340:, the official web site of the Illinois state courts. It is therefore not critical that information on this jurist, even, if more thorough and informative than in the other biographies, is also included in the Knowledge encyclopedia. I do think, though, that what is being missed here is that Ms. McNulty sat, in one of the most populous states in the union, on an appellate court, which tribunals make decisions that have the effect of law in their jurisdiction, and that she, herself, was involved in rendering such legal opinions, some of which are cited in the Knowledge article on Jill McNulty that is now up for deletion. You would think that if some members of the Wiki community had problems with that article's sourcing, they would work and research to fix the problem, but I suppose it is simpler and certainly less work to just delete the article. We are also in a period of time when the accomplishments of career women as opposed to career men are still diminished. I wonder if the reaction would be the same if this were a former male state appellate jurist, having sat just below a state Supreme Court position and who therefore is in front running for potential of becoming a state Supreme Court appointee. I will research the matter in Knowledge. It is also inane to say that such office is not at least the equivalent of a lower house state legislative office, whose office holders by definition would be "notable" enough for inclusion in the Knowledge encyclopedia.
1871:
by those arguing for deletion nor her scholarly contributions to the enactment of state and federal legislation, also, sited in the article. Also, the fact that I, personally, think that such a notable and accomplished woman should be published as a role model for young woman has logically nothing to do with this notability, just, a response to comment that I was demonstrating an emotional "stake". A fallacious logical argument anyway, like the one "when you argue so strongly this discredits your argument". Of course people have emotional stakes in their activities. This does not mean that they are also not making sound arguments. Now, we are down to republication of unproven allegations without sourcing in baseless ad hominen attacks against a woman, who has never been charged let alone convicted of anything or disciplined as an attorney or judge, but instead given awards by her peers. TYPICAL. What could these possibly have to do with her notability as a person who has made enduring contributions to
Illinois law. All of this is very muddy irrational argument. HAS ANYONE EVEN LOOKED AT THE VOLUME OF THIS WOMAN'S PUBLISHED CASE LAW OPINIONS IN THE
1626:(13c) to be worthy of: MERIT (~s another chance) ~ vt: to be worthy, fit, or suitable for some reward or requital (have become recognized as they ~ - T. S. Eliot) - deserver n". A total 3 definitions are provided for "worthy" at page 1445 "1 a: having worth or value ... b: HONORABLE, MERITORIOUS ... 2: having sufficient worth or importance.). In its noun sense even, "merit 1: c a praise worthy quality: VIRTUE ... d: character or conduct deserving reward, honor, or esteem, also: ACHIEVEMENT ... 3: b individual significance or justification ("2:" is not usage. "3: a" is not usage. "1: a" is not usage and noted as an obsolete definition. Only one definition, "1: b the qualities or actions that constitute the basis of one's deserts", even in the improper noun sense is ambiguous and might be interpreted either way to support my or your interpretation. (Even improper noun definition concensus is 4 possible for my interpretation and 0.5 possible for your interpretation from 4. Proper verb tense is 2 for my interpretation and 0 for yours out of 2. Oh, and I'm still waiting for you to keep your word "If I saw even one source
1368:“expanded greatly, unfortunately without any reliable proof of the increasingly exaggerated claims.” Really? What about “United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education, and Labor. Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity. Oversight hearing on the Runaway youth act: hearing before the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, second session, hearing held in Washington, DC on March 7, 1978. US Govt. Print. Off., 1978 and Michael T. Nolan “Public Hearings in the Juvenile Court: California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 676 as Amended by Assembly Bill No. 1374” 4 Crim. Just. J. 497 (1980-1981)” and the 20 some other added cites to reliable sources or as prior to your other precipitous "edits" of article content did you also not even bother to review these sources. How about expanded and improved, while copiously sourcing to overcome irrational resistance?
1494:
deletion is because of a personal issue of the nominator with him and not on merit of the Jill K. McNulty article. I just opened my user account so from hereon out I can regularly participate in deletion discussions of exactly this type. I must agree with the article creator on all counts. I don't know what we're bothering to discuss anymore. Enduring contributions to
Illinois case law – Enduring contributions to literature in field of juvenile law - Enduring influence in scholarly and legislative debate on juvenile law – “Broke Glass Ceiling” 53 years ago in 1960 becoming first female associate at Ross McGowan, at one time a major, top tier Chicago law firm, one of whose partners from the early 1950s was
1906:
investigation (of accusations against lower traffic court judges, not her) and by failing to request reassignment of judges who were implicated in such charges." Boy, I wonder how many people could be angry enough to try to file a clearly baseless complaint against a traffic court judge to harass them and disrupt the court system? Sounds political to me and in
Chicago, who'd have thought! It is noteworthy that the voters reelected Judge McNulty anyway. Also, when parentheticals like (clients) appear in a quote, you should insert them, because the conveyor of the quote is thereby unequivically signalling that the words in parentheticals are not the words of the source being quoted.
1770:: Knowledge has certainly permitted a very, very full airing of all sides of this Afd discussion, whatever the outcome. In for once, briefly, summarizing my perspective on those arguments and without being caustic, an appointment to the Illinois State Appellate Court isn’t worth encyclopedic mention, itself. Its judges’ issuing legal opinions that are binding on state’s trial courts can make an enduring contribution to Illinois state law. This is more likely if a judge repeatedly issues opinions over a long period of time. Jill K. McNulty sat on the Illinois Appellate Court for a long 3 decades.
1954:
Association, National League of Cities, and U. S. Conference of Mayors. The
Academy assists these seven national organizations of state and local officials in seeking solutions to critical problems in American states, counties, municipalities and the nation's federal system in general. The National Training and Development Service for State and Local Government (NTDS), a subsidiary of the Academy, promotes the training and development of state, county and municipal managers and offers assistance to those attempting to improve the processes of public problem-solving.
780:: I stated earlier that I was through commenting on the issue of this article's possible deletion, but, in light of the above exchange between Theodore and Sionk, which exchange clearly demonstrates that Sionk did not even clearly understand the nature of a state appellate court seat before nominating this article for deletion, I am compelled to reenter the debate on behalf of Knowledge users with 2 pieces of additional information, which I believe shall inform the debate participants in possibly unknown essentials and thereby greatly aid the debate.
1702:, a portion of the official annual report of the Illinois Supreme Court, Judicial Conference, which at its page 56 states “Judge McNulty was the first female associate at Ross, McGowan, Hardies & O'Keefe, working there from 1960 - 1964.” Yep, nomination only has to do with Jill K. McNulty and not the nominator's disapproval of other of the work of the article's creator in the Knowledge and, certainly, Jill K. McNulty's being a career woman doesn't factor in, even, subconsciously. All human behavior is always perfectly rational and emotion free.
