266:
364:
Yes, but what's your definition of significant coverage? The sources you gave covered it pretty casually, as it would any amusing internet material. It definitely wasn't the "intense scrutiny" you described it as. It gets maybe one sentence of analysis at most. Definitely not enough to establish any
154:
321:
as the article crosses both the notability and verifiability thresholds. Unclear on the benefits of merger with an article about a vaguely similar but unrelated parody. Are there so many notable
350:, "Notability is not temporary: once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." -
262:
294:
The TIME and Tosh.0 blog mentions are about 6 sentences each. This is not "pretty powerful media attention", nor is it significant coverage by multiple reliable sources that meets
185:
Non-notable blog that lasted for only two months and received passing media attention for a few days before falling into obscurity. Perhaps it is more appropriate to merge it with
115:
404:. Fails notability standard of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. A few sentences on a TIME blog is not significant coverage. Thanks,
261:
TIME is fair, but I don't see how coverage on another weblog would make this one notable. A page for FC parodies in general would work, I think. There are other ones like the
206:
148:
280:
My mistake regarding Tosh.0 -- I had the impression that the webcomic was mentioned on the TV show, but that appears not to be the case. --
421:. Fails notability standard. Deserves a mention in the Jersey Shore and probably Family Circus articles, under the section parodies.
17:
88:
83:
247:
would not be unreasonable if people feel strongly enough -- call it something like "Internet parodies of The Family Circus"?). --
92:
75:
169:
136:
230:- This seems to have been a short-lived parody, but it received some pretty powerful media attention (notably including
473:
36:
366:
270:
244:
190:
186:
48:. Everybody agrees that there is coverage but there's no consensus on whether or not the coverage is "significant".
409:
303:
472:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
130:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
295:
458:
430:
413:
396:
371:
359:
338:
307:
289:
275:
256:
221:
195:
126:
57:
439:
79:
53:
405:
299:
176:
426:
162:
71:
63:
355:
334:
347:
217:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
285:
252:
49:
142:
231:
454:
422:
392:
351:
330:
213:
109:
281:
248:
447:
388:
239:
325:
that an omnibus article is called for? (Disclosure: I created the
387:
466:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
161:
175:
189:, but that's the farthest I believe it should go.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
476:). No further edits should be made to this page.
207:list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions
8:
243:). That's notability, IMO. (But merger with
269:that got even more attention in their day.
201:
383:- Coverage establishes this as notable.
205:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
438:. The media coverage is just
459:18:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
446:jumps on this bandwagon. --
431:16:20, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
414:05:13, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
397:16:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
372:19:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
360:12:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
339:03:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
308:15:41, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
290:18:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
276:17:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
257:03:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
222:02:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
196:21:15, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
58:01:12, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
245:Dysfunctional Family Circus
187:Dysfunctional Family Circus
493:
267:Scott Meets Family Circus
469:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
263:Nietzsche Family Circus
365:kind of importance.
44:The result was
457:
224:
210:
484:
471:
453:
369:
273:
211:
193:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
492:
491:
487:
486:
485:
483:
482:
481:
480:
474:deletion review
467:
406:Starblueheather
367:
300:Starblueheather
271:
191:
122:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
490:
488:
479:
478:
462:
461:
433:
416:
399:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
225:
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
489:
477:
475:
470:
464:
463:
460:
456:
451:
450:
445:
441:
437:
434:
432:
428:
424:
420:
417:
415:
411:
407:
403:
400:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
373:
370:
363:
362:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:Jersey Circus
324:
323:Family Circus
320:
317:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:WP:NOTABILITY
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
274:
268:
264:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
241:
236:
234:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
208:
204:
200:
199:
198:
197:
194:
188:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:Jersey Circus
69:
68:
65:
64:Jersey Circus
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
468:
465:
448:
443:
440:WP:Recentism
435:
418:
401:
385:Oppose merge
384:
380:
343:
329:article.) -
326:
322:
318:
238:
232:
227:
202:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
149:free images
50:Ron Ritzman
298:. Thanks,
423:Walterego
214:• Gene93k
352:Dravecky
348:WP:NTEMP
344:Addendum
331:Dravecky
235:magazine
116:View log
449:P 1 9 9
442:. Even
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
436:Delete
419:Delete
402:Delete
346:: Per
282:Orlady
249:Orlady
240:Tosh.0
127:Google
93:delete
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
455:TALK
444:Time
427:talk
410:talk
393:talk
389:Whpq
381:Keep
368:~jcm
356:talk
335:talk
319:Keep
304:talk
286:talk
272:~jcm
265:and
253:talk
237:and
233:Time
228:Keep
218:talk
203:Note
192:~jcm
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
212:--
177:TWL
114:– (
452:•
429:)
412:)
395:)
358:)
337:)
306:)
288:)
255:)
220:)
209:.
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
425:(
408:(
391:(
354:(
333:(
302:(
284:(
251:(
216:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.