393:
I've recently looked at other profiles for authors pages and their like Alfie Kohn and Daniel Pink and they dont have reference points without ties to their publishing. Maybe some of the language like academic should be removed, but is current working as a researcher and student. And I dont think
394:
that how he paid for his books printing has anything to do with its validity. It is recommended reading in my upcoming
Ecology course on People and Environment. This author is young, so how many old recommendations does he need to be deemed valuable enough for a wiki?
204:
in the article and I can find none in Google news or elsewhere. In removing the prod I placed on this article, the creator of the article noted this is a "relatively new author". Too new to be notable for
Knowledge purposes, I suggest.
157:
285:
428:
is ever very compelling, of those two authors, one had a book on the NY Times bestseller list and the other received coverage in major newspapers. For more on how authors become notable, read
356:. He has, according to the article, published a couple of magazine articles and founded a couple of small companies; that's not enough. And almost none of the article is supportable by
151:
112:
309:. I also cannot find any reliable sources for this individual. Zero hits on Google Scholar for "James Felton Keith". Also note that his only currently published book,
259:
117:
85:
80:
89:
401:
72:
172:
139:
17:
133:
340:
330:, for lack of a better term; the article makes it difficult to figure out what the claim of notability even is. --
466:
36:
449:
409:
385:
369:
348:
300:
274:
249:
232:
214:
54:
465:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
405:
365:
129:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
76:
445:
210:
179:
245:
68:
60:
397:
228:
224:
361:
165:
433:
145:
223:
per nom. The lack of reliable secondary sources brings the subject's notability into question.
441:
327:
296:
270:
206:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
429:
241:
189:
378:
337:
437:
425:
357:
323:
292:
266:
201:
106:
436:. This author does not even come close to meeting either. (And here is more on
193:
332:
50:
314:
313:, is self-published. The publisher, Think Enxit Press, is a company
459:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
197:
286:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
102:
98:
94:
326:
indicating notability. Indeed, there's quite a bit of
164:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
469:). No further edits should be made to this page.
178:
8:
260:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
438:how to contribute to a deletion discussion
280:
254:
284:: This debate has been included in the
258:: This debate has been included in the
7:
240:Can't find reliable source at all.
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
55:19:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
440:in case you are interested.
200:. There are no unaffiliated
450:18:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
410:18:41, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
386:13:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
370:16:37, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
349:08:13, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
301:19:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
275:19:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
250:19:42, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
233:17:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
215:17:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
486:
432:, and for academics, read
462:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
377:- Per David Eppstein.
426:other stuff exists
335:
188:This author fails
69:James Felton Keith
61:James Felton Keith
44:The result was
400:comment added by
333:
315:founded by Keith.
311:Intergrationalism
303:
289:
277:
263:
477:
464:
412:
383:
358:reliable sources
347:
324:reliable sources
290:
264:
202:reliable sources
183:
182:
168:
120:
110:
92:
34:
485:
484:
480:
479:
478:
476:
475:
474:
473:
467:deletion review
460:
395:
379:
345:
331:
125:
116:
83:
67:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
483:
481:
472:
471:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
414:
413:
402:71.206.110.180
388:
372:
362:David Eppstein
351:
341:
317:
304:
278:
252:
235:
186:
185:
122:
118:AfD statistics
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
482:
470:
468:
463:
457:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
392:
389:
387:
384:
382:
376:
373:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
350:
346:
344:
338:
336:
329:
325:
321:
318:
316:
312:
308:
305:
302:
298:
294:
287:
283:
279:
276:
272:
268:
261:
257:
253:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
203:
199:
195:
191:
181:
177:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
131:
128:
127:Find sources:
123:
119:
114:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
461:
458:
442:Novaseminary
421:
390:
380:
374:
353:
342:
319:
310:
306:
281:
255:
237:
220:
207:Novaseminary
187:
175:
169:
161:
154:
148:
142:
136:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
434:WP:ACADEMIC
396:—Preceding
391:Dont Delete
242:scope_creep
152:free images
381:Joaquin008
225:Uncle Dick
430:WP:AUTHOR
424:Not that
293:• Gene93k
267:• Gene93k
190:WP:AUTHOR
398:unsigned
113:View log
422:Comment
328:puffery
158:WP refs
146:scholar
86:protect
81:history
375:Delete
354:Delete
320:Delete
307:Delete
238:Delete
221:Delete
130:Google
90:delete
46:delete
322:, no
198:W:BIO
173:JSTOR
134:books
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
446:talk
406:talk
366:talk
334:Kinu
297:talk
282:Note
271:talk
256:Note
246:talk
229:talk
211:talk
194:WP:N
192:and
166:FENS
140:news
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
51:Tone
360:. —
291:--
265:--
180:TWL
115:•
111:– (
448:)
408:)
368:)
299:)
288:.
273:)
262:.
248:)
231:)
213:)
160:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
48:.
444:(
404:(
364:(
343:c
339:/
295:(
269:(
244:(
227:(
209:(
196:/
184:)
176:·
170:·
162:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
137:·
132:(
124:(
121:)
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.