1489:- I commented (deleted above) on this article as a concerned Knowledge user and diplomatically so not to increase the vitriol of the disscusion participants. This was before I opened a Knowledge user account and before the Jill K. McNulty article was repeatedly improved. One of the participants unilaterally edited out a portion of my prior comment. Is this kosher? I now expand upon my cleaved comment and with a stronger statement. A friend and I had read several web articles suggesting an
1185:) concedes anyway that “She (Jill K. McNulty) might possibly be notable as an academic, if there's a verifiable reliable reference to being a full-time full professor.” As McNulty’s tenure as a full time law professor is established, then, lets look at the following. How does Jill K. McNulty compare as a legal scholar to some other subjects of Knowledge articles, who are categorized as “legal scholars”? How does the content and sourcing of her article compare to theirs?
788:
decision. The intermediate appellate courts usually publish written opinions which are hard bound in reporters and archived for the legal community in law libraries and today on line on LEXUS. These published opinions are binding authority and must be followed by all trial or lower courts in the state. A state
Supreme Court alternatively hears a petitioner’s appeal of one of these intermediate appellate court's decisions at the Supreme Court's discretion by a grant of
1199:, categorized as a “legal scholar”, has existed in Knowledge since April of this year. His field of specialty is law and economics of Islamic law, a department which he chairs. The Knowledge article consists of a single sentence and references as its sole source the law faculty profile website at the University of Toronto. A Google Scholar search picks up 50 law related works written by an M. Fadel, but these works have only been cited by other scholars 205 times.
599:
K. McNulty meets notability. I have just read the article and it is marginal. On my read it does meet basic
Knowledge notability guidelines for persons. The subject has significant regional media coverage in national newspapers, was a candidate for a state supreme court seat and full biographies on her are published by independent internet and print sources and a judge-mcnulty.blogspot.com. demonstrates public interest. Hope my input helps.
792:. It does not have to hear such an appeal and, usually, does not unless an issue of extreme legal importance is involved, and, even then, if the Supreme Court agrees with the intermediate appellate court’s decision, it may not hear the case anyway and may simply let the appellate court's decision stand as state case law in the interest of the Supreme Court’s judicial economy. No appellant has a right to a hearing before the Supreme Court.
1550:, a portion of the official annual report of the Illinois Supreme Court, Judicial Conference, which at its page 56 states “Judge McNulty was the first female associate at Ross, McGowan, Hardies & O'Keefe, working there from 1960 - 1964.” I’m glad that somebody actually reads the article and its sources before commenting. Since I assume you are a person of your word, and you stated “If I saw even one source
865:. As a legal scholar, Jill K. McNulty played an important role in shaping criminology's national debates on juvenile law, juvenile offense procedures and juvenile offender detention and treatment in the last quarter of the 20th century. Her research publications on juvenile law are cited to in dozens upon dozens of texts and peer review journals in the U.S. and, even, internationally and also hearings of the
1901:
was "hustling clients"!!!! Its getting to the point where people appear irrationally willing to stoop to anything to delete this woman from
Knowledge! This 25 year old inserted newspaper article, supposed "quote" of the state bar and posed as argument to suggest that Judge McNulty is “notorious” and unsuitable for her own misconduct, is libelously of the subject and otherwise grossly misleading. The
424:
a free pass over
Knowledge's relevant notability criteria. If you've got an example of anything that comments on her success as a woman in a man's world, by all means put it forward. As you know, you've been creating several McNulty articles and not all of them are suitable for a general encyclopedia (though I'm sure of interest to someone studying the surname).
1131:
tenured professor, is not. Finally, every mundane university professor does not have over 50 journal and text citations to their works and, additional, citation of their works during U.S. Congressional and
California Legislature proceedings on proposed legislative enactments. You even admit in comment that McNulty is a noted academic and scholar.
1498:- Awarded the Illinois Judicial Council Chairperson’s Award in 1988. Persons are not automatically notable because they are state appellate justices. Persons who have made enduring contributions to the law are not “not” notable because they are state appellate justices. Promotional - give me a break. This woman doesn’t need any promotion.
1835:. McNulty failed to cross the threshold of notability several times in her career. She failed to get elected, she failed to gain a seat on a higher court, she failed to write a bestseller, and she failed to become famous or even notorious in the media. In looking for books on McNulty, all I found were brief biographical listings in
1113:
any political office. This woman, who was born in 1935, graduated J.D. from
Northwestern and was admitted to the bar in 1960, is now 78 years old! This trail blazing female attorney was the first female associate in history ever hired at Chicago’s staid Ross, McGowan, Hardies & O'Keefe law firm, working there from 1960 – 1964
1844:
1219:, which requires a subscription. A Google Scholar search produces no legal scholarly works for an Elizabeth Owen at all. Yet, before everybody jumps on the wagon with their shears to delete her rather than developing this stub, they might want to read this on Elizabeth A. Owen (1919-1998) from Harvard University,
332:(edited to change from delete in case anyone did not understand based on the following that I was being sardonic when I orinally said delete) On my further research I have found that researchers on the internet searching for information on this prominent jurist can already find her biographies in both the Wiki
1953:
The Academy for Contemporary Problems is a tax-exempt, nonprofit public research and education training foundation operated by the Council of State Governments, International City Management Association, National Association of Counties, National Conference of State Legislatures, National Governors'
1851:
which said McNulty was "not qualified for retention" as a judge in Cook County because she "exercised poor judgment in response to charges of hustling" clients. Even though this could have boosted McNulty's notability in a negative fashion, the newspaper article did not give more coverage to her than
1297:
Following my “thousands of words” arguing against the article as a promotion, you concede that the article is not “promotional”. I apparently did not entirely waste my time, as otherwise, there exists no consensus here. Varying editors have in good faith argued near equally both for retention and for
1082:
regardless of notability. This is the campaign season, and we need to beware of campaign biographies--the more elaborate, (and the more elaborately argued) the more dubious. She might possibly be notable as an academic, if there's a verifiable reliable reference to being a full-time full professor
1870:
I believe what is being missed here entirely is the contribution, the enduring contribution, this woman has made to the mandatory legal authority of Illinois case law in 30 years of issueing opinions from an appellate court. Some of these opinions are sited in the article. This is not even discussed
1774:
in our encyclopedia never held any office higher than Illinois Appellate Court Judge and is notable only for his long office. While I myself only know of some cases and have not fully researched the legal reporters, both Burke & McNulty are notable for making an enduring contribution to Illinois
1554:
