296:
in your keep vote. The two criteria mentioned are "The person has received a notable award or honor, or has been often nominated for them" and "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". I think we can agree to
249:- Read my comments again. He can be heard and seen weekly in millions of homes. He also played on one of the best American college football teams in the late 1960s. Just because you're British (I'm assuming so anyway for how you spelled color) and haven't heard of him, doesn't mean no one else has.
263:
None of what you have written relates to the specific criteria in the guideline you referenced in your vote. Please read what you linked to. Which of the criteria do you believe applies? I'm not trying to badger you, but I don't think you are basing your voting or editing on WP guidelines and
623:. Exactly, why is this discussion still open? It was prematurely afded (and before that speedy afded). I never said i was done with it before this nominations. There's an ongoing discussion about this kind of thing at
325:: President of the Detroit Sports Broadcasters Association, a democratic group of his peers. He was voted in. I think that's quite an honor. Give it up, you're not winning this argument. Admin, can I get a close per
281:: I disagree, he has written 2 books and can be found in hundreds of newspaper articles. He is also 2 time president on an organization of his peers (The Detroit Sports Broadcasters Association), all 3 proving both
190:). Just because you haven't heard of him doesn't mean no one else has either. Notability is simply a matter of opinion (so far yours and no one else's opinion), and NOT a matter of fact. He passes
202:(in that channel's case nationwide in both the U.S. and Canada, 2 of the most populated nations in the world) and can be heard on over 40 radio stations in 2 states and Canada, and nationwide on
153:
768:
I agree with bwilkins. I have advised Tom that his comments hurt him the most. In a positive turn of events, he struck out one comment, and I hope he refactors out (deletes) the rest.
126:
744:
that nominating editor believed they were doing what was best in their opinion for
Knowledge. Please, also respect process - "rushing it" does little to help. (
423:
351:
sense. I know you think this is an argument, but I'm just trying to show you that your vote is not based on the guideline that you yourself offered.
458:
I changed it to "some", on further searching these articles, I realized that only the first 15 have Jim in the subject. Is this agreeable?
93:
88:
415:
97:
440:
I'd just as soon leave this alone, but since there seems to be some canvassing going on, I'd like to point out that the assertion that
297:
ignore the latter. The former criteria says nothing about being mentioned in books or articles - it talks about awards, specifically
736:
I can fully see why nominator originally nominated this article. Subsequent improvements have helped. I am extremely concerned with
493:
80:
497:
17:
757:
517:
this article has gone through extensive improvements since the original AfD nomination. Including several more sources, etc.
56:
449:
356:
313:
293:
282:
269:
237:
229:
191:
138:
444:
of the articles have "Jim" as their subject appears to be a gross inflation, based on my viewing of the search results.
187:
489:
382:, seems to be a notable broadcaster. The creator is encouraged to avoid casting aspersions on other editors, however.
211:
794:
610:
179:
165:
36:
793:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
445:
352:
309:
265:
233:
134:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
777:
763:
728:
699:
674:
636:
615:
593:
576:
557:
526:
508:
467:
453:
435:
405:
391:
360:
338:
317:
273:
258:
241:
223:
169:
142:
62:
387:
203:
84:
695:
670:
655:
632:
603:
572:
485:
401:
348:
334:
299:
254:
219:
161:
285:(person has received a notable award or honor, or has been often nominated for them) and point 1 of
481:
745:
624:
286:
207:
195:
724:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
535:
289:(person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors)
76:
68:
716:
691:
666:
651:
628:
589:
568:
397:
330:
250:
215:
199:
773:
712:
647:
522:
504:
463:
431:
422:
some of these articles have Jim as the central topic of the article, also mentioned in
326:
584:. Brandstatter has been a major figure in Michigan football over the past 30 years.
752:
741:
737:
708:
687:
183:
49:
308:
has the article subject won or been often nominated for? It's not a trick question.
740:
and overall attitude of the the original editor (I hate to say "creator") - please
720:
114:
383:
715:. Discussion unlikely to change, but may continue for another 12 hours before
585:
133:
Unremarkable local (American) football colour commentator. Declined speedy.
769:
518:
500:
459:
427:
214:. All games are also broadcast worldwide online. How isn't that notable?
565:
Though not FA quality, subject is notable and the article has improved.
534:
He has enough news coverage to meet all requirements for an article.
182:, He can be heard statewide on not one but 2 teams radio networks (
787:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
232:. Which of the two listed criteria do you believe applies here?
194:
because he has a TV show on not one but two national channels
665:
Make that 8-0. Any body else? The snowball is melting fast...
650:. 7 keeps to zero votes for delete besides nominator's.
121:
110:
106:
102:
154:
list of
American football-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
797:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
294:Knowledge:Notability_(people)#Any_biography
283:Knowledge:Notability_(people)#Any_biography
264:policies, so I'm asking you to look again.
230:Knowledge:Notability_(people)#Any_biography
192:Knowledge:Notability_(people)#Any_biography
148:
152:: This debate has been included in the
347:. "Notable" here means notable in the
7:
515:Closing administratior please note
228:The article subject clearly fails
24:
601:of the markedly improved artcle.
