145:- I dont see where the Prod was contested on the talk page. I just see an explanation as to why it should be kept. Benkler is a prominent figure in the free culture movement, of which Knowledge (XXG) is a part. This is a term we should all be familiar with.
174:- Benkler was a speaker at Wikimania 2006, and is renowned for this particular essay. Why does the existence of this verifiable and detailed description harm anyone that it's in Knowledge (XXG). Incredible that it's even being proposed here. --
299:
to
Benkler's article and redirect; right now, it's not much more than a definition, and as noted above, there's not a lot of sources to work with. If sources are turned up, then the redirect could be replaced in the future.
258:
339:
113:
124:) coined by professor. Fails notability requirements, as does not appear to be widely cited or accepted terminology. Prod was contested and removed: see
272:
Non-notable neologism. Will change to keep if that turns out not be true. But from the current state the article is in, I don't see that.
193:
Would you mind citing some references of its notability? Its inclusion certainly doesn't 'harm' anyone, but it still needs verifiable (
17:
197:) sources to establish the widespread acceptance and usage of term. If it is truly an established term and does not violate
207:
162:
134:
370:
36:
369:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
86:
81:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
226:
90:
261:
156:
My mistake... the talk page includes reasons for keeping it, and the prod was removed by the 'prodder'.
73:
326:
305:
276:
179:
52:
254:
354:
349:
329:
309:
291:
279:
264:
245:
242:
233:
209:
182:
164:
149:
136:
55:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
205:
160:
132:
318:
220:
198:
121:
47:
194:
322:
301:
273:
175:
346:
107:
202:
157:
129:
317:
to
Benkler's article. The creator of a coinage does not confer notability on a
288:
146:
125:
77:
287:- appears to be a non-notable neologism. Prove me otherwise, people! --
363:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
69:
61:
103:
99:
95:
201:, I'm more than happy to reconsider my nomination.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
253:into the Benkler article. Non-notable neologism,
373:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
340:list of Social science-related deletions
338:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
390:
56:00:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
355:11:01, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
330:05:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
310:04:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
292:23:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
280:20:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
265:19:12, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
246:18:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
241:Non-notable neologism. -
234:18:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
210:19:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
183:18:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
165:19:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
150:18:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
137:18:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
366:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
228:ZOUAVMAN LE ZOUAVE
357:
343:
321:automatically. --
308:
232:
128:for reasons why.
381:
368:
352:
344:
334:
304:
262:The Evil Spartan
231:
229:
224:
111:
93:
34:
389:
388:
384:
383:
382:
380:
379:
378:
377:
371:deletion review
364:
350:
227:
225:
84:
68:
65:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
387:
385:
376:
375:
359:
358:
332:
312:
294:
282:
267:
248:
236:
213:
212:
186:
185:
168:
167:
153:
152:
118:
117:
64:
59:
48:Yochai Benkler
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
386:
374:
372:
367:
361:
360:
356:
353:
348:
341:
337:
333:
331:
328:
324:
320:
316:
313:
311:
307:
303:
298:
295:
293:
290:
286:
283:
281:
278:
275:
271:
268:
266:
263:
259:
256:
252:
249:
247:
244:
240:
237:
235:
230:
222:
218:
215:
214:
211:
208:
206:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
170:
169:
166:
163:
161:
159:
155:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:
139:
138:
135:
133:
131:
127:
123:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
53:Pascal.Tesson
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
365:
362:
335:
314:
296:
284:
269:
250:
243:Cyborg Ninja
238:
216:
190:
171:
142:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
319:protologism
120:Neologism (
126:Talk:Jalt
46:merge to
323:Dhartung
302:Tony Fox
274:Garion96
255:WP:WINAD
176:Fuzheado
114:View log
347:the wub
191:Comment
87:protect
82:history
306:(arf!)
285:Delete
277:(talk)
270:Delete
239:Delete
221:WP:NEO
217:Delete
203:Eliz81
199:WP:NEO
158:Eliz81
130:Eliz81
122:WP:NEO
91:delete
315:Merge
297:Merge
289:Haemo
251:Merge
189:(e/c)
147:Danny
108:views
100:watch
96:links
16:<
351:"?!"
336:Note
327:Talk
219:per
195:WP:V
180:Talk
172:Keep
143:Keep
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
70:Jalt
62:Jalt
345:--
342:.
112:– (
325:|
260:.
257::
223:.
178:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
51:.
116:)
110:)
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.