that Jill McNulty had "broke glass ceiling" (your words, I presume) then I wouldn't nominate the article in the first place.”, I am anxiously, then, awaiting your now changing your “Delete” “vote” to a “Keep” “vote” (your words, I presume). Oh, and the administrator only “rmv speedy” deletion (their
1112:
This article clearly does not even remotely risk promotion of a political candidacy of Jill K. McNulty and such suggestion is ludicrous on the evidence and specious attempt to justify a deletion that is clearly just not justified.There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that McNulty is running for
1087:
shows her only 3 cited articles as 21, 15, 10 with another 10 for citations of a legal opinion. This is not notable in any subject We have never considered state judges below the Supreme court as intrinsically notable: the list given of articles we have keep consist of those judges at her level
814:
Her academic work in the area of the limits of juvenile court jurisdiction and a juvenile offender’s right to psychotherapeutic treatment is a contribution to an important area of national debate in the field of criminology. Prof./Judge McNulty’s scholarly work in the area is also not just published
752:
should be changed; I have made a note on the page's talk regarding appellate judges. An intermediary-level appellate judge is not a district judge; instead, they sit on courts "in between" trial courts and state supreme courts. It would be my opinion that an appellate judge would be notable enough
598:
Two participants in this debate say that the article on Jill K. McNulty should be deleted. They argue the article fails Knowledge notability guidelines, but neither specifies how the article fails to meet these guidelines. The one debater clearly being sarcastic and rude does anyway specify how Jill
423:
I'm not entirely sure whether or not you're being sarcastic here, but I suppose I'll have to take what you say at face value. There was no sexism involved here. I could see no evidence McNulty had been widely written about and there seems to be little evidence she reached a high enough office to get
1900:
Also, "she 'exercised poor judgment in response to charges of hustling' clients." Come on! Don't you think that this quote inserted in context of your own verbage and without elaborating could cause readers, who might not go to the article, to come to a false impression that Judge McNulty, herself,
1518:
If I saw even one source hinting that Jill McNulty had "broke glass ceiling" (your words, I presume) then I wouldn't nominate the article in the first place. As my nomination makes clear, an independent administrator suggested this article be taken to AfD. So please stop these accusations of sexism
890:
Academy for Contemporary Problems Columbus, Ohio 1982, report prepared under grant no. 78 JN AX 0038, Printed in U.S., Library of Congress Catalogue No. 8167952; Publically available, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevent, National Institutes of Justice for
1459:
The sources cited in the Jill K. McNulty article are to sources containing biographical detail and, also, sources such as her announcement of major opinions that are now an "enduring" part of the the ever evolving Illinois case law and her scholarly writings and their citation, which have effected
1364:
surname article that article, otherwise, had no relevant information or sourcing and simultaneously you restored ambiguous links, causing me to go back and correct all of the same, as in the earlier noted instances of your “edits”. You nominated this article for deletion without even understanding
787:
1) As Theodore pointed out, the intermediate appellate court is a court of errors that sits between a state’s trial court and its Supreme Court. In most states, except to my knowledge in Nevada, it is the only court which must hear the appeal of a litigant, who is dissatisfied with a trial court’s
730:
is changed. From my vague understanding of the legal system, all legal judgements contribute towards the body of case law, therefore will have an enduring legacy in some capacity. The fact one of her papers has been cited in two research journals is questionable proof of her "influence outside the
1130:
No. 4, p. 745, Article 2, “Juvenile Right to Treatment: Panacea or Pandora’s Box” at p. 745, footnote *). Also, academics, who are part time faculty at a University, are noted as such in contemporaneous faculty profiles being there designated as "adjunct faculty". Jill K. McNulty, who left a full
1119:
Official Illinois State website as to 2 preceding sentences) which I shall hereafter note in her article. All evidence is that McNulty is retired after an extraordinarily accomplished 40 year career. Her Knowledge article also did not first appear during any campaign or campaign season. Again, to
456:
2) Pollticians: "Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature. This also applies to those who have been elected to such offices but have not yet been sworn
1555:
edit note), while stating that the article’s removal would “merit” an Afd , they did not suggest that it be nominated or, themselves, make the nomination. You did this all by yourself without tell of anyone’s encouragement or prompting. Don't try to associate the administrator with your actions.
1493:
bias in Knowledge debates on retention of articles on female subjects (85% of Wiki editors allegedly male). We researched through the Knowledge:Articles for deletion and found this deletion discussion where the creator hints at an anti-feminist bias. The creator also says that the nomination for
1752:
Yep, the AfD was opened 3 weeks ago. As for the fact McNulty was the first female associate of the law firm, Ross, McGowan, Hardies & O'Keefe, well, it tells us very little. The claim she was "an elder of the women's movement" and her employers were "staid" are the claims of Albeit, not the
1206:
in her specialty of juvenile law, but these 3 articles have been cited 46 times by other scholars. It appears that each of McNulty’s articles is having on average a significantly greater impact on the scholarly community in her field and society at large than either Mr. Taipale’s or Fadel’s are
1905:
article only states that in the opinion of the state bar (its members making a recommendation to voters in a non official capacity), McNulty had not vigorously enough pursued investigation of alleged miscreant lower traffic court judges and recused them during, “failure to pursue an aggressive
630:
and a nationally recognized researcher and scholar in the field of juvenile law. She was published on issues of juvenile law multiple times in multiple scholarly legal journals and cited to in prestigious legal texts on issue. Among the articles that Jill K. McNulty has authored in peer review
258:
Of the three sources presented, one simply drops the subject's name, one lacks a link so that it might be reviewed, and one is simply the subject's three-sentence CV-like entry on the state's website. Fails the GNG, fails WP:POLITICIAN, and I have no idea what the prod decliner was thinking.
1156:
At this point, I cannot even remotely understand the vicious resistance by many to inclusion in the Knowledge of this, in multiple Knowledge categories, clearly notable and trail blazing women attorney, jurist, scholar and elder of the woman's movement. I can count at least 100 less notable
646:
McNulty's writings are cited in very prestigious legal texts but have also had influence outside the legal field on broader social policy debate. Jill K. McNulty’s scholarly research on proposed limits of juvenile courts jurisdiction published in Jill K. McNulty "The right to be Left Alone"
676:
Not meaning to seem "rude", but I thought that the idea of creating a Knowledge Stub article on a subject is that other editors will contribute supplement to it, so it can eventually become an informative source for Knowledge users, instead, of just attacking its early short comings.
1460:
enactment of legislation at both the federal and state level and that, thereby, demonstrate a second "enduring" body of McNulty's work in the legal field. That is how these materials, which apparently seem unrelated to you, actually, connect to support McNulty's "general notability".
