241:: This page was NOT recreated by a blocked or formerly blocked user... it was created by me. I have assisted Jenna and her family by posting relevant information received directly from the family on the Internet. Other contributors have since added relevant information to make this page more useful. I don't know who put up the original page that was already deleted, but my intention was to add to the already exiting page to add accurate and relevant information according to the terms of Knowledge (XXG). If there is a question to the accuracy or relevance of this page, inquiries should be directed to Jenna Rose and her family. It is easy to find their contact information, or I can provide it. Furthermore, Jenna's popularity has grown based on her own talent and viral videos. As of the moment I am writing this, her YouTube video "My Jeans" has over 14 million views. Let's work together to keep this page in compliance, to keep it relevant, and to keep in useful. Scott
315:
This person is not only a minor but a very young minor (7th-grader apparently) and we are and should be very conservative about articles about such young persons out of BLP concerns. Even if the article is entirely laudatory now it might not always be so. If she retains an article and later something
346:
I'm voting delete on the basis of marginal entity who is a very young minor, besides which it was already deleted. Four people (including the nominator) voted Delete there, one suggested a redirect, and nobody with standing wanted to keep the article. I suggest the person closing this discussion add
216:
Leaning towards delete...? Yes, there's articles dedicated to her, but so do many other people who had their "fifteen minutes of fame" that did not get their
Knowledge (XXG) article here. If one had taken a look at the statistics search, Jenna Rose basically rode on Rebecca Black's infamy, and
331:), which I guess is a very small paper but on the other hand it's a fully developed feature-length article, just about this person. There's also coverage in Patch, which seems to be an online-only entity but apparently has a real editorial staff and so forth. They've even noted her existence
342:
Is 14 million YouTube hits a lot or a little? Can anybody answer this? If it's one of the ten highest total ever achieved, that'd mean a lot more than if its just something that happens to hundreds of videos a year. Also the 14 million claim is not
316:
occurs that is not so great, there'll be an article to hang that info into. If she was clearly very notable then we'd have to have an article. But if she's only marginally notable, we want to be as conservative as possible here, I'm just saying.
311:
created by a blocked user, that's a deal-killer: we automatically delete such material even if it's good on the grounds of enforcing the block. Apparently this isn't the case, though, or claimed not to be the case, so this may be
153:
387:, I think sources cross the line into notability. I don't see advantage to deletion, because this is the kind of thing people will be googling in years hence, "do you remember that 'my jeans' girl..."--
439:
202:: Regardless of who created it, there's a case to be made for notability, is there not? There have been articles dedicated to her even though she's sort of a level below Rebecca Black.--
147:
114:
297:
328:
404:
The coverage found confirms she is notable. Instead of just talking about her for her first song, they even meniton her later for her next one
168:
135:
332:
224:
300:, earlier this year. It was deleted, and unless the new article is substantially different from that article it should be handled at
17:
242:
129:
87:
82:
472:
454:
430:
396:
375:
356:
283:
267:
250:
232:
211:
193:
125:
55:
263:
189:
91:
487:
175:
36:
74:
405:
339:
requirement of "significant coverage" I don't know. Probably. Meeting the GNG doesn not guarantee inclusion, though.
371:
320:
274:
Because God said so? The previous AfD is not dispositive in cases like this of internet-driven "celebrities".--
486:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
366:: The Page is accurate, informative, and useful... we can only wonder why the delete comments are being made.
259:
185:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
141:
246:
220:
228:
367:
352:
465:-- Coverage is not broad enough to warrant overturning the consensus established at the first AfD.--
161:
450:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
469:
408:
384:
348:
52:
336:
301:
335:, but that's also just a website (I don't know how notable it is). Whether this meets the
78:
217:
already nothing is heard of her just when
Rebecca Black news slowed down just a little.
389:
276:
204:
446:
108:
466:
49:
70:
61:
347:
the weight of their numbers and arguments when considering the outcome.
324:
327:, a highly notable publication. There's also the Baldwin Herald (
480:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
258:
a previous AfD was created, this page should not exist --
440:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
104:
100:
96:
160:
174:
383:: Basically I'm on the other side of the line as
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
490:). No further edits should be made to this page.
298:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Jenna Rose
184:Recreated by a blocked/formerly blocked user
8:
438:Note: This debate has been included in the
437:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
473:16:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
455:17:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
431:04:41, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
397:04:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
376:23:28, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
357:22:40, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
319:There's an article about her (
56:01:43, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
284:10:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
268:09:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
251:21:53, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
233:09:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
212:14:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
194:11:19, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
507:
296:The previous AfD is here:
483:Please do not modify it.
293:. Some assorted points:
32:Please do not modify it.
260:ChristianandJericho
186:ChristianandJericho
44:The result was
457:
443:
395:
364:Comment (keep it)
282:
223:comment added by
210:
498:
485:
444:
427:
424:
421:
418:
415:
412:
394:
368:InternetConcepts
281:
235:
209:
179:
178:
164:
112:
94:
64:(2nd nomination)
34:
506:
505:
501:
500:
499:
497:
496:
495:
494:
488:deletion review
481:
425:
422:
419:
416:
413:
410:
307:If the article
302:deletion review
218:
121:
85:
69:
66:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
504:
502:
493:
492:
476:
475:
459:
458:
434:
433:
399:
378:
361:
360:
359:
344:
340:
317:
313:
305:
287:
286:
271:
270:
253:
236:
214:
182:
181:
118:
65:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
503:
491:
489:
484:
478:
477:
474:
471:
468:
464:
461:
460:
456:
452:
448:
441:
436:
435:
432:
429:
428:
406:
403:
400:
398:
392:
391:
386:
382:
379:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
358:
354:
350:
345:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
304:and not here.
303:
299:
295:
294:
292:
289:
288:
285:
279:
278:
273:
272:
269:
265:
261:
257:
256:Strong Delete
254:
252:
248:
244:
240:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
215:
213:
207:
206:
201:
198:
197:
196:
195:
191:
187:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
482:
479:
470:(let's chat)
462:
409:
401:
388:
380:
363:
308:
290:
275:
255:
238:
225:218.186.8.10
219:— Preceding
203:
199:
183:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
385:Herostratus
349:Herostratus
243:24.91.26.28
148:free images
71:Jenna Rose
62:Jenna Rose
333:in France
390:Milowent
277:Milowent
221:unsigned
205:Milowent
115:View log
48:. v/r -
447:frankie
325:Newsday
239:Comment
200:Comment
154:WP refs
142:scholar
88:protect
83:history
467:Yaksar
463:Delete
343:ref'd.
337:WP:GNG
291:Delete
126:Google
92:delete
426:Focus
323:) in
312:moot.
169:JSTOR
130:books
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
451:talk
402:Keep
381:Keep
372:talk
353:talk
329:here
321:here
264:talk
247:talk
229:talk
190:talk
162:FENS
136:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
309:was
176:TWL
113:– (
453:)
445:—
442:.
407:.
393:•
374:)
355:)
280:•
266:)
249:)
231:)
208:•
192:)
156:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
449:(
423:m
420:a
417:e
414:r
411:D
370:(
351:(
262:(
245:(
227:(
188:(
180:)
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
120:(
117:)
111:)
73:(
53:P
50:T
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.