350:
I would also like to apologize about the confusion involved in the AfC process. Currently come changes are being discussed, but the intent is for article writers (like yourself) to wait for a review from a reviewing editor who will either accept the article and move it to the mainspace or reject the
301:
As for my name including "film". I just want to be able to create articles about films that I enjoy. I'm confused as to why that would be an issue as film is where my interest is in contributing to wikipedia. I would also think that someone who is an avid follower of films would be a better source
412:
Lastly, when you are commenting on talk pages, it is standard to use colons to indicate who is saying what. So for example if you are the first one to comment, you use no colons. The next person who comments below them puts one colon before what they write. The next person two, etc. It just makes
390:
No offense taken, as I was just confused as to the issue with my name but your explanation makes complete sense. What I am beginning to understand is that there is not the typical admin roles and restrictions that you typically see with website and that everyone can edit and contribute equally but
200:
Only the BoldLife source is a reliable, independent source that is actually about the topic of the article. Others are not reliable, not independent, or contain merely a passing mention of the article's topic (or less). Because we need multiple reliable, independent sources about the topic,
405:
You can go ahead and add them if you like. Just make sure that if they are being used to establish notability they must be independent (no affiliation), reliable (no blogs, etc), and actually cover the topic of the article (no passing mentions, at least a decently sized paragraph about the
351:
article and tell the article writer what changes need to be made. This is done to help new editors not have their pages deleted from the mainspace. Unfortunately, AfC usually gets very clogged and backlogged, so you probably were waiting awhile.
342:
If the nomination was indeed very controversial, it should not be difficult to find independent, reliable, third-party sources that sufficiently cover the topic. If more of those are found then the page can be included. See
297:
I was searching online about how to get the article published and a wikipedia article explained all I had to do was move it with detailed instructions. I'm green at this and to be honest the system is quite difficult to
169:
257:
237:
391:
an emphasis is put on follow the proper procedure. That's great and such a community oriented approach. I'll be sure to research more before jumping the gun again. Thanks.
163:
354:
Lastly, I apologize for implying things about your username. I assumed that your username was the name of a company affiliated in some way with the article topic.
122:
413:
the formatting a lot nicer and easier to follow. (so since I am using three colons on this one, you use four on the next). Welcome to
Knowledge, btw. :)
129:
387:
I'll add more links to the article relating to the controversy now. I am assuming that is the best method as opposed to adding them here?
409:
There are admins here, but it is more that they are given additional "janitorial" privileges to block/ban users and delete pages, etc.
95:
90:
99:
17:
82:
184:
151:
326:
57:
279:
I'm relatively new to
Knowledge and not sure how this works but I will add my reasons for including this article:
509:
289:
His film "Red Dirt Rising" had one of the largest independent film premiere ever with over 4000 people attending.
40:
283:
He is the
Director of Photography on an Academy Award Nominated film. A role that is key to the films success.
145:
488:
458:
430:
423:
400:
375:
368:
330:
269:
249:
228:
221:
141:
64:
505:
455:
61:
36:
286:
The
Nomination was one of the most controversial nominations in recent history for the academy awards.
314:
191:
177:
392:
318:
303:
86:
415:
360:
302:
of info that someone interested in "Science" or "Astronomy" writing articles about "films".
265:
245:
213:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
504:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
470:
444:
396:
322:
307:
157:
53:
344:
78:
70:
261:
241:
116:
211:
Article creator's username contains "film", and the article topic is a filmmaker
481:
473:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
447:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
208:
Article was moved from AfC by its creator without actually being accepted
498:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
258:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
112:
108:
104:
176:
480:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
454:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
238:
list of North
Carolina-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
512:). No further edits should be made to this page.
293:As for responding to the additional side-notes:
190:
8:
256:Note: This debate has been included in the
236:Note: This debate has been included in the
255:
235:
201:notability has not been established.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
529:
331:14:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
270:02:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
250:02:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
229:01:49, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
501:Please do not modify it.
489:02:54, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
65:01:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
459:08:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
431:00:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
401:20:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
376:19:39, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
204:Additional side-notes:
48:The result was
491:
487:
461:
334:
317:comment added by
272:
252:
58:non-admin closure
520:
503:
486:
484:
479:
475:
453:
449:
429:
426:
420:
374:
371:
365:
333:
311:
227:
224:
218:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
34:
528:
527:
523:
522:
521:
519:
518:
517:
516:
510:deletion review
499:
482:
468:
442:
424:
416:
414:
369:
361:
359:
312:
222:
214:
212:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
526:
524:
515:
514:
494:
493:
492:
477:
476:
465:
464:
463:
462:
451:
450:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
410:
407:
388:
385:
379:
378:
356:
355:
352:
348:
347:for more info.
340:
336:
335:
299:
291:
290:
287:
284:
274:
273:
253:
232:
231:
209:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
525:
513:
511:
507:
502:
496:
495:
490:
485:
478:
474:
472:
467:
466:
460:
457:
452:
448:
446:
441:
440:
432:
428:
427:
421:
419:
411:
408:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
389:
386:
384:TheCascadian,
383:
382:
381:
380:
377:
373:
372:
366:
364:
358:
357:
353:
349:
346:
341:
338:
337:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
309:
305:
300:
296:
295:
294:
288:
285:
282:
281:
280:
278:
271:
267:
263:
259:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
233:
230:
226:
225:
219:
217:
210:
207:
206:
205:
202:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:James Suttles
76:
75:
72:
71:James Suttles
69:
67:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
500:
497:
469:
456:NorthAmerica
443:
422:
417:
367:
362:
313:— Preceding
292:
276:
275:
220:
215:
203:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
62:NorthAmerica
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
298:understand.
164:free images
339:Hi JLFilm,
506:talk page
425:Cascadian
370:Cascadian
262:• Gene93k
242:• Gene93k
223:Cascadian
37:talk page
508:or in a
471:Relisted
445:Relisted
327:contribs
315:unsigned
304:• JLFilm
123:View log
54:WP:NPASR
39:or in a
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
406:topic.
393:JLFilm
345:WP:GNG
319:JLFilm
142:Google
100:delete
483:slakr
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
397:talk
323:talk
308:talk
277:Keep
266:talk
246:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
56:). (
418:The
363:The
216:The
192:TWL
121:– (
52:. (
399:)
329:)
325:•
268:)
260:.
248:)
240:.
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
60:)
395:(
321:(
310:)
306:(
264:(
244:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.