1609:
at page 777 and as employed in its verb tense by the administrator, "merit" has 2 meanings. Both of which clearly only support my interpretation and not yours. One is noted obsolete or "a kind or style no longer current: OLD FASHIONED". The verb tense definitions of merit are "1:
1753:
source. The claim she "broke the glass ceiling" in a "major, top tier Chicago law firm" is IP 64's and, again, editorializing. Sure, McNulty has had a long and successful career, but doesn't meet Knowledge's broad notability guidelines. I'm content for the AfD to run its course.
199:
Speedy deletion A7 was declined in March with a suggestion to send to AfD. Article has not been significantly improved since. Subject did not reach the level of state or provincial legislature, only news coverage is to announce her candidature for election, therefore fails
1083:-- "a professor" when used outside a formal academic CV, can mean almost anything, including an part-time adjunct assistant professor. As for the citations to her work, essentially every published academic and every judge at this level has them. At the academic level,
1453:, because that is what you provided for my response and my comments were responsively on point. If you consider such rampant, wild, unsupported and unproveable statements sound argument for your position here, than so was my response thereto relevant to the debate here
1879:. ANYWAY, ANYONE CAN SEE WHERE THIS IS GOING NOW. WHEN I RECREATE THIS ARTICLE IMPROVED, I SHALL BE SURE TO HAVE REVIEWED EVERYONE OF THESE APPELLATE DECISIONS AND THE OPINIONS OF EVERY ILLINIOS TRIAL COURT FOLLOWING ANY OF THEM, SO NO ONE CAN POSSIBLY MISS THE POINT.
1775:
law. Jill K. McNulty is certainly an excellent role model for young woman and should be published for them by this article's retention. THIS IS THE VERY IMPORTANT STAKE THAT I HAVE IN THE DEBATE HERE. I also think that people should live by their word. Thank you all.
1214:
in Knowledge since 2010. She is categorized as a “legal scholar”. The article contains no information except her dates of birth and death (1919-1998) and a sentence stating that she was a "legal scholar". The article cites to a single online biographical reference
696:. Intermediate-level appellate judges seem to be considered notable. All of Wisconsin's current appellate judges have articles, including some which only cite Wisconsin's court website. If McNulty's legal contributions are "enduring" and important to her field,
367:. What could I have possibly been thinking in creating a Knowledge article on the holder of such a insignificant office, especially, a holder who had, as noted in such ridiculous article, been part of announcing legal precedent setting opinions from that bench?!!!
1717:
So what exactly are you waiting for? The nomination has already occurred, and there's too much discussion now to just abandon it. I highly suggest you stop hounding people involved in this discussion. It makes it look like you have a bit too much as stake here.
875:
This is a small, bibliography sampling of the dozens upon dozens of texts and journal articles in the U.S. in which during the later part of the 20th century one or more of Jill K. McNulty’s research publications on juvenile law issues are cited at least once.
1351:
You have followed me about Knowledge precipitously editing my articles without even bothering to read their sources and, thereby, failing as an objective editor and, inappropriately, disputing credible sources without any contrary evidence (view history
796:
Trial court opinions are not precedent, except, in some states, where district or superior courts are permitted to hear appeals from muni or justice court decisions and, then, the appeal's decision is only binding on those muni/justice courts in the
1542:, the Jill K. McNulty article reads “An elder of the women's movement, McNulty was the first female associate in history ever hired at Chicago’s staid Ross, McGowan, Hardies & O'Keefe law firm, working there from 1960 – 1964." The source for
860:
was born in Peoria, Illinois. She was a professor of law for 10 years and, thereafter, for 30 years a jurist, who retired from a seat on the Illinois intermediate state appellate court, but who had been a prominent candidate for a seat on the
1666:, a portion of the official annual report of the Illinois Supreme Court, Judicial Conference, which at its page 56 states “Judge McNulty was the first female associate at Ross, McGowan, Hardies & O'Keefe, working there from 1960 - 1964.”
1157:
individuals whose biographies I have encountered and, justifiably, in the Knowledge in just the last month! I shall list them if anyone requests. Why such vicious resistance to so notable and accomplished a women?! What is going on here!!!
1141:), just because you do not consider an intermediate appellate court, which produces the bulk of a state’s case law and interprets its statute law as important as the legislature that produces its statute law (and I don't know why),
452:
1) Basic Notability: “A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.”
823:, one of the most prestigious think tanks in the nation. I'm sure that there are many more citations to McNulty's work. These cites were just readily accessible to me for example. Hope the above clarifications aid the debate.
1192:, who is categorized as a “legal scholar”. His field of legal specialty is law and technology. A Google Scholar search turns up 26 works, yet it shows his 26 articles have been cited by other legal scholars just 236 times.
1260:, the article has been expanded greatly, unfortunately without any reliable proof of the increasingly exaggerated claims. Though McNulty worked as an acadmeic, I still fail to see any reliable secondary proof (other than
1092:
gotten seats in the Illinois Supreme Court, and do not justify the inclusion of someone who has not yet obtained one. If kept, or if reinstated if she wins the position, the article will need very substantial trimming.
1371:
Also, your vote is not going to create a consensus and sway this matter. Don’t you think that the administrator considered that you as nominee favored the article’s deletion and your unsuccessful arguments made to
1207:
having upon the scholarly community in their fields. And how reliable is Google Scholar at hitting all of a scholars works anyway? Consider the case of the late Harvard legal scholar Elizabeth A. Owens (1919-1998).
168:
1324:
and others, also, their descended. Other articles I have written on MacNulty have been most on historical figures indisputably notable under Knowledge guidelines and thereto conspicuously absent from Knowledge,
1360:, who by this very definition meet Knowledge guidelines, as "possibly" not notable and, recently, with no sound reason at all removed some brief missing information on etymology that I provided on a
1843:—these have a lower standard than Knowledge and list every minor judge. In looking for news items, I found nothing with substantial coverage of McNulty's life and career. The closest I got was
1126:
If you had bothered to review the article sources before commenting, you would know this. McNulty is noted to already be an Associate Professor at Chicago Kent Law as early as 1976 (Vol. 16
1795:, nor is Knowledge to be used to establish notability. None of the references establish the notability of her length of service or of her contributions on the bench. My suggestion is to
1698:: "If I saw even one source hinting that Jill McNulty had "broke glass ceiling" (your words, I presume) then I wouldn't nominate the article in the first place." (your words, I presume)
1662:: "If I saw even one source hinting that Jill McNulty had "broke glass ceiling" (your words, I presume) then I wouldn't nominate the article in the first place." (your words, I presume)
1248:, 'vote' as nominator (the author has expended thousands of words explaining their 'keep' vote so I think I need to make my position quite clear). Article fails the current Knowledge
1264:'s claims) that McNulty was an exceptionally important one (academics, by their job description, write academic books and papers and this doesn't make them notable per se).
