237:). I don't really see this fitting into the main article. In addition, having reviewed the nominator's statement above, I feel a warning may be in order unless the nominator can prove the article was created with the intent to "create controversy"; otherwise I feel it's an unwarranted statement made against another editor which violates Knowledge (XXG) policy.
249:
If the article is sourced and NPOV per Wiki guidelines I see no reason to delete - however there may be a case for renaming it per 23skidoo or moving to a Jimmy Carter incident subpage as suggested above. If per the nominator there are other incidents which deserve more attention, then if these could
208:
Yes, the article is sourced and appears to be NPOV, but I do have to ask... does this event really mean anything for Jimmy Carter? Or for rabbits or related mammals? (If so, a merge would be appropriate). This appears to be dredged out a small series of news stories occuring in a very short space of
124:
Created to insert a bigger "controversy" about Jimmy Carter. There are alot of significant events in this biography but they don't get as much attention compared to what this person is giving regarding "Jimmy Carter's rabbit".
345:
The article could be expanded. There were many stories from the time of the incident to the present in sources such as the New York Times which no one has included yet, as well as a chapter in a book.
317:
there really isn't much to be said about the whole rabbit incident that cannot be accomplished with a small section in the parent article. All it really amounts to is a bit of presidential trivia.
285:, this is an event that captured the public imagination, and deserves an WP explanation. As creator, find it odd that nominator accuses me of being politically-motivated to attack Carter in the
333:. I can see the merge argument given the somewhat trivial nature of the event, but the Jimmy Carter article is already pretty long, so my first choice would be to keep this one separate.
117:
90:
85:
94:
142:. It is not the topic's fault that the topic attracted a wikipedian. If we start discriminating by importance, wikipedia will be in big trouble `'
77:
17:
129:
210:
357:
The Carter article would be too long if this was merged there, and clearly it is a notable incident. Plus it has pictures!
226:
468:
453:
441:
429:
417:
405:
393:
373:
361:
349:
337:
321:
297:
273:
254:
241:
217:
203:
187:
175:
163:
146:
36:
81:
467:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
290:
282:
229:. A noted event that was covered by media and has also been cited numerous times in pop culture. (Cited by
286:
269:
NPOV problems with the article, if any, should be resolved by a tag and editing, rather than deletion. --
73:
65:
267:
225:
but rename as the title isn't very accurate and suggests Carter owned said rabbit. Maybe something like
381:
or Rename, notable, but I think it is too much of a side topic to merge into Jimmy Carter's article. --
389:
230:
251:
402:
309:. The event may have been newsworth and the article may be NPOV and souced. Unlike, say, the
213:
guideline elaborates on how and why such articles can be inappropriate for
Knowledge (XXG). --
184:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
310:
250:
be identified a subpage could be created incorporating all such events, including this one.
139:
382:
358:
426:
294:
370:
270:
238:
214:
200:
172:
159:
143:
414:
314:
306:
196:
111:
346:
334:
318:
126:
54:
281:- I can understand the argument for a rename, but strongly believe tha tlike
449:. Notable as demonstrated above, continued expansion would be beneficial.
438:
155:
183:
If the article is NPOV and has sources I see no reason for deletion.
461:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
199:. It's a very minor incident, not enough to warrant an article.
266:. Unquestionably notable; the event is still mentioned today.
289:
AFD...then accuses me of being politically motivated in the
313:
which was a major event and had lasting consequences for
437:- clearly notable. Expand the article, don't delete it.
450:
107:
103:
99:
209:
time, with nothing appearing afterwards. The proposed
293:
AFD they also started. Do I just hate everybody? :P
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
471:). No further edits should be made to this page.
401:and reword any non-NPOV parts of the article.
8:
369:this thing almost killed the president.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
171:to a subpage under Jimmy Carter. /
138:. Not a valid reason for deletion.
24:
211:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (news)
247:Keep but possible merge/rename
233:, for example, in his lecture
1:
329:ideally. Failing that, then
227:Jimmy Carter rabbit incident
488:
454:05:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
442:02:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
430:16:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
418:16:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
406:12:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
394:08:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
374:01:41, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
362:00:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
350:21:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
338:20:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
322:15:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
298:15:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
274:12:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
255:12:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
242:12:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
218:10:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
204:10:47, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
188:10:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
176:09:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
164:09:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
147:09:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
130:09:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
464:Please do not modify it.
291:George W. Bush's pretzel
283:George W. Bush's pretzel
32:Please do not modify it.
154:. Unencyclopedic. --
140:wikipedia is not paper
64:
287:Jimmy Carter's rabbit
74:Jimmy Carter's rabbit
66:Jimmy Carter's rabbit
425:, clearly notable.
231:Robert Anton Wilson
386:
59:
58:2007-03-18 08:47Z
479:
466:
384:
311:Lewinsky scandal
235:Secrets of Power
115:
97:
61:
57:
50:
34:
487:
486:
482:
481:
480:
478:
477:
476:
475:
469:deletion review
462:
399:Keep and Rename
327:Keep and rename
169:Keep & Move
88:
72:
69:
51:
45:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
485:
483:
474:
473:
457:
456:
444:
432:
420:
408:
396:
376:
364:
352:
340:
324:
300:
276:
257:
244:
220:
206:
193:Trim and Merge
190:
178:
166:
149:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
484:
472:
470:
465:
459:
458:
455:
452:
448:
445:
443:
440:
436:
433:
431:
428:
424:
421:
419:
416:
412:
409:
407:
404:
400:
397:
395:
391:
387:
380:
377:
375:
372:
368:
365:
363:
360:
356:
353:
351:
348:
344:
341:
339:
336:
332:
328:
325:
323:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
301:
299:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
275:
272:
268:
265:
261:
258:
256:
253:
248:
245:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
221:
219:
216:
212:
207:
205:
202:
198:
194:
191:
189:
186:
182:
179:
177:
174:
170:
167:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:
148:
145:
141:
137:
134:
133:
132:
131:
128:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
60:
56:
48:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
463:
460:
446:
434:
422:
410:
398:
378:
366:
354:
342:
330:
326:
315:Bill Clinton
307:Jimmy Carter
302:
278:
263:
259:
246:
234:
222:
197:Jimmy Carter
192:
185:Pax:Vobiscum
180:
168:
151:
135:
123:
52:
46:
43:
31:
28:
451:Yamaguchi先生
305:back in to
279:Keep/Rename
260:Strong keep
385:ヴィルヴェルヴィント
383:Wirbelwind
359:Nathanalex
427:Everyking
295:Sherurcij
181:Weak Keep
371:Nardman1
271:TedFrank
239:23skidoo
215:saberwyn
201:TJ Spyke
173:Blaxthos
118:View log
415:Lampman
252:Addyboy
91:protect
86:history
347:Edison
335:Mwelch
319:Arkyan
264:rename
152:Delete
127:ViriiK
95:delete
403:Jules
331:merge
303:Merge
144:mikka
112:views
104:watch
100:links
55:Quarl
16:<
447:Keep
435:Keep
423:Keep
411:Keep
390:talk
379:Keep
367:Keep
355:Keep
343:Keep
262:and
223:Keep
160:talk
136:keep
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
47:Keep
439:JRG
195:to
156:Nlu
116:– (
413:.
392:)
162:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
388:(
158:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
53:—
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.