427:. Being the youngest person to hold an otherwise non-notable office is not a notability claim that confers an automatic presumption of notability — school board trustees do not get Knowledge (XXG) articles just for being school board trustees, and being the youngest trustee on the board does not make him more notable than his other colleagues in and of itself. None of Knowledge (XXG)'s inclusion standards confer any special status on being the youngest person to achieve something in and of itself — the thing they achieved still has to clear a notability test on its face, and if it doesn't then age doesn't confer a free notability boost.
502:. Leahy isn't just the youngest school board member, he is the youngest elected official in the state. This lends enough notability to give this article a chance. The page is less than a month old. Editors may be able to find additional sources to strengthen notability by GNG, without the prospect of deletion circling overhead.--
365:
as it is not simply basic campaign coverage or something of the like. The reliability and independence of the subject does not appear to be in question, so that seems to fit the criteria as well. Based on these, it should certainly be presumed to be notable. If there is a reason why the presumption
361:. Based on those guidelines, I think there is no doubt that there is "significant coverage" which certainly covers the topic at length. These are not routine as most local elected officials and school board member do not receive this coverage. It also clearly does not fall into the guideline of
336:. The references in the article include coverage several local papers and the "national" coverage include a op-ed the subject submitted to "The Hill" and a link to a local news article included in a roundup of Illinois politics in "Politico." The local coverage is
607:"Leahy was elected with 28% of the vote, or 131 votes, in an uncontested election with four candidates on the ballot." suggests that even contemporaneous press coverage because of his age may not be sufficient to establish notability.
395:
534:
of office held satisfies NPOL or not, and give no quarter to the age at which they happened to get elected. Even in those one or two oddball situations where a small town has elected a mayor who was literally a
168:
239:
403:
308:
530:
Being the youngest elected official in the entire state isn't a notability criterion either. Our notability criteria for political officeholders are based on whether the
213:
121:
162:
481:
to making him more notable than the norm for a school board trustee. For an officeholder at this level of government, the sourcing has to show him as significantly
399:
669:
must be applied, and there is no automatic presumption of being youngest within that standard, automatically conferring notability, hence he fails
128:
380:
282:
17:
94:
89:
98:
628:. He certainly may be the youngest person to be elected to this role, but it is still to an non significant role,as per
579:
183:
705:
150:
40:
485:
notable than the norm before he clears GNG in lieu of failing NPOL — but the sourcing here isn't showing that at all.
81:
555:
materialize to confer a GNG pass, then their age itself doesn't create any sort of inclusion freebie that would
366:
should not stand here that can certainly be argued, but I think based on the criteria the presumption is there.
641:
376:
340:. In past AfD's being the youngest officeholder in a state has not been seen as notable, in an of itself. --
144:
662:
654:
625:
329:
612:
278:
250:
224:
701:
682:
521:
313:
204:
36:
539:, what makes them potentially notable enough for a Knowledge (XXG) article is whether or not they pass
140:
686:
645:
616:
597:
568:
525:
517:
511:
494:
415:
385:
349:
317:
299:
257:
231:
200:
63:
507:
357:
Prior to deciding to make this page, I did significant research to determine if this topic meets the
85:
442:
362:
337:
290:
272:
keeper due to his status as the youngest elected official in
Illinois with a lot of related press.--
637:
371:
176:
294:
190:
438:
77:
69:
465:
worth of information about him in a "potpourri of many topics" sort of article, and thus isn't
633:
608:
564:
490:
411:
345:
273:
245:
219:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
700:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
286:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
678:
593:
674:
670:
666:
658:
540:
430:
358:
333:
269:
503:
156:
59:
629:
560:
486:
407:
367:
341:
115:
589:
516:
Being youngest is not among our defining notability criteria here in wikipedia.
54:
370:
do you know of any similar pages which have been deleted in the AfD? T--
469:
coverage of him, while the other is an op-ed where he's the bylined
694:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
661:. Being the youngest doesn't make him notable. As he has failed
582:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
240:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
457:
show this much local coverage. And of the two sources which
396:
WP:Articles for deletion/Christopher Seeley (2nd nomination)
332:
as a local school board member so the appropriate metric is
559:
them from having to pass GNG just because of their age.
111:
107:
103:
175:
461:
expand beyond the purely local, one contains a mere
588:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
404:
WP:Articles for deletion/Terence Smith (politician)
189:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
708:). No further edits should be made to this page.
309:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
477:— so neither of those sources is contributing
214:list of Illinois-related deletion discussions
8:
307:Note: This debate has been included in the
238:Note: This debate has been included in the
212:Note: This debate has been included in the
433:pass here either, as the sourcing here is
306:
237:
211:
199:Nonnotable local level political activist
665:, the higher standard of notability in
551:that is — but if solid media coverage
543:because an abnormally deep volume of
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
445:local coverage in the local media —
381:Special:Contributions/Illinoiswiki10
24:
400:WP:Articles for deletion/Sam Juhl
449:school board member who exists
1:
547:coverage resulted from how
725:
636:) So no page for you! :-)
437:too strongly dependent on
697:Please do not modify it.
687:18:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
646:03:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
617:02:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
598:00:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
569:13:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
526:00:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
512:23:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
495:14:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
416:23:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
386:16:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
377:User talk:Illinoiswiki10
350:17:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
318:15:15, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
300:11:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
258:22:39, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
232:22:39, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
64:02:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
372:User:Illinoiswiki10
52:. clear consensus
657:and subsequently
600:
384:
320:
298:
268:I feel this is a
260:
234:
716:
699:
587:
585:
583:
374:
316:
276:
255:
253:
248:
229:
227:
222:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
34:
724:
723:
719:
718:
717:
715:
714:
713:
712:
706:deletion review
695:
601:
578:
576:
429:And there's no
312:
251:
246:
244:
225:
220:
218:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
722:
720:
711:
710:
690:
689:
648:
638:Deathlibrarian
619:
586:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
528:
497:
428:
421:
420:
419:
418:
394:Some examples
389:
388:
352:
322:
321:
303:
302:
262:
261:
235:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
721:
709:
707:
703:
698:
692:
691:
688:
684:
680:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:WP:POLITICIAN
660:
656:
655:WP:POLITICIAN
652:
651:Strong Delete
649:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
626:WP:POLITICIAN
623:
620:
618:
614:
610:
606:
603:
602:
599:
595:
591:
584:
581:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
533:
529:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:
513:
509:
505:
501:
498:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
426:
423:
422:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
391:
390:
387:
382:
378:
373:
369:
364:
360:
356:
353:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
330:WP:POLITICIAN
327:
324:
323:
319:
315:
314:North America
310:
305:
304:
301:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
271:
267:
264:
263:
259:
256:
254:
249:
241:
236:
233:
230:
228:
223:
215:
210:
209:
208:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
696:
693:
650:
621:
609:Power~enwiki
604:
577:
556:
552:
548:
544:
536:
531:
499:
482:
478:
474:
473:and not the
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
434:
424:
368:User:Enos733
354:
325:
274:TonyTheTiger
265:
247:CAPTAIN RAJU
243:
221:CAPTAIN RAJU
217:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
679:scope_creep
605:Weak Delete
518:Staszek Lem
467:substantive
441:and purely
201:Staszek Lem
163:free images
504:Libertyguy
363:WP:ROUTINE
338:WP:ROUTINE
291:WP:CHICAGO
78:Jake Leahy
70:Jake Leahy
702:talk page
295:WP:WAWARD
37:talk page
704:or in a
580:Relisted
479:anything
122:View log
39:or in a
630:Bearcat
561:Bearcat
553:doesn't
549:unusual
487:Bearcat
475:subject
463:blurb's
443:routine
408:Enos733
342:Enos733
287:WP:FOUR
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
675:WP:GNG
671:WP:BIO
667:WP:BIO
659:WP:GNG
653:fails
624:fails
622:Delete
590:Kurykh
557:exempt
541:WP:GNG
471:author
455:always
453:could
451:at all
431:WP:GNG
425:Delete
402:, and
359:WP:GNG
334:WP:GNG
328:fails
326:Delete
270:WP:GNG
141:Google
99:delete
50:delete
545:media
537:child
532:level
447:every
439:blogs
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
60:talk
16:<
683:talk
673:and
642:talk
634:talk
613:talk
594:talk
565:talk
522:talk
508:talk
500:Keep
491:talk
483:more
412:talk
355:Keep
346:talk
266:Keep
205:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
435:far
252:(✉)
226:(✉)
191:TWL
120:– (
55:DGG
685:)
677:.
644:)
615:)
596:)
567:)
524:)
510:)
493:)
459:do
414:)
406:--
398:,
383:/
379:/
348:)
311:.
293:/
289:/
285:/
281:/
242:.
216:.
207:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
62:)
681:(
640:(
632:(
611:(
592:(
563:(
520:(
506:(
489:(
410:(
375:(
344:(
297:)
283:C
279:T
277:(
203:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.