278:
121:
162:
1124:
Article sources already confirm that Jill K. McNulty was full time (not part time) faculty at the Chicago Kent College of Law and a nationally recognized legal scholar.
794:
Accordingly, most of a state’s binding case law is announced by the intermediate appellate courts. As can be seen, they are extremely important bodies in our society.
1417:. The 'reliable sources' you've listed are generally works that cite one of McNulty's works. This doesn't ij itself show she meets any of the notability criteria of
240:
1137:
Still yet another, objective, independent source containing a biography of Jill K. McNulty, in addition to those already noted, is the Illinois Blue Book, p 170, (
666:, 9780815707318. She is also cited in the research journals of fields as diverse as Mary K. Zimmerman & David B. Chein “Decision Making in the Juvenile Court”
355:
Here is a brief list of Knowledge articles on persons who last held a seat on the Illinois state appellate court before being appointed sometime thereafter to the
981:
14. Michael T. Nolan “Public Hearings in the Juvenile Court: California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 676 as Amended by Assembly Bill No. 1374” 4
939:
8. Daniell R. Odo, Article 5, “Removing Confidentiality Protections and the ‘Get Tough’ Rhetoric: What Has Gone Wrong With The Juvenile Justice System?”,
225:
1963:
Michael T. Nolan “Public Hearings in the Juvenile Court: California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 676 as Amended by Assembly Bill No. 1374” 4
1403:
article and its content. If you wish to discuss your other articles, or my edits to other articles, please do so at the appropriate places (not here).
1269:
I seriously doubt there is any promotion here by McNulty herself. The promotion here is by Albeit and their project to write about people with the
883:
Department of Health Education and Welfare, Office of Human Development, Office of Youth Development Washington, D.C. 20201 (February, 1975) p. 30
510:
a) multiple of her opinions published for legal practitioners, lower courts and other jurists as binding or persuasive authority statewide in the
128:
1399:
I can only suggest if you do not want any personal comments, you abide by these rules too. I'm trying to engage in a rational debate about the
558:
has now been edited and condensed, while subject and her notability have been elaborated and more copiously sourced. Maybe worth a second look.
499:
635:
Vol. 10, No. 2 (Summer 1980) pp. 311-340, Jill K. McNulty and William S. White “The Juvenile Right to Treatment: Panacea or Pandora’s Box” 16
1295:
Are we now reduced to the logical flaw of ad hominem arguments. Let’s instead try to concentrate on discussing the merits of the debate here.
891:
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevent, National Institutes of Justice United States Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20531 6-3-83
888:
Major Issues in Juvenile Justice Information and Training: The Out of state Placement of Children: A Search for Rights, Boundaries, Services
626:
McNulty, whose first judicial appointments were to juvenile and family court divisions, was prior from 1971-1982 a professor of law at the
1499:
1357:
600:
1803:
is concerned, I don't immediately see why it exists either, but whether or not he is notable is of no consequence in this discussion. --
94:
89:
98:
520:
b) Some of her opinions of such significance to legal practice that they are discussed in publications for legal professionals like
208:
notability criteria (I can only presume that her position as circuit judge prior to 1990 was for one of Illinois' county circuits).
1409:
As for the reliable sources, there seems to be a basic misunderstanding of the Knowledge notability guidelines. It is one thing to
1630:
that Jill McNulty had 'broke glass ceiling' ... then I wouldn't nominate the article in the first place." (your words, I presume)
809:
81:
1084:
762:
709:
17:
1449:
article and its content" that you found this Jill K. McNulty deletion debate platform "the appropriate place" for discussion,
183:
905:
663:
535:
493:
444:
1133:
The fact that you have to rely on the canard of this articles being "promotional" speaks volumes of its subjects notability.
150:
1486:
1024:"Her work has influenced the enactment of juvenile offender legislation in states as far flung from her's as California."
697:
988:
15. Lynne G. Masters “Constitutioinal Law - The Horns of a Dilemma: Prior Restraint or Access to Juvenile Courtrooms” 17
356:
974:
13. Susan Cohn “Protecting Child Rape Victims From the Public and Press After Globe Newspaper and Cox Broadcasting” 51
967:
12. D. Mark McIntyre “Juvenile Court Proceedings: The Conflict between Juvenile Anonymity and Freedom of the Press” 23
627:
1791:
So your primary reason for keeping this article has nothing to do with previously established notability? Sorry, but
1699:
1663:
1547:
1345:, have not been flattering of them at all. I write and edit articles on other subjects not related to the Ulaidh too.
1116:
631:
journals are Jill K. McNulty “First Amendment versus Sixth Amendment A Constitutional Battle in the Juvenile Courts”
1546:’ comment about braking a “glass ceiling” then seems to be this reference of the Jill K. McNulty article, which is
723:
1937:
1852:
that. Other news items were bare endorsements in lists of political candidates. No in-depth coverage of McNulty.
144:
40:
1451:"The promotion here is by Albeit and their project to write about people with the McNulty surname. Sionk (talk)"
995:
16. Elizabeth L. Pike “State Ex Rel. Oregonian Publishing Co. V. Diez: An End to Soft-Hearted Mollycoddling” 17
1298:
deletion of the article. The article must have some at least arguable merit. Why attempt to make this personal?
1503:
1302:
I have no personal interest in the MacNulty per se at all. One of my scholarly interests is the ancient Irish
604:
1220:
1915:
1888:
1861:
1825:
1784:
1762:
1740:
1711:
1675:
1639:
1590:
1564:
1528:
1507:
1471:
1430:
1385:
1282:
1232:
1166:
1102:
1070:
1041:
1015:
832:
766:
740:
713:
686:
608:
587:
568:
547:
433:
414:
349:
320:
290:
269:
247:
232:
217:
140:
63:
960:
11. Stephen Jonas “Press Access to the Juvenile Courtroom: Juvenile Anonymity and the First Amendment” 17
862:
515:
488:
85:
1376:
before they twice relisted it. I am sorry that the process that you initiated is so frustrating for you.
726:. Maybe these other district judge articles need to be looked at. Alternatively someone needs to suggest
1933:
1857:
1816:
1731:
1066:
898:
820:
656:
316:
244:
229:
36:
1349:
What is your problem here, Jill K. McNulty or my activities as an editor and refusal to cow tow to you.
815:
in prestigious legal journals and cited by as Sionk puts it “cited in two research journals”. Horowitz
190:
538:
criterion for inclusion in Knowledge. Lets get her out. Are you now sure whether I'm being sarcastic?
