281:. Attempts to change this policy should be made on the talk page of that article, not here. Whatever the outcome of this AfD debate, the nominator seems to have done an inadequate job. He finds no references, whereas the first person to wander by and click a link finds 1000 plus (a few citations indeed!).
427:
at
Waikato lists him as the editor for MCQ (that's how I found out about it) so I'm quite sure they're the same. I tried searching Dalhousie for his name but found very little there. I don't know why MCQ lists his affiliation as Dalhousie; maybe it's a mistake, or maybe he was there at some point and
303:
Because you don't like the way that the nominator handled this it does not follow that they are trying to change policy, and I wonder if you really thought that was the case. If you have found 2000 reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject (or even one) then it will be very helpful if
257:
Nothing whatsoever to suggest he is any more than a very ordinary run-of-the-mill academic. The fact that a few citations can be located proves nothing: all academics write papers, and papers get cited by other academics, even if they are of minor significance. I have found no evidence that Barker
308:
that was done was clicking on a link: if so that is not enough. You need to sort the wheat from the chaff, e.g. the mentions of this James Barker from other James
Barkers, the passing mentions from the significant coverage, the multiple mirrors of an original article from those originals, the
408:. The editor of the journal is affiliated with Dalhousie university whereas the subject of this nomination appears to be from New Zealand. Are they the same? If they are different this will reflect on citations. The article is poorly written and needs improvement at least.
304:
you can give us links to some of them: simply stating that they exist is not helpful. I have spent a considerable amount of time searching, and have not found them. Also I wonder whether "the first person to wander by and click a link" implies that
309:
reliable sources from the unreliable ones, etc. You may of course have done this, but it is not clear from the above comment that you have. If you have then please, as I have suggested above, give us links to the good sources you have found.
239:. J R Barker is a not uncommon name but on GS I find cites in management science of 1087, 114, 89, 43... which is a good start. Could the nominator comment if these are for the correct person? If so there are plenty of references.
258:
has received particularly significant attention, and the article does not even suggest that he has. Part of the original text of the article was written in the first person. The article is essentially a very short C.V. or resume.
160:
215:
357:
115:
154:
120:
88:
83:
92:
17:
75:
175:
142:
331:
495:
36:
136:
494:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
433:
396:
368:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
480:
460:
437:
417:
400:
372:
347:
318:
290:
267:
248:
230:
204:
132:
57:
343:
314:
263:
79:
389:
192:
182:
456:
413:
286:
244:
226:
424:
429:
392:
364:
168:
339:
310:
259:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
448:
382:
335:
278:
148:
53:
452:
409:
282:
240:
222:
71:
63:
277:. WP policy regarding notability of academics, researchers and scholars is determined by
476:
200:
109:
338:
criterion 1. I don't understand how these can be described as "a few" citations.
49:
469:
as editor of major journal. The material needs to be added to the article.
471:
196:
488:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
216:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
105:
101:
97:
167:
332:
a paper that has attracted over a thousand citations
181:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
498:). No further edits should be made to this page.
358:list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions
385:#1, but also I think he passes #8 as editor of
8:
447:. I think that settles the matter. Passes
352:
210:
356:: This debate has been included in the
214:: This debate has been included in the
381:. Per Phil Bridger he appears to pass
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
387:Management Communication Quarterly
24:
330:. Any academic who has written
195:. Unreferenced. Disputed prod.
1:
515:
348:20:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
319:12:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
291:01:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
268:10:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
249:08:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
231:08:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
205:06:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
481:17:28, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
461:04:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
438:03:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
418:02:15, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
401:22:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
373:22:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
58:18:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
491:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
334:pretty clearly passes
44:The result was
375:
361:
233:
219:
506:
493:
362:
220:
191:Appears to fail
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
514:
513:
509:
508:
507:
505:
504:
503:
502:
496:deletion review
489:
128:
119:
86:
72:James R. Barker
70:
67:
64:James R. Barker
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
512:
510:
501:
500:
484:
483:
464:
442:
441:
440:
430:David Eppstein
403:
393:David Eppstein
376:
365:David Eppstein
350:
324:
323:
322:
321:
295:
294:
271:
270:
252:
234:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
511:
499:
497:
492:
486:
485:
482:
478:
474:
473:
468:
465:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:
439:
435:
431:
426:
425:staff profile
422:
421:
419:
415:
411:
407:
404:
402:
398:
394:
390:
388:
384:
380:
377:
374:
370:
366:
359:
355:
351:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
326:
325:
320:
316:
312:
307:
302:
299:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:
272:
269:
265:
261:
256:
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
232:
228:
224:
217:
213:
209:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
194:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
490:
487:
470:
466:
444:
405:
386:
378:
353:
340:Phil Bridger
327:
311:JamesBWatson
305:
300:
274:
260:JamesBWatson
254:
236:
211:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
451:#1 and #8.
193:WP:ACADEMIC
155:free images
453:Xxanthippe
410:Xxanthippe
283:Xxanthippe
241:Xxanthippe
223:Xxanthippe
423:Barker's
428:moved? —
406:Question
116:View log
449:WP:Prof
383:WP:PROF
336:WP:PROF
301:Comment
279:WP:Prof
275:Comment
237:Comment
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
255:Delete
133:Google
93:delete
50:JohnCD
477:talk
467:Keep'
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
457:talk
445:Keep
434:talk
414:talk
397:talk
379:Keep
369:talk
354:Note
344:talk
328:Keep
315:talk
287:talk
264:talk
245:talk
227:talk
212:Note
201:talk
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:keep
472:DGG
391:. —
306:all
197:noq
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
479:)
459:)
436:)
420:.
416:)
399:)
371:)
360:.
346:)
317:)
289:)
266:)
247:)
229:)
218:.
203:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
475:(
463:.
455:(
432:(
412:(
395:(
367:(
363:—
342:(
313:(
293:.
285:(
262:(
251:.
243:(
225:(
221:—
199:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.