266:, Friends is one, what are the others?. You can appear for a minute on screen and get it listed in imdb, it proves nothing (I'm not even sure why you think I wasn't aware of these other appearances, they are listed in the article, never mind imdb). It is never going to be the case that 1 episode of Friends (or even 1 series as someone suggests) will be considered as the 'event' in WP:OneEvent.
293:
Yes, 'significant' is subjective, but the perception of these roles being insignificant is not helped by the article having zero references to suggest otherwise (no discussion of them in his career information, no detailing of awards etc), and by the fact it identifies them as guest roles, and by the
199:
The keyword is significant. The other TV roles were guest appearances, and the movies were so unremarkable, none of them have an article. I am assuming his appearances in those were also incidental, the article certainly doesn't say otherwise.
380:. The idea that playing a recurring character, appearing in more than half the episodes of the most popular American TV comedy series of its time, isn't enough to demonstrate notability demonstrates how badly flawed the phrasing of
227:
I did a brief search after the above comment, and that was in addition to searches I did before nominating, so I am as sure as I can be bothered to be that they were not significant roles or even films. If you can
336:
it makes no sense to look for relevance using wikipedia itself. again, many notable people, events, objects, brands, do not have an article, and that doesn't make them irrelevant.--
384:
is right now. At the very least, we should treat each season of the show as a separate production, which is an accurate relection of the way prime time US TV shows are produced.
125:
284:" is, on the other hand, subjective. you might think those roles are not significant, some might say they are. you can't delete an article based on a subjetive motive.--
456:
214:
the fact that the movies don't have an article doesn't make them less notable. many notable movies, people, etc., don't have an article. also, you can't just
313:
319:
294:
fact the films have no articles. Seriously, anybody who disagrees with me that apart from
Friends, he has had insignifcant roles, is free to try and
312:
And you don't even have to start with external sources. Using
Knowledge (XXG), you can see that the character 'Ethan' was insignificant to the show
92:
87:
96:
79:
17:
280:
when i wrote the imdb link i wasn't implying that just for appearing in imdb you're notable. i meant that he had multiple parts. "
462:. So he's never had another particularly noteworthy role, but this one was for 10 years in one of the most watched series ever.
389:
146:, namely he has not "had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, or other productions".
49:
345:
Which is why I am asking for sources, and indeed looked for them before nominating, and still did it in the above reply.
471:
451:. He appeared in about half of the episodes of Friends, which is not exactly one event. Articles specifically about him:
491:
36:
253:
alone could have granted him notability, since "one event" would have been just one episode. he appeared 131 times.--
385:
476:
439:
421:
407:
393:
354:
340:
331:
307:
288:
275:
257:
241:
222:
209:
194:
182:
155:
61:
232:
otherwise, that would be great. Films is one of our best covered topics also, and these are pretty recent films.
173:
490:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
83:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
381:
463:
190:. i agree with the commentary above. besides, he appeared in more than one tv series and several movies.--
57:
165:
318:, because neither 'Ethan' or 'Tyler' appears anywhere on that page. Which is reflected by an external
435:
403:
350:
327:
303:
271:
237:
205:
151:
295:
229:
75:
67:
139:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
418:
53:
249:
you can see he's had several appearances. i think it's relevant. also, i think his part in
143:
135:
431:
399:
346:
323:
299:
267:
233:
201:
147:
132:
178:
164:. The article is unsourced, but sources can easily be found. I really don't think
113:
460:
452:
458:
454:
337:
285:
254:
219:
191:
218:
that his appearances on them were incidental, that's mere speculation.--
246:
484:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
430:
If you are to stalk me DJ, try and give an original rationale.
168:
applies because although he was never a regular cast member on
398:
Well, that's certainly a novel way of looking at it I guess.
120:
109:
105:
101:
48:. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (
417:
per all the comments above. What a stupid notion....
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
494:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
142:and non-notable as an actor as defined by
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
174:listed with the cast bios on NBC.com
24:
322:for any kind of significance.
172:, he was notable enough to be
1:
136:biography of a living person
511:
264:multiple significant parts
477:17:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
440:21:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
422:20:53, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
408:10:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
394:03:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
355:02:28, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
341:22:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
332:18:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
308:18:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
289:17:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
276:22:39, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
258:22:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
242:22:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
223:19:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
210:00:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
195:23:38, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
183:21:42, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
156:21:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
144:the entertainer guideline
62:00:09, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
487:Please do not modify it.
262:The WP:ENT criteria is,
179:THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL
138:arguably only known for
32:Please do not modify it.
386:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
76:James Michael Tyler
68:James Michael Tyler
44:The result was
50:non-admin closure
502:
489:
474:
470:
466:
123:
117:
99:
34:
510:
509:
505:
504:
503:
501:
500:
499:
498:
492:deletion review
485:
472:
468:
464:
296:prove otherwise
119:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
508:
506:
497:
496:
480:
479:
445:
444:
443:
442:
425:
424:
412:
411:
410:
382:WP:ENTERTAINER
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
310:
185:
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
507:
495:
493:
488:
482:
481:
478:
475:
467:
461:
459:
457:
455:
453:
450:
447:
446:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
426:
423:
420:
416:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
396:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
376:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:
342:
339:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
311:
309:
305:
301:
297:
292:
291:
290:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
260:
259:
256:
252:
248:
245:
244:
243:
239:
235:
231:
226:
225:
224:
221:
217:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
198:
197:
196:
193:
189:
186:
184:
181:
180:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
159:
158:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
134:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
486:
483:
448:
414:
377:
314:
281:
263:
250:
215:
187:
177:
169:
161:
133:Unreferenced
131:
45:
43:
31:
28:
282:significant
166:WP:ONEEVENT
54:Ron Ritzman
432:MickMacNee
400:MickMacNee
347:MickMacNee
324:MickMacNee
300:MickMacNee
268:MickMacNee
234:MickMacNee
202:MickMacNee
148:MickMacNee
140:one thing
126:View log
473:Windows
315:Sabrina
251:friends
230:show me
170:Friends
93:protect
88:history
465:Fences
320:search
216:assume
121:delete
97:delete
469:&
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
449:Keep
436:talk
415:Keep
404:talk
390:talk
378:Keep
351:talk
338:camr
328:talk
304:talk
286:camr
272:talk
255:camr
247:here
238:talk
220:camr
206:talk
192:camr
188:Keep
162:Keep
152:talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
46:keep
438:)
419:DJ
406:)
392:)
353:)
330:)
306:)
298:.
274:)
240:)
208:)
176:.
154:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:)
434:(
402:(
388:(
349:(
326:(
302:(
270:(
236:(
204:(
150:(
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.