461:
JILL K. MCNULTY, State Appellate Court Justice whose rulings have precedent setting effect statewide:
1800:
1446:
1400:
1249:
1203:
1182:
1098:
749:
727:
555:
337:
260:
201:
77:
69:
1334:
1138:
758:
705:
400:
360:
176:
1907:
1880:
1776:
1703:
1667:
1631:
1556:
1463:
1454:
1418:
1377:
1338:
1330:
1321:
1224:
1158:
1033:
1025:
1007:
946:
9. A. Breed & P. Voss “Procedural Due Process in the Discipline of Incarcerated Juveniles” 5
824:
678:
560:
539:
406:
341:
57:
1614:
to be entitled to reward or honor" and "2:DESERVE" (The verb "deserve" is, itself, defined at
1413:
something happened or someone did something, its another thing to prove these facts make them
902:
660:
583:
385:
370:
286:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1932:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
156:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1911:
1884:
1853:
1808:
1780:
1723:
1707:
1671:
1635:
1560:
1467:
1381:
1342:
1317:
1261:
1228:
1162:
1062:
1051:
1037:
1029:
1011:
828:
682:
564:
543:
511:
410:
380:
345:
312:
301:
1758:
1586:
1543:
1524:
1510:
1495:
1426:
1353:
1326:
1278:
1211:
1178:
1094:
736:
478:
429:
213:
922:
L. E. Teitelbaum & A. R, Gough, eds., Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co. (1977)
1792:
1373:
1252:
and the news coverage about McNulty is fleeting, only brief mentions therefore failing
1196:
754:
701:
375:
1799:
this article until such time as notability is established. As far as the article for
1490:
1414:
1253:
866:
395:
205:
54:
848:
The following lead in and Bibliography sections have been added to Jill K. McNulty:
528:
3) Could potentially in future be appointed too or run for other high public office
1771:
1356:, alone, here, multiple times). You have inappropriately tagged U.S. flag officers
1189:
953:
10. Mary K. Zimmerman & David B. Chein “Decision Making in the Juvenile Court”
579:
390:
282:
1700:
http://www.state.il.us/court/supremecourt/jud_conf/AnnualReport/2008/Retired08.pdf
1664:
http://www.state.il.us/court/supremecourt/jud_conf/AnnualReport/2008/Retired08.pdf
1548:
http://www.state.il.us/court/supremecourt/jud_conf/AnnualReport/2008/Retired08.pdf
1120:
suggest that the article is or could become a campaign advertisement is ludicrous.
1117:
http://www.state.il.us/court/supremecourt/jud_conf/AnnualReport/2008/Retired08.pdf
115:
1002:
17. Y. Merker & L. Rosenberg “Legacy of the Stubborn and Rebellious Son” 74
943:, Volume 18, Issue 1, 1/1/98 (cite as 18 B.C. Third World L.J. 105, 1998) p. 120
1410:
1313:
1309:
364:
1754:
1695:
1659:
1582:
1539:
1520:
1422:
1291:
1274:
732:
469:
425:
333:
209:
1054:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
304:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
1361:
932:
7. Stanley Z. Fisher “Families with Service Needs: The Newest Euphemism” 18
651:
Vol. 11 (1972) pp. 1-25 at 25 is cited to at page 210 of Donald L. Horowitz
1306:
race and the continued influence of their small remnant into modern times.
1221:
http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/bulletin/backissues/spring99/article6.html
1143:
this does not detract from Jill K. McNulty’s general notability otherwise.
1032:) 15:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Albiet, minor fix inadvertent link brackets
1270:
1188:
Since at least 2006, there has existed a Knowledge article on subject
1303:
474:
b) Biography independently at Official site of Illinois State Courts
1308:
The McNulty just happen to be their namesake and descended with the
619:
The following has been edited into the Jill K. McNulty stub article:
363:
or nominated by a major U.S. political party as candidates for the
338:
http://www.state.il.us/court/AppellateCourt/Judges/Bio_McNulty.asp
1793:
Knowledge is not a soapbox from which you can promote your causes
477:
c) Multiple Feature Articles about Jill K. McNulty appear in the
1926:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1462:
I am not the one who is having "a basic misunderstanding" here.
1139:
http://www.idaillinois.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/bb/id/40600
886:
2. J. Hall, B. Baker, J. Foster, J. Pillota, K. Welland and J.
731:
legal field on broader social policy debate" (Albeit's words).
879:
1. J. Olson & G. Sheppard (program managers-operations)
639:
745 (1976) and Jill K. McNulty “The Right to Be Left Alone”
1154:
Are we now to delete articles based on rampant speculation?
1341:
and etc. Some of these articles on historic McNulty, like
881:
Intake Screening Guides – Improving Justice for Juveniles
869:
on federal juvenile offender legislation of the period."
1578:
1257:
920:
Beyond Control – Status Offenders in the Juvenile Court
111:
107:
103:
1618:
page 337 with usage examples and in full definitions "
1457:. I "abide" by your "rules" or most experienced lead.
465:
1) In multiple published reliable secondary sources:
175:
1061:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
311:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
929:St. Paul: West Publishing Company (1985) Vol. 12
808:With the latest inclusions Jill K. McNulty meets
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1940:). No further edits should be made to this page.
279:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
241:list of Illinois-related deletion discussions
189:
8:
1607:Merriam Webster's 11th Collegiate Dictionary
277:Note: This debate has been included in the
239:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:Note: This debate has been included in the
913:Juvenile Justice in America Port Washington
496:evaluated to be qualified for that position
276:
238:
223:
1581:means what it says, as far as I can see.
1223:“Two Path Breaking Scholars Remembered”.
1210:There has been a stub article on subject
872:"Partial Bibliography to citations ...
507:2) Very influential in her profession:
226:list of Law-related deletion discussions
1946:
1605:Yes, certainly does. Lets parse it. In
1445:Is this the "rational debate about the
1365:the nature of Justice McNulty’s office.
1022:Added to "Lead in" for Jill K. McNulty
941:Boston College Third World Law Journal
925:6. S. Sonsteng, R. Scott and D. Niles
7:
1694:Yet, Another Day and Still Waiting,
1487:WP:Notability (people)#Any biography
1358:James F. McNulty (Rear Admiral USMS)
1202:Google turns up just 3 articles for
698:WP:Notability (people)#Any biography
1195:An article in Knowledge on subject
468:a) Biography independently in Wiki
955:Social Work Research and Abstracts
915:, New York: Kennikat Press (1978)
668:Social Work Research and Abstracts
24:
1250:notability guidelines for judges
819:is a text book published by the
810:Knowledge:Notability (academics)
689:Albiet my last comment on issue
492:nominees that the 36,000 member
957:Vol. 17 No. 4 pp. 14-21 (1981)
670:Vol. 17 No. 4 pp. 14-21 (1981).
