486:- there are a few GoogleBooks hits which seem to discuss his contribution in the context of a wider view of Canadian Catholic history. There's also one which would seem to provide some details (biographical) by way of an obituary not long after his death. However, I'm struggling to source online links and most of the content is in French anyway.
490:
provides for sources in languages other than
English (they can all be in French - there's not requirement for them to be in English) but my limited French and lack of access to the texts themselves means checking reliability of the sources is going to be a struggle. That aside, there seems to be a
354:
from 1888-1897 so there will be less than the customary number of good sources, but I still feel he is notable. He was also known as John
Nicholas Lemmens and a decent amount of material was written about him on page 515 of
306:
Why you want to delete the Jean-Nicolas
Lemmens page is without a valuable reason ? It has significance for the B.C. Canada people as he was the bishop of St. Andrew Cathedral and layed the first stone for that Cathedral.
173:
521:
Further to the above, I've had a crack at doing some cleaning up - removed some of the strange language that came with the copy-paste, provided some verification references, fixed a few of the links, etc.
383:
126:
167:
403:
249::Since I can't find a notability guideline for bishops and I'm not particularly aware of how important they are in the Catholic Church, I have mentioned this discussion at
347:
423:
133:
99:
94:
103:
303:
I am afraid you did not look on the French page carefully enough as on the French page it is a
Jacques Nicolas Lmmens the famous organ player.
250:
86:
188:
155:
332:
220:
64:
17:
230:
This is an article translated from the Dutch
Knowledge; I've added the interwiki and the Dutch source for the article.
149:
53:
535:
512:
478:
461:
435:
415:
395:
374:
359:. Unless someone else incorporates that material (it can be copied or completely rewritten) I hope to do so soon.
351:
336:
318:
295:
268:
239:
224:
68:
446:. Consensus has been that Catholic bishops are almost always considered notable - this discussion from last year
554:
145:
90:
40:
450:
346::Pending comment from someone from WikiProject catholocism, it appears that Catholic Bishops are notable. See
499:
arguments without some more to back it up, but everything combined would suggest this article should be kept.
447:
314:
195:
550:
528:
505:
457:
36:
310:
212:
key guideline. Appears to be an entry at the French
Knowledge, but that's French, needs to be English.
474:
367:
288:
261:
82:
74:
329:
277:
217:
181:
61:
161:
431:
411:
391:
235:
205:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
549:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
356:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
523:
500:
453:
487:
470:
360:
281:
254:
208:, having no English significant coverage or reliable sources at all in order to pass the
452:. Also, per Ryan's above comments, the bishop in question is mentioned in some sources.
326:
214:
58:
209:
427:
407:
387:
231:
120:
492:
469:. Bishops of major denominations are invariably considered notable. --
280:
is a source, but it doesn't do anything to help establish notability.
324:
Nope, see my nomination description. No notability, consider that.
543:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
491:
contention that all bishops are (by default) considered
116:
112:
108:
180:
384:
list of
British Columbia-related deletion discussions
404:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
348:List of the Catholic bishops of the United States
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
557:). No further edits should be made to this page.
194:
8:
422:Note: This debate has been included in the
402:Note: This debate has been included in the
382:Note: This debate has been included in the
424:list of People-related deletion discussions
421:
401:
381:
251:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Catholicism
7:
24:
52:. I withdraw this nomination. (
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
204:Subject does not appear to be
1:
536:04:04, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
513:03:43, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
479:13:31, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
462:03:37, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
436:00:47, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
416:00:47, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
396:00:47, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
375:20:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
337:19:45, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
319:15:42, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
296:16:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
269:16:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
240:08:29, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
225:07:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
69:04:06, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
574:
352:Bishop of Vancouver Island
546:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
449:. Also, see this essay
495:. I'm not a huge of
83:Jean-Nicolas Lemmens
75:Jean-Nicolas Lemmens
48:The result was
497:all x are notable
438:
418:
398:
54:non-admin closure
565:
548:
532:
509:
335:
223:
199:
198:
184:
136:
124:
106:
67:
34:
573:
572:
568:
567:
566:
564:
563:
562:
561:
555:deletion review
544:
530:
507:
350:. Lemmens was
325:
213:
141:
132:
97:
81:
78:
57:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
571:
569:
560:
559:
540:
539:
538:
516:
515:
481:
464:
440:
439:
419:
399:
378:
377:
340:
339:
301:
300:
299:
298:
272:
271:
243:
242:
202:
201:
138:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
570:
558:
556:
552:
547:
541:
537:
534:
533:
527:
526:
520:
519:
518:
517:
514:
511:
510:
504:
503:
498:
494:
489:
485:
482:
480:
476:
472:
468:
465:
463:
459:
455:
451:
448:
445:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
400:
397:
393:
389:
385:
380:
379:
376:
373:
372:
371:
366:
365:
364:
358:
353:
349:
345:
342:
341:
338:
334:
331:
328:
323:
322:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
297:
294:
293:
292:
287:
286:
285:
279:
276:
275:
274:
273:
270:
267:
266:
265:
260:
259:
258:
252:
248:
245:
244:
241:
237:
233:
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
219:
216:
211:
207:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
63:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
545:
542:
529:
524:
506:
501:
496:
483:
466:
443:
369:
368:
362:
361:
357:this PD book
343:
311:Glemmens1940
309:
305:
302:
290:
289:
283:
282:
263:
262:
256:
255:
246:
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
129:
49:
47:
31:
28:
454:Majoreditor
168:free images
471:Necrothesp
551:talk page
37:talk page
553:or in a
525:Stalwart
502:Stalwart
488:WP:NOENG
127:View log
39:or in a
493:notable
428:Frankie
408:Frankie
388:Frankie
247:Comment
232:Menke66
206:notable
174:WP refs
162:scholar
100:protect
95:history
210:WP:GNG
146:Google
104:delete
370:Vesey
291:Vesey
264:Vesey
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
484:Keep
475:talk
467:Keep
458:talk
444:Keep
432:talk
426:. —
412:talk
406:. —
392:talk
386:. —
363:Ryan
344:Keep
315:talk
284:Ryan
278:Here
257:Ryan
236:talk
182:FENS
156:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
50:keep
531:111
508:111
333:ley
330:and
327:TBr
221:ley
218:and
215:TBr
196:TWL
125:– (
65:ley
62:and
59:TBr
477:)
460:)
434:)
414:)
394:)
317:)
253:.
238:)
176:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
56:)
473:(
456:(
430:(
410:(
390:(
313:(
234:(
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
130:·
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.