387:
included." I looked at the evidence offered in the article and from my own searches and concluded that, on balance, this subject is not sufficiently notable to warrant an encyclopedia entry. For what it's worth, I do believe that there are plenty of porn stars who do belong in WP. This person is not one of them. If my vote and comments are not merely disagreeable to you, but also unintelligent, well, I do apologize. --
358:
Whatever I personally think of the pornbio standards, they have the support of the community, and the article clearly meets them. Anyone nominating or supporting deletion for this has clearly not read them; some basic knowledge needs to be seen as a prerequisite to making intelligent comments here,
386:
at the top of the WP:BIO page where it says: "People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be
405:
I think DGG was mainly referring to Cox wasan and to the nom. It is legitimate to think that a subject isn't sufficiently notable to be in WP, despite like in this case he/she passes SNG-criteria and has some (sporadic) secondary coverage. I consider that as
155:
226:
116:
302:
clearly passes WP:PORNBIO#2 as WP:ANYBIO#1. Long series of XRCO & AVN noms includig noms in two significant categories like "Best New
Starlet" and "Performer of the Year".--
186:
Subject appears to fail both GNG & PORNBIO. Can't find significant third party coverage and she appears to only have been nominated for awards and never winning any.
149:
414:", it demonstrate he has not read PORNBIO. And it is even more "unintelligent", after three users noticed how the subject effectively passes this SNG, saying "
206:
203:
473:
251:. Got a brief flutter of notice for making a Jennifer Lopez take-off porno. Other than that, stray mentions, PR, & sales sites. --
17:
89:
84:
410:, but your comment correctly explained this POV. It is "unintelligent" saying, as the nom says, that a subject fails pornbio as "
93:
382:. I cannot speak on behalf of anyone else, but I did read the pornbio standards, before voting to delete. I've also read the
76:
170:
137:
496:
40:
53:
392:
256:
273:
131:
477:
447:
427:
396:
370:
346:
328:
311:
294:
277:
260:
240:
218:
195:
127:
58:
407:
492:
468:
80:
36:
388:
252:
191:
177:
464:
383:
423:
342:
324:
307:
269:
163:
72:
64:
236:
214:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
491:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
292:
143:
187:
419:
338:
320:
303:
443:
366:
232:
210:
110:
287:
436:
yes, I apologize for my wording, because I was chiefly thinking on the nom.
438:
361:
412:
she appears to only have been nominated for awards and never winning any
485:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
227:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
268:- Passes PORNBIO with multiple years of AVN nominations.
106:
102:
98:
162:
418:" without any reason, explanation or comment given.--
359:otherwise AfD becomes I like it/ I don't like it.
176:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
499:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
225:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:
202:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
337:It seems you haven't read PORNBIO.--
24:
1:
478:20:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
428:10:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
397:05:26, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
371:20:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
347:12:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
329:11:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
312:09:29, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
295:08:57, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
278:08:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
261:04:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
241:00:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
219:00:17, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
196:21:51, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
448:03:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
59:23:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
516:
319:- Fails GNG and PORNBIO.--
488:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
204:WikiProject Pornography
416:Fails GNG and PORNBIO
285:per Morbidthoughts.
48:The result was
243:
230:
207:list of deletions
507:
490:
384:introductory bit
290:
231:
221:
181:
180:
166:
114:
96:
56:
34:
515:
514:
510:
509:
508:
506:
505:
504:
503:
497:deletion review
486:
476:
389:Hobbes Goodyear
286:
253:Hobbes Goodyear
201:
123:
87:
71:
68:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
513:
511:
502:
501:
481:
480:
472:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
431:
430:
400:
399:
374:
373:
352:
351:
350:
349:
332:
331:
314:
297:
280:
270:Morbidthoughts
263:
245:
244:
222:
184:
183:
120:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
512:
500:
498:
494:
489:
483:
482:
479:
475:
470:
469:Malik Shabazz
466:
462:
459:
458:
449:
445:
441:
440:
435:
434:
433:
432:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
394:
390:
385:
381:
378:
377:
376:
375:
372:
368:
364:
363:
357:
354:
353:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
334:
333:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
296:
293:
289:
284:
281:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
228:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
200:
199:
198:
197:
193:
189:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
125:Find sources:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:Jasmine Byrne
70:
69:
66:
65:Jasmine Byrne
63:
61:
60:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
487:
484:
460:
437:
415:
411:
408:WP:IDONTLIKE
379:
360:
355:
316:
299:
282:
265:
248:
185:
173:
167:
159:
152:
146:
140:
134:
124:
49:
47:
31:
28:
150:free images
465:WP:PORNBIO
463:Satisfies
188:JoshyDinda
493:talk page
420:Cavarrone
339:Cavarrone
321:Cox wasan
304:Cavarrone
233:• Gene93k
211:• Gene93k
37:talk page
495:or in a
117:View log
39:or in a
156:WP refs
144:scholar
90:protect
85:history
317:Delete
288:Dismas
249:Delete
128:Google
94:delete
474:Stalk
444:talk
380:Reply
367:talk
171:JSTOR
132:books
111:views
103:watch
99:links
55:m.o.p
16:<
467:. —
461:Keep
424:talk
393:talk
356:Keep
343:talk
325:talk
308:talk
300:Keep
283:Keep
274:talk
266:Keep
257:talk
237:talk
215:talk
192:talk
164:FENS
138:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
50:keep
439:DGG
362:DGG
178:TWL
115:– (
446:)
426:)
395:)
369:)
345:)
327:)
310:)
276:)
259:)
239:)
229:.
217:)
209:.
194:)
158:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
471:/
442:(
422:(
391:(
365:(
341:(
323:(
306:(
291:|
272:(
255:(
235:(
213:(
190:(
182:)
174:·
168:·
160:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
130:(
122:(
119:)
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.