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1519:or personal vendettas please.
536:Knowledge:Notability (persons)
522:The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin
494:Illinois State Bar Association
445:Knowledge:Notability (persons)
1:
962:Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs.
486:One of only 8 named potential
1877:WEST'S NORTHEASTERN REPORTER
1837:Sullivan's Judicial Profiles
896:The Courts and Social Policy
817:The Courts and Social Policy
653:The Courts and Social Policy
649:American Criminal Law Review
641:American Criminal Law Review
534:No. Obviously does not meet
357:Illinois State Supreme Court
1916:21:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
1889:20:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
1862:19:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
1826:18:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
1785:17:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
1763:17:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
1741:16:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
1712:16:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
1676:17:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
1658:Another Day, Still Waiting
1640:16:45, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1591:11:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1565:11:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1529:08:53, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1508:04:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
1472:03:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
1431:23:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
1386:21:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
1283:18:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
1233:07:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
1217:American National Biography
1167:00:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
1103:19:53, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
1071:18:49, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
1042:15:44, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
1016:03:34, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
833:08:50, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
767:06:39, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
741:04:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
714:02:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
687:20:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
628:Chicago Kent College of Law
609:17:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
588:01:51, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
569:23:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
548:21:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
531:DID I PUT ENOUGH FORWARD?
434:18:13, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
415:16:08, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
350:15:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
321:03:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
64:23:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
1984:
643:Vol. 11 (1972) pp. 1-25.
291:15:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
270:03:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
248:03:59, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
233:03:59, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
218:21:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
927:Juvenile Law and Practice
514:and nationally in West’s
501:Chicago Tribune 3/6/1992
1929:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
753:to merit an article. —
700:might be applicable. —
1128:Santa Clara Law Review
1080:Delete as promotional
894:3. Donald L. Horowitz
863:Illinois Supreme Court
722:That sounds very like
637:Santa Clara Law Review
516:North Eastern Reporter
489:Illinois Supreme Court
1622:deserved; deserving
899:Brookings Institution
821:Brookings Institution
657:Brookings Institution
633:New Mexico Law Review
611:Trying to be Helpful!
578:- Fails notability.
1801:Joseph Burke (judge)
812:Criteria (1) anyway.
1335:William K. MacNulty
724:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
401:Richard Henry Mills
361:U.S. District Court
1841:Illinois Blue Book
1339:Richard R. McNulty
1331:William A. McNulty
1322:McKinley (surname)
1258:the AfD nomination
1006:1097 (1975-1976)"
999:719 (1980-1981)
997:Willamette L. Rev.
990:Suffolk U. L. Rev.
985:497 (1980-1981)
976:Geo. Wash. L. Rev.
950:641 (1977-1978)
901:Press 1977 p. 210
48:The result was
1073:
655:published by the
386:Nicholas John Bua
371:Sue E. Myerscough
323:
293:
250:
235:
1975:
1968:
1961:
1955:
1951:
1931:
1873:ILLINOIS REPORTS
1824:
1823:
1819:
1813:
1807:
1739:
1738:
1734:
1728:
1722:
1343:Caleb J. McNulty
1318:Dunlop (surname)
1256:criteria. Since
1060:
1056:
978:269 (1982-1983)
964:287 (1981-1983)
936:1 (1979-1980)
911:4. V. L. Streib
908:, 9780815707318
512:Illinois Reports
381:Charles H. Davis
310:
306:
266:
245:Northamerica1000
230:Northamerica1000
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
60:
34:
1983:
1982:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1967:497 (1980-1981)
1962:
1958:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1938:deletion review
1927:
1849:story from 1988
1821:
1817:
1809:
1805:
1804:
1736:
1732:
1724:
1720:
1719:
1692:August 28, 2013
1656:August 27, 2013
1616:Merriam Webster
1579:"Merits an AfD"
1496:Carl E. McGowan
1447:Jill K. McNulty
1401:Jill K. McNulty
1354:Bernard McNulty
1327:Arthur MacNalty
1212:Elizabeth Owens
1204:Jill K. McNulty
1049:
858:Jill K. McNulty
556:Jill K. McNulty
479:Chicago Tribune
299:
262:
136:
127:
92:
78:Jill K. McNulty
76:
73:
70:Jill K. McNulty
58:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1981:
1979:
1970:
1969:
1965:Crim. Just. J.
1956:
1945:
1943:
1942:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1865:
1864:
1829:
1828:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1500:64.134.102.201
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1369:
1366:
1346:
1299:
1286:
1285:
1266:
1265:
1241:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1208:
1200:
1197:Mohammed Fadel
1193:
1186:
1179:'DGG (at NYPL)
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1135:
1121:
1106:
1105:
1095:'DGG (at NYPL)
1085:Google Scholar
1076:
1075:
1074:
1058:
1057:
1046:
983:Crim. Just. J.
846:
845:
839:
838:
837:
836:
801:
800:
799:
798:
782:
781:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
744:
743:
717:
716:
621:
620:
601:64.134.102.201
591:
590:
527:
504:
464:
460:
450:
449:
448:
447:
439:
438:
437:
436:
404:
403:
398:
393:
388:
383:
378:
376:Sharon Coleman
373:
368:
353:
326:
325:
324:
308:
307:
296:
295:
294:
273:
272:
252:
251:
236:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1980:
1966:
1960:
1957:
1950:
1947:
1941:
1939:
1935:
1930:
1924:
1923:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1904:
1903:Chicago Times
1899:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1850:
1848:
1847:Chicago Times
1842:
1838:
1834:
1831:
1830:
1827:
1820:
1814:
1812:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1742:
1735:
1729:
1727:
1716:
1715:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1608:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1492:
1491:anti-feminist
1488:
1484:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1407:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1370:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1350:
1347:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1305:
1300:
1296:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1198:
1194:
1191:
1187:
1184:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1155:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1134:
1129:
1125:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1059:
1055:
1053:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1004:Mich. L. Rev.
1000:
998:
993:
992:328 (1983)
991:
986:
984:
979:
977:
972:
970:
965:
963:
958:
956:
951:
949:
948:Pepp. L. Rev.
