399:
202:(change of content but no sourcds at all) and this has stayed too long (started in May 2008 by SPA) to not have gotten better and what's worse is that there has never been any other significant change. So unless this was an unknown person, there's simply nothing to confirm existence and suggest improvement. Inviting
382:. Any MP in virtually any era will have many references in Google Books, old newspapers and elsewhere, particularly one firmly identified with a political cause. No references whatsoever for "Snipplet argues snippets" or similar details. The "Crime and Outrageous Act" is apparently a bungled reference to the
336:
It really does look like a hoax. If this guy were real, there would be sources. The only other possible explanation is some sort of spelling error. I did try searching on
Sniplet and a couple of abbreviations for James. The only corroboration for his existence that I could locate was a twitter
506:
constituency he represented in
Parliament (presumably because any such detail would have made a hoax easier to detect), and no article about any parliamentary constituency in the entire United Kingdom links to his name either. So he's clearly a figment of somebody's imagination —
498:(they were being wasted on a capricious adventure instead of being compared for preciousness.) And we'll never mind that "snippet of blood" is not a figure of speech anybody would ever have used in a political tirade anyway — blood idiomatically comes in
225:
This was tickling me as such a fabrication I considered speedying but thought AfD was better and at best, if this man existed, the author may have been adding their family history (which would also explain the no sourcing).
167:
310:
If he actually was a "widely respected member of the
British Parliament" active in speaking out about the Potato Famine in Ireland, then certainly he would be discussed in books indexed by Google. But I find
315:. Then, we have a major addition of content by an editor who claims to be a "history buff", and who made just this one edit and then disappeared. I think that this unreferenced article is a hoax.
361:
Hoax. Someone as involved in politics as he's supposed to have been would be well referenced. Lack of simple facts like which constituency he represented in parliament gives it away, too.
482:
from the history books — an MP who'd become a prominent laughingstock, to the point of having his name sweep the entire nation as a sarcastic slang word, would have gotten covered like
120:
268:
161:
246:
486:.) Plus, if you look further back in the edit history, the context of the "snippet of blood" speech changes from the Irish potato famine to the creation of the
127:
383:
52:. The consensus is very clear, and entirely in accord with policy, there is no significant dispute, so I am closing in accordance with
93:
88:
17:
97:
449:
80:
198:
My searches absolutely nothing at all aside from results for other people or simply mirrors. What's especially interesting is
182:
149:
555:
40:
298:
143:
277:
255:
232:
212:
536:
429:
411:
370:
353:
328:
302:
282:
260:
237:
217:
139:
62:
425:
407:
294:
84:
551:
464:
much in place by that time — frex, we still to this day have direct, widely available digital access to
441:
349:
36:
189:
416:
For what it's worth, this is the first
Knowledge (XXG) hoax I've encountered to be "supported" by a
76:
68:
466:
387:
366:
341:
321:
272:
250:
227:
207:
175:
60:
532:
421:
403:
203:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
550:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
395:
345:
155:
293:
I found absolutely nothing in my searches too, beginning to think this is just some hoax.
394:
lists the names of the commissioners on the Royal
Commission (more commonly known as the
362:
316:
57:
528:
114:
487:
436:
Yeah, I'm going with "crock of hooey" here. Past UK Members of
Parliament are
440:
a difficult topic to source — I could potentially buy a member of the old
502:, not snippets. Finally, for added bonus, this article fails to state
444:
in the 1200s or 1300s slipping through the sourceability cracks, but
417:
338:
544:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
523:
had they become even half as infamous as this article claims.
340:- it corroborates his existence as a hoax. Nice spotting,
199:
110:
106:
102:
174:
392:
Young
Ireland: A Fragment of Irish History 1840-1850
188:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
558:). No further edits should be made to this page.
269:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
494:thing he even said the snippets of blood were
8:
267:Note: This debate has been included in the
247:list of England-related deletion discussions
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
511:who had really served in Parliament in the
266:
244:
474:. So no stinking way does something like
402:, and Snipplet's name is not among them.
384:Crime and Outrage Bill (Ireland) 1847
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
460:media and publishing were already
24:
450:Parliament of the United Kingdom
1:
537:18:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
430:13:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
412:12:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
371:10:33, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
354:09:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
329:04:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
303:04:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
283:02:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
261:02:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
238:05:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
218:02:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
63:19:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
470:content all the way back to
575:
547:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
456:. (The foundations of
442:Parliament of England
418:fake Twitter account
467:The Times of London
388:Charles Gavan Duffy
342:User:SwisterTwister
295:SuperCarnivore591
285:
263:
566:
549:
448:a member of the
396:Devon Commission
326:
324:Let's discuss it
280:
275:
258:
253:
235:
230:
215:
210:
193:
192:
178:
130:
118:
100:
48:The result was
34:
574:
573:
569:
568:
567:
565:
564:
563:
562:
556:deletion review
545:
322:
278:
273:
256:
251:
233:
228:
213:
208:
135:
126:
91:
75:
72:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
572:
570:
561:
560:
540:
539:
519:unsourceable,
490:— as does the
434:
433:
432:
373:
356:
331:
305:
287:
286:
274:SwisterTwister
264:
252:SwisterTwister
242:
241:
240:
229:SwisterTwister
209:SwisterTwister
196:
195:
132:
77:James Snipplet
71:
69:James Snipplet
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
571:
559:
557:
553:
548:
542:
541:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
468:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
414:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
372:
368:
364:
360:
357:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
332:
330:
327:
325:
320:
319:
314:
309:
306:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
288:
284:
281:
276:
270:
265:
262:
259:
254:
248:
243:
239:
236:
231:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
216:
211:
206:for comment.
205:
201:
191:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:Find sources:
133:
129:
125:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
546:
543:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
503:
499:
495:
491:
483:
479:
475:
471:
465:
461:
457:
453:
445:
437:
422:Calamondin12
404:Calamondin12
391:
379:
378:. Clearly a
375:
358:
333:
323:
317:
312:
307:
290:
204:Calamondin12
197:
185:
179:
171:
164:
158:
152:
146:
136:
123:
49:
47:
31:
28:
527:with fire.
346:E.M.Gregory
162:free images
521:especially
488:Suez Canal
552:talk page
515:would be
480:disappear
363:Neiltonks
37:talk page
554:or in a
400:page 640
337:account
121:View log
39:or in a
529:Bearcat
452:in the
313:nothing
168:WP refs
156:scholar
94:protect
89:history
54:WP:SNOW
525:Delete
509:nobody
492:entire
458:modern
376:Delete
359:Delete
334:Delete
318:Cullen
308:Delete
291:Delete
140:Google
98:delete
50:Delete
513:1800s
500:drops
496:doing
484:crazy
478:just
454:1800s
398:) on
183:JSTOR
144:books
128:Stats
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
533:talk
517:this
504:what
476:this
472:1785
462:very
426:talk
408:talk
380:hoax
367:talk
350:talk
299:talk
279:talk
257:talk
234:talk
214:talk
200:this
176:FENS
150:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
446:not
438:not
390:'s
190:TWL
119:– (
58:DES
535:)
428:)
420:.
410:)
386:.
369:)
352:)
301:)
271:.
249:.
170:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
56:.
531:(
424:(
406:(
365:(
348:(
344:.
297:(
194:)
186:·
180:·
172:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
142:(
134:(
131:)
124:·
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.