Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Japanese pop culture in America - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

536:. Like Malkinann, I wonder if we don't already cover this topic already under another name or perhaps as a very big section of another article; Japanese pop culture's reception and uptake in the USA is such a legitimate and obvious topic that it seems hard to believe it only got an article in December 2010. -- 432:
While I agree that wikipedia is not a place to post your own work, the impact on Japanese pop culture in America is big and goes beyond just anime and manga so in a way its ironic that this topic was made by someone who was just doing an english paper. I feel this article just needs to be rewritten
312:
The writer does seem to have had little experience with WP, hence their plea when such is useless, but I get the distinct impression from their plea that their sense of what it is has become quite clear, if it was not before. The failing here is in the nom not being able to use Google, not the
496: 156: 519:
Japanese pop culture has had a huge impact on America in the last decade that goes on strong today, I fully see potential in this article, although parts of it need to be rewritten and sourced.
288: 150: 117: 549:
It is a notable topic. I'm sure there are books written on the subject, and news coverage listing something about this. There is an interview linked to and referenced in the
90: 85: 94: 238:
merely by typing the title of the article into google, as I did to find these, it would have confirmed this seems to be a perfectly deep enough topic for an article. --
77: 379:- The article seems large enough and has the potential to expand sufficiently to warrant its own article. Which I believe was the OP's rationale for deletion/merge. 553:
article, where the American creator of this animated series said he was influenced by Japanese anime style. That's the only thing that comes to mind right away.
478:
notable topic. I'm disappointed that there doesn't seem to have been an attempt to explain why the redirect was done, and I'm disappointed by the
221:
Article needs perhaps a retitle and some cleaning up, but as a subject it is clearly notable as being covered by many scholarly sources. See
171: 138: 81: 313:
author's writing ability. WP writers got scooped by an English writing project - Snap!. So what's it going to be? Hubris or humility?
17: 593: 576: 528: 509: 442: 425: 392: 364: 350: 336: 322: 303: 276: 253: 212: 59: 132: 584:- Notable topic, and the majority of the information in the article is capable of being sourced even if it's not at present. - 73: 65: 421: 128: 261:. I tend to agree. Unless there is another article on this topic to merge to, this is a big topic that needs an article. 608: 178: 36: 540: 455: 228: 607:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
589: 524: 438: 188: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
144: 191:
twice, but the creator reverted it both times (I didn't do it a third time because I didn't want to violate
467: 475: 225: 222: 346: 318: 479: 585: 520: 505: 434: 271: 164: 235: 417: 246: 53: 231: 299: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
487: 554: 387: 360: 342: 332: 314: 208: 403: 192: 537: 491: 466:- seems like an analogous article (if simultaneously broader and more narrow in scope) to 452: 483: 501: 263: 196: 497:
From Impressionism To Anime: Japan As Fantasy And Fan Cult In The Western Imagination
412: 239: 50: 295: 203:, it's clear that s/he doesn't quite understand what Knowledge (XXG) is all about. 111: 380: 550: 471: 490:
behaviour which leads to Knowledge (XXG) not retaining new editors.
601:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
410:
proves the point that this is someone's research paper. —
484:
any of the alternatives explained by the editing policy
407: 200: 107: 103: 99: 163: 289:
list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions
447:Farix, a research paper is presumably heavy on the 177: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 611:). No further edits should be made to this page. 500:may assist in the building of the article. -- 195:). I was then going to ask for assistance at 8: 355:I meant I didn't understand what you said. 283: 199:but considering what the creator wrote in 230:is a book length treatment of the topic, 451:part as well as containing some OR... -- 287:: This debate has been included in the 187:I initially redirected this article to 227:as newspaper sources, this one here: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 234:is an NPR podcast. Had the OP done 24: 486:. This is precisely the kind