944:
942:
937:
935:
930:
928:
923:
921:
916:
914:
909:
907:
904:
900:
897:
892:
889:
884:
882:
877:
873:
870:
868:
867:U.S. Congress
864:
859:
854:
853:
849:
844:
841:
840:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
813:
811:
805:
804:
803:
802:
795:
791:
786:
785:
784:
783:
779:
776:
775:
768:
764:
760:
756:
751:
750:WP:POLITICIAN
748:
747:
746:
745:
742:
738:
734:
729:
728:WP:POLITICIAN
725:
721:
720:
719:
718:
715:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
692:
691:
690:
688:
684:
680:
674:
673:
669:
665:
662:
658:
654:
650:
644:
642:
638:
634:
629:
625:
618:
615:
614:
613:
612:
610:
606:
602:
597:
589:
585:
581:
577:
574:
573:
572:
570:
566:
562:
559:
557:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
532:
529:
525:
523:
518:
517:
513:
508:
505:
502:
500:
497:
495:
490:
487:
482:
480:
475:
472:
471:
466:
462:
458:
454:
446:
443:
442:
441:
440:
435:
431:
427:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
416:
412:
408:
402:
399:
397:
396:Anne M. Burke
394:
392:
389:
387:
384:
382:
379:
377:
374:
372:
369:
366:
362:
358:
354:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
328:
327:
322:
318:
314:
309:
305:
303:
298:
297:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
274:
271:
268:
267:
265:
257:
254:
253:
249:
246:
242:
237:
234:
231:
227:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
202:WP:POLITICIAN
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
61:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1964:
1959:
1949:
1928:
1925:
1902:
1876:
1872:
1846:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1810:
1796:
1772:Joseph Burke
1767:
1766:
1751:
1725:
1691:
1655:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1606:
1551:
1482:
1481:
1458:
1450:
1348:
1301:
1294:
1245:
1240:
1216:
1190:K.A. Taipale
1153:
1142:
1132:
1127:
1123:
1111:
1089:
1079:
1050:
1021:
1020:
1003:
1001:
996:
994:
989:
987:
982:
980:
975:
973:
971:383 (1982)
969:S. Tex. L.J.
968:
966:
961:
959:
954:
952:
947:
945:
940:
938:
933:
931:
926:
924:
919:
917:
912:
910:
895:
893:
887:
885:
880:
878:
874:
871:
857:
855:
851:
850:
847:
842:
816:
807:
793:
789:
777:
693:
675:
671:
667:
659:Press, 1977
652:
648:
645:
640:
636:
632:
623:
622:
616:
595:
593:
592:
575:
553:
552:
533:
530:
526:
524:newspaper
521:
519:
509:
506:
503:
491:
485:
483:
476:
473:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
405:
391:Judy Koehler
329:
300:
263:
261:
255:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1854:Binksternet
1811:Uncle Milty
1726:Uncle Milty
1455:WP:ACADEMIC
1419:WP:ACADEMIC
1314:Livingstone
1310:Clan MacLea
1063:Mark Arsten
852:Lead in ...
778:again, Keep
365:U.S. Senate
313:Mark Arsten
264:Ravenswing
163:free images
1544:Tammytoons
1511:Tammytoons
934:J. Fam. L.
906:0815707312
790:Certiorari
664:0815707312
554:**Article
481:newspaper
470:Judgepedia
334:Judgepedia
1934:talk page
1374:Theodore!
1362:MacKinley
1273:surname.
797:district.
755:Theodore!
702:Theodore!
283:• Gene93k
37:talk page
1936:or in a
1839:and the
1052:Relisted
763:contribs
710:contribs
302:Relisted
122:View log
39:or in a
1787:Albiet
1768:Comment
1714:Albiet
1628:hinting
1552:hinting
1415:notable
1271:McNulty
1044:Albiet
1018:Albiet
580:Caffeyw
571:Albiet
550:Albiet
457:in."
417:Albiet
336:and at
256:Delete:
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
59:Faraone
1918:Albiet
1908:Albiet
1891:Albiet
1881:Albiet
1833:Delete
1797:Delete
1777:Albiet
1704:Albiet
1678:Albiet
1668:Albiet
1642:Albiet
1632:Albiet
1567:Albiet
1557:Albiet
1474:Albiet
1464:Albiet
1411:verify
1388:Albiet
1378:Albiet
1304:Ulaidh
1262:Albiet
1254:WP:GNG
1246:Delete
1235:Albiet
1225:Albiet
1169:Albiet
1159:Albiet
1034:Albiet
1026:Albiet
1008:Albiet
843:Update
835:Albiet
825:Albiet
679:Albiet
617:Update
596:Retain
576:Delete
561:Albiet
540:Albiet
407:Albiet
352:Albiet
342:Albiet
206:WP:GNG
141:Google
99:delete
50:delete
1755:Sionk
1696:Sionk
1660:Sionk
1583:Sionk
1540:Sionk
1521:Sionk
1423:Sionk
1292:Sionk
1275:Sionk
733:Sionk
426:Sionk
330:Keep:
210:Sionk
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
1912:talk
1885:talk
1875:AND
1858:talk
1818:talk
1781:talk
1759:talk
1733:talk
1708:talk
1672:talk
1636:talk
1612:obs.
1587:talk
1561:talk
1525:talk
1504:talk
1483:Keep
1468:talk
1427:talk
1382:talk
1279:talk
1229:talk
1183:talk
1163:talk
1099:talk
1090:have
1088:who
1067:talk
1038:talk
1030:talk
1012:talk
903:ISBN
829:talk
759:talk
737:talk
706:talk
694:Keep
683:talk
661:ISBN
605:talk
584:talk
565:talk
544:talk
430:talk
411:talk
346:talk
317:talk
287:talk
214:talk
204:and
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
918:5.
806:2)
761:) (
708:) (
484:d)
191:TWL
120:– (
1914:)
1887:)
1860:)
1845:a
1815:|
1783:)
1761:)
1730:|
1718:--
1710:)
1674:)
1638:)
1624:vt
1620:vb
1589:)
1563:)
1527:)
1506:)
1485:-
1470:)
1429:)
1421:.
1384:)
1337:,
1333:,
1329:,
1320:,
1316:,
1312:,
1281:)
1231:)
1165:)
1101:)
1069:)
1040:)
1014:)
831:)
765:)
739:)
712:)
685:)
607:)
594:*
586:)
567:)
546:)
498:.
432:)
413:)
359:,
348:)
319:)
289:)
281:.
243:.
228:.
216:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
52:.
1910:(
1883:(
1856:(
1822:|
1806:|
1779:(
1757:(
1737:|
1721:|
1706:(
1670:(
1634:(
1585:(
1559:(
1523:(
1502:(
1466:(
1425:(
1380:(
1277:(
1227:(
1181:(
1161:(
1115:(
1097:(
1065:(
1036:(
1028:(
1010:(
856:"
827:(
757:(
735:(
704:(
681:(
672:]
624:[
603:(
582:(
563:(
542:(
428:(
409:(
344:(
315:(
285:(
212:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
55:L
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.