494:Talk:Michigan Wolverines football
498:Talk:Detroit Lions Radio Network
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
480:this discussion mentioned on:
1:
210:, as well as overseas on the
188:Michigan Wolverines football
490:Talk:University of Michigan
814:
778:08:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
764:20:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
729:17:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
700:23:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
675:03:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
637:17:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
616:21:25, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
594:21:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
577:20:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
558:20:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
527:20:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
509:20:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
468:21:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
454:20:16, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
436:19:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
406:18:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
392:17:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
361:03:45, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
339:21:25, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
318:20:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
274:18:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
259:18:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
242:18:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
224:17:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
212:Armed Forces Radio Network
170:15:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
143:15:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
63:19:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
690:, sources noted by Ikip.
646:: Admin please close per
180:Dan Miller (sportscaster)
790:Please do not modify it.
416:238 google news articles
32:Please do not modify it.
345:notable award or honor
204:Sirius Satellite Radio
178:. Just like I said at
48:(non-admin closure).--
486:Talk:Bo Schembechler
343:That's simply not a
482:Talk:Rich Rodriguez
446:Delicious carbuncle
396:Sorry I'll behave.
353:Delicious carbuncle
310:Delicious carbuncle
266:Delicious carbuncle
234:Delicious carbuncle
135:Delicious carbuncle
292:You chose to cite
208:XM Satellite Radio
196:Fox Sports Detroit
734:Keep with concern
575:
511:
172:
157:
61:
805:
792:
760:
756:
748:
606:
566:
554:
551:
548:
545:
542:
539:
476:
176:VERY STRONG KEEP
158:
124:
118:
100:
77:Jim Brandstatter
69:Jim Brandstatter
59:
55:
52:
34:
813:
812:
808:
807:
806:
804:
803:
802:
801:
795:deletion review
788:
758:
750:
746:
604:
552:
549:
546:
543:
540:
537:
424:20 google books
200:Big Ten Network
162:LinguistAtLarge
120:
91:
75:
72:
57:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
811:
809:
800:
799:
783:
782:
781:
780:
731:
702:
680:
679:
678:
677:
660:
659:
641:
640:
639:
596:
579:
560:
529:
512:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
410:
409:
408:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
306:notable awards
173:
131:
130:
71:
66:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
810:
798:
796:
791:
785:
784:
779:
775:
771:
767:
766:
765:
761:
755:
754:
749:
743:
739:
735:
732:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
706:
703:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
682:
681:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:
662:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
644:Close request
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
619:
618:
617:
614:
613:
612:
608:
607:
600:
599:Snowball Keep
597:
595:
591:
587:
583:
580:
578:
574:
570:
564:
561:
559:
556:
555:
533:
530:
528:
524:
520:
516:
513:
510:
506:
502:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
414:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:WP:NOTABILITY
346:
342:
341:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
320:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
301:
295:
291:
290:
288:
284:
280:
277:
276:
275:
271:
267:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
244:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
226:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
184:Detroit Lions
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
167:
163:
155:
151:
147:
146:
145:
144:
140:
136:
128:
123:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
60:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
789:
786:
751:
733:
704:
683:
643:
620:
611:
609:
602:
598:
581:
562:
536:
532:Obvious Keep
531:
514:
477:
441:
419:
412:
379:
344:
322:
305:
298:
278:
246:
175:
160:
149:
132:
45:
43:
31:
28:
413:Strong keep
287:WP:CREATIVE
46:speedy keep
692:Strikehold
667:TomCat4680
652:TomCat4680
629:TomCat4680
569:MrDolomite
398:TomCat4680
331:TomCat4680
251:TomCat4680
216:TomCat4680
719:applies.
418:in which
753:BWilkins
717:WP:STICK
605:Schmidt,
304:. Which
127:View log
51:Giants27
721:Bearian
713:WP:SNOW
648:WP:SNOW
621:Comment
327:WP:SNOW
323:Comment
300:notable
279:Comment
247:Comment
94:protect
89:history
759:←track
742:WP:AGF
738:WP:OWN
709:WP:HEY
688:WP:BIO
625:WT:BLP
384:Stifle
302:awards
122:delete
98:delete
747:talk→
586:Cbl62
553:Focus
478:Note:
125:) – (
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
774:talk
770:Ikip
725:talk
707:per
705:Keep
696:talk
686:per
684:Keep
671:talk
656:talk
633:talk
590:talk
582:Keep
573:Talk
563:Keep
523:talk
519:Ikip
505:talk
501:Ikip
464:talk
460:Ikip
450:talk
442:many
432:talk
428:Ikip
420:many
402:talk
388:talk
380:Keep
357:talk
335:talk
314:talk
270:talk
255:talk
238:talk
220:talk
206:and
198:and
186:and
166:Talk
159:-- —
150:Note
139:talk
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
776:)
762:)
727:)
711:,
698:)
673:)
635:)
627:.
592:)
571:•
567:—
525:)
507:)
496:,
492:,
488:,
484:,
466:)
452:)
434:)
426:.
404:)
390:)
359:)
337:)
329:?
316:)
272:)
257:)
240:)
222:)
164:•
156:.
141:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
772:(
723:(
694:(
669:(
658:)
654:(
631:(
588:(
550:m
547:a
544:e
541:r
538:D
521:(
503:(
462:(
448:(
430:(
400:(
386:(
355:(
333:(
312:(
268:(
253:(
236:(
218:(
137:(
129:)
119:(
117:)
79:(
58:C
54:/
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.