of 74:Japanese pop culture in America 66:Japanese pop culture in America 402:This article is just flat out 1: 594:00:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC) 577:22:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC) 529:16:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC) 510:04:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC) 443:16:54, 16 December 2010 (UTC) 426:14:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC) 393:14:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC) 365:21:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC) 351:12:14, 13 December 2010 (UTC) 337:06:50, 13 December 2010 (UTC) 323:19:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC) 304:02:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC) 277:19:21, 11 December 2010 (UTC) 254:19:09, 11 December 2010 (UTC) 213:18:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC) 60:19:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC) 543:22:39 16 December 2010 (GMT) 482:of the article, rather than 458:22:40 16 December 2010 (GMT) 433:and have some TLC for it. - 628: 604:Please do not modify it. 189:Japanese popular culture 32:Please do not modify it. 468:anime and manga fandom 361:(let's talk about it) 333:(let's talk about it) 209:(let's talk about it) 474:, and seems like a 44:The result was 404:original research 363: 335: 306: 292: 211: 201:this edit summary 619: 606: 573: 570: 567: 564: 561: 558: 406:. In fact, this 385: 359: 331: 293: 275: 268: 249: 242: 207: 182: 181: 167: 115: 97: 56: 34: 627: 626: 622: 621: 620: 618: 617: 616: 615: 609:deletion review 602: 571: 568: 565: 562: 559: 556: 492:Susan J. Napier 381: 264: 262: 247: 240: 124: 88: 72: 69: 54: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 625: 623: 614: 613: 597: 596: 586:DustFormsWords 579: 544: 531: 521:Knowledgekid87 513: 512: 460: 459: 445: 435:Knowledgekid87 429: 428: 396: 395: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 307: 281: 280: 279: 185: 184: 121: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 624: 612: 610: 605: 599: 598: 595: 591: 587: 583: 580: 578: 575: 574: 552: 548: 545: 542: 539: 535: 532: 530: 526: 522: 518: 515: 514: 511: 507: 503: 499: 498: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 462: 461: 457: 454: 450: 446: 444: 440: 436: 431: 430: 427: 423: 419: 415: 414: 409: 405: 401: 398: 397: 394: 391: 390: 386: 384: 378: 374: 366: 362: 358: 354: 353: 352: 348: 344: 340: 339: 338: 334: 330: 326: 325: 324: 320: 316: 311: 308: 305: 301: 297: 290: 286: 282: 278: 273: 269: 267: 260: 257: 256: 255: 252: 251: 250: 243: 237: 233: 229: 226: 223: 220: 217: 216: 215: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 180: 176: 173: 170: 166: 162: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 130: 127: 126:Find sources: 122: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 58: 57: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 603: 600: 581: 555: 546: 533: 516: 495: 463: 448: 411: 408:edit summary 399: 388: 382: 376: 356: 328: 309: 284: 265: 258: 245: 244: 218: 204: 186: 174: 168: 160: 153: 147: 141: 135: 125: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 476:potentially 343:Anarchangel 315:Anarchangel 151:free images 541:(contribs) 480:tagbombing 456:(contribs) 389:talk to me 375:Anyway... 551:Exo-Squad 534:Weak keep 502:Malkinann 472:Japonisme 296:• Gene93k 272:reasoning 266:Abductive 236:WP:BEFORE 449:research 118:View log 259:Comment 157:WP refs 145:scholar 91:protect 86:history 55:Faraone 400:Delete 383:Pol430 357:Erpert 329:Erpert 327:What? 241:Jayron 205:Erpert 193:WP:3RR 129:Google 95:delete 572:Focus 538:Gwern 488:bitey 453:Gwern 413:Farix 341:And? 172:JSTOR 133:books 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 590:talk 582:Keep 547:Keep 525:talk 517:Keep 506:talk 464:Keep 439:talk 377:Keep 347:talk 319:talk 310:Keep 300:talk 285:Note 232:here 224:and 219:Keep 197:WP:3 165:FENS 139:news 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 46:keep 494:'s 470:or 294:-- 179:TWL 116:– ( 592:) 527:) 508:) 441:) 424:) 420:| 349:) 321:) 302:) 291:. 248:32 159:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 48:. 588:( 569:m 566:a 563:e 560:r 557:D 523:( 504:( 437:( 422:c 418:t 416:( 345:( 317:( 298:( 274:) 270:( 183:) 175:· 169:· 161:· 154:· 148:· 142:· 136:· 131:( 123:( 120:) 114:) 76:( 51:L

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
L
Faraone
19:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Japanese pop culture in America
Japanese pop culture in America
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Japanese popular culture
WP:3RR
WP:3
this edit summary

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.