31:
134:
filed a copyright violation on another article, that I consider to be in bogus and in bad faith, and an attempt to game the wikipedia rules. I called them on it in a comment filed just a few minutes before JM filed this {AfD}. If JM believed in full disclosure they would have acknowledged this
150:
JM says in their explanation that the article should be merged, or if not deleted. So, why didn't they apply the {mergeto} tag instead of the {AfD} tag? This is, in my opinion, a misuse of {AfD}.
105:. The text of the article and external links are similar to the Richmond article. The witness is not notable other than in the contextof the Richmond case, so perhaps this article could be
143:
JM suggests we should merge these articles when Waruch's inquiry is still in progress? The results of Waruch's inquiry will have nothing to do with
Richmond. Remember,
40:
162:
Waruch doesn't pass my criteria for notability. In 5 years, will anyone remember who this guy is? Merge anything that isn't already stated into the
144:
17:
246:
228:
65:
140:
Granted, the two articles contain common elements. But Waruch, IMO, merited an article when we learned he too was under inquiry.
46:
130:-- In the interests of full disclosure -- I started the Jeffrey Waruch article. In the interests of full disclosure,
178:. The Richmond case is notable; this subject is not, and his role in the case should be basically a sentence in the
227:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
195:
179:
163:
110:
102:
78:
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a
213:
186:
170:
121:
89:
131:
118:
208:
95:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
198:
article. The results of Waruch's own investigation may affect his own notability however. --
199:
167:
86:
240:
183:
194:- The information should be recorded somewhere, but would be best in th
221:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25:
147:. There is no downside to keeping the two articles distinct.
68:
nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
101:
This article concerns a witness in the court martial of
231:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
45:For an explanation of the process, see
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
41:deletion review on 2010 March 19
29:
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1:
73:The result of the debate was
214:08:39, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
187:22:18, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
171:17:18, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
145:Knowledge (XXG) is not paper
122:15:05, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
90:02:17, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
263:
247:Pages at deletion review
224:Please do not modify it.
196:Edward L. Richmond (Pfc)
180:Edward L. Richmond (Pfc)
164:Edward L. Richmond (Pfc)
111:Edward L. Richmond (Pfc)
103:Edward L. Richmond (Pfc)
79:Edward L. Richmond (Pfc)
61:Please do not modify it.
132:User:Joaquin Murietta
66:Votes for Undeletion
229:undeletion request
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
254:
226:
211:
206:
119:Joaquin Murietta
63:
33:
32:
26:
262:
261:
257:
256:
255:
253:
252:
251:
237:
236:
235:
222:
209:
200:
99:
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
260:
258:
250:
249:
239:
238:
234:
233:
217:
216:
189:
173:
152:
151:
148:
141:
137:
136:
113:, or, if not,
98:
96:Jeffrey Waruch
93:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
259:
248:
245:
244:
242:
232:
230:
225:
219:
218:
215:
212:
207:
204:
197:
193:
190:
188:
185:
181:
177:
174:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
153:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:
133:
129:
126:
125:
124:
123:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
97:
94:
92:
91:
88:
84:
80:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
223:
220:
202:
191:
175:
159:
155:
127:
114:
106:
100:
82:
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
135:themselves.
182:article.
166:article.--
87:Rob Church
168:Isotope23
241:Category
115:deleted
201:Cactus
176:Delete
160:Delete
158:&
107:merged
83:delete
192:Merge
156:Merge
109:with
81:then
75:merge
16:<
128:keep
205:man
184:MCB
77:to
243::
85:.
43:.
210:✍
203:.
117:.
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.