157:
make your poor Uncle G suffer! You never call. You never write. You never visit. You don't just zap the unsourced "popular media" and "characteristics" sections and start again with a stub and the several sources already cited in the article. The mighty Doc has no respect for the lowly article subjects, that multiple independent reliable source writers have worked their fingers to the bone to document in depth. And you haven't been eating properly, either, have you? Oy!
156:
I was hoping to buy food today. But now I have to rescue this, with the ample sources that exist covering this stereotype, including discussion of its roots in Jewish culture and why it is a particularly Jewish stereotype (ISBN 9780878559534, chapter 1). I have to go hungry for you! Look how you
142:
Gaaah. Original research, virtually all uncited and much of it is not about a stereotype but just people with Jewish mothers. I'm sure the stereotype may exist, and that can be noted in an article on stereotypes or on Jewish parenthood, but I am equally sure that this isn't an article and that no
171:
Meh, if you are genuinely going to work on this, I've no objections to you closing this afd and we can consider whether the finished product is encyclopedic at a later date. I've enough respect for your work to know you don't tend to rescue total hopeless cases. I've messaged WP.Judaism also, it
146:(This survived a deletion attempt in 2005, which can be found on talk, but I think we've matured since then, and 4 years of existence shows there's little cause for thinking this will improve with age.)
75:
135:
102:
97:
106:
89:
17:
93:
176:
166:
150:
59:
193:
36:
173:
147:
192:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
85:
65:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
162:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
172:
would be interesting to get their take. I'm open to being convinced. Here, have a cookie.--
55:
158:
123:
50:
186:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
143:
article could be written without violating WP:OR and WP:SYN.
130:
119:
115:
111:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
196:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
76:Articles for deletion/Jewish mother syndrome
48:. AfD apparently withdrawn by nominator
73:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
72:
24:
1:
213:
177:19:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
167:18:47, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
151:17:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
60:20:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
189:Please do not modify it.
86:Jewish mother stereotype
66:Jewish mother stereotype
32:Please do not modify it.
71:Related AfD discusions:
44:The result was
204:
191:
133:
127:
109:
34:
212:
211:
207:
206:
205:
203:
202:
201:
200:
194:deletion review
187:
174:Scott Mac (Doc)
148:Scott Mac (Doc)
129:
100:
84:
81:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
210:
208:
199:
198:
182:
181:
180:
179:
140:
139:
80:
79:
78:
70:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
209:
197:
195:
190:
184:
183:
178:
175:
170:
169:
168:
164:
160:
155:
154:
153:
152:
149:
144:
137:
132:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:
77:
74:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
188:
185:
145:
141:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
136:View log
159:Uncle G
103:protect
98:history
131:delete
107:delete
134:) – (
124:views
116:watch
112:links
16:<
163:talk
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
56:talk
46:keep
51:DGG
165:)
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
58:)
161:(
138:)
128:(
126:)
88:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.