08 477:Schmidt, 467:concerns 328:contribs 184:as an un 144:View log 64:contribs 553:King of 545:Comment 518:King of 186:sourced 111:protect 106:history 603:Delete 549:WP:IAR 494:Oo7565 417:WP:NOT 413:WP:WAF 409:Delete 392:Delete 343:Delete 296:Delete 210:feydey 206:Delete 182:Delete 139:delete 115:delete 46:delete 433:Space 308:Amory 142:) – ( 132:views 124:watch 120:links 16:< 590:talk 498:talk 463:Keep 454:talk 443:Keep 428:From 423:Them 415:and 400:talk 373:Note 359:talk 351:WP:N 349:and 345:per 322:talk 316:user 304:WP:N 302:and 298:per 287:talk 265:talk 250:Note 239:talk 224:Note 214:talk 197:talk 172:talk 128:logs 102:talk 98:edit 60:talk 50:WP:N 582:NOT 449:DGG 259:-- 233:-- 62:| 592:) 570:♠ 535:♠ 500:) 456:) 402:) 379:. 365:) 361:• 353:. 325:• 319:• 289:) 267:) 256:. 241:) 230:. 216:) 199:) 191:. 174:) 130:| 126:| 122:| 118:| 113:| 109:| 104:| 100:| 58:| 588:( 567:♣ 562:♦ 557:♥ 532:♣ 527:♦ 522:♥ 496:( 452:( 398:( 357:( 331:) 313:( 285:( 263:( 237:( 212:( 195:( 170:( 146:) 136:( 134:) 96:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
WP:N
Bigtimepeace
talk
contribs
07:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Jak & Daxter vehicles
Articles for deletion/Jak & Daxter vehicles
Jak & Daxter vehicles
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Magiciandude
talk
04:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
sourced
gamers' guide
Alexius08
talk
11:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
feydey

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.