351:. I tried to find some sources for her and for her books, but the vast majority of what I could find are not the type that show notability. I did manage to find three sources that discuss her Mouseketeers book, but that's not enough to show that the book itself would have notability, let alone for the author. As far as her work as a journalist goes, there's nothing out there to show that she's had that large of an impact to where she'd pass notability guidelines on that front.
308:.) Writers are deemed notable if they are widely cited by peers or successors, are known for originating a significant new concept, or have created a significant or well-known work. Additionally, a writer may satisfy general notability guidelines for academics or for biographies. I see no evidence that Jennifer Armstrong satisfies these criteria (but of course I am willing to be convinced).
295:
as PROD-er, per
Notability (people). TRLIJC19 is quite right that there was nothing improper in removing the PROD. I disagree, though, that the cited sources are sufficient to establish notability. The first is Armstrong's own blog; the other two are biographical descriptions at
228:. If the author objects to the deletion, and there is at least one source present that mentions the subject, the PROD template is allowed to be removed. While I am not expressing any viewpoints, your nomination statement is hardly accurate.
166:
331:, and the above. Though the sources that are cited can be considered high-quality, one is a blog, and others a bio descriptions, just a note, this kinda also happened to one of my articles, which got deleted.
225:
160:
121:
94:
89:
272:
98:
209:
and some of them are primary sources and/or unreliable. Further searches have not provided articles about the subject in the established independent press.
126:
81:
181:
148:
142:
339:
17:
256:
385:
360:
343:
317:
284:
265:
218:
138:
63:
328:
200:
188:
85:
404:
77:
69:
40:
57:
154:
400:
356:
36:
230:
336:
174:
53:
248:
304:, where she has blogged; they are primary sources. (There is currently nothing cited from the
280:
236:
214:
205:
The sources provided are insufficient in number, depth, and scope to assert notability per
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
399:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
381:
369:
352:
313:
206:
240:
are clearly reliable sources, though I understand that you may feel they are inadequate.
333:
242:
373:
276:
210:
115:
377:
309:
199:
Does not meet criteria for 'any biography' or 'creative professionals' per
226:
Knowledge:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people#Objecting
197:
DePRODed by creator without addressing the issue(s). Concern was:
393:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
111:
107:
103:
173:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
407:). No further edits should be made to this page.
187:
8:
273:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
271:Note: This debate has been included in the
270:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
386:04:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
361:13:28, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
344:05:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
318:04:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
285:03:39, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
266:00:41, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
219:00:32, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
64:00:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
78:Jennifer Armstrong (writer)
70:Jennifer Armstrong (writer)
424:
396:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
300:, where she works, and
329:WP:Notability (people)
201:WP:Notability (people)
298:Entertainment Weekly
231:Entertainment Weekly
48:The result was
306:Los Angeles Times
287:
261:
253:
237:Los Angeles Times
415:
398:
342:
264:
260:
257:
252:
249:
245:
192:
191:
177:
129:
119:
101:
60:
34:
423:
422:
418:
417:
416:
414:
413:
412:
411:
405:deletion review
394:
332:
302:Huffington Post
258:
250:
243:
241:
211:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
134:
125:
92:
76:
73:
62:
58:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
421:
419:
410:
409:
389:
388:
363:
346:
321:
320:
289:
288:
268:
195:
194:
131:
72:
67:
56:
54:The Bushranger
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
420:
408:
406:
402:
397:
391:
390:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
364:
362:
358:
354:
350:
347:
345:
341:
338:
335:
330:
326:
323:
322:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
294:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
267:
262:
254:
246:
239:
238:
233:
232:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
202:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
59:One ping only
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
395:
392:
365:
348:
324:
305:
301:
297:
292:
235:
229:
198:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
49:
47:
31:
28:
353:Tokyogirl79
224:Please see
161:free images
401:talk page
370:WP:AUTHOR
277:• Gene93k
207:WP:AUTHOR
37:talk page
403:or in a
259:contribs
244:TRLIJC19
234:and the
122:View log
39:or in a
366:Delete.
327:as per
167:WP refs
155:scholar
95:protect
90:history
378:Qworty
368:Fails
349:Delete
325:Delete
310:Cnilep
293:Delete
139:Google
99:delete
50:delete
374:WP:BK
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
382:talk
372:and
357:talk
314:talk
281:talk
251:talk
215:talk
175:FENS
149:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
340:ley
337:and
334:TBr
189:TWL
124:•
120:– (
384:)
376:.
359:)
316:)
283:)
275:.
255:•
217:)
169:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
52:.
380:(
355:(
312:(
279:(
263:)
247:(
213:(
203:.
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.