375:
intriguing possibility of an
Australian first in the announcement early on Wednesday, Sydney time." That is speculation about a nomination, not confirmation of a nomination, and not "false reporting". The only thing that is false is the claim that this reference verifies an Academy Award nomination. Please link to the actual nomination on the Academy Award website,
297:
appears false. There was speculation but no nomination. Being a member of a team of filmmakers whose work has won a few awards does not confer notability on the team member, nor do assertions that a person is "obviously notable". Nothing is obvious to me unless good sources are provided. Significant
271:
Most of the references profile her. Not only was she a producer of films (one of which was significant and shown at Cannes) but she's been a creative director as well. Her work has won awards and been covered by
Australian media. As a person involved with a well reviewed film and someone with
374:
said on the matter: "The award comes as other
Australian film-makers wait to hear whether they will be nominated for Academy Awards. While the great streak for Australian actors at the Oscars looks likely to finally end - after nods for 11 consecutive years, including four wins - there is the
204:
I doubt notable here. Being producer of a film is much less significant as a creative act than directing or writing it, and does not usually lead to notability unless its part of a substantial career. The refs are about various minor projects and some barely mention her.
173:
224:
167:
126:
246:
52:. Not the clearest of consensuses (consensi?) numerically, but apart from Megalibrarygirl's, the "keep" opinions merely assert notability rather than discuss
293:
reference, for example, is a passing mention, not significant coverage. The assertion that an animated cat film she produced was nominated for an
133:
99:
94:
103:
86:
188:
17:
155:
335:
349:
the
Academy Award nomination was reported by Sydney Morning Herald. Do you have sources saying it's false reporting?
498:
467:
403:
149:
553:
454:
437:
354:
277:
40:
534:
503:
482:
458:
441:
418:
392:
358:
339:
311:
281:
260:
255:
238:
233:
216:
68:
145:
90:
432:. I had to re-read the article a few times, but you're right. I need to rewrite that area on the article.
195:
549:
493:
478:
36:
82:
74:
450:
433:
416:
376:
350:
323:
273:
385:
304:
250:
228:
181:
161:
512:
331:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
548:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
520:
449:
I can see the notability as well as professional growth but the article needs a re-write.
413:
429:
380:
299:
59:
524:
516:
294:
212:
327:
289:
I see no significant coverage of this person in independent, reliable sources. The
120:
207:
515:, but at the moment searches don't turn up enough to show they pass
542:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
298:
coverage is needed to show notability and I do not yet see it.
470:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
406:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
56:
it might exist here, and are therefore assigned less weight.
225:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
116:
112:
108:
412:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
180:
272:
coverage in national news, she's obviously notable.
476:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
556:). No further edits should be made to this page.
247:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
194:
8:
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
223:Note: This debate has been included in the
244:
222:
511:and perhaps userfy. Might be a case of
7:
24:
340:09:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
459:20:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
442:19:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
419:07:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
393:07:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
359:05:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
312:05:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
282:05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
261:04:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
239:04:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
217:04:15, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
1:
535:13:10, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
69:20:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
504:11:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
483:01:49, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
573:
370:Here is exactly what the
545:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
372:Sydney Morning Herald
319:. Clearly notable.
492:per Cullen328. --
485:
421:
343:
326:comment added by
263:
241:
83:Jessica Brentnall
75:Jessica Brentnall
67:
564:
547:
531:
528:
481:
475:
473:
471:
411:
409:
407:
390:
388:Let's discuss it
342:
320:
309:
307:Let's discuss it
258:
253:
236:
231:
199:
198:
184:
136:
124:
106:
66:
64:
57:
34:
572:
571:
567:
566:
565:
563:
562:
561:
560:
554:deletion review
543:
529:
526:
486:
477:
466:
464:
451:Heyyouoverthere
434:Megalibrarygirl
422:
402:
400:
386:
377:Megalibrarygirl
351:Megalibrarygirl
321:
305:
274:Megalibrarygirl
256:
251:
234:
229:
141:
132:
97:
81:
78:
60:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
570:
568:
559:
558:
538:
537:
506:
474:
463:
462:
461:
444:
410:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
362:
361:
344:
314:
291:New York Times
284:
265:
264:
252:SwisterTwister
242:
230:SwisterTwister
202:
201:
138:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
569:
557:
555:
551:
546:
540:
539:
536:
533:
532:
522:
518:
514:
510:
507:
505:
502:
501:
497:
496:
491:
488:
487:
484:
480:
479:North America
472:
469:
460:
456:
452:
448:
445:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
423:
420:
417:
415:
408:
405:
394:
391:
389:
384:
383:
378:
373:
369:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
318:
315:
313:
310:
308:
303:
302:
296:
295:Academy Award
292:
288:
285:
283:
279:
275:
270:
267:
266:
262:
259:
254:
248:
243:
240:
237:
232:
226:
221:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
209:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
63:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
544:
541:
525:
508:
499:
494:
489:
465:
446:
428:Good catch,
425:
401:
387:
381:
371:
367:
346:
322:— Preceding
316:
306:
300:
290:
286:
268:
206:
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
129:
61:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
168:free images
513:WP:TOOSOON
414:Sam Sailor
62:Sandstein
550:talk page
521:WP:NACTOR
447:Weak Keep
430:Cullen328
37:talk page
552:or in a
500:computer
468:Relisted
404:Relisted
336:contribs
324:unsigned
127:View log
39:or in a
495:Rubbish
426:Comment
347:Comment
328:Ipigott
174:WP refs
162:scholar
100:protect
95:history
517:WP:GNG
509:Delete
490:Delete
382:Cullen
301:Cullen
287:Delete
146:Google
104:delete
50:delete
368:Reply
213:talk
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
530:5969
527:Onel
455:talk
438:talk
355:talk
332:talk
317:Keep
278:talk
269:Keep
257:talk
235:talk
182:FENS
156:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
519:or
338:)
208:DGG
196:TWL
125:– (
54:why
523:.
457:)
440:)
379:.
357:)
334:•
280:)
249:.
227:.
215:)
176:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
453:(
436:(
353:(
330:(
276:(
211:(